Dear Editor,
I recently attended the recent joint Sudbury/Wayland “visioning workshop” concerning the future of Sherman’s Bridge. I must express my shock and dismay that our respective Departments of Public Works have progressed so far with a fundamentally flawed plan without proper briefing or involvement of the town boards that have jurisdiction over this matter. More concerning is the decision to hire an outside consulting firm to promote a plan that does not reflect the best interests of our communities — a troubling use of taxpayer funds on an unwanted proposal.
The current proposal displays a complete disregard for the 282 years of history embodied by Sherman’s Bridge. Astounding are the technical, legal and safety issues that remain unaddressed and unresolved. Alarming is that the timeline suggests this plan is predetermined to proceed without meaningful further discussion. I strongly urge the elected and paid officials serving the towns of Sudbury and Wayland to do what is right by prioritizing a welcoming, safe, accessible bridge that takes into consideration the well-being of the neighbors of Sherman’s Bridge and all who use Sherman’s Bridge for recreation, while preserving the environment, beauty, the history, and of this treasured landmark. It should not be designed with a motorist-centric focus.
Specifically:
Narrowing the walkway is unacceptable as it reduces access for pedestrians, anglers, bird watchers and artists.
The bridge’s rural setting is one of the few local spots offering dark skies for viewing astronomical events.
Both sides of the bridge should remain accessible to all. The proposed raised railing structure will restrict quick crossing and limit access between the two sides of the bridge.
Sherman’s Bridge should not serve as a major commuter cut-through nor a route for large trucks. I believe heavy trucks cause more than half the damage to the bridge, often while speeding.
A weight limit for trucks must be posted and enforced.
The current plan will likely increase traffic speed, thereby compromising pedestrian safety and the recreational enjoyment of the bridge. Alternate routes to larger roads are available and should be used by commuters and trucks.
I strongly oppose the proposed plan and the way it is being forced upon us because it fails to respect the neighbors and the historic significance of Sherman’s Bridge and endangers the neighborhood’s shared vision for a safe, accessible and environmentally sensitive crossing.
Karen Hodges
Sherman Bridge Road
