Municipal Video Transcripts
The News Production System (NPS) was used to produce the Municipal Meeting Recaps. NPS, developed by the Wayland Post, includes the use of artificial intelligence and automation programs. These programs are used to record, transcribe, and summarize town government meetings and events. Municipal Meeting Recaps are reviewed and edited by Wayland Post staff members prior to publication. Many of the meeting recordings were produced by WayCAM, whose government on-demand recordings can be viewed at www.waycam.tv/government-on-demand.
212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
February 3, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee01:04:23
January 27, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
October 22, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:45:32
January 8, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
January 7, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:21:19
December 17, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:28:41
December 8, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:01:12
December 3, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee01:39:29
November 13, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee01:19:47
November 6, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:20:45
8-Oct-25 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:22:15
3-Sep-25 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee02:01:27
Watch with transcript (12 meetings)
- February 3, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- January 27, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- October 22, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- January 8, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- January 7, 2026 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- December 17, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- December 8, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- December 3, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- November 13, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- November 6, 2025 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- 8-Oct-25 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
- 3-Sep-25 - 212 Cochituate Road Advisory Committee
Annual Town Meeting
Watch with transcript (2 meetings)
Audit Committee
Watch with transcript (4 meetings)
Board of Assessors
September 14, 2026 - Board of Assessors52:09
August 10, 2026 - Board of Assessors11:20
July 20, 2026 - Board of Assessors12:03
June 15, 2026 - Board of Assessors15:49
June 1, 2026 - Board of Assessors21:27
May 11, 2026 - Board of Assessors10:34
April 13, 2026 - Board of Assessors06:50
March 16, 2026 - Board of Assessors07:53
March 2, 2026 - Board of Assessors18:45
February 2, 2026 - Board of Assessors06:49
January 12, 2026 - Board of Assessors11:33
December 8, 2025 - Board of Assessors11:53
November 20, 2025 - Board of Assessors02:49
November 3, 2025 - Board of Assessors10:13
6-Oct-25 - Board of Assessors12:08
8-Sep-25 - Board of Assessors13:49
11-Aug-25 - Board of Assessors08:52
Watch with transcript (16 meetings)
- September 14, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- August 10, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- July 20, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- June 15, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- June 1, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- May 11, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- April 13, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- March 16, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- March 2, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- February 2, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- January 12, 2026 - Board of Assessors
- December 8, 2025 - Board of Assessors
- November 20, 2025 - Board of Assessors
- November 3, 2025 - Board of Assessors
- 6-Oct-25 - Board of Assessors
- 8-Sep-25 - Board of Assessors
Board of Health
Watch with transcript (11 meetings)
Board of Public Works
July 28, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:35:28
June 23, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:30:24
June 16, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:28:29
May 19, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:58:27
April 21, 2026 - Board of Public Works02:32:15
April 7, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:33:40
March 10, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:23:23
February 24, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:42:52
February 9, 2026 - Board of Public Works21:44
January 20, 2026 - Board of Public Works02:01:46
January 6, 2026 - Board of Public Works01:00:38
December 16, 2025 - Board of Public Works
November 18, 2025 - Board of Public Works02:33:33
October 21, 2025 - Board of Public Works
16-Sep-25 - Board of Public Works03:03:48
19-Aug-25 - Board of Public Works01:33:42
Watch with transcript (16 meetings)
- July 28, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- June 23, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- June 16, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- May 19, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- April 21, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- April 7, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- March 10, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- February 24, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- February 9, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- January 20, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- January 6, 2026 - Board of Public Works
- December 16, 2025 - Board of Public Works
- November 18, 2025 - Board of Public Works
- October 21, 2025 - Board of Public Works
- 16-Sep-25 - Board of Public Works
- 19-Aug-25 - Board of Public Works
Capital Improvement Planning Committee
September 16, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:01:22
September 9, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:53:37
September 2, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:19:20
August 31, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:20:57
August 24, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:17:05
August 19, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:06:04
August 5, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:11:47
July 22, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:22:15
July 6, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
June 24, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:19:34
June 3, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:06:49
May 27, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee45:59
May 13, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:57:42
April 29, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:06:26
April 14, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:34:37
March 18, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:52:43
March 4, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:44:33
February 10, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:59:36
February 4, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:34:09
January 26, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:36:36
January 21, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
January 14, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
December 17, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
December 9, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:04:02
December 4, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:20:40
November 13, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
October 30, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
January 7, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
10-15-25 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:43:36
09-30-25 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee02:07:27
9/9/2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee01:26:15
Watch with transcript (30 meetings)
- September 16, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- September 9, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- September 2, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- August 31, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- August 24, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- August 19, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- August 5, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- July 22, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- July 6, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- June 24, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- June 3, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- May 27, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- May 13, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- April 29, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- April 14, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- March 18, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- March 4, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- February 10, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- February 4, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- January 26, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- January 21, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- January 14, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- December 17, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- December 9, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- December 4, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- November 13, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- October 30, 2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- January 7, 2026 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- 09-30-25 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
- 9/9/2025 - Capital Improvement Planning Committee
Community Meeting – MWRA Connection
October 23, 2025 - Community Meeting - MWRA Connection
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
Community Preservation Committee
Watch with transcript (6 meetings)
Conservation Commission
September 9, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:56:50
August 19, 2026 - Conservation Commission58:50
August 6, 2026 - Conservation Commission02:14
July 29, 2026 - Conservation Commission59:18
July 8, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:17:06
June 17, 2026 - Conservation Commission02:22:47
May 27, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:50:27
May 6, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:24:08
April 15, 2026 - Conservation Commission02:55:45
March 4, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:40:43
February 11, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:34:35
January 28, 2026 - Conservation Commission01:54:16
January 7, 2026 - Conservation Commission20:45
December 17, 2025 - Conservation Commission
December 3, 2025 - Conservation Commission01:26:54
November 19, 2025 - Conservation Commission01:33:45
October 29, 2025 - Conservation Commission02:00:22
8-Oct-25 - Conservation Commission01:26:03
10-Sep-25 - Conservation Commission03:05:27
20-Aug-25 - Conservation Commission01:59:40
09-24-25 - Conservation Commission02:26:24
Watch with transcript (21 meetings)
- September 9, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- August 19, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- August 6, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- July 29, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- July 8, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- June 17, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- May 27, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- May 6, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- April 15, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- March 4, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- February 11, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- January 28, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- January 7, 2026 - Conservation Commission
- December 17, 2025 - Conservation Commission
- December 3, 2025 - Conservation Commission
- November 19, 2025 - Conservation Commission
- October 29, 2025 - Conservation Commission
- 8-Oct-25 - Conservation Commission
- 10-Sep-25 - Conservation Commission
- 20-Aug-25 - Conservation Commission
- 09-24-25 - Conservation Commission
Cultural Council
Watch with transcript (9 meetings)
Design Review Board
Watch with transcript (7 meetings)
Economic Development Committee
July 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee43:59
June 12, 2026 - Economic Development Committee01:55:52
May 11, 2026 - Economic Development Committee53:30
April 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee01:29:23
April 8, 2026 - Economic Development Committee01:53:07
March 20, 2026 - Economic Development Committee01:31:18
February 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee33:13
January 16, 2026 - Economic Development Committee01:35:51
December 12, 2025 - Economic Development Committee01:45:46
November 14, 2025 - Economic Development Committee01:52:00
October 17, 2025 - Economic Development Committee01:11:39
12-Sep-25 - Economic Development Committee01:33:39
28-Aug-25 - Economic Development Committee33:31
14-Aug-25 - Economic Development Committee01:33:27
Watch with transcript (14 meetings)
- July 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- June 12, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- May 11, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- April 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- April 8, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- March 20, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- February 10, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- January 16, 2026 - Economic Development Committee
- December 12, 2025 - Economic Development Committee
- November 14, 2025 - Economic Development Committee
- October 17, 2025 - Economic Development Committee
- 12-Sep-25 - Economic Development Committee
- 28-Aug-25 - Economic Development Committee
- 14-Aug-25 - Economic Development Committee
ELVIS Committee
Watch with transcript (2 meetings)
Energy and Climate Committee
Watch with transcript (9 meetings)
Finance Committee
September 14, 2026 - Finance Committee02:02:26
September 8, 2026 - Finance Committee02:04:30
August 24, 2026 - Finance Committee02:01:05
August 17, 2026 - Finance Committee01:16:14
July 27, 2026 - Finance Committee02:23:03
July 13, 2026 - Finance Committee02:01:37
April 13, 2026 - Finance Committee33:53
April 6, 2026 - Finance Committee01:28:00
March 16, 2026 - Finance Committee01:47:52
March 11, 2026 - Finance Committee
March 9, 2026 - Finance Committee
March 4, 2026 - Finance Committee02:05:30
March 2, 2026 - Finance Committee
February 25, 2026 - Finance Committee01:54:08
February 23, 2026 - Finance Committee01:27:25
February 18, 2026 - Finance Committee
February 11, 2026 - Finance Committee02:23:57
February 9, 2026 - Finance Committee02:30:07
February 4, 2026 - Finance Committee55:04
February 2, 2026 - Finance Committee01:21:50
January 28, 2026 - Finance Committee02:03:15
January 5, 2026 - Finance Committee01:42:36
December 1, 2025 - Finance Committee01:14:32
November 3, 2025 - Finance Committee24:58
6-Oct-25 - Finance Committee01:27:57
28-Aug-25 - Finance Committee01:26:39
8-Sep-25 - Finance Committee01:08:45
Watch with transcript (27 meetings)
- September 14, 2026 - Finance Committee
- September 8, 2026 - Finance Committee
- August 24, 2026 - Finance Committee
- August 17, 2026 - Finance Committee
- July 27, 2026 - Finance Committee
- July 13, 2026 - Finance Committee
- April 13, 2026 - Finance Committee
- April 6, 2026 - Finance Committee
- March 16, 2026 - Finance Committee
- March 11, 2026 - Finance Committee
- March 9, 2026 - Finance Committee
- March 4, 2026 - Finance Committee
- March 2, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 25, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 23, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 18, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 11, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 9, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 4, 2026 - Finance Committee
- February 2, 2026 - Finance Committee
- January 28, 2026 - Finance Committee
- January 5, 2026 - Finance Committee
- December 1, 2025 - Finance Committee
- November 3, 2025 - Finance Committee
- 6-Oct-25 - Finance Committee
- 28-Aug-25 - Finance Committee
- 8-Sep-25 - Finance Committee
Finance Committee Appointing Board
Watch with transcript (6 meetings)
Historic District Commission
Watch with transcript (6 meetings)
Historical Commission
September 2, 2026 - Historical Commission02:44:22
August 17, 2026 - Historical Commission02:15:37
June 3, 2026 - Historical Commission01:09:31
May 6, 2026 - Historical Commission48:57
April 1, 2026 - Historical Commission01:57:55
March 25, 2026 - Historical Commission56:44
March 4, 2026 - Historical Commission02:11:53
February 4, 2026 - Historical Commission01:49:32
January 7, 2026 - Historical Commission01:06:55
December 3, 2025 - Historical Commission01:04:43
November 17, 2025 - Historical Commission
08-Oct-25 - Historical Commission57:07
01-Oct-25 - Historic Commission57:36
10-Sep-25 - Historical Commission02:59:06
20-Aug-25 - Historical Commission02:47:57
Watch with transcript (13 meetings)
- September 2, 2026 - Historical Commission
- August 17, 2026 - Historical Commission
- June 3, 2026 - Historical Commission
- May 6, 2026 - Historical Commission
- April 1, 2026 - Historical Commission
- March 25, 2026 - Historical Commission
- March 4, 2026 - Historical Commission
- February 4, 2026 - Historical Commission
- January 7, 2026 - Historical Commission
- December 3, 2025 - Historical Commission
- November 17, 2025 - Historical Commission
- 08-Oct-25 - Historical Commission
- 10-Sep-25 - Historical Commission
Housing Partnership
Watch with transcript (9 meetings)
HRDEI Committee
September 15, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:48:15
July 21, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:39:36
June 16, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:37:40
May 19, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:42:12
April 21, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:26:44
March 17, 2026 - HRDEI Committee54:17
February 17, 2026 - HRDEI Committee32:50
January 20, 2026 - HRDEI Committee01:24:06
December 16, 2025 - HRDEI Committee02:00:35
November 18, 2025 - HRDEI Committee02:01:37
October 21, 2025 - HRDEI Committee02:00:16
16-Sep-25 - HRDEI Committee01:50:49
19-Aug-25 - HRDEI Committee01:53:41
Karen Blumenfeld: Good evening.
everybody. This is the human
rights. diversity. equity and
inclusion committee. retiring on
August 19. At we're just
starting 5pm I'm Karen Bell. the
committee chair. and let's start
with the roll call. and let's
start with the people in the
room. So the following people
are all in the room. I'm saying
this for the benefit of note
takers. Heather. you want to
start Heather
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Pino
present. Shadow members. Suarez
present.
Karen Blumenfeld: Mary Anne
burkowski present. Denise
Watkins present. Karen
Lewisville present. and let's
start with the people on Zoom.
Sarah Shtutin: Fair student
present.
Unknown: Mariam present.
Asma Khan: as my Khan Maya Raj
present.
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you.
Maya great. Happy. Everybody's
here. So we are missing ya Wu
Tang and we're missing. Kevin
Goodwin. I believe Jailyn will
come sometime soon. Mario. would
you get us started
Maya Raj: today. as we begin. we
would like to acknowledge the
following indigenous peoples on
whose traditional homelands we
live. work and gather today. the
Massachusetts. the Nim Puck. the
Wampanoag and the Pawtucket. We
acknowledge their ancestors.
particularly cartoon of the
Massachusett tribes. who are
steward of much of the land now
encompassing Sudbury Wayland.
Sudbury and Wayland. when
European settlers arrived to
colonize this place in 1638. we
seek to understand. acknowledge
and remember the painful.
ongoing history of war. genocide
and forced removal of indigenous
peoples by European settlers.
and We offer a living
celebration of the indigenous
communities who are not just
part of the past. but will
continue to live and make new
history here today. may we all
commit to deepening our
relationships with indigenous
communities and to begin their
ally and to and to being their
allies in working for Justice.
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you.
Could you also read the short
verbiage at the top of that
page? If you don't have it all.
I can just do it real quick.
Thank you. Want me to do it?
Yes. please. Okay. it's super
quick. It's just anybody
listening from the public who's
listening to this meeting.
Please note that items may not
be discussed in the order listed
or at the specific time.
Estimated times are approximate
in the agenda. All topics may be
subject to deliberation and
vote. and this meeting is being
recorded. and it will be made
available to the public on
WayCAM As soon as is
practicable. Okay. public
comment do we can't really see
no attendees. Okay. okay. so no
public comment. So let's move to
Agenda Item number three. which
is discussion and possible vote
to approve the July 15. 2025.
meeting minutes. Does anybody
have any comments on the meeting
minutes draft? If there are no
comments. would somebody please
move to approve the July 15.
2025. meeting minutes.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Marianne
moves to approve the July 15.
2025. meeting minutes.
Karen Blumenfeld: Okay. Denise.
Mary Ann made the motion. and
Denise seconded. and let's take
a vote. Let's start with Zoom.
Folks. Sarah approved. You.
Maria. you. Asma approved. Maya.
I abstain. Abstain. Thank you.
Is there anyone else who needs
to abstain? No. that was it
Okay. Thank you. Good. Good
thinking. Maya. thank you.
Heather. I yes. no. yes.
Marianne. yes. Denise. yes. And
Karen. yes. So we were the
people in the room who all said
yes. So that's a unanimous
approval. Good. Let's move to
Agenda Item number four.
discussion and possible vote for
HR deic Clerk. This is a little
bit tougher without Yahoo.
because he needs to be part of
this discussion. but I think I
feel comfortable in speaking for
him. Asma. Would you like to say
anything about this role
following up on our conversation
from the last meeting.
Asma Khan: no just excited to
take it on and hopefully smooth
sailing after a couple months
with yo. who's AI assistance.
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you.
Yeah. So I think what we're
going to propose is not. I think
we are going to propose that
Asma and yalu share this role.
that ya will is willing to take
the transcript from our meetings
and put it into a very rough
format of minutes without he's
not going to prove it or
anything like that. He's just
going to put it in a rough
format and rough format and turn
it over to Asma. who. who will?
Asma. you will decide whether
we're going to have a note
taker. I think we just. we
talked about that we would still
have note takers for the next
couple months. just to help.
like Heather is taking notes
tonight. just to kind of help as
we transition into this new
process. and then maybe over
time. we won't even need that
person if the whole AI thing
moves from a slightly forest. So
we'll probably have note takers
through December and then
revisit where we're at and see
if we need that extra pair of
eyes and ears or not. So I
think. unless anybody has any
comments. I would ask if anybody
would move that Asma and yaw
share the clerk role for for
this year. Asma. does that sound
good? Sounds perfect. Thanks.
Oh. and there's yellow. okay.
yeah. well. you have just been
nominated. Okay. so Yahoo joined
us at 6:10pm. and Yao. can you
hear us?
Unknown: Yes. hi.
Karen Blumenfeld: sorry. that's
okay. So we're just talking
about Agenda Item number four.
the HR deic Clerk. And we just
got to the point of saying that
what we're proposing is that
you. and as much share the role
and that you would do the AI
piece of taking that transcript
that we get and turning it into
a very rough set of minutes. and
then Asma will work on the rest.
Oops. we lost someone. We just
lost Sarah. Alright. well.
she'll come back. We lost Sarah
at 612. I'm sure she'll be right
back. And we'll have. we'll
continue to have note takers.
Oh. Sarah's back. Okay? So that
that was one second continue to
have no takers through December.
and then we'll see if maybe we
don't need no takers anymore. if
maybe the process is so smooth
by then that that we're good
with just the two of you working
on the minutes. So the proposal
on the table. if it's okay with
you. Yahoo is to to ask someone
to make a motion to nominate you
and Asma to share the clerk role
for the hrdic for the year. Is
that okay with you? Yellow?
Yauwu Tang: Yeah. but so we
don't need the new tape anymore.
Karen Blumenfeld: Well. what
we're saying is. let's keep a
note take. Let's keep rotating
note takers through December.
and then let's talk about it in
December and see maybe the
process will be so smooth by
then we don't need note takers.
But we're not sure how the
technology is going to work. so
we'll. we'll try it through them
this way. with note takers.
Unknown: Cool. Okay.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: so I so
move.
Karen Blumenfeld: So. John no is
moving making the motion. and
Denise is making the second. Let
us take a vote. Heather. yes.
John O. yes. Mary Ann. yes.
Denise. yes. okay. Marion. yes.
yellow Yes. Sarah. thank you.
Asma. yes. Maya. yes. and Karen.
yes. Okay. so we have
unanimously approved yellow and
Asma as the clerk. Thank you so
much to both of you. and we will
continue to work to make this as
easy as possible for everybody.
