By The Wayland Post Staff
Wayland’s boards increasingly rely on small working groups and subcommittees to move complicated projects forward. When used correctly, these teams expand resident expertise, improve efficiency, and remain consistent with Massachusetts’ Open Meeting Law (OML).
Wayland’s landscape includes several different types of groups, each with its own legal standing. Some are formal standing committees established by bylaw or Town Meeting, while others are subcommittees created directly by Boards to study an issue and report back. These bodies have defined membership, a formal charge, and delegated authority, which makes them subject to the Open Meeting Law’s requirements for public notice, agendas, and minutes.
Separate from these are informal working groups or staff-level assignments, teams formed to research a topic, coordinate logistics, or prepare background materials. Because these groups are not created by a board vote and have no independent decision-making authority, they are not considered subcommittees under OML. Instead, they function as support teams that explore specific issues but do not act as deliberative public bodies.
Other teams operate informally inside larger committees, where members pair off to draft language, review consultant material, or gather information. These assignments do not trigger the OML unless the group is formally asked to deliberate or make recommendations.
Boards can also use task forces with specific sunset dates, like the Route 20 South Landfill Visioning group which extended their sunset date to Feb. 27, 2026, which functions as a full OML committee. And occasionally the Town Manager forms short-term advisory groups to assist with budget preparation or other matters within their administrative authority. A FY26 budget working group reviewing the override possibility and an ongoing Opioid Settlement Working Group were both composed of cross functional staff and a resident(s). Under a Massachusetts court ruling (Connelly v. Hanover), those groups are not public bodies, though sharing summaries improves public understanding. BoPW created a transfer station RFP review working group that the Department of Public Works manages. (Steve Klitgord, Mike Wegerbauer, Carol Martin, Pam Roman and Klaus Shigley).
The Town has not maintained a published list of all working groups. What matters legally is who creates the group and whether it will advise a public body. Under the OML, any multiple-member body created by a board to make recommendations must meet openly and keep minutes.
Used thoughtfully, working groups allow residents and volunteers to bring specialized knowledge to town projects while keeping final deliberation and decision-making where it belongs with boards meeting in public.
