To the Editor:
My name is Charu Kokate, and I am a senior partner at Safdie Architects, a global practice known for designing and delivering major architectural works worldwide. I have been fortunate to lead several complex projects, including Marina Bay Sands, Jewel Changi Airport, and the forthcoming expansion of Marina Bay Sands in Singapore.
With this background, I find it difficult to accept the repeated statements from the Sudbury and Wayland departments of Public Works that adding a second pedestrian walkway on the opposite side of the bridge is not feasible. A simple look at the bridge’s underside suggests that a solution is well within reach.
A secondary walkway could be supported by sistering the existing 12″×12″ crossbeams above each of the six pier sets and at the abutments. In my professional view, the real consideration lies in the fastening system — not in the load-bearing capacity of the beams.
Should this not be preferred, a straightforward alternative would be to add an additional upright at each existing pier. This is routine work, commonly executed on similar bridges, and easily handled within normal engineering practice.
Both approaches are practical, cost-sensible, and especially efficient when undertaken as part of the planned renovation.
To ensure an unbiased perspective, I consulted a reputable structural engineering firm in New York. Their preliminary review aligns with mine, adding a second pedestrian walkway is entirely achievable.
I share this perspective in the hope that the Town will take a fresh, objective look at this essential community improvement.
Charu Kokate
Sherman’s Bridge Road