So thank you.
Denise Fortin: Okay. so
Heather Pineault: can I ask a
clarification question please?
So would you like note takers to
send the notes to both of you
after the meeting. or should it
go to ya wo? What works for you
both? I
Asma Khan: think sending it to
both of us would be helpful.
Yauwu Tang: For sure. I send all
the minutes to the note taker so
he can update it to make it the
final draft. I
Asma Khan: think the plan is
that. yeah. you would send me
the AI transcript. and then the
note taker sends me what they
have. and then I kind of review
both and condense it. Into one
document
Karen Blumenfeld: that sounds
great. Thank you.
Yauwu Tang: Okay. you use the I.
no. take a word. Make it final.
Way.
Karen Blumenfeld: No. the clerk.
The clerk makes it final. And
then as chair. I take the. you
know. I
Yauwu Tang: mean the note taker
will take the shot.
Heather Pineault: No. no. no.
Takers. Take the note takers
taking the first shot during the
meeting to get any details. and
then sharing it with you and
Asma. but then asthma will
condense the two together.
Karen Blumenfeld: And the note
taker isn't necessarily putting
it into. you know. proper
minutes format. They're just
kind of saying who made the
motion. Who seconded. like. you
know. a few details. but they're
not going to put it in in a
format necessarily.
Yauwu Tang: Okay. we can try.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Okay.
the note taker is just taking
notes. but as MA is. is creating
the minutes. and then Karen does
the final approval. Just have
eyes on.
Karen Blumenfeld: Excellent.
Thank you. So Agenda Item number
five is community conversation
with district attorney Marion
Ryan. So that was scheduled for
October 8. but da Ryan's
schedule has changed. and she
has rescheduled for Monday.
November 10. at 6:30pm and that
works for Chief Berman. So we
have given the heads up. the
thumbs up. Rather. for that
date. it works for both of them.
I'm hoping it works for
everybody
Janot Mendler de Suarez: here as
well. And will that be at the
community center? Yes. it'll be
Karen Blumenfeld: a great yes at
the new community new council on
aging community center. So
November 10. 6:30pm is this new
day. and I want to put forth to
this committee the possibility
of CO sponsoring this event. not
only with our chief. but also
with the Sudbury dei commission.
who I have been in conversation
with. and they're interested in
CO sponsoring with us. and they
love the idea that it's in the
community center. which is like
right on the Sudbury line. So
it's pretty convenient for
Sudbury folks as well. And they
haven't voted on it yet on their
committee. but I've I suggest
that we vote on it and let them
vote when they can have their
meeting. And they will also
invite chief. next Sudbury chief
of police. to to also co
sponsor. So this would be a co
sponsorship between us. the
Sudbury dei commission. and the
two police departments. Pretty
cool. and we have a room that
holds up to 100 people. Not
that. I mean. it'll be hybrid.
so a lot of people come online.
but still. we can accommodate a
lot of people that way. very
Janot Mendler de Suarez: exciting
to co sponsor with Sudbury.
Karen Blumenfeld: So what I
would like to do is ask somebody
to make a motion to co sponsor
the community conversation with
Da Marion Ryan with the Sudbury
dei commission and Sudbury
Police Department.
Sarah Shtutin: Sorry. I just
have a quick question. Oh. sure.
go ahead. What does kind of CO
sponsoring mean? Is it co
promoting? Is there a financial
involved. and then are we going
to invite because I think in the
last committee meeting. we were
talking about how the data is
going to be for all of Middlesex
County. Yes. are we going to be
inviting other towns or just us
in
Karen Blumenfeld: Sudbury? You
asked a question right before
that. Oh. is there any financial
commitment? No. the DA is coming
during me. I'm sorry.
Sarah Shtutin: what is CO
sponsoring
Karen Blumenfeld: So. yes. co
publicizing. we would definitely
look to them to publicize it in
Sudbury. There's no financial
commitment. If we all decide we
want to bring snacks or
whatever. we can work that out.
But there's no there's no fun.
We don't have any funding. I
don't know whether have any
funding. actually. so we can
find that out. And police
departments have funding. So the
only thing I can think of is
food if we want to do and yes.
we will look to them to also
promote it. And you know. our
Chief of Police is a very open
hearted guy who's probably going
to invite people from other
communities. and so I will need
to chat with him and chief Nix
about that. But I'm thinking we
have room for lots of people.
Many people will come online. I
can't imagine we'd exceed 100
people. So I think probably we.
we would open it up. but I. I.
I'm not 100% sure of that at
this moment. That's good. Yeah.
Thank you. Who had
Mary Ann Borkowski: a question?
Um. well. we are co sponsoring.
It is. is the police department
sponsoring? Yes. we already
voted that. Okay. so last I
should remember. no. no. no. I
should have said that last time
we voted to go sponsor with the
police. with our police. right?
Okay. yes. So. so this would be
to add on the Sudbury Commission
and the Sudbury Police. And I
remember Ed saying he was going
to invite other people. and
actually. even the freedom teams
were. I think. interested in
this. So good. yeah. So it'll be
great.
Karen Blumenfeld: We'll make it
big. Yeah. who hosts and sets up
the zoom? So Robbie. can I ask
you a question in this meeting.
Normally. we don't ask you
questions like this in the
meeting. But it's my
understanding that the town
doesn't provide zoom hosting yet
over at the new council or an
aging community center. Is that
true? Do you ever host over
there? No. I don't. Yeah. I
don't. My understanding when I
last asked. is that they don't
send anyone from the town to do
that Zoom hosting. Ed Berman is
very conversant with how to do
that. and I think he will take
that on. I asked Jailyn to
reserve an owl for us for the
green line people. and Ed is
planning to kind of back that
up. Whatever his plan B is to
make sure we have a zoom. Excuse
me. an hour
Heather Pineault: so people will
be able to
Karen Blumenfeld: attend
remotely. So people can attend
remotely. That's the idea that
this would be a hybrid event.
and
Yauwu Tang: we should be able to
do the Zoom ourselves. Usually
allowed to do so. We
Karen Blumenfeld: should do it.
Be able to do it ourselves. I am
not ever volunteering to do
that. but if somebody here is
interested in doing that. then
we're we're welcome to do that.
Yauwu Tang: I can help you. We
all decide. does it consider to
Okay? It
Heather Pineault: would have. do
you have an account that can
have a not that many people join
it as a webinar?
Karen Blumenfeld: No. it would
have to be the town. He would be
doing what Robbie does with the
town's equipment. Yeah. so. so I
gotta ask Jailyn. Okay. so
somebody asked about WayCAM.
somebody asked about the owl.
which we're talking about. but
also the laptop up because I.
actually. I didn't explicitly
ask her for a laptop well. and
Mary Ann Borkowski: you might
want to just say 100 people.
capacity
Janot Mendler de Suarez: of 200
on and you will verify all this
with Ed Berman. right?
Unknown: Yep. with Ed
Mary Ann Borkowski: and Jailyn.
Just a few. just a few
connections there. And
Heather Pineault: it's the
intent to do it interactive like
this. or like to do it at where.
like are they going to be here
in
Karen Blumenfeld: person? Da
Ryan said she was coming in
person.
Heather Pineault: So are we
trying to do it more as a
webinar. where people are
watching. or where people can
get in. like that? Oh. good
question. So that's just food
for thought.
Unknown: Yeah? So
Janot Mendler de Suarez: webinar.
she may want to offer a Q. a at
the end. yeah. depending what
Heather Pineault: she how she
wants to do it. So or so. I've
been in webinars where. you
know. you can put the questions
right the chat. in the chat if
you have a question. but more
just. how do they want to do it
Karen Blumenfeld: right? And
also. do we want to provide
privacy. like. if there are
people who want to come but they
don't want to be seen. they
might prefer the webinar format
where nobody sees who's there.
but if there are people who
really want to get be engaged.
then they then they would do it
like we're doing right now. so
that they their faces can be
seen. and they could
participate.
Mary Ann Borkowski: I would
worry about promising something
when we are barely thinking that
we can manage to do this. all of
these pieces together. So I
guess I would think that you
can't really promise that. if
someone's really
Janot Mendler de Suarez: concerned.
we can do just another question.
Fred Berman. so that we have a
sense of how it's going to go.
It's not until November. Yeah.
Heather Pineault: and if. if
someone. they don't have to have
their name pop up on the screen.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: true.
they don't know. it'll be
important to know what da Ryan's
expectation is.
Karen Blumenfeld: Yeah. okay. I
can ask a whole page of
questions. yeah. I can ask that
question. What they normally do?
They might have a normal format.
you're right. And Which reminds
me. the DAs office is going to
make the flyer for us. which is
nice. And I created a little
registration form. a Google
form. so people can register.
Yauwu Tang: Another question is.
does all the attendees is
willing to be seen
Karen Blumenfeld: by everyone?
Yes. that is a question. I
Yauwu Tang: think. not just the
Zoom attendees. I mean the in
person attendees. or we would
hyper avoid that.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Well.
yeah. well. wouldn't you always
have. The option of not entering
your name and leaving your video
off. The
Yauwu Tang: people on this. the
people attending. all over the
phone. That's easy to handle. So
either for the meeting itself.
the people speaker speaks at the
meeting. Do you want them all
those. those people want to be
saved by everyone else. Do you
want speak? Luke.
Heather Pineault: so we could
take. we could take written
questions. And I guess that's a
question for how the DA. I mean
the
Yauwu Tang: speakers. I mean the
we
Heather Pineault: have an owl.
depending where the person is.
they would then be visible on
the recording. And are we
recording it to play later as
well? It
Mary Ann Borkowski: would be
nice to be able to record it.
Karen Blumenfeld: but not the Q
A. only. I would say only her
presentation. yeah. not the Q.
Denise Fortin: a. yeah. I
thought when Sarah spoke that
she put herself back on you
mean. when she spoke because of
the owl. it just brought her
back up.
Karen Blumenfeld: Oh. mean.
right now. just now. yeah. I
don't know. Maybe she lost her
connection for a second. I don't
know.
Heather Pineault: Oh. I was
saying. like when I speak. the
owl turns to me so someone could
see. So if we had somebody
speaking and making a public
comment. the owl would then show
them up there. if they didn't
want
Unknown: to be smart owl. but.
um.
Karen Blumenfeld: but But I do
think we could probably take
written questions. These are
things I can talk to Yeah. her
person about. and find out how
they normally handle
Janot Mendler de Suarez: these.
Yeah. Denise. if you speak.
you'll probably see yourself pop
up here. Oh. okay. I
Denise Fortin: thought she
meant. I thought you met the
people on Zoom. Would if they
were blocked out like Sarah had
been. and they spoke that.
Karen Blumenfeld: No. I'm okay.
Sarah has control over whether
her video is showing or not.
Yeah. okay. yeah. I see your
Sarah Shtutin: question. Yes.
I'm sorry. I'm just dealing with
some stuff at home. but I'm
listening intently.
Karen Blumenfeld: We're so glad
you're here. Sarah. yes.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: and you
don't have to share your private
life.
Sarah Shtutin: No. that's okay.
It's totally fine. I already let
Karen know. but my grandfather.
who's 97 had a little issue. so
she's here now with us and
trying to figure things out.
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you. So
okay. so Can some I'll have a
whole good list of questions to
ask. to talk with both chief
Berman. with Jailyn and with the
DAs office about and we'll I'll
know more for next time. Would
somebody please make a motion
you were actually about to.
Denise. make a motion to co
sponsor this program with the
Sudbury dei commission and
Sudbury Police Department. in
addition to our own police
department. which we've already
voted to co sponsor. So moved.
Thank you. So Denise moved. Is
there a second? Second? Okay.
general seconded. so let us take
a vote. Uh. yalu. let's start
online.
Yauwu Tang: Yes.
Karen Blumenfeld: yes. Mariam.
yes. Sarah. yes. Asma. yes.
Maya. yes. Okay. let's go to the
room. Heather. yes. ADU. no.
yes. Marianne. yes. Denise. yes.
And Karen. yes. So we have
unanimously decided to co
sponsor. That's great. I will
let Sudbury know. Um. the second
item and is to talk about y'all.
I'm just going to introduce
something new to you. This just
came up recently. so I haven't
shared it with you yet. and that
is that the following the
Frederick. Frederick Douglas
community conversation the week
of July 4. there was a lot of
interest in follow up
conversations. It was really it
was well attended. it was well
received. And so the library has
been in conversations with Dr
Eden Renee Hayes. who had
facilitated that event. that
conversation. They've been in
conversation with Dr Hayes and
with the Wayland Museum and
Historical Society to propose a
four session conversation series
called Conversations for change.
to be facilitated by Dr Hayes.
And the series would create a
space where community members
can explore sensitive topics.
challenge assumptions. Systems
and connect historical insights
to present day realities in ways
that lead to meaningful action.
It's. you know. it's a series
that's meant to foster honest
and open dialog about
differences and shared humanity.
encourage residents to examine
local norms. build skills and
relationships and strengthen the
town's commitment to inclusion
and belonging. So it's right up
our alley. and they have invited
us to co sponsor. along with the
library and the historical
museum and Historical Society
and museum. I'll just mention
what the dates are. The dates
are Thursdays in the it's in the
fall. starting in the fall.
Thursdays from seven to 8:30pm.
I will it start four dates.
October 16. November. 3.
December. 4 and January. 15. And
there are so dr Haynes has come
up with a wide range of amazing
topics to just really get some
broad community conversations
going. and I'll share the
proposed four topics. One is
George Washington's Farewell
Address. 1796 the second is from
the book. The sum of us just
taking a chapter. chapter four
from that wonderful book. The
third is the town of Wayland.
community life and engagement
Executive Report. which we're
going to talk about soon here
tonight. And the fourth is
local. historical connections.
and just understanding how some
things from the past connect
with today. And they're hoping
that if the series is a success.
there could be expanded even
further. So it's a really.
really exciting series that I
think is very much up our alley.
And does anyone have any
questions?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Just so
great that sparked traction on
more conversations.
Mary Ann Borkowski: on that
people asked for it. yeah. that
people wanted it. And and. of
course. goes along with what the
conversations could be later. So
it's a. it's a one of the things
we would want to do in response
to the equity assessment. I
can't imagine anything better
than to be doing this and so
happy that we didn't initiate
it. but that another group
initiated. you know. which says
that we're we're doing something
right in Tom. you know. So
really appreciate it. Appreciate
the library taking the
initiative here. Yes.
Karen Blumenfeld: anything from
the people on Zoom.
All right. so if there are no
more questions or comments. can
someone move to co sponsor the
conversations for Change Series
facilitated by Dr Ian Renee
Hayes with the Wayland library
and Wayland Museum and
Historical Society. So Denise
moved. is there a second?
Second? Marianne seconded. Let
us vote about the level yellow.
yes. Mario. yes. SARAH Yes.
Asma. yes. Maya Yes. Heather
Yes. in the back in the room.
Heather and Jen No. yes. and
Marianne Yes. Denise Yes. Aaron.
yes. Okay. so it's unanimous
that we would love to co sponsor
this program. So this is really
wonderful. Excited about that.
Okay. so let's do Wayland
festival planning updates and
let us know what's going on with
that.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: I'll
start with the positive. which
is that. stepping back from all
of the details and all the teams
working on the different
elements. it's really
extraordinary that we have such
strong. generous hearted
collaboration between so many
different departments and groups
in the town of Wayland. all
hoping to make this a an event
that draws the whole town out To
get together and get to know
each other that said we are
entering. what we what were you
calling it the sprint? Mary.
with just. I don't know. a month
and a half to go. and we have a
lot of things that we need to.
People together. We will have a
very dynamic performance
schedule. We will have a very
diverse community marketplace
with community groups and
vendors. and we'll have a nice
artists and artisan section. I
hope we'll have some great
children's activities. And we
are going to kick off an almost
day long event with touch a
truck. The parade will now take
place with a loop within the
town center. and when it arrives
at the town green. that will
initiate the multicultural
performance segment of the
festival. And we will probably
have. I think we're going to
start at 10am with touch a
truck. and we will be going from
noon to 6pm with stage
performances and the marketplace
Busy. There are food trucks that
will be coming. and we're just
trying to keep going with the
fundraising. We have some very
generous contributors. donors.
local businesses who want to
sponsor us. We're gearing up for
how we're going to manage the
publicity. good ideas. and
we're. I think. nervous. but
basically in good shape and
moving forward on all fronts for
Karen Blumenfeld: members of the
public who might be listening. I
forgot to mention the date at
the beginning. over four
Saturday.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: October
Saturday. October 4 at the town
center. and starting at about
10am probably with the touch of
truck. and probably the parade
will start maybe 11. Get to the
details of the program as we get
closer to the event timing. It's
a lot of coordination with a lot
of entities. And I also want to
mention the Wayland 250
committee. as well as the
Historical Society. who are
partnering to make this a great
event.
Karen Blumenfeld: A question
somebody raised with me that
when they Googled multicultural
festival. not surprisingly.
nothing came up for 2025 Yeah.
Is it possible to put somewhere
in there. formally multicultural
festival as well? Google said
Janot Mendler de Suarez: it
would come up. It's not the same
multicultural Festival. It's
much larger. The elements of our
multicultural festival are all
embedded in the Wayland
festival. We don't know.
honestly. if this is the way
that we will continue going
forward. It's a big experiment.
We're hoping that we will bring
a multicultural experience and a
broader community interactive
experience to a much. much
larger cross section of the
community than we have been able
to attract to the multicultural
festival. so that remains to be
seen whether we will continue in
the same format or try to tweak
it do a little bit better next
year. or that we may go back to
having a separate multicultural
festival in the spring. or maybe
we'll do both. Maybe we'll have
the Wayland festival in the fall
and indoor multicultural
festival in the spring. We don't
know. Okay. it's a learning by
doing. So if
Karen Blumenfeld: someone
Googles festival 2025 hopefully
at some point soon this
Janot Mendler de Suarez: would
come up. yeah. hopefully they
will see Wayland festival. Yeah.
Mary Ann Borkowski: it probably
is more related to the fact that
we don't have enough publicity
out there. that's what. Yeah.
Yauwu Tang: we'll have the
website. All we should be able
to we can add a keyword into our
website
Mary Ann Borkowski: is. is. I
have no idea. What I'm asking.
I'm using these words someone. I
remember someone saying Facebook
events. Create a Facebook event.
then you can with that. I mean.
right? Then you attach some
keywords to it. What is the
magic here? I feel like there's
some magic that certainly I
don't know. I understand how to
do
Janot Mendler de Suarez: but do
you know about that? Asma. how
it might work if we have a
Facebook Wayland festival? Yeah.
I think
Unknown: if we're able to create
Asma Khan: an event through
Facebook. and then just in the
description. we can add like.
formally known as the
multicultural festival. so what
if it's in the wording. then it
should pop up if someone's
searching for it. I just don't
know if that pops up on a Google
search. If it's just Facebook.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: yeah.
but it's not really that. It was
formerly known as the
multicultural festival because
it was also formerly known as
the Rec and police department
touch a truck. It was formerly
known as arts waylands Expo. So
it the Wayland festival is
bringing a lot of events
together. Everyone is on board
with it being multicultural. but
it's not the multicultural
festival. Yeah.
Asma Khan: I think maybe just in
the description. adding it
different. the different events
that it's kind of including in
one. So we'll add in. like.
touch. a truck. whatever the
events were. and then just
include that in the description.
So when you're searching it. it
pops up
Janot Mendler de Suarez: multicultural
fair or multicultural
marketplace. as Yahoo said.
adding the keyword might be the
that might do the trick.
Sarah Shtutin: You can also
like. for example. the Wayland
community forum. You can create
an event on the Wayland
community forum and invite all
of the members of the Wayland
Community Forum. I'm not sure
how that would come up in search
results. but that's one way to
create a Facebook event targeted
Karen Blumenfeld: the two
things. one is search results.
That's one thing. but just
getting it on Facebook is huge.
So many Wayland people get their
information about stuff through.
as you said. the community
forum. There's also a Wayland
events page. So if we can get it
onto Facebook as soon as
possible. I think that's a great
way to spread the word. Will
there
Asma Khan: be a flyer that's
made. or is that does a seat the
date? Is that the flyer.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: right?
So we're. well. we'd like. we'd
like to have a more
professional. jazzier looking
flyer. That was just to save the
date. So we'd like to have more
flyer. or succession of flyers.
as we get closer to the event.
And we'd also like to have a lot
more yard signs that could go up
in different neighborhoods. So
that may be question. if we're
not going to have a committee
meeting next month.
Mary Ann Borkowski: say that
next month.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: well.
would it be okay before the next
committee meeting for our
meeting. for our meeting. before
our next meeting. would it be
okay if we send out an
informational to committee
members that we have printed
yard signs. and if you'd like to
collect them. get in touch with
somebody or other and help to
get them. you know. sprinkled
into as many neighborhoods as we
can. But is
Karen Blumenfeld: there any
reason not to put the Save the
date on Facebook today? No
reason can we get this thing
going? Oh.
Mary Ann Borkowski: okay. okay.
you can ask as much
Heather Pineault: it's on our so
if you know to look. if you just
put in Wayland the festival.
actually. as of three hours ago.
Boston Central has it whatever
that is. right? But it's called
Wayland Festival. and if you
look it up for the Wayland is
full day of community. culture
and fun for all exploring
multicultural exhibits and
marketplace and an artist
marketplace. So that's on Boston
central as of a few hours ago.
arts Wayland. it pops up under
them. and then. actually. it
pops up under in Wayland. under.
I mean. it pops up under ours as
the 2025. multicultural
festival. But there is no.
there's.
Mary Ann Borkowski: yes. you're
not on the right page.
Heather Pineault: When you
search the town. pop this pops
up on the town under us. That's
under the hrdic. So I'm
wondering. if we 2025
Mary Ann Borkowski: it's on our
I don't understand. It's on our
so whatever that we
Janot Mendler de Suarez: need to
get that point to. The question
Heather Pineault: would be. if
you search this. this is what
comes
Mary Ann Borkowski: up our but
it is on our Web. Jailyn put it
on. yes.
Heather Pineault: yeah. If you
go back to our home for it. it
is there. right? But if you
search it. there's an orphan for
somehow. somewhere. somehow.
that page is by itself. So maybe
Janot Mendler de Suarez: blaming
that. maybe that was a place
folder that is.
Heather Pineault: what's by
itself. what's an orphan. I
don't know where this
Janot Mendler de Suarez: is.
This is no information. You
Heather Pineault: know where
it's showing up. It's because we
have this in the in the side
column. We have a. We have a
menu item for the festival. the
festival. but we don't have that
there. so we want to. we want to
also put that flyer here. okay.
Karen Blumenfeld: as well as on
the homepage. Okay. yeah. Can
you. if you look at the
multicultural festival page. it
has 2324 and 25 right on. So
that
Mary Ann Borkowski: picked up. I
did do that. of course.
wonderfully efficient and
Karen Blumenfeld: sounds. yeah.
Heather Pineault: so it's ready.
but great. there found that for
it. yeah? So. because that way.
if somebody knew we did this and
they went to our website and
looked. then. actually. there is
a link directly to it. right?
Yeah. Okay. great.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Thanks.
Karen Blumenfeld: Just saying.
Wow.
Asma Khan: you were mentioning
searching for it. So I just did
a quick Google search for
Wayland multicultural festival
2025 and so it says. The Wayland
multicultural Festival in 2025
will be held on Saturday.
October 4. as part of the larger
Wayland Fest at the town center.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Oh.
wow. And where's that? I don't
know who wrote that.
Asma Khan: but if you just
Google it. yeah. it's an AI
response.
Heather Pineault: No. you know
why? It's because. oh no. it
links me to Wayland. 250 also
has it on their homepage. Oh.
great. yeah. but they do
mentioning a combined
multicultural pavilion and
artist marketplace on the
Wayland 250 page also. So it's
get it.
Karen Blumenfeld: That's right.
Wayland 250 is. like the 250th
anniversary.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: I think
it's the country about a year
Wayland has a committee. yeah.
that's doing like. a year's
worth of events. like the parade
is part of the 2/50 and they're
working with the schools on
that.
Unknown: I have a question.
Asma Khan: yeah. so because.
like. school is starting in all
that. is there anything that I
can send out? Maybe.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: absolutely.
we also Maya. We. this student
named Noah reached out to us.
who's started something called
serve Wayland. who's really keen
to help with the festival. And I
had told Noah that it would be
great if there were. you know.
people who were good at graphics
outreach to maybe. you know.
research some of the performers.
and help us do a lot more
publicity than we're capable of
doing as our own just the
committee and that there will be
volunteer positions at the
festival itself. that it'd be
great. You know when school
starts. for people to know that
we'll need some runners to
assist with the stage manager
and helping you know the acts to
be ready and in sequence.
There's also that. There's also
something that I just mentioned
to Noah. the castle Brewing
Company is going to be serving
beer. It's a Wayland high school
grad who started this company.
but they are also serving free
water throughout the festival.
But the rule is that you cannot
carry the beer off of the
festival grounds. so you can't
leave the green so it would be
really helpful if we had. you
know. like one or two students
an hour. just walking around and
in a friendly way if they notice
someone who's holding a. you
know. a beer. to just make sure
that they don't wander off.
because that is against the law.
Karen Blumenfeld: Directed so
Maya saying. What can she do?
Yes.
Unknown: so it would
Janot Mendler de Suarez: be
helpful to to think about how
you might like to get the word
out. and we should connect you
with Noah if you wanted to have
some support.
Asma Khan: Does this? You might
know him. Is this Noah Goldstein
by any chance? No. no.
Karen Blumenfeld: okay. no. he
has a different last name. Can
we send her the Sega date flyer?
It's no. yeah. Noah Spiewak or
SP Yeah. something
Janot Mendler de Suarez: like
wax be West. yes. that's his
last name.
Heather Pineault: Do you know
anyone at Wayland Student Press
that could do an article about
Asma Khan: it? I. I do.
actually. so I could ask around
if you'd like.
Heather Pineault: and also that
great sounds like. if you. if
you can help get word out about
meeting volunteers that could be
communities. Service
Karen Blumenfeld: hours. So it's
so. yeah. they get community
service hours. The question is.
so Noah has this organization
Janot Mendler de Suarez: that
serve Wayland. which so he could
have a few students.
Karen Blumenfeld: and that's
separate from the school and
maybe separate from community
service service credits. right?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: But if
they're Wayland students. any
help they give for the festival
and become can count as
community service.
Karen Blumenfeld: So maybe Maya.
what if we connect Maya with
Noah and maybe they can figure
out how to work together? Yeah.
will you do that? You want me to
do that?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: I'm not
sure. If I don't have Maya's
email
Karen Blumenfeld: address. I'll
connect
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Karen.
Can connect you to Noah. Maya.
okay.
Mary Ann Borkowski: yeah. and I.
I'll send. I'll send you the
Save the date flyer. and that's
at least give some background.
Yeah. something to work
Janot Mendler de Suarez: from.
And Maya. you're welcome. You're
always welcome to text me or
call me. maybe Karen. just
include my contact information
when you do the connection to
NOAA.
Unknown: well. I will do
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Thank
you. Thank you.
Asma Khan: Another thought to
that point. Maya and Sarah. you
might have more knowledge about
this than me. but I know last
year for the harvest festival.
when we did. we had high school
kids help out. They get certain
like points that build up to
privileges. and so they're able
to like build up depending on
how many they earn. So I wonder
if we can get in touch with the
schools to be able to get like.
be able to recruit more high
school kids to be able to
participate?
Sarah Shtutin: Yeah. they get.
I'm not sure about a point
system. but I know I've
recruited high school kids and
they get community service
hours. which. oh. okay. everyone
has a certain amount of hours. I
don't know what that is. that
they have to get by the end of
high school. So
Janot Mendler de Suarez: and
certify. as you know. our
festival committee. the number
of hours that the students who
are volunteering. we had to sign
something last
Sarah Shtutin: year in a form.
Heather Pineault: Sarah. is it
possible in terms of this
publicity. to get something else
through the PTOs? You know what
Sarah Shtutin: I was thinking
about that while we were having
this conversation. Let me take
it back to my board. I know want
to wear kind of two hats. My hat
is part of this committee. My
hat is part of the PTO
presidency. And what we've
continued to discuss. there's a
lot of events. right? So how
much do we flood our kind of
publicity with all the events
happening in Wayland. versus
focusing on the events happening
at Happy hollow. sponsored by
the PTO? So that's something
that we kind of grapple with. I
honestly think that there's a
huge overlap between members of
the PTO and members of. for
example. the happy hollow
community. those who are on
social media that they're also
on the community forum. So I'm
happy to post the flyer on the
community forum. I'm happy to
create an event on the community
forum. inviting kind of
everybody. I'm more than happy
to do that. I just I've gotten a
lot of requests to post
something on our Facebook page.
and what I find is that people
are confused. Is this a PTO
event? Is this. you know. are
happy hollow people are going to
be there? Am I paying for it?
Because people contribute to the
PTO. and then we have events
which we fund through the PTO.
and every single communication.
if I were to include every event
that people reach out to me for.
then the communication of the
actual PTO events that I run
would be kind of lost in in the
shuffle. so I don't know the
answer.
Mary Ann Borkowski: That's why
they use the all school
newsletter. and that's this kind
of thing ends up in there.
Sarah Shtutin: Yeah. absolutely.
That is
Mary Ann Borkowski: absolutely
school newsletter. right? That
is not in my school newsletter
gets the all school
Sarah Shtutin: Yeah. correct.
corrections. So if you want me.
I mean. I know less. I know you
know Leslie corner. who does the
all school news. So if you want
me to send something to her. I
think that's a great you know
that has a library section that
has kind of all the events that
that she has a lot more
flexibility versus the
communication that comes from me
that is very specific to the
happy hollow community. right?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Yeah.
So it would be that would be
great if you could get it. you
know. especially sort of a back
to school timing newsletter. at
least. That's. Save the date.
But I'm wondering. you know.
this is something just to think
about. Would the PTO be
interested in CO sponsoring? And
again. what a co sponsorship
would entail would simply be
helping to get the word out. get
the word out of. you know.
families with children. and we
should give you a little bit
more information. I actually
don't have a very recent update
from the parade committee. but
the idea behind the parade.
which the Wayland 250 committee
and the historical museum are
kind of the drivers of was that
they wanted to reach out to each
of the schools so that the kids
could have some kind of a float.
or floats. sort of by school. so
that each of the schools would
be in the parade. and the parade
is going to be led by the High
School Band. and the band is
going to play while they're in
the parade. and then they're
going to continue their set.
When they arrive at the town
green. they'll go up on stage
and have a few more instruments.
So the parade portion is a big.
you know. family kickoff for the
festival. because we're hoping
we'll have lots of kids that
really make the parade. But I'm
not. I'm not up to date on where
they where that committee is
with the schools. and if they're
working with art teachers or
history teachers. I don't know.
WCA.
Yauwu Tang: WCA women in Chinese
American Association. They are
working hard with the school
kids. They are looking for them
to participate in the dragon
dance. to train them to operate
the non dragon. They also. every
year they get a lot of kids to
help out logistically during the
festival day. So we have quite a
long list of participants. I'm
pretty sure. So they are doing
that till this year.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: And the
lion dancers are also Wayland
kids who will be in the parade
and then perform when they get
to the green at the stage.
Karen Blumenfeld: You need
anything else from us right now?
Yauwu Tang: It's really a
multicultural festival. but
because it's combined with three
festival together. Somehow these
people will have the reservation
to call it multicultural
festival. because it's nice more
than contains all other two
called festivals. Or for some
reason. the people started to
call the boat the wing of
festival. Instead of doing a
multicultural festival.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: we
could have called it the
multicultural festival. but
everybody in the big
collaborative group decided.
including us. that it didn't
have to be called the
multicultural festival. that we
thought it would be more concise
to just call it Wayland
Festival. and that the
multicultural experience would
be clear.
Yauwu Tang: Because the purpose
of encourage and
Janot Mendler de Suarez: it's
great that the message is
getting out there. and that it's
clearly the message that AI has
pulled from the bit of publicity
that we've started with. So
that's that's a success.
Karen Blumenfeld: 10 days ago.
it wasn't there. so now it's
starting to pop up. Yeah. it's
great. Just like so such a huge
thank you to you and to all the
folks that are working on this
incredible. incredible event.
And just know that the rest of
us are available to help on the
day of you know. in any way that
would be helpful. of course. and
we hope
Janot Mendler de Suarez: that
you'll have a table. And
Mary Ann Borkowski: yes.
actually. that does entertain.
What a perfect opening. We have
to have a table. And last time.
last time. we had the welcome
table. and then I had a fabric
table. We did some fabric
crafts. but we don't. maybe.
actually some of the things
we're going to talk about later
today. maybe that we can look at
them to see about some handouts
and what would be on that table.
So. and
Karen Blumenfeld: if we don't
get to that tonight. we'll find
a way next time. Yeah.
Mary Ann Borkowski: we'll be a
little more final. But yes.
we're on. We're on for a table
at. The event.
Karen Blumenfeld: And one thing
we'll be covering a table. So
we'll be covering a table. and
we can all help cover the table.
And one thing I have to remember
to do is pick up the banners
from the town. because they're.
you know. they're using our
banners on the sign boards. but
you need them for the festival.
And I'm pretty sure I have a
note in my calendar. but I'll
just triple check that too. that
I gotta pick them up and make
Mary Ann Borkowski: sure. I'm
guessing. that those festivals.
those those time periods. will
be done. Oh.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: but I
gotta get them. Yeah. guys out
of storage. put them up. So
beautiful.
Karen Blumenfeld: Okay. okay.
thank you. Huge. huge. Thanks to
everybody who's working on this.
It's an amazing. amazing thing.
Okay. so we'll take a breath.
and then we're going to move to
number seven. and Robbie. if we
have a guest who's joining us.
yeah. she's here. I know. but we
want to make her a panel. Is she
a panelist? We
Janot Mendler de Suarez: can
move her over. Yeah. welcome Dr
Renee.
Mary Ann Borkowski: When this
picture was taken. right? It
just went dark. No. oh. just
went dark. They all have masks
on. So during covid. that's when
that picture was taken. The good
old days. time to update it.
Karen Blumenfeld: Oh. welcome.
Oh. hey. So Dr Eden Renee Hayes
is here to join us. and I'm
going to introduce her in a
second. I want to lay a little
groundwork here for what we're
about to talk about. So the
Wayland community life and
engagement Executive Report.
which in the past we called the
equity assessment. So just want
to put this in context. It's
called the equity I mean. the
community life and engagement
Executive Report was produced by
Dr Damon a Williams and the
Center for Strategic diversity.
leadership and social
innovation. which is the acronym
is CSD. LSI. for any members of
the public who are watching that
report. can now be found on the
Select boards web page under the
tab called external reports. And
joining us tonight is Dr in
Renee Hayes. a dei consultant
and Wayland resident. whom the
town hired as a thought partner
to help bring this assessment.
this huge assessment. to life
and throughout the whole process
from the very from day one. Dr
Hayes has worked closely with
the town manager and me.
providing incredibly thoughtful
guidance and direction and just
really helping bring this thing
to life. So I want to thank Dr
Hayes for that and for being
here tonight. And you already
know some of the people here.
You may not know some of our
newer folks. but we're really
happy to have you here. and I
want to say one more thing to
set the table for this
discussion. which is so the
report was prepared for the town
of Wayland. was really prepared
for the Select Board. and the
Select Board was hoping to talk
about the report at one of their
meetings this summer. but wasn't
able to fit it in. It's now
scheduled on tentatively. for
their September 2 meeting.
September two. So ideally. the
HR. deic. we would talk about
this report after the Select
Board had talked about it. But
the reason I put it on tonight's
agenda is because I won't be
able to be here for the
September meeting. and I didn't
want to wait. you know. another.
whatever. two months to talk
about it. So if we're
comfortable moving forward with
this discussion. recognizing
that. you know. it's not our
place tonight to talk about what
the Select Board should do. they
haven't even had a chance to
talk about this report. So you
know. it's our place to talk
about our takeaways and what we
might consider doing to follow
up. And I just want to make sure
everybody's comfortable
Mary Ann Borkowski: with that.
That good when you say you're
not going to be here. you're not
going to be here for the second.
I can't
Karen Blumenfeld: be here. No.
I'll be here on the second. but
I can't be here for our ad
meeting on I think it's. yeah.
September 16. So. and I didn't
want. just selfishly. but also
because I've been so closely
involved with it. no. yeah. I
didn't want to have it come up
at that meeting. So anyway. here
we are. So if everyone is
comfortable with that. then
let's talk that. Sound good?
Anybody have any comments before
we again? Alright. let's get to
it. So let's get to it. So we
all. you know. we have. What did
we have till about roughly 725.
we don't have look we could
spend hours and hours and hours
talking about this report. It's
really rich and deep. So this is
a beginning. I thought we might
start with. you know. what were
some of your key takeaways? What
did you notice about it and
about the report? And if there's
time. we could talk about some
things that HR DIC might do to
follow up. But for sure. we're
going to keep talking about
this. And as as you heard
before. one of the library
program topics will be this
report. so there'll be lots more
opportunities. but let's start
with key takeaways. What did you
notice when you looked through
this report? What sort of what
stuck out for you? Yeah.
Unknown: um.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: I I
have a perception that we that
we have a lot of problems in our
school system there. there's a
there's a long history. and the
history includes. unfortunately.
a considerable bit of litigation
that is frequently connected
with diversity. equity and
inclusion issues. and when
issues come up there. there is
usually no transparency about
the process and very little
information about the outcomes.
Karen Blumenfeld: Can I
interrupt for one second? What
did you see in the report?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: So what
I saw in the report was a gap. I
was hoping that I would see ways
to address the disconnect
between the schools that operate
almost as a sub community within
the town. and the larger
community. And the larger
community would include the rest
of town governance. including
this committee. we had a very
nice attempt to collaborate that
kind of fizzled. and also the
continuing. I think it addresses
very nicely. the Continuing
compartmentalization of the
Metco program and the Metco
families. all of those
recommendations. I'm very happy
to see. But I think at the level
of the the school system. which
would be the school department
and the school committee. feel
as though there's a there's room
for some further examination and
recommendations. Thank you.
Karen Blumenfeld: Others. yeah.
Sarah. yes. Um.
Sarah Shtutin: I want to
piggyback a little bit off of
that. I think I'm familiar as a
PTO president I and the board
and I have A lot of
conversations of how to enable
Metco families to better
participate in our programming.
So I don't know if we want to
take a few minutes here. but I'd
like to just share a little bit
of what we do do. and a little
bit of some of the discussions
that we have. I don't know.
Karen. if that's if we have time
for that. Or if people are
interested
Karen Blumenfeld: in Renee. what
are your thoughts
Unknown: to address Jenos
concerns. just reminding us all
that this was I'm connecting the
two. So to Jessica Jenos
concerns and this was an a
community engagement serving
have having to do with the town.
There were different ideas about
what would happen with the with
the school. It is true that the
schools would need a separate
equity audit and would. Need to
invest in something like that in
order to be able to be more
reflected. And we do also see
that expressed in the roadmap
itself. which is on page five of
the summary. And we see it's a
smaller point down. kind of like
in the lower middle of that page
that that we agree. and now it
was also brought up by by
different participants within
the survey that. yeah. the
schools need to be addressed in
the same way they and so that
that is reflected. It's just
this type of a survey would it
requires a completely different
type of a survey in order for
the connection between this the
schools in the town to be to be
more more reflected in there.
And in terms of Sarah's a
comment about trying to discuss
what's going on with the PTO and
the Metco program. I really
leave it to to the HR deic
committee to discuss whether
that's part of this discussion
or not. It sounds to me like
it's not directly related to
what's going on with the equity
audit. but it is an important
discussion to have.
Karen Blumenfeld: Well. I guess
my instinct not wanting to turn
any topic away. but My instinct
is. if we go down that path. we
won't really get to keep
dissecting the report. And I'd
really like us to just talk
about our observations. about
what we've learned from the
report.
Sarah Shtutin: I agree. but I
also. and I hear what you're
saying. that maybe there's
another report that needs to be
focused on the schools. but I
think I have some like some say
in things that I can do today to
help. include the Metco
families. I just don't know what
it is more that I could do. I
mean. because you're saying we
need another report that could
take X amount of years. and we
do spend a lot of time talking
about how to include Metco
families. We do have things that
we do to include them and make
make our programming more
accessible. but I don't. I don't
know what else we can do. So
that was just my observation.
because Metco. you know. it is
very specific to the schools. We
have. Metco families within
happy hollow. and it the Metco
theme is woven throughout the
entire report. And Medco is
specific to the school system.
right? So I don't. I don't know
I want more concrete things that
I could do today. because I do
feel that there are barriers to
entry for Midco families to
participate. and as many of
those as I can break down. I
want to. but I just don't know
exactly what to do. More than
what
Janot Mendler de Suarez: we're
doing. Are the roadmap
recommendations helpful to you?
Sarah. um. I mean.
Sarah Shtutin: you mean like the
strategic recommendations. or
like this page five.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: or like
recommendations on page 23 Yeah.
PAGE 28 page 28 Yeah. yes. PAGE
28 and I appreciate Eden Renee
that the I mean this. there's
not a whole lot of information.
It just says that there's a need
to do. you know. an audit for
access and inclusion across
school programs. So I understand
now that that's kind of the
placeholder that addresses my
larger concerns. It's in here.
Yeah.
Heather Pineault: because the
thing that jumped. one of the
things that jumped out at me
and. and part is because it. it
wasn't a school audit. was that
it. there was a focus. as you
said. Metco came up regularly.
and a lot of people forget. We
have students of color who live
in Wayland as well. who also
don't. also have experiences
that aren't. aren't great. and
that did come up a little bit.
not in terms of students per se.
but the differing experiences of
how much belonging and people
felt was different depending on
race. not only but for adults. I
mean. that happened as adults.
but I also. when we talk about
Metco. I don't want us to forget
that we actually have a lot of
students of color who aren't in
the Metco program. and Metco
has. Its own issues as well. In
terms of like. there it's a both
end. I guess I would say.
Sarah Shtutin: Yeah. to me.
those two issues are potentially
co mingled. but somewhat
separate. you know. from Metco
families. Every time we have an
event. we provide child care to
bridge the gap from between when
school closes and when the event
starts. so that they don't have
to go. you know. into Boston and
then have to come right back. We
have transportation for our
events that is provided. you
know. we had a vice principal
opening. and there were medical
families that were part of the
process to help select the new
one. but unfortunately. they
were only able to make it to one
of the meetings. I don't know
how to facilitate that. because
you're only able to. you know.
interview two out of the seven
candidates. then you're not
really a full participant in the
process. You're can't really
have a say. because you didn't
kind of interview everybody. So
yeah. I yeah. that was just. I
would like some concrete things
that I can do at a very small
level with just my school to
help these families become more
involved. I can't convene like a
school town met. go working
group. I have a very small area
of control that I'm trying to
make changes to. Anyway. that
was my only observation. Sorry
to I had a visceral response.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Thank you. I
don't want to discourage you
from. you know. it taking what
ideas may be here that are
prompted and continuing to work.
like. you say. through an area.
that you have some controls
over. right? And. and. I mean. I
had. you know. thought. because
it did come up a fair number of
times that. you know. we don't
have a lot of not that we can't
reach out to the superintendent.
but we don't have a lot of
control over what the schools
are doing. but we there is a
medical director. and you know.
we can work and try to support
It town. interaction with the
medical families. and provide
support as community members to
programs that the Metco director
might like support on. So there
is that possibility. and
Sarah Shtutin: every school has
a Metco representative. right? I
think the happy hollow one is
shared between happy hollow and
loker. but I talk to her. you
know. regularly. Yeah.
Karen Blumenfeld: Marianne. Have
you shared your role with CO
with Sarah? Like. maybe the two
of you might connect offline at
some point on these topics?
Yeah.
Mary Ann Borkowski: So Sarah. I
used to work a lot as a Medco
community liaison. and so kind
of goes back a number of years
so. but maybe there's some
opportunity to we can still add
to think about some of the
things that we used to do and
and work with Latoya about that.
But the. you know. one thing
that I picked up from this
report was that. of course. the
same message that. you know.
there's nothing new about the
fact that people who are are not
the majority culture have. I
don't feel like they belong. and
it there's insults to who and
who they are in various ways
throughout our town. And you
know. so and I always think. and
it's always easy to think about
schools. and I don't want to.
Sarah. you know that is. you
have anybody who has a power.
you need to use it in in terms
of where you see. we could
improve in terms of equity and
inclusion. But you know. it's
not just our schools. I mean.
our kids are coming out of our
homes. and that it happens in
our homes. It's happening in our
town. It wasn't my friend who
was she didn't walk into the
schools with her kids. so she
did have issues there. But you
know. she was being insulted
when she was. you know. in the
stores. So it was her as an
adult. be insulted by another
adult. And so the key. you know.
that's a huge opportunity and
obligation for us and to address
that. and think about how we're
going to address that. If it was
easy. it would have been cured.
It's not easy. yeah. so we have
to be creative about how we're
going to try to address this and
try to. you know. if we don't
have a direct link to the
schools. not that. then we need
to show that we can lead and
have our. you know. the adults
we affect. and have them bring
that message to the schools.
And. And we can show up at
school committee meetings too.
and and state our whatever our
issues may be at any particular
time. But I don't want us to
think that we don't have
anything because we can't talk
to the schools. There's a lot we
there's a lot we need to be
doing with us and that. and they
bring it up so But anyhow. so
I've just. my takeaway is that
I'm just here it is and and we
have to confront the fact that
the very act of that we're
talking about training our our
town staff to be more sensitive.
And. you know. it's just hard to
be still just talking about
that. that we have. you know.
that you know. but you know we
don't have. So what would that
look like? So let's get our
staff so that some people feel
like they're treat you know that
that they're being addressed.
and their issues are being
addressed. just like the white.
heterosexual person standing
next to them. So
Yauwu Tang: I think it's still a
long way to go. We just have to
work on it slowly. I don't think
that this can be done overnight.
Yeah. it's this big issue still
there. We just need to do
another education. a lot of
cultural understanding and the
acceptance of each other. Truly
acceptance is not on the table.
Most. A lot of since it's on the
paper. look like this. accept
each other that we bring hard
and still not really to the time
level God's created. That's the
direction we need to go. It's
200 people really feel
comfortable to beat each other.
Denise Fortin: Sarah. hope you
can hear me. I just wanted to
say that I think it's wonderful
that you just want to jump in
and start doing something at
your school. The schools that
you represent. So I just think
it's wonderful. And I wanted to
let you know that.
Sarah Shtutin: thank you. I feel
like I have this. like you said.
you know. narrow time frame and
narrow focus. and we're just. I
just want you guys to know that
we talk about it a lot. and we
we liaise with the Metco
representatives to try to see
how many families want to
attend. So. for example. even
the World Fair right. we can
reach out and say how many
families are interested in
attending this. We can work with
the boosters to hire a bus to go
and pick families up. to
facilitate transformation
transportation from Boston. And
it's there is a financial
investment in that. which is
something like. again. we talk
about it a lot because. right.
we have to. like. I think. for
for the. not the boosters. but
just having a bus go and make
three stops in downtown Boston
for one of our events was like
$450 and I think we had two or
three families raise their hands
saying that they would be
interested about a month and a
half before the event. But
closer to the event. right? You
have to get on this bus. They
have to spend all day in
Wayland. It's not very flexible.
and then they go back on the
bus. So closer to the event.
things came up. and none of them
ended up coming. And I don't
know how to sort of break those
barriers. We even said. like. if
you change your mind. let us
know we can pay for an Uber you
know. like. what are those
barriers to you coming to an
event on a weekend?
Heather Pineault: Do you and I
asked this question? Haven't
been a PTO President myself. so
I totally hear you and and have
been in your in your situation.
Do you have any Metco parents on
the board?
Sarah Shtutin: We do not have
any met co parents on the board.
I will go further to say that I
don't think I've had any met co
parent volunteer for any event.
even things that can be done
remotely. like being a room
parent. which is just a lot of
kind of coordination. but not a
physical presence. We don't
specifically target or not
target the medical community.
You know. we send our
communications to everyone. We
usually use social media or use
the weekly newsletter. which
goes to. Everyone or room
parents emails that goes to
everyone. and we equally
broadcast those opportunities to
everyone. In the end. is it
mostly parents that have
flexibility with work. that are
able to come on a random day to
attend library. for sure. but
there are absolutely
opportunities that are remote.
that we just haven't had a lot
of engagement and and as I
mentioned. we had a vice
principal candidate. There was a
medical representative on the
board. She was able to attend
the first meeting remotely.
whereas the rest of us were in
the room. And after that.
because of her work schedule.
she was just not able to
participate further in the
conversation.
Unknown: Yeah. if I can know for
a minute. just one of the ways
that we can encourage a
welcoming environment is to make
a targeted ask and say. Hey. we
would love to see you here. like
to the demographics that we
would like to see more of. So
sending out a blanket message
doesn't say you're looking for
me. It says you're looking for
somebody. and that's where
communication can break down.
And instead. give the impression
that. okay. we just need a warm
body. and rather than we really
would enjoy having your voice
added to this conversation. to
this event. to whatever's going
on. and. you know. explicitly
pointing out we we understand
that there's barriers as it
relates to to distance and work
schedules. And we would love to
be flexible and work work with
you. And have to wonder what the
work schedule. especially since
that person is not here. like.
how much was the planning around
the the individual interviews
around. like. this person's work
schedule to ensure that they
could participate? Just. I don't
want us to come into a
conversation that ends up with.
we. we like. we think we tried
and Mecca wasn't there. Like. I
have great relationships with
with my co families. and I just
they. I just. and that's how my
friends. my my my kids. have
friends that are of. of. uh.
basically. like friends of
color. and how they can better
able to really navigate what's
what's going on. I mean. we
moved here in the in the middle
of the school year a few years
ago. and it it was a Metco kid
who was who went up to my son
and said. Come on. play with us.
We should be doing exactly the
same thing. And in saying. like.
saying. hey. like you. you're
just sitting there. Come on.
play with us.
Sarah Shtutin: I completely
agree with you. And to be fair.
the the interview process was
not something I had any you
know. stay in. It was driven by
the principal. so I don't know
kind of the details. And in
terms of sending a targeted
communication to the Metco
families. The truth is. a lot of
the opportunities don't include
any particular input or voices
from any of the different
communities. but it. it lets you
be more involved in whatever is
going on. So then you feel like
you kind of okay. you know
what's happening. You've been
involved in the planning. Maybe
even you're more able to
participate.
Karen Blumenfeld: So I'd like to
suggest. because I hear that you
are trying hard to do this work
in your sphere of influence.
which is what the best that all
of us can do is to do what we
can do in our own spheres of
influence. And Sarah. I just
want to sort of wind up this
part of the conversation.
Absolutely. Yeah. you have
Heather. who's a past PTO
president. You've got Marianne.
who's been involved in Metco for
more years than she's willing to
say. and is still involved very
closely with Metco So and. and.
you know. Dr Hayes. who is also
here. but I. you know. use the
resources in this room. but. but
let's do that offline. Let's
Sarah Shtutin: do that. I'm
sorry. yes. thank you. Let's
treat that as
Karen Blumenfeld: like school
business. not HR. DSC. business.
per se. so that you can get
guidance and support from people
in this group who have relevant
experience. Sounds good. Thank
you. Yeah. go ahead.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: So
there's another really
interesting recommendation in
this report. and I'd love to get
a little more insight on it from
Dr Eden Renee. So there's this
idea of potentially changing the
name of the human rights.
diversity. equity. inclusion
committee to community life and
engagement. And it seems to me
that you know. like one of the.
The objectives would be to
attract a more a more diverse.
more diverse perspectives to
actually join and serve on this
committee. I think it even says
in the report somewhere. even
people who are. perhaps. you
know. against dei and that was
super interesting to me. because
precursor to this committee. we
had the former town managers.
what was it called. Racial
Justice Advisory Committee. and
there were a number of people on
that committee who were not
particularly for having a
diversity equity inclusion
committee in Wayland. although
it was the recommendation of
that committee to establish
this. And I just. I thought that
was a really insightful
recommendation that. you know in
a way.
Yauwu Tang: we we need
Janot Mendler de Suarez: to be
reaching out to people who don't
like this committee to
understand how we can where
they're coming from and how we
can actually do better. But I
thought even Renee. since we
have the privilege of having you
with us. maybe you could shed a
little more insight on that
recommendation and how it could.
how it could enable this
committee to do better. to shift
the language around. what we
call it.
Unknown: I'm not sure that a
language shift is going to do
very much if the the mission
stays the same. if the the
content of what's discussed
seems the same. I i in
workshops. I've been playing a
little game of hot and cold to
you know. like a hot you're
closer to the answer cold.
you're really far away from it.
With participants just quickly
to just to highlight how old the
concepts of dei are. And I'm
just going to tell you upfront.
dei is it started in 1865. 18. I
want to emphasize like that.
This is before 1919. 65 and
meaning people do start with
that. like. in playing Hot and
cold. oh. it had to be in like.
the 60s. maybe the 70s. like.
Nope. you're actually super cold
because you're. like. 100 years
off. And that's the thing is
that the like. what we now call
Dei. or may call something else
soon started a very. very long
time ago. but then the concept
itself. it still remains
unchanged that there are groups
that are treated differently.
And we need to be thinking about
how it is that we can do our
best job in order to support
them. I mean. when I when I was
young and my mom worked for the
Social Security Administration.
it was called sensitivity
training. Not too long after
that. it was called tolerance.
And I think we know the problems
with with calling it tolerance.
because that that feeling around
we're putting up with someone.
So the name dei has changed.
like so many different times
over. over a lot of years. So
changing it again doesn't change
the the mission. So I just if a
Rose was not called a rose. it
would smell identical to the way
it smells now.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Yeah.
here in Wayland. the first town
wide racial healing workshops
were actually funded by the
police department with. as you
said. sensitivity funding. And
when was that 90s we did that?
Oh. my goodness.
Unknown: yeah. since sensitivity
training was was a 90s term.
Karen Blumenfeld: I think the
way the consultant in may
correct me if. if I'm wrong
here. But the way they framed it
in the end was. if it feels
right or necessary to change it.
here's a possible way to change
it. But they weren't saying you
should do this. Do Is that your
read on it also. yes.
Unknown: they were responding to
a national trend to change the
name of it. especially with
certain political and legal
factions going afterwards. I can
also say that I attend trainings
myself. I don't just just give
them. I. Make sure that I'm up
to date. So I one of the ones
that I like to follow is a
really important. you know. and
well known law firm that's
actually based based in Boston.
They they focus on employment
law. and what they found is that
there's so much attack on an
acronym that what you could do
is just turn the acronym
backwards. so IE. D. and then
you would be less likely to be
found by whoever searching for
for Dei. And that just
highlights even more like
changing the name is just
changing the name. If you're
keeping the mission. then you're
still doing. doing the work. And
if some big notice comes out.
the HR deic is now this new
name. the people that you're
looking for that are anti dei
may see that and say. oh. okay.
it's the same thing still. but
Karen Blumenfeld: it's something
to keep in mind. Yeah. yes.
Mary Ann Borkowski: there's so
much here to talk about. and I'm
afraid that we cannot do justice
to my thought is when I look at
this is to over the next few
meetings. is to look at. there's
a recommendation. one. two and
three. and that we really try to
drill down on each number and
come up with several action
items that we could do. For
example. you know. one was a
statement. you know. has come
out with a statement on
inclusion. and we have a
statement. this effort to have a
statement on racism. I don't
know if we want to. actually.
when you read it. it reads like
inclusion. but. you know. one of
the recommendations might be
that we ask them to. you know.
just speak it again. you know.
put it out there and that. you
know we're in Fay. and look it
over and that. you know we
continue to support this and
say. say that out loud.
Karen Blumenfeld: So I love your
idea of at subsequent meetings.
taking a recommendation at a
time. you know. one in
September. one in October. one
in November. But aren't there?
Are there
Mary Ann Borkowski: deeper than
that? But yes. and then then we
go back and revisit them and
find more that we can do. But
it's a. you know. I just don't
want to. We can't. you know. we
want to. We want to come up with
some action items. and maybe not
tonight. because I think we're.
we're. you know. we all. I don't
know about you. but I was the
two hours I spent reading this.
There was a lot of things that
came up. but. but. you know. to
think to. you know. add. devote
a certain amount of 15 minutes
of each of the next for the
meetings for the rest of the
year to and see if. at least at
the end of each one of those. we
would have at least one action
item. if not two or three.
Heather. were you going to
Unknown: respond to that? I was.
I just have one thing really
quick. if you don't mind. I'm
sorry. I just wanted to
piggyback off of Marie Marion's
point about about doing a
statement specifically as just
my professional advice around
reinvigorating any type of
statement around inclusion. is
that to not just leave it at us
as a statement. because
statements tend to be read as
performative. like you're just
putting words on a page. So it's
always. always follow up a
statement with these are the
actions that we are taking in
order to to follow through with
the values that we are stating.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: Thank
you. Sorry. I was thinking.
yeah. I was thinking.
Heather Pineault: sorry. oh.
thank you. I was just wondering
if we might want to start the
cycle after the Select Board
meets. so that we can know
Karen Blumenfeld: because
they're meeting September 2.
okay. and our next meeting is
September 16. so that's exactly
what should happen if they don't
meet before the September 6
meeting. I completely agree we
should not have another thing
until they have a chance to talk
about it. Yeah.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: but
along the lines of. you know.
statements being performative.
And. I mean. we have statements.
it's always good to refresh. But
I was thinking that. I mean.
it's. it's not a recommendation
that we are committee do a
statement. It's that the town
make an official statement. So
the role of our committee could
be to identify. go through the
whole. the whole report. and
identify those. perhaps initial
actions that every single town
department could embrace. and we
could help to broker. getting.
essentially the signatures of
every single town department of
getting everyone on the same
page.
Karen Blumenfeld: Can we put
that on those? Up on the What's
it called? The parking lot. The
parking lot because we don't
want to be making
recommendation. We don't want to
be going there tonight. We want
to let the Select Board talk
first. But let's put that in the
parking lot. I for sure.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Do we want
to be at the some of us I can't
come on the second. but the that
a few of us are at that meeting.
So.
Karen Blumenfeld: yep. whoever
can go. should go if. if you're
planning to go. let me know.
because if we're going to have a
quorum. I might need to do
something about that. No. I
don't need to. okay. because
we're just going not unless
we're having a conversation to
listen. So it's fine. yeah. yes.
But also keep an eye on the
Select board's agenda. like.
make sure you look at the
agenda. because in case they
change it don't show up at the
meeting. you know? Yeah. All
right. So anything in Renee.
would you like to say any final
words before we we move to the
next?
Yauwu Tang: I think I let them
those recommendations and
cities. we as a group. we could
study it this month. and this
come on some idea. to see what
we really can do to have one
small step forward to those is a
big goal. I don't think we can
do the to everything or even
make it too big. that we need to
have the steps when we would see
resource recommendation. what we
can do next year. within This
year. to move forward a little
bit. I think the more people I
wish this a bit more. because
when I first of all training. I
feel much more challenged than
with who had at the
multicultural festival. because
now we face a bigger. bigger
crowd. So I think that's good.
because that is who we can learn
of different things that can
truly understand how we can move
forward to truly EDI. So I
suggest we study these the next
September we share this all
ideas.
Karen Blumenfeld: Yeah. thank
you. And in Renee. did you want
to say any final words before we
wrap this up?
Unknown: No. I'm just glad that
we are finally at this point and
and that we are committed to
moving
Karen Blumenfeld: forward Yes.
and to keeping on discussing
this. because it's very rich.
and we can't get through a road
map in 25 minutes. yes. exactly.
So we'll see what the Select
Board conversation is like. and
then continue to think about
what can we do as the HR DEP. so
thank you for reading this.
because it's a it's a big read.
It's a heavy lift. There's a lot
in here. website updates. Do we
is there anything. or should?
Can we skip over that?
Mary Ann Borkowski: I just
wanted to. so let me see. I was
thinking. Oh no. I guess. I
guess there isn't anything. you
know. I've made some changes
already. and I could just say
that before the next meeting.
we'll probably have more stuff
about the festival. So Tom and
you know it. I don't expect that
it would be controversial. So
just be talking about the
festival and and whatever's
happening in it. So that's what
will show up on it. We do have a
the next three statements are
old. all in September of 2021.
so. yeah. I was going to look
them over. They were simple
statements. But on the other
hand. you know. it's an
opportunity to think about what
we should be doing now. and
actually. well. we have the
equity audit. so I guess so
let's think about next. next
meeting. what we're going to do
about that. So maybe there that
should inform when we're reading
those statements about what
should be in there and who's at
the table looking at them. So
Karen Blumenfeld: thank you. The
next item on the agenda is the
HR deics Annual Report. which is
every town committee and this
board has to write these annual
reports that get compiled and
for the whole town. it's just a
two page thing. And what I was
Heather and I were talking about
it and wondering. we will need
to review a draft by the
September meeting. A draft has
not yet been written. And I
wondered if. There is. The way
we put this report together is
to look at we have a format. and
we look at all the minutes from
all the meetings from the past
year. and then we pull out items
that are relevant and put them
in the categories where they
belong. It's really a list of
bullets pages. Those of you
working on the festival. I'm not
asking you. I'm asking others.
if there's anybody here who
would have time and availability
in the next two weeks to help
put together a first draft of
that report to go through those
minutes and put together bullets
as a first draft. Use chat. GPT.
Heather Pineault: and all the
minutes are. all the minutes are
on the town website. so I did it
last year. and you just click
through all the minutes. just to
Janot Mendler de Suarez: use
judge the draft. yes. it will
start with. Yeah. whoo.
Yauwu Tang: I could try the chat
CBT to see if I can do something
similar. Are
Karen Blumenfeld: you willing?
Are you willing to do
Janot Mendler de Suarez: that?
It would be brilliant. Yeah. Oh
my god.
Yauwu Tang: I tried. Okay. I'm
willing to better. You know.
that's the next month is kind of
challenge. because the
Karen Blumenfeld: thing and it
would need to be done in the
next two weeks. So that's
Yauwu Tang: okay. maybe someone
else.
Karen Blumenfeld: What if I ask
you for guidance of the best.
most efficient way to do it. on
chat GPT. and then and you could
guide me how to do it? Would
that
Yauwu Tang: work? Yeah. okay.
Karen Blumenfeld: I will do
that. I know how to use chat
GPT. but I don't. but I've not
fed that much information into
it before. so that's my
question. But okay. we'll talk
offline about that. And is there
a way to get it to
Heather Pineault: format and
similarly. since it's a Tom.
Karen Blumenfeld: yeah. alright.
okay. ongoing business.
September meeting. Just want to
encourage people. if you have
So. Heather is going to lead
that meeting. I won't be here.
So if you have meeting topics.
please send them proposed
topics. Send them to Heather
between now and September.
Heather Pineault: Yeah. because
I mean to be what we talked
about was that we really didn't
have anything specific other
than the festival coming up in
October. and
Karen Blumenfeld: table. our
table. right? But
Heather Pineault: do we need a
meet. Like the question was. do
we need a meeting? Versus here's
what we need. please show up.
like a directive. not a
conversation. Is there something
that we need to all come
together for
Mary Ann Borkowski: scoping the
September meeting? Is that what
you're
Heather Pineault: suggesting?
Yeah. because as we were going
through the agenda. like we
don't. we didn't have a clear
agenda item. other than the
festival coming up.
Karen Blumenfeld: continuation
of the and now about the report?
Yeah.
Mary Ann Borkowski: I guess. um.
well. but the if the town Select
Board can has their
conversation. I think we need to
have that. You know. we can't.
We can't waste a meeting by not
having a meeting. I think
Karen Blumenfeld: if the Select
Board goes ahead and the annual
review report would have to get
reviewed. Okay. we have to Okay.
So I know September is a super
hard month for everybody who's
back to school. both teachers.
parents and others. So maybe the
meeting can be shorter. if that.
if that works. to try to really
keep it up as tight an agenda as
possible.
Yauwu Tang: anything we need to
do. for the principal is.
anything we need to approve.
Mary Ann Borkowski: we're gonna
have to think about what's on
the table.
Yauwu Tang: Do we need to
approve any budget?
Karen Blumenfeld: Oh. her budget
Yauwu Tang: last year.
Karen Blumenfeld: You need to
talk to Heather. Oh. okay. yeah.
because Denise is the new
Treasurer. and so I suggested
she talk with you. not this
moment. but Tom so you can hand
over the responsibilities to her
so she knows what to do. Yeah.
Heather Pineault: and at this
moment. because we're not doing
any of the money for the
festival. and we don't have any
money. maybe we don't have a
line item or anything at the
moment.
Karen Blumenfeld: so Okay. so
we're not managing this of the
money. No.
Heather Pineault: not that I've
heard of.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Okay. that's
why we running it through our
Denise Fortin: Wayland
Karen Blumenfeld: and then the
money from the town that the
town allocated. What happens to
that? What happens to that?
Janot Mendler de Suarez: We
would have to
Unknown: and. well. don't have
Janot Mendler de Suarez: to vote
on that. The monies would be
things that can take us. like a
30 day payment. whatever. so we
could have a vote.
Karen Blumenfeld: okay? But
didn't we vote? Did we vote
before? Or actually
Janot Mendler de Suarez: we
voted ahead to approve the
Indicative budget. I believe.
last year. So.
Karen Blumenfeld: Yeah. but I
think we need
Heather Pineault: to always
voted. We voted specific
expenditures. But did the town
give us specifically the money.
or did they say they will cover
it? So I'm not sure it has to go
through us. if it's going
through
Mary Ann Borkowski: the Tom
Wayland. and the
Janot Mendler de Suarez: invoices
go to the town. For the town.
9500 ticket items like the stage
intent should be invoiced to the
town way on stage.
Yauwu Tang: The manager this
year last year is give to our
committee with the money go to
our community this year. sounds
like Chris is the one.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: No. the
town money Yahoo is is earmarked
for the festival.
Heather Pineault: But not it's
not our festival specifically
anymore. It's multiple
Karen Blumenfeld: groups. So
yeah.
Yauwu Tang: human rights first
year. inclusion
Janot Mendler de Suarez: committee
for first inclusion committee.
Arts. Wayland isn't a town
entity. and that town government
entity. so the invoicing for
those big ticket expenditures
would need to be invoiced to the
town of Wayland and the. you
know. the tent and the stage
mental probably have. they
probably require a deposit and
then a. like. 30 day invoicing.
So that would work.
Karen Blumenfeld: So the
question. my question is. at the
September meeting. do we need to
vote?
Denise Fortin: Probably. yeah.
yeah. probably need to vote. So.
and that'll be
Karen Blumenfeld: important.
somebody will need to work with
Denise. who's the new treasurer.
to kind of because. because we
could look at last year's
meeting minute meeting agendas
to remind ourselves how we did
those goals. Yeah. yeah. So I
should
Heather Pineault: so. but 100
that the committee needs to
agree on the town's paying.
right? And if it's possible to
get a few large items. and we
can do it in one vote that we
approve the town. Yeah.
Janot Mendler de Suarez: right?
Yard signs.
Mary Ann Borkowski: yes. right.
Some publicity. some banner
production.
Yauwu Tang: winning. The signs.
few members for our members to
design in charge of for our
table. who is working we have
people from our community to
work on for our table to desire
to collect all information
Karen Blumenfeld: we're talking
about the September meeting. and
what do we like? What do we need
to vote on or talk about at the
September meeting? So. so. if
there's any so. so. just so
Heather knows when she creates
the agenda. Sounds like we're
going to have to vote on some
budget items. and you'll work
with Denise to figure out how to
put those on the agenda
Janot Mendler de Suarez: and
what. yeah. we just said the
committee table at the
Yauwu Tang: committee is the
table. We need to load anything
with that. We just
Janot Mendler de Suarez: need to
come up. Just need to talk about
it at the meeting.
Unknown: How to do it. right?
What we're going to
Karen Blumenfeld: do? Okay?
Thank you. And then just a quick
reminder. good neighbor. Day.
September 27 the library hasn't
told us if they need our. you
know. bodies on the ground to
help with anything. but I'll
email. are we co
Mary Ann Borkowski: sponsoring
that we are
Janot Mendler de Suarez: co
sponsoring. and that's 11 to one
at the library.
Karen Blumenfeld: 11 to one
September 27 at the library.
Good Neighbor day. It's a it's a
Saturday. yes. Okay. And then
any announcements and topics not
anticipated 24 hours in advance.
or whatever. 48 hours in
advance? Yes. so
Mary Ann Borkowski: the there is
a limitary discussion putting
being put on by the Hopkinton
Freedom Team and put together by
Yauwu Tang: through our a local
Mary Ann Borkowski: creator of
these events. Shaheen aktar so
and she sent me a copy of the
flyer. And we're not co
sponsoring it the so I'm asking.
Can we put that on our Facebook
page? It is being. being it's a
part of the artful connections
the social justice lens events
where artists offer music.
poetry readings and spoken word.
And this is about the book The
lemon tree. Me with two speakers
having happening in hoppington.
Karen Blumenfeld: So the lemon
tree is a book about an Israeli
and a Palestinian family. And
these. these community
conversations have been going on
around in various towns. and I'm
not sure of the answer of that.
and I don't want to give an
answer on the
Mary Ann Borkowski: fly. okay?
Karen Blumenfeld: I feel like I
need to think about that
Mary Ann Borkowski: a little
bit. Yeah. well. it happens on
the 16th. That's 16th of
September. so and so. I don't
know well. and I don't know if
we'd come up with a rule
Karen Blumenfeld: it's not an
event in Wayland. you know. it's
a Hopkinton event. So. I mean.
we've been. we've been putting
on facebook event. We've been
putting on our Facebook site.
Wayland. events that are not
ours. but Hopkinton. I mean.
it's a little far. so I'm just
not. I don't know. I don't want
to answer it on the fly. Well.
it's
Heather Pineault: interesting
conversation for us to have
about how much we promote. You
know. why or why? Why would we.
or why wouldn't we? Why
Karen Blumenfeld: we have our
criteria for
Heather Pineault: for CO
sponsoring. co
Karen Blumenfeld: sponsoring.
but this is a different thing.
yeah? Well.
Mary Ann Borkowski: site. yeah.
we know what we be a co
sponsorship or on
Heather Pineault: the Facebook
page.
Karen Blumenfeld: Don't know
yeah for posting to Facebook. My
instinct is offhand. is to say
no. in part. just because it's
far away. but also because it's
the type of topic that we would
spend some time discussing
before doing something.
Mary Ann Borkowski: right? So
not an announcement and topic
not anticipated. like. for
Karen Blumenfeld: example. if
you were asking if. if lemon
tree discussion were being done
here in Wayland. we would put
that on the agenda. and we'd
talk about the pros and the
cons. Because it is. it's about
a topic that's a difficult
topic. It it has religion
involved. Like. we would be
looking through our criteria and
thinking about it carefully. We
wouldn't just say. Oh yeah.
let's do that. Thank you. Okay.
any other topics not
anticipated? Okay. really.
really appreciate the
thoughtfulness of this group and
your willingness to tackle
difficult subjects in a public
forum. which this is. even
though it feels like just us. it
is a public forum. So just so
much appreciation to everyone
here.
Mary Ann Borkowski: Thank you
for leading us.
Karen Blumenfeld: So would
somebody move to adjourn? Let's
give someone else. attorney to
make a motion. How about someone
online? Would somebody move to
adjourn? Yahoo is moving to
adjourn. Is there a second?
Online?
Denise Fortin: Second?
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you.
Asma is secondary. Let us vote
Yahoo. Yes. Yes. SARAH Yes.
Maryam. yes. Asma. yes. Maya
Yes. Heather Yes. Jen No. yes.
Marianne. yes. Denise Yes. And
Karen Yes. so the meeting is
adjourned. Thank you so much.
everybody. You.
Watch with transcript (12 meetings)
- September 15, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- July 21, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- June 16, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- May 19, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- April 21, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- March 17, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- February 17, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- January 20, 2026 - HRDEI Committee
- December 16, 2025 - HRDEI Committee
- November 18, 2025 - HRDEI Committee
- October 21, 2025 - HRDEI Committee
- 16-Sep-25 - HRDEI Committee
Joint EDC Fincom Meeting
November 17, 2025 - Joint EDC Fincom Meeting
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
LWV Issues Forum
April 29, 2026 - LWV Issues Forum
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
Municipal Affordable Housing Trust
Watch with transcript (6 meetings)
MWRA Connection and PFAS Treatment Project – MEPA Meeting
November 18, 2025 - MWRA Connection and PFAS Treatment Project - MEPA Meeting
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
Personnel Board
Watch with transcript (10 meetings)
PiP Meeting – Former DPW Site
July 30, 2026 - PiP Meeting - Former DPW Site
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
Planning Board
September 9, 2026 - Planning Board02:32:48
August 26, 2026 - Planning Board01:33:31
July 22, 2026 - Planning Board33:25
July 8, 2026 - Planning Board01:43:14
June 10, 2026 - Planning Board02:42:18
May 27, 2026 - Planning Board01:15:30
May 13, 2026 - Planning Board02:46:20
April 29, 2026 - Planning Board02:37:32
April 15, 2026 - Planning Board02:43:02
March 25, 2026 - Planning Board02:38:20
March 11, 2026 - Planning Board02:25:14
February 25, 2026 - Planning Board02:24:32
February 11, 2026 - Planning Board02:10:22
February 9, 2026 - Planning Board48:13
January 28, 2026 - Planning Board02:48:45
January 7, 2026 - Planning Board
December 29, 2025 - Planning Board01:52:10
December 17, 2025 - Planning Board
December 10, 2025 - Planning Board02:35:45
December 3, 2025 - Planning Board
November 19, 2025 - Planning Board01:59:16
November 12, 2025 - Planning Board
October 29, 2025 - Planning Board02:16:21
10-15-25 - Planning Board03:36:09
17-Sep-25 - Planning Board02:05:07
10-Sep-25 - Planning Board01:42:45
27-Aug-25 - Planning Board02:27:46
13-Aug-25 - Planning Board02:31:01
Watch with transcript (26 meetings)
- September 9, 2026 - Planning Board
- August 26, 2026 - Planning Board
- July 22, 2026 - Planning Board
- July 8, 2026 - Planning Board
- June 10, 2026 - Planning Board
- May 27, 2026 - Planning Board
- May 13, 2026 - Planning Board
- April 29, 2026 - Planning Board
- April 15, 2026 - Planning Board
- March 25, 2026 - Planning Board
- March 11, 2026 - Planning Board
- February 25, 2026 - Planning Board
- February 11, 2026 - Planning Board
- February 9, 2026 - Planning Board
- January 28, 2026 - Planning Board
- January 7, 2026 - Planning Board
- December 29, 2025 - Planning Board
- December 17, 2025 - Planning Board
- December 10, 2025 - Planning Board
- December 3, 2025 - Planning Board
- November 19, 2025 - Planning Board
- November 12, 2025 - Planning Board
- October 29, 2025 - Planning Board
- 17-Sep-25 - Planning Board
- 10-Sep-25 - Planning Board
- 27-Aug-25 - Planning Board
Recreation Commission
Watch with transcript (8 meetings)
Route 20 South Landfill Visioning Committee
Watch with transcript (4 meetings)
School Committee
September 9, 2026 - School Committee01:53:54
August 24, 2026 - School Committee
August 3, 2026 - School Committee02:27
June 24, 2026 - School Committee
June 10, 2026 - School Committee
May 27, 2026 - School Committee01:11:24
May 13, 2026 - School Committee
April 29, 2026 - School Committee
April 8, 2026 - School Committee
March 25, 2026 - School Committee
March 13, 2026 - School Committee25:06
February 25, 2026 - School Committee
February 11, 2026 - School Committee36:58
February 4, 2026 - School Committee01:37:18
February 2, 2026 - School Committee01:41:40
January 27, 2026 - School Committee01:50:47
January 7, 2026 - School Committee
December 17, 2025 - School Committee
December 3, 2025 - School Committee02:03:47
November 5, 2025 - School Committee01:36:24
October 22, 2025 - School Committee01:38:03
8-Oct-25 - School Committee01:12:40
24-Sep-25 - School Committee52:45
10-Sep-25 - School Committee01:57:59
18-Aug-25 - School Committee02:39:05
Watch with transcript (23 meetings)
- September 9, 2026 - School Committee
- August 24, 2026 - School Committee
- August 3, 2026 - School Committee
- June 24, 2026 - School Committee
- June 10, 2026 - School Committee
- May 27, 2026 - School Committee
- May 13, 2026 - School Committee
- April 29, 2026 - School Committee
- April 8, 2026 - School Committee
- March 25, 2026 - School Committee
- March 13, 2026 - School Committee
- February 25, 2026 - School Committee
- February 11, 2026 - School Committee
- February 4, 2026 - School Committee
- February 2, 2026 - School Committee
- January 27, 2026 - School Committee
- January 7, 2026 - School Committee
- December 17, 2025 - School Committee
- December 3, 2025 - School Committee
- November 5, 2025 - School Committee
- October 22, 2025 - School Committee
- 10-Sep-25 - School Committee
- 18-Aug-25 - School Committee
Select Board
September 8, 2026 - Select Board01:41:51
August 31, 2026 - Select Board02:32:12
August 13, 2026 - Select Board09:33
July 20, 2026 - Select Board
July 7, 2026 - Select Board02:08:13
June 29, 2026 - Select Board
June 15, 2026 - Select Board02:17:29
June 8, 2026 - Select Board18:16
June 1, 2026 - Select Board
May 18, 2026 - Select Board
April 27, 2026 - Select Board02:40:50
April 13, 2026 - Select Board02:59:01
March 30, 2026 - Select Board02:23:41
March 23, 2026 - Select Board17:30
March 16, 2026 - Select Board02:48:45
March 9, 2026 - Select Board
March 2, 2026 - Select Board
February 23, 2026 - Select Board
February 13, 2026 - Select Board09:54
February 9, 2026 - Select Board
February 2, 2026 - Select Board
January 20, 2026 - Select Board02:32:53
January 14, 2026 - Select Board01:26:40
January 5, 2026 - Select Board
December 19, 2025 - Select Board01:14:35
December 15, 2025 - Select Board
December 1, 2025 - Select Board02:23:57
November 17, 2025 - Select Board
November 3, 2025 - Select Board02:48:26
October 24, 2025 - Select Board29:00
October 20, 2025 - Select Board03:00:17
6-Oct-25 - Select Board02:15:37
09-29-25 - Select Board02:48:35
09-24-25 - Select Board01:25:37
15-Sep-25 - Select Board03:27:40
2-Sep-25 - Select Board03:17:11
18-Aug-25 - Select Board03:10:44
Carol Martin: Good evening.
Carol. Can chair the Select
Board. I'm calling the meeting
of the Select Board to order for
Wednesday. September 24 2025 at
6pm It's a hybrid meeting.
although we are physically in
Wayland. town building. Select
Board meeting room. One may
watch with the meeting link that
can be found on our calendar
pursuant to chapter two of the
acts of 2025 this meeting will
be conducted in person and via
remote means. in accordance with
Africa law. this meeting may be
recorded which will be made
available to the public as soon
on WayCAM. as soon after the
meeting as is practical when
required by law or allowed by
the chair. Persons wishing to
provide public comment or
otherwise participate in the
meeting may do so by in person
attendance. by accessing the
remote meeting remotely. as
noted above on the Wayland
calendar. we respect request.
Why I'm rushing today? Public
comment be limited to two
minutes per person. So the
agenda for tonight is going to
include announcements and public
comment. and approximately 610
we will have a joint meeting
with the finance committee and
the school committee to discuss
the fiscal year 2027. project
task force strategies that will
be followed by a discussion
review and possible to request
of the finance committee make a
recommendation on a possible
debt exclusion vote. We will
discuss review and potential
vote to amend the town of
Wayland non union employee sick
leave policy. We will discuss
review and potentially vote to
issue a bands versus bonds. and
also the vote on the DEP
reclassification of the
department come with works
facility at 66 River Road. There
are no topics not reasonably
anticipated 48 hours in advance.
and hopefully at six. 735
hopefully 730 we will adjourn.
So do we have. I would like to
recognize that in the room with
me this evening. we have Bill
Whitney and Doug Levine. So Mr.
We are joined by Anne brensley.
She's on. I see that I'm here my
there. Good evening. joined by
Anne bransley. remotely. Mr. Fay
will not be able to join us this
evening. We are also joined in
the room by our town manager
Michael McCall and remotely by
our assistant town manager.
Kelsi callous Spirlet. All
right. so are there? Is there
any public comment in the room.
I see But is there any online?
No online. Okay. Is there any
announcements?
Unknown: Okay. I would just note
that the today's edition of the
central register has the
request. request information
with respect to the property at
212 Cochituate road that has
been put together by the 212
Cochituate road Advisory
Committee seeking responses.
Finally. later than October 16.
the notion being to just alert
experienced developers and
service providers of housing for
people with disabilities to get
a sense of what they would
propose For the site. the
committee would then review
that. I think. help inform
recommendations that would be
made to this board in the
spring. after which the Board
may wish to issue an RFP more
specific.
Carol Martin: that property.
Thank you. Um. Mr. McCall. did
you have any announcements?
Michael McCall: Nothing
specific. Madam Chair. other
than to remind people. week from
this Saturday will be our
Wayland festival. I encourage
people to check out on the
website. Be held over at Town
Center. and it will be a
combination of the arts Wayland
festival and multicultural
festival. as well as touch a
truck events. So it should be a
good time. And it's my
understanding for Mr. Reynolds.
it is rain or shock.
Carol Martin: I was also going
to speak to that and but one
thing that I'm not sure I was
able to ascertain was what time
is the parade. the 258 parade. I
saw different times. Time was
like 10 to four or something. I
didn't tend to six and stuff
six. But does anybody know what
time the parade is running those
things? Okay. well. guess what?
Maybe we'll find out and
announce that on Monday night as
well. So anybody else have any
announcements? Okay? So. So we
are running about five minutes
ahead. and I wanted to. I'll
move down to number five in the
path of here. but I need Mike to
come back and do this agenda
item. So do you think if you
have to leave me. or Would you.
could you talk about policy
Michael McCall: school committee
called. They were nearly and
they thought we may be meeting
up there. but I said the hybrid
was down here. so they're on
their way down.
Carol Martin: Okay. so within
five minutes. and we were
wondering if you wanted to speak
to number five. discuss review
and potential vote to amend the
town of Wayland non union.
really sickly policy. which is
in our packet.
Michael McCall: So what I am
asking the board's approval here
is for a single amendment. not a
complete rewrite of the policy.
So last spring. a town meeting.
we repealed the bulk of chapter
43 which was our former
personnel board bylaws. we
repealed some language. we put
in new language. and one of the
things was that. after reviewing
this. it appeared we had policy
inside the bylaws. so we chose
to remove the policy. and the
intent was to integrate it back
in and update our policies and
put them on the website.
Currently. our website is
showing a an older policy on
vacation buy back from the year
2000 there was a vote from the
personnel board and an amendment
to the bylaw in 2016 changing
the numbers. And the intent was
that we would put that back in
the policy. It hadn't yet
happened. And we had some people
approach retirement that would
some under that the 20 years of
service and one over 20 years of
service. speaking with town
council to ensure we weren't
violating any policy. And now
that we don't have the bylaw.
they recommended that I have the
board make this one amendment
with the understanding that we
will go back with the you know.
consult with the personnel board
HR and update the overall
policy. But because I have
people before me right now who
are in the process of going
through retirement. we want to
ensure that we don't treat
anybody unfairly. and would like
to have this amendment. I have
received some feedback online
from some folks that said that
other items need to be changed.
We are aware of that. but for
the purposes of handling the
individual or individuals before
us. we just need this minor and
Carol Martin: more just one
second. All right. any questions
from the board. what we're
trying to accomplish here we
went to the next we'll be trying
to switch one actually. hold on
with us. Yeah. Did everybody
understand what Michael was
saying? Does anybody else have
any questions on what's trying
to accomplish here? So we're
really not approving the policy.
We're just making a couple
amendments. and so maybe on the
bottom it would just say a
Select Board amendment.
September. 2425 it's crossed
out. and then the amounts have
changed. right? Michael. just.
we're just.
Michael McCall: we're putting
the the lines from the 2016
bylaw into the policy. and we'll
display it on the website and
then follow it so that we've
treated the retirees fairly that
we're going through the process.
When this happened again. this I
did consult town council about
how to deal with this. We
thought this was a fair and
equitable solution. please.
Unknown: I think this is fine.
You did get an email. however.
that pointed out in the fifth
paragraph that presently reads.
When a permanent employee
retires or dies. his or her
beneficiary shall receive so if
the permanent employee retires
but does not die. presumably. he
or she would receive pay equal
and likewise. if the permanent
employee dies. So I might just
change the language slightly to
reflect that correction.
Michael McCall: Am I to
interpret that if you were to
pass this as Mr. What you would
like that you would leave me to
craft that language with
Council. to clear that up. Is
that what you're suggesting.
Unknown: sure. or I can propose
language. but I think if we
could authorize you to work with
council. To address that and to
I would move that we would
approve this change subject to
that correction. which we had
asked the manager to make. in
consultation with Tom Council.
Carol Martin: Okay. great. Thank
you. So now in discussion. are
there any other questions from
all the board members?
Doug Levine: I just noted that
we received an email from the
personnel board. but she had
mentioned that she connected
with you on the phone
Carol Martin: before I had read
the packet. which I clearly
stated. but and I have Michael
and I have had a couple
conversations about this. and I
think he has explained that he
will this was an oversight
initially. We're just correcting
something so the policies in
place and that he will. uh.
adjust the language and go back
to personnel board. right like
me.
Michael McCall: we will try and
update the most recent version
to put this in there. in I can
consult with Miss. She believe
afterwards from the personnel
board would put the last policy
was that maybe one going back to
2016 the 2016 language does
appear one place in the website.
and then there is a link to an
older policy. So we have to
clear that up same time. So this
Carol Martin: actually is an
issue we've brought up on other
things. and that as we are
hoping. we go forward. and
Michael actually is just going
to indulge me for a second. It's
actually got a plan in place I'm
hoping to implement where we
actually end up starting to
update our website. So this kind
of issue. where things are in
two and three places. will go
away. All right. If there's not
any further discussion. I'm
going to have a vote. We have to
be roll call. because Ian's
persist. I mean. so may I ask
that was Bill and Dave. okay?
Bill. yes. yes. Dan. yes. Thank
you. And Carol. Yes. Motion
passes four zero. Michael. thank
you. Madam Chair. Okay. our
pleasure. So we now we'd like to
do is have a turn our attention
to the main purpose for
tonight's meeting. and it is. I
want to thank the board for
coming in at such short notice.
and I do apologize that we
weren't able to get the full
five. full five members. but
we've got four of us. so thank
you very much. So we didn't have
a joint meeting. Finance
Committee and the school
committee. as I mentioned
earlier. to discuss the FY 27
budget task for strategies.
including. but not limited to
recommendations regarding
financing River Road and a
borrowing and DEP plan. Doesn't
say it on the agenda. but we are
inviting Mr. Kevin me to join
us. who will make the give us a
slide presentation. But before
you do that. I want to recognize
the school committee. and in
particular the chair Miss
Gibbons and beyond. call to
order. Or do you need to call to
order? We're all set. You're all
set. I want to mention there's a
chair here. If there's a school
committee member or somebody
wants to sit over here. Dr.
bless. there's one next to me.
You want to anybody wants to
move up from the school
committee. that's fine. The
slide deck. I believe. is hard
copies there. although it's
going to be up on the screen.
And for the Finance Committee. I
believe they don't have a
quorum. but I want to recognize
Phil Judy seems to chair him.
and so method. and am I good for
Unknown: that? Yes. thank you.
Carol.
Carol Martin: Thank you
appreciate it. and think then
we're good. So Brian. we
normally. as I mentioned early
in the when we put together the
slide deck that we ordinarily
like to have a few slides and
have more time for discussion.
Very every full slide. DEP.
excuse me. yes. since usually
when there is a school committee
meeting. people have like. two
minutes public speaking. This is
a Select Board meeting. and
we've had public comment
already. So am I okay? Yeah. we
have it on the agenda for after
this portion of our meeting.
Unknown: This after this up
there. we'll have public
comment.
That's fine. just asking.
Carol Martin: Okay. so I want to
ask the board. do we would. It's
21 slides. and we do. Everyone
know watching that the slide
deck was changed slightly. and I
think the current one is version
six is going is in the
supplemental packet that came
out today. So if you're trying
to follow along. that's what.
yeah. what is the board's
pleasure? Do we? Do we want Ryan
to run through the whole deck?
Or do we would like him to
Unknown: anticipate the
presentation I'll probably get
through this in 12 minutes.
Would you like him to stop as I
go Bill much more discussion
about the topic.
Carol Martin: All right? The
floor is yours. Brian. I figure
out where
Michael McCall: Madam Chair. if
I may. I'd just like to think of
some introductory remarks. First
of all. I want to thank you the
members of the board. the school
committee. the Finance
Committee. the audience at home.
as well as the other members of
the community here this evening.
as you know. Mr. Kevin and I
have been working hard over the
last couple of years to deliver
balanced budgets to the
community within our current
Levy. The last few years through
level budgeting. and last year.
working in collaboration with Dr
Fleischman. we were able to make
some cuts in the end. which
ended in some reductions in
staff. and we delivered a
balanced budget in both FY 25
and FY 26 due to an unexpected
down Tom in our health insurance
numbers. we wound up with some
excess levy capacity at the end
of last year. and Mr. Kevin and
I felt that we might be able to
go one more year without having
to come to the community for an
override. And we feel we've been
responsible and good stewards
with the community. and we've.
I've instituted a hiring freeze.
We again working with Dr
Fleischman. we tried to be
responsible with our budgeting.
and as we have in the last two
years. we put together a budget
Working Group shortly after the
end of the fiscal year. many of
those members are here this
evening. Madam Chair. as you
know. you've been part of this
group. Mr. Kemeny. me. We've had
Dr Fleischman. as well as his
business manager. Christine
Patterson. We've had Phil judici
from the finance committee.
We've had representatives from
the school community. including
Aaron Mueller and Aaron Givens.
the chair who's here. We've had
past members of boards.
including Kathy Steinberg and
Brian he and what we set out to
do is to see where we would be
for FY 27 starting some
modeling. Mr. Kevin worked with
a lot of the department heads to
get some preliminary numbers.
and from the outset. it started
to look like we were going to
have a more challenging year
than we had in the past. We use
some of our worst case scenario
numbers. putting in 12% for
health care. although we had a
better year last year. we put in
some numbers. get conservative
estimates for state aid. and
when we came down to it. it
appears that we may have a $1.8
million shortfall. after which
we set out to look at some
strategies which we have shared
with the board. We have two
different strategies of helping
to close that gap. One.
converting some existing levy
debt to excluded debt in the
other some refinancing of our
bond anticipation notes and
bombing of some of our debt. I
will say that the town has not
had to have an operating
override in over 10 years. We
have to go back to 2013 and some
of the reasons we have been
fortunate is we had some new
growth all the oxbow rivers edge
by another name. We also were a
foundation aid community for a
period of time. so that helped
us with our state aid but we've
had some changes since then. We
haven't experienced the new
growth that we have had in
recent years. We went back to
being a minimum aid community.
and we haven't really had the
fortune of the new growth. as I
said. but that's been compounded
by dramatic increases in some of
our non discretionary expenses.
such as our health care. our
pension. our OPEB. which is
Other Post Employment Benefits
for our retirees. So we've had
this perfect storm of events
that has unfortunately led us to
eating into our levy capacity.
And for those who don't know.
we're allowed to raise our taxes
each year under Proposition two
and a half up to our levy
capacity and over time. without
the new growth increasing two
and a half percent. we've come
to the point where we've hit
that. that threshold where we
can't raise taxes without
looking at some of these other
strategies. Unless we have some
change in our new growth.
changes in state aid. we foresee
this to be a potential problem
for the next few years. And so
as we work with this budget task
force or budget working group.
we felt prudent to come before
the three boards explain where
we are and what our financial
picture looks like for the next
couple of years. And so
momentarily. I will turn this
over to Mr. Kevin for further
discussion and to walk you
through these slides. But this
is a projection. It doesn't mean
it's certain that it will go
this way. It could break our way
some years. some years it could
go the other way. but we have to
start acting now. I've had a lot
of. Conversations with the
budget working group as well as
individuals on that about what
we can do. and we want to work
together with the community.
with this particular group. and
possibly create a task force to
look at what we will need to do
if we have to call for an
operating override. And the
strategy that we have worked on
Mr. Kevin and I. is that we
would like to avoid an operating
override this coming fiscal year
for a multitude of reasons. One.
all of us are going into
collective bargaining. It would
really help us with our numbers
if we could settle our contracts
and know what we need to ask
from the community. Two. we may
be looking for a debt exclusion
next year to do some of the
repairs on this building. Three.
as many of you know. we're
facing a potential $38.5 million
project to join the MWRA to deal
with the PFAS in our water. So
there are reasons why we think
it would be beneficial for us to
get through this year. focus on
those other large financial
tasks. and then put together a
thoughtful proposal for the
community. which may be a one to
three year override. so that we
can work on other strategies
down the road. looking at how we
can encourage new growth.
taxable new growth. because a
lot of people see growth in the
town. but some of the large
projects come before us.
nonprofits. some of the schools
and the religious institutions.
how we can better manage
budgets. how we can take
advantage of technology and
other ways to generate revenue.
We've already tried some under
the leadership of the board. as
well as Mr. Kevin and my staff.
looking back at our licenses and
fees. We also have some new
staff that have come on in
facilities and IT and we want to
look at how we are doing our
purchasing. a closer eye on some
of our large software contracts.
So there are things that we we
can do to help minimize these
but we want to get through this
upcoming fiscal year first. So
on that note. I will hand it
over to Mr. Kemeny to walk you
through the presentation. which
has been the culmination of the
work so far over the summer.
looking at these strategies and
the FY 27
Unknown: budget. Mr.
Kemeny. good evening.
Brian Keveny: The presentation
tonight really is to the efforts
of this working group that we
put together. We even met this
morning. and we find this
project without everybody
chipping in that Mike just
alluded to this project. this
presentation. I wouldn't have
been brought to be so I'm going
to go through the slides. Stop
me with any questions. Sometimes
I go through this and I don't
get questions. But if you're
confused with something or want
clarity. please just ask. So the
very first slide is really our
group's intent to set to show
the status of Wayland
financially. Now let me explain
what this graph is saying. On
the far left hand side. you see
the stacks in black. Those
relate to fiscal 23 to 26 where
we had surplus levy starting in
fiscal 27 through fiscal 36 you
see red negatives on the bottom
of the red. you see blue that
relates to the DPW debt service
that's funded by levy debt. On
the very far right. you see the
black going up back into the
black. That means that the
Middlesex retirement
appropriation is expected to be
fully funded. So we are
expecting Middlesex
appropriation to fall off the
budget in fiscal 37 so this
graph here is trying to display
exactly what Wayland is facing
in the future. I know we here to
talk about fiscal 27 but this is
really the real issue that is
going on.
Carol Martin: Are we successful
signed out. Do we have to stop?
Like clockwork. it happens every
time I think
Unknown: what he's doing is he's
starting the other end of the
building.
Zoom Zoom is working fine. If
that helps
Brian Keveny: you see it. okay.
yes. hopefully you can
Unknown: see the screen. Well.
yes. I can. Okay.
so. so let's. let's keep
Brian Keveny: So this graph is
an effort to show folks exactly
the condition of the town. We're
heading into years of structural
deficits where expenses are
exceeding revenues.
Carol Martin: Kelly. this. since
you can't see that. there's some
hard copy over here if you want.
Sorry.
Brian Keveny: Brian. so. Uh.
also you see in fiscal 27 it's
the smallest deficit. That's
what we're here to talk about
tonight with the Selectmen. To
have two options in front of
them. Michael described before
to alleviate an override 27 but
you can clearly see. in fiscal
28 through 2636 it's going to be
impossible to fund a budget
without overrides. We simply
don't have revenue streams
coming in with new growth. state
aid. local receipts to offset
the growth and expenses. So
structurally. we have to come up
with solutions that are going to
solve the problem in the next 10
years. As Michael said. our hope
was to get past 27 and then
develop a plan to develop
structural improvements to our
structural deficit. This graph
here is the efforts of the group
to show in one screen exactly
where we stand. and this affects
the town of school and the
unclassified budgets. This graph
was developed by projecting out
expected increases in expenses
on the town budget. the school
budget. unclassified. We did
projections on the prop two and
a half. and we looked at the new
growth areas. So all these bar
graphs really relate to numbers
that we're going to get into a
little bit later on the screen.
But this was our best effort to
show the folks what we're really
looking at. What we're really
looking at here is beyond 27
we're looking at really to 36 to
come up with solutions. though.
we don't have to go back to the
town every single year for
overrides. whether that's a
single override or a monthly
year. So that's really the
financial condition of the town.
So any questions on this graph?
So here is a bullet point of
some of the things that are
affecting the town. and I go
through them. Wayland is one of
14 communities in Massachusetts
that Moody's has rated as a
triple A community. We have
strong financial disciplines.
and we continue to spend at or
below annual budgets. meaning
that we don't fully expend our
budgets. we return unspent
appropriations in the form of
free cash. so we're able to
find. for the most part.
capital. So don't. we don't
fully expend all of our
appropriations. we continue to
need to fund on unfunded pension
liabilities. As I say. middle
such retirement funding is still
10 years away. So we're expected
to be fully funded to 2000 at
2036 however. in the past.
Wayland used to get a 3%
increase in the assessment. then
a six. and that was historically
how it went. 3636. they've
changed that now to six and nine
and a half. and six and nine and
a half. So our appropriations.
from now until it's fully
funded. will be at a greater
percent than what we've seen
previously. So Middlesex wants
to be fully funded in 36 and the
only way to do that is increase
the assessments that all the
member communities are going to
pay. We're minimal. We have
minimal commercial sector where
95% of the town revenue is
dependent on residential tax.
Now that residential tax figure.
if you compare that to peer
towns. Wayland is one of the
highest. So on tax recap. we
have residential tax.
commercial. industrial and
personal property. Our
residential number is at the
high end in comparison to our
pier towns. I relatively have a
high tax rate compared to peer
towns. albeit a medium tax bill.
So our average tax bill is more
comparable with our peer towns.
We have uncertain state support.
and we have federal challenges
that were apparently unknown at
this point. We have uncertain
employee costs with Tom school
labor unions still unfilled. and
we still have the fire contract
that's not been settled. which
goes back for 2425 and 26 so
Michael is currently working on
the labor contracts. and they
all expire at the end of this
fiscal year. Health care
expenditures are uniquely
uncertain with one time savings
taken in fiscal 26 and again.
here's another one of our
largest budgets that typically
runs 10. 10 million. 9 million.
Unexpectedly last year we got an
increase of less than 3% the
year before we got a 10% so this
thing is very volatile in our
budget. In our projections.
we're counting 12% it may be a
conservative number. maybe too
high. but given what we've seen
in the past. we're currently
carrying a 12% number. That
number is not going to be trued
up until February. But for now.
purposes of building our budget.
we're going to maintain we also
have a pending substantial $38
million investment with the MWRA
that affects everybody's tax
bill in the town. whether it's
in water bill. whether he paying
taxes you're paying water bills.
Fact. the matter is. it affects
the family's finances. So if we
move to the next file. any
questions on that. sorry. I'm
going to go through. Is
estimated revenue. We're going
to go through the 10 year
financial forecast. We're going
to talk about the fiscal 27
budget forecast. and we've
included a lot of the slides
that we're going to present
tonight in appendix. I'm not
going to go through the details
of a one of them. however. it
depends upon the group's
preview. If we want to talk
about some we will. but I'm
going to go through the slides.
allude to the appendix. If you
have questions on there. we're
certainly happy to answer them.
So the general fund revenue
really comes from these areas.
Here it is real estate and
personal property tax. state
aid. local receipts. And we get
transfers from enterprise funds
and revolving funds. and every
once in a while we get a grant.
It's one time revenue that we
use to either allocate towards a
capital project or some other
endeavor. Those are two and five
between this next slide here is
a slide I've used for probably
over five years running. Now it
seems to work well. so let me
just show you what the intent
here is. on the left hand side
is really the prop two and a
half calculation. It really
starts with last year's
priority. a number which was 89
point 3 million. To that you add
the standard two and a half
percent prop two and a half
increase. new growth is
highlighted in yellow at 400.000
for this reason. in our original
forecast. we were carrying well
over $500.000 for new growth
because we got it last year. The
assessor has come back and said
that that trend now is around
400.000 so we originally started
our budget group in July. we
were carrying over 500 we've now
brought that down to 400 we'll
get into new growth in a bit.
But that's an important
barometer. because new growth
goes into the prop two and a
half calculation. As you bring
in new growth. it increases your
ability to raise the overall
prop two and a half max limit.
And we'll get into that a bit.
So the next highlighting one is
important. It's the annual Max
levy limit. It's at 96 point 2
million. That's the number we're
projecting. Is the most amount
of money Wayland can raise in
fiscal 27 tax recap is 96 point
2 million. State aid is 99.5
historical. we've always gotten
additional state aid. It hasn't
been a year where it went back
or we didn't get anything at
all. Every single year. we get
additional state aid. mostly
that's in the form of chapter 70
reimbursement. There is a
appendix in the back. if you
want to take a look at the
trend. But in our forecast.
we're projecting state aid will
increase about $250.000 a year.
We don't want to be too
optimistic on that and put in
too much. and then stay come
back and keep us at a more level
amount. so we're conservative on
that one. The next one is. is
local receipts. The number in
there is 6.1 that that's a good
story. A couple last year. the
town. along with the Selectmen.
put in increases on a lot of the
fees that the Tom town is sold.
and we're seeing the higher
volume come in. So that's a
growth area for the town.
However. every time I get to the
tax recap with Dor. they only
let me go up amount at an amount
that's reasonably above what we
actually brought in the year
before. I can't go to dor and
say I want a 10% increase on
Luke receipts. The only way
that's going to happen is if I
can prove I had that in the
prior year. So they only want to
take last year's actual which
will be fiscal 26 and only let
us go up about two and a half
percent. That's why it's
important to have a very good
fiscal 26 that's why we put in
the rate increases. we've had
good growth of multi vehicle.
The last couple of years. We've
had new growth. or not growth.
but we've had good results from
an investment income. That's for
the most part. because we've had
a borrowing of the COA of $11
million and as that project was
being built. we put a lot of
that money into investment
vehicles to income. We're not
going to have that kind of
revenue going forward. because
we're simply not going to have
that kind of money laying around
in a bond. So that brings us to
a total. Total is. sorry. we got
1.4 million. but transfer some
of the funds. you know. we
appropriate about 2.5 million of
free cash. So we're looking at
about 115.000.000.9
Unknown: in total
Brian Keveny: ability to fund
budgets in 27 new growth. This
is a information dor the Wayland
Post ran this. I believe. a week
ago. or maybe a few weeks ago in
the paper. On the left hand
side. it shows that Wayland was
ranked 312 in new growth. Now.
the metric here is they take new
growth as a percentage a
priority. so they get a level
playing field with all the
different communities. Every
community is not the same. You
know. Wayland is not the same as
Wakefield or Quincy. So the. The
barometer to level everything is
that new growth as a percentage
of prior levy the willow rack
ranks 312. out of 365 on the
right hand side. in comparison
to AAA. Towns were ranked last.
Cambridge is. you know.
approaching over so they're
Cambridge. for example. their
new growth is 3% of the prior we
all know Cambridge has a lot of
industry and new growth. but
hopefully this metric kind of
levels things if you take a look
at it. So what is comparable?
You could probably take a look
at Weston. like. what is more
comparable to Wayland? Weston?
Maybe Cronkite. probably not.
Brookline. maybe Winchester. I
wouldn't say Belmont. So when
you look at the AAA communities.
and when Moody's raised these
because of certain metrics as
well. they don't rate Wayland is
AAA community because of its new
growth. They don't do that.
However. if you want to compare
Wayland comparison to our other
AAA towns. That's one metric.
You can use any questions on
that. So here's the local
receipts. I talked about it
briefly. I wanted to keep this
as a slide. On the left hand
side. you see the different
areas of local receipts. Mostly
that's right in motor vehicle.
Motor vehicle drives the bus on
local receipts. just like in
state aid. Chapter 70 runs is
drives the bus. That's the
biggest revenue stream in state
aid is chapter 70 on the right
hand side just shows. basically
our projections. we're expecting
sustained good growth in local
receipts. mostly because we
continue to see good growth in
motor vehicle Plus. we're hoping
that the increases on the fees
really helps the town. So as we
get into the forecast. So the
forecast that we're going to go
over is a 10 year revenue and
expense forecast. We're going to
estimate the surplus deficit and
surplus and deficit and levy.
We're going to estimate the tax
levy and the year to year tax
increase. We're going to talk
about the enterprise funds and
revolving funds briefly. and
we're going to get into fiscal
27 revenue and expense forecast.
which includes the total town.
school and unclassified budgets.
and now we're going to talk
about the fiscal 27 revenue
deficit. We wanted to first
start with this graph here to
really show you what the town
has been doing since 2016 to
2026 so the growth rate over 10
years is 4% the growth rate in
the last five years is 4.61 the
years between 2016 through 2020
for example. one 4% it was a
little bit less. So
historically. the town has been
around the 4% average. If you go
back to 10 years. this is what
we're averaging our projection.
When we see it is over five.
It's over five because we're
carrying big assumptions on some
of these items. We haven't had a
single year in these years where
health insurance went up 12% so
this is where the town
historically is actually
budgeted their expenses.
Michael McCall: And for those
who want a little more
explanation in the tendency in
the appendix on slide number 17.
you can look we broke out what
our retirement and our payroll
and health care. So you can see
that healthcare is been on a
steady increase. and that is
what has been lifting up our
overall budget numbers these
last few years.
Brian Keveny: So this next slide
is a take from the very first
slide that we went over. A lot
of the numbers you saw on the
first slide came from this
chart. Obviously. it's a very
busy job. but I'm going to point
to the important areas. You have
11 years here that have
projections. and their
projections based on assumptions
and spending. Again. we have
health insurance at 12% pension
is going from 6% to 9% and back
to six to nine we're carrying
general insurance at 10% we've
mapped in here debt service.
Right now. currently. we have a
capital plan that only covers
the next four years. so I put in
some assumptions on what the
capital expenses may be. instead
of them having just fall off the
chart completely. That's
unrealistic. So there are
assumptions in here on debt
service. We probably missed
adjusting the excluded debt
portion. because there's going
to be debt service in the
upcoming years. It's going to be
funded by excluded debt. But
that won't materially change
what we're looking at here. So
you're looking at five years.
and the first highlights in red
and yellow are the area
percentages. Now we. Went over
slide that was less than 5%
always keep in mind. we've got
some very conservative numbers
in our expenses. We don't have
labor contracts. Then we have
some of our unclassifieds at the
high end than they've ever been.
The next row to look at is you
the tax increase. This does not
have anything related to the
MWRA. This is the town budget.
You see them around 6% you know.
5% five and a half percent. So I
wanted schools done school. This
is a this is the budget. So the
tax rate theories. based on our
assumptions. would be around
these amounts. The next
important number to look at is
the third from the bottom. where
it's highlighted in red. is
deficit those numbers there.
starting with the 1.8 leading to
the next number next to it.
which is 2.4 that 2.4 number is
dependent upon the town voting
an override of 1.8 the year
before. So this is very much a
hypothetical analysis each one
of those red years you see.
there would have to be voted as
an override amount in order to
generate the override total for
the next year. One number is
dependent upon the other. So in
a perfect world. every one of
these numbers would be voted as
an override. and these would be
the right numbers. but we all
know this is a forecast. and the
next series of numbers to look
at is highlighted in green.
Those are the numbers that are
the debt service related to the
DPW facility. Those are
currently in our levy tax
bucket. If those are moved to
excluded. a new adjusted number
in the first year would drop
from 1.8 to 1.1 in running
across we have about 4.3 million
left in debt service. So the
story with that project is. not
only does it help 27 it really
helps. The subsequent years
right out to fiscal 35 it's
going to either be included as
an override number or be
excluded from our override
number. depending upon if we
move from levy to excluded debt.
Unknown: It was also a Moody's
recommendation in 2018
Brian Keveny: Yeah. in movies.
Movies has always encouraged the
town to always fund large
capital projects by exclusive
from prop two and a half by
excluded debt. So this chart
here ended up being the first
graph you showed. This is where
those numbers came from. And
I'll stop here because anybody
has any questions. because it's
a busy schedule. and I only want
to highlight a certain areas.
because they really tell the
story as to the next 11 years of
spending
Unknown: the DEP w if there debt
goes down each year. Is that.
because there's a constant
payment. principal and interest
is based on Yes. prior years
principal
Carol Martin: balance. what's
the dollar amount the budget's
going to increase from FY 26 to
27
Brian Keveny: I think 5.83 based
on this. it's the top number.
5.83
Unknown: Madam Chair has dollar
amount.
Brian Keveny: If you dollar
amount. sorry. that's all right.
To me. it's in my one
Carol Martin: of my 40s. I
thought I saw. And also. could
we have the what was the tax?
The dollar the dollar amount
increased from 25 to 26 I wrote
you these questions. I didn't
see the answer. And what was the
and what's the was the year over
year tax increase. percent? See
this? One's six is this looks
right? Six. fine. I thought I
saw six months seven early the
Brian Keveny: tax increase. I
don't have the dollar value. The
tax increase would be six points
as what would be
Carol Martin: 6.6 and then for
this year that we're in for 26
How much was it always much less
than that. It was. I've seen it
on another chart. You have
three.
Unknown: three years. something
like that. 4.3841
Brian Keveny: well. we our recap
will be down. It will be lower
than expected. because we got a
little bit more stated. It's
slower than what went to town
meeting. because our assessments
came down and we got a little
more stated. I should have
brought that number in front of
me. Maybe remember call. these
are just assumptions. The worst
case scenario. these are
assumptions and spending. right?
The worst case? No. no. I am not
assumptions on the revenues.
More set in stone. There's not a
lot of flexibility on revenue.
Carol Martin: Anyone else have
any questions? Ellen. anyone
sorry. so we're
Brian Keveny: getting in the
fiscal 27 forecast. as Michael
briefly talked about in his
opening remarks. All the
collecting buying projects
expire the end of June. We don't
know all labor contracts right
now for 2728 29 that's why it
would be important to try to get
past 27 and really being planned
for long term structural plan to
get out of our deficit
situation. But they mentioned
Michael is currently trying to
resolve the fire contract. We
have assumptions in our this
projection right now. but we
don't ultimately know what
that's going to be. We have
unknown revenue increases in
state aid. and which means that
we're carrying $250.000 but you
never know down the road that
they start pulling back some of
that state aid that's really
unknown at that point. we won't
know our state aid number until
January. We won't know our
health insurance number until
February. So as we compile the
budgets initially. we're
assuming certain numbers. and
they're all going to be trued up
at the end of February. when we
get all of our numbers in. But
we also have. we have a issue
with new growth. Right now we're
carrying $400.000 so again. the
drivers of the 24 self
insurance. pension. general
insurance. and we need to
maintain a provision for labor
contracts. And we don't know
that number. but it certainly
will be a cost driver. When we
did our projections for this.
this assumption the town and the
school. our expense sides were
very low. I think. I think the
town expense budget is only
supposed to go up like 2% in an
environment where there's
inflation. Christine has done a
nice job on her expense side.
We'll speak to a bit. But you
know. the biggest driver lately
in the school budget has been
special education. But if you
take specialization out of it.
they've done a good job of
bringing down their expenses.
The school budget. as I just
said. is really driven by
unknowns in special education.
So what we did do is go into
this trying to do a budget
without having to have other
needs. And as group met. and
we've met over 10 times. over 10
times on Wednesday mornings.
from nine to 11 consistently.
we've come to the conclusion we
can't produce a budget under the
levy. unless we have these three
things on the screen happen. The
first one is. as we present it
to the Selectmen. is to have the
residents re vote the DPW levy
debt as excluded. That that
would involve them calling a
ballot question in November and
the residents coming out and
supporting moving that from levy
to excluded. As I said. it not
only helps 27 it helps you
through multiple years. The next
one. as I presented to the
Selectmen. was that were to
issue. we're planning on issuing
$60 million of bonds. One of the
ideas that we came up with was
to only issue 8 million of the
bonds. The 8 million would be
for the water department. What
we can do is issue bands in
November and have those bands
bond anticipation notes for the
people. okay. bonding notes.
which we refer to as bands. The
town has issued bands in the
fact. in the past. currently. we
actually have two bands.
outstanding bands. help towns
through periods in between an
appropriation and then actually
getting the funding that it's a
it's a bridge of money until
they do long term some towns ban
a project. completely finish it.
and then they know exactly what
dollar value to bond. So they
actually borrowed exactly what
the project ended up spending.
I've seen some towns do that.
but you can use bands for
different reasons. So we looked
at this option. and I went true
with our advisor. hilltop
securities. And the plan that
was presented to the Selectmen
was was as follows. in November.
we issue bonds for the water
department. We issue bands for
the general fund projects. which
in which means that in November
26 those bands would expire. and
we then issue them long term
bonds we would only have in our
fiscal 27 budget. Interest
payable. Now there's a cost to
doing this. As I told the
Selectmen. you're going to be
paying interest on those bands
between November 25 in November
26 and we calculated the amount
around $140.000 that's assuming
that the interest rate would be
4% in November. Currently. bonds
are paid selling at 4% so if you
take a look at one of the slides
in the appendix. it's basically
a what if scenario. What if we
what if we don't issue bonds in
November at 4% what if we waited
until November 26 and the rates
were 3% well. that interest
expense kind of goes away
because we're going to pay
longer term at 3% it's simply a
hypothetical. Nobody knows what
the rates are going to be in 20
in 26 but it's good to talk
about. We know that the bond
rate is going to be 4% in
November. Don't know what the
bond rate is going to be in
November. 20. Six. If you take a
look at different scenarios.
maybe when we get to 26 and we
issue long term bonds. we'll
issue them at a rate less than
4% but nobody knows that. but I
wanted to put the table in there
just to show you. yes. we may
pay interest expense. but maybe
we won't. and nobody in this
table knows for sure what that's
going to be. So the last bucket
would be.
Michael McCall: you need to say.
but by doing that and paying the
interest only. that frees up the
800.000
Brian Keveny: Yeah. And one
other important thing I didn't
mention is that these projects
during the time period between
November 25 and June 26 they
need funding right now. Some of
the projects have funding in the
form of bands. The majority
don't do our allows the town to
do advancing from the general
fund. That basically means the
general fund can transfer money
to capital projects without
approval at Tom meeting. It
simply involves the Selectmen
approving that and signing a
form. It's a no interest loan
from the general fund to the
capital account. The money must
come back to the general fund by
June 30. So it's not like the
general fund in the number we
calculated was about 6 million.
free cash is expected to be
certified around 12 million.
That's what we're projecting. So
the way it would work is that
after do our approves the town's
free cash. the Select model
would have approved to move 6
million into the capital count.
That immediately brings our
appropriation that we can do a
Tom meeting to 6 million.
Because we've restricted six we
still have plenty of free cash
to fund any projects that we
want to do with town meeting.
But remember. the money comes
back to the general fund at June
30. It's not lost by the General
Fund. and it doesn't affect the
town. Towns have done this in
the past. You can either do that
or you can issue bands. So that
was presented to the Selectmen
as well as part of this option
to move from bands to bonds. so
we've gone over that with them.
I went over with our bank. I
talked to the one of the
directors of dor because it's
been a while since I did this. I
just wanted to make sure I had
my ducks in a row. and I I did
it once before. And he says. All
you do is you fill out the form.
explain it to select men.
everybody's on board. And you do
it in the money. I say it comes
back to the general fund. It is
not lost money. It comes back to
the general fund. So those are
the three things that they need
to happen. And lastly. the third
one. even with these two. we
still need cuts on the town of
the school to balance a prop two
and a half percent balance
budget. It's these two projects
alone. Based on these four
project assumptions. will not
bring in a budget under proc
tool. Now the town of the school
still need to do additional
costs between three and 500.000
we think that's manageable. So
that is a presentation you have
the paperwork. Is a series of
slides that we've included in
here for you folks to this one I
put in here. if you have time.
this really maps out the first
column where we stand. the
agreements move from levy to
excluded. how that affects only
the do our calculation. And then
we have in here the use of him.
which actually affects expense.
which brings us to our ongoing
three to $500.000 problem. which
is in the bottom right. And
again. this is that incremental
assumption on interest. I wanted
to put in at least have a folks
to take a look at it. So that's
they have this slide in yet.
because in the top right.
there's brightest guys on the
sun coming school.
Unknown: The top right
Brian Keveny: came from my
believer. obviously. in the
river. So I think I found the
right slide. I see the rainbow.
brightest guys in the cheap
truck. That's our presentation.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Brian.
thank you. Michael. I want to
just ask Aaron real quick. Are
you short on time? Here? Are you
till 710
Unknown: you can call until 710
Carol Martin: Okay. so we have
to ask questions fast. because
we got 15 minutes. and one of my
board members has his art style
at 730 which I'm started at six.
So who would like to start the
questions? Normally. we start at
this level. but why don't Aaron.
would you like to start the
questions? Or would you like us
to
Unknown: anybody from my board
have questions?
Carol Martin: Would you say the
300 500.000
Unknown: cut? Is that
Carol Martin: shared among the
school. or is
Brian Keveny: that each of we
didn't help an allocation we
just knew generally? You know.
we have an ongoing problem that
could be three to 500.000 it
could be 600.000
Unknown: it's shared. Okay. I
actually have a question about
that number as well. Is that
based on numbers from what
fiscally in 26 you're cutting
from that. or you're cutting
from like a 4.55% over fiscal
year 26
Brian Keveny: it's. it's based
on the school budget in fiscal
27
Unknown: Okay. so like. what was
kind of put out as a so what
does that look like from a
percentage
Brian Keveny: we in the school
but for 27 the school budget is
up 5.5%
Unknown: so. okay. yeah. okay.
Brian Keveny: so we have a
conservative number up there.
And Christine is still. you
know. as we know. she's
relatively new to the district.
just trying to get the schools
up and running. So we have in
there a 5.5 number. I just
wanted to clarify where it was.
We lost you a four point. I
forget the number right under
five. Under five. we have 5.5
Unknown: right now. We would. of
course. try to get under five
well
cushion.
Michael McCall: although it uses
the word cuts. There may be
other ways to interpret that. as
indicated before I didn't send
out an email the department
heads about a hiring freeze. As
we have turnover. there may be
some positions we choose not to
fill so we wouldn't be spending
that money. and we may postpone
filling that until we get
through FY 27 and know what our
numbers are. So without truly
cutting position. we don't fill
it. We're realizing those
savings to help us get through
that that year. But there may be
positions we just do need to
eliminate. So it'd be a
combination of things
Brian Keveny: I would ask Dave
to say again. the importance of
deferring the Override to next
year and getting past 27 you
said. why is that important for
the school to do that? You
talked about that in the budget.
Unknown: Sure. a couple of
reasons. Brian. the certainty of
planning. It's very hard to do a
budget when we don't know what
our revenue is going to be from
an override. That is really hard
to do. And when you start
creating a budgets and B budgets
and C budgets. the instability
that it leads to. and I've
certainly had to do that. and
what you end up having to do is
show the positions you're going
to reduce. and think about
excellent new teachers who will
leave. And it just creates a lot
of instability. That is the most
important thing. Number two.
obviously. in collective
bargaining. to not have a sense
when you're putting together a
budget. where you are in terms
of planning. So it creates
certainty. both from a
uncertainty. both from a
financial and a human resource
side. as opposed to certainty. I
think that sums it up. Brian.
yes.
Carol Martin: I'm gonna see if
the Select Board has any
questions.
Doug Levine: I've got two brief
questions. Brian. so the first
is. we're assuming a worst case
scenario of a 1.8 and same
million dollar short call. What
is the range? If that's the
worst case scenario? What is the
best case scenario? If we have
higher local receipts. higher
state aid. how much does that
fall? Well. it
Brian Keveny: really would be
the delta if health insurance
came in less than than two
digits. if it was. say. seven or
eight. That is set in stone.
Middlesex. we already have our
assessment. so that's. that's a
hard number. The only other
thing would be. if the
collective bargaining amounts
come in less than we have in our
projection. we have a number in
there that we think is
reasonable. If the if the
collective bargaining came in
less than that. that would bring
the number down on the revenue
side. reasonably on the state
side. you can really expect more
than 250.000 you can expect
growth in the local receipts.
But again. that's only about
that's. that's not a material
number to you know. two or
300.000 it's a good thing that
we bring in more money in the
local receipts. but to get. get
from your $1.8 million down to a
better case scenario. it's the
jury still out there? Because we
don't know what our new growth
is going to be on the tax recap
in December. which rolls into
prop two and a half calculation.
which then adjust all these
numbers. stating number in
January. in the health insurance
so I can't really answer that.
because those numbers would are
key in bringing this problem
about
Doug Levine: I asked the
question. though. because there
there are two. I call them
mechanisms. and that last slide.
700.000 800.000 and if we just
passed one. it doesn't answer
the mail correct. even if we had
a best case scenario for a
budget. Shortfall.
Brian Keveny: If we had one of
them proved right. we'd still be
in a difficult situation.
Budget. generally.
Unknown: Doug The one thing I
would add also Brian. I'm
thinking this past year. there
were significant swings in
health insurance. depending on
what plan you I mean. we were
quite low. Think of the GIC.
which was historically high. as
you know. Doug. and so just
given that swing. that's why you
don't want to. you know. there's
some uncertainty in that
particular area. For sure. you
don't know till January.
Doug Levine: And then my other
quick question. Brian was on the
first slide in fiscal year 37
the budget swings by $10 million
combined from the negative to
the positive. and that's all as
a result of us funding the
retirement liability. And that's
done. It's that many millions of
dollars.
Carol Martin: Yes. um. do you
mind if I hop into because I
have the same one? So this is
interesting. There were a couple
slides in here originally that
talked about this. and you'll
have to help me with the correct
wording. Brian. but it's we pay
a pension assessment every year.
but then be for a number of
reasons. which Brian can explain
probably another day is a very
long report. everyone in the
communities in Middlesex
retirement is being assessed by
what they call it unfunded
liability. and waylands is 58
million correct. which we're
paying out over these 10 years.
Brian Keveny: You hit me with
these numbers. I have to go back
and check essentially. it's
substantial. I think. I think
it's 58 to 60 million.
Carol Martin: So that's really
and those slides were in here.
So when you asked me. I saw
what's coming up. I didn't see
it. But. um. I would really like
if Doug doesn't mind if I hop in
on his question too. I really. I
had sent you a question. I'd
like to know what's our unfunded
liability for the this amount we
have to pay this additional for
27 and then 27 to 30 just out of
care.
Brian Keveny: We don't we only
have that. We only get from two
years. So we have from Middlesex
26 and 27 Okay. so post that on
their website. They write the
unfunded liability on 27 to
60.000.058
Carol Martin: to 60 minutes. Do
we have to pay in 27 to what is
it? Two additional million?
Brian Keveny: I have that hard
number anyway. It's it's in my
Unknown: calculation. every two
years.
Carol Martin: So we pay the
regular
Brian Keveny: ones. 7 million.
We pay some. I'm sorry. 7
million. and
Carol Martin: change the 27
Yeah. but that. Inc. what's the
what's the amount in blue?
Because that's the additional
amount.
Brian Keveny: The amount in blue
is the levy debt related to the
DPW.
Carol Martin: Yeah. No on this
slide. yeah. see that we have in
the screen? All right? I think
what I like that number? I can
get that. I think that sounds
like you would like that as
well. What is that amount? I
think it was in the prior
version. It showed the pension
and the pension liability. and
that's in the operating budget.
correct? Yes. the liability.
yeah. So I'd like to know
Unknown: Yes.
Christine clarification that it
is based on the actuarial study
that is posted on the Middlesex
County website. They dictate the
amount that we have to pay.
irregardless of what our
unfurling liability is. They
identify because they have
adjusted their payment schedule.
So that number changes every
actuarial period. and so we know
what we have right now and what
the payment will be for 26 and
27 then it will go through
another cycle of the actuarial
and they will recalculate our
unfunded liability amount. So
that's a changing. moving
target. So we don't know that.
Doug Levine: but it has to end
in fiscal year 37 that's what's
Unknown: that's what they say.
Or the town's fully funded
portion.
Brian Keveny: Okay. state may
have mandated them all pension
funds to be fully funded by 2036
some are already. you know. 80.
90% funded. Middlesex right now
is a 50% fund. So right now. as
we sit here. we're between 50
and 60% fully funded in 10
years. that that number needs to
go to 100% Fund. and the only
way to get there. Brian Oh
Hurley. he did a nice job. I've
taken the fiscal 26 and 27
assessments that we have. and
actually developing an
amortization out to that which
runs. and we have that number
embedded. So every two years.
like Carol. like Christine.
said. We get that assessment.
but they we've got a long way to
go from 50 to 100 in a very
short period.
Carol Martin: So my question is.
that's an operating expense.
right? But I'd like to know the
dollar amount of that for 27 I
think that's the number you and
I are looking for. Maybe you can
send that to us. right? I don't
want to monopolize all the time.
I'm going to go with care to
there are. although they haven't
called to order. there are
members of the Finance Committee
who speak as individuals. like
just for. So April or Pam.
Unknown: yeah. so I'll just put
a an exclamation point on the
overall presentation. We've got
financial challenges in front of
this. the town. It would be
great to get through fiscal year
27 without having to go to an
override process. but we've got
a lot of education to do. to
help the entire town community.
to really understand our
financial circumstances.
identify all the efficiencies
that we can and really take
steps to sort of implement those
efficiencies and communicate it.
because we're going to have
overrides in the future. It's
just right now doesn't feel like
the right time to try and put
one through. especially if
there's levers in front of us
that we can all get behind to do
the bands and do the debt
reclassification. So I'm strong.
individually. strong. supportive
of the overall plan here. and I
don't have any other questions
at this time.
Carol Martin: Okay. so because
we're speaking as as individual
residents. would you like to
give your address for
Unknown: the Oh yeah. seven deer
run Wayland. Thank you. And
we're
Carol Martin: looking for
questions so April or Pam. Miss
Kelsi. do you have one? Okay?
And Bill. yes. I know I forgot
to respond. I went that way.
Sorry. Sorry. let's see
Brian Keveny: so the the
assessment of a 27 is 7.3
million.
Unknown: Middlesex County
retirement
Brian Keveny: 7.3 million. We
already had the unfunded
liability
Carol Martin: portion is 6966
Unknown: 27 this is part of the
actuarial study. Yes. she wants
to know. what's the difference
year over year? Is that what
you're asking? No. yes.
they don't give it to you that
way career. But the amount. the
assessment that we will be
including in the FY 27 is 7.3
million. right for the middle
sense. county. what it was for
FY 26 was 6.8 million.
Carol Martin: There you go. 6.8
so it's 500.000
Brian Keveny: and for another
day. we talked about doing a
pension obligation bond. but
that's. that's another night's
discussion to address the
Middlesex issue.
Carol Martin: Mr. Whitney. I'm
sorry. Brian. the 802.000
Unknown: for the bands. is that
net of the 100? Yes. an
interest. okay?
William Whitney: And what
happens if we do the issue the
bands in lieu of 8 million in
bonds. and we. and we there is
an unsuccessful vote on the
reclassification of the TPW
facility type.
Brian Keveny: Yeah. that's a
good question. because do we
proceed with just winning the
bands and the bonds and bringing
down the budget in 27 by 800 we
wreck even we recognize as a
group that. you know. we still
have to make a cut of over a
million dollars. and that would
be very challenging. A lot of
things would have to break our
way. So that's the it's sort of
like. which do you want to pick?
Do you want to just if we don't
get involved? Do we just call it
a day and ask for an override
because the cuts will be just
too insurmountable? Or do we
take the 800.000 savings and
deal with a million dollar
problem? That's the information
we have at this point in the
budget development.
Unknown: So and you mentioned a
November election.
Brian Keveny: well. you would
have called ballot question
Unknown: right in November. in
November. before November. or
November. which is kind of a
month away. yeah. 3030. we think
there is sufficient time to
educate the electorate as to the
importance of voting For this
thing in a month
would be a challenge.
Doug Levine: That's the latest
you can have in the election. at
Michael McCall: least 35 days
from when it's 35 days from when
the Select Board calls the
election. The clerk actually
asked for 45 days. And if you go
back. and I was looking at today
with Madam Chair. the policy is
when. as we have presented a
request for the board to
consider a reclassification the
debt under Proposition two and a
half in your policy. we have to
request a presentation or
opinion from the FinCom. and
they have to Give it to the
board and you. according to
policy. cannot vote to have the
election until one week after
that. It has to be one week. But
there is a timeline so well.
Unknown: a question. I guess.
for the elected officials here.
which is. how do we feel about
taking this to the voters in a
month? The. For 45 days. can
kind of sufficiently robust
public information campaign be
developed and get the word
Michael McCall: out another
community in March. we put on a
debt exclusion for a fire
station. They voted to put it on
the ballot. I think. in March.
and then managed to get it to
pass. Interesting you're looking
about. because
Unknown: this is. this is much
more esoteric. I think this is
not saying we need a fire
station. This is. we've issued
the debt. We've been paying it
all along. We want to pay it out
of a different pocket and why is
that a good idea?
Michael McCall: All we can do is
an informational campaign. We
are limited under Proposition
two and a half. We we the town
staff cannot. I'm not
Unknown: suggesting there would
be an advocacy campaign per se
by but individuals can speak to
their neighbors. can have
coffees. can have Q and A's put
together. and that takes time
and organization understand.
Doug Levine: So that goes back
to the question. why do you have
to have this election November?
Can you have it in December or
January? What is the latest that
we can have it to allow for more
time for
Carol Martin: education? Hey.
it's April. but we don't want to
do that. What can we do
Doug Levine: it in January?
Giving us several months? I
Brian Keveny: guess that's a
question for Michael and the
town clerk. If they didn't want
to do it in November. could they
do it in January? But then keep
in mind. we're right in the
middle of budget
Unknown: development to to the
question I had. so there seems
to be a lot of discussion of
having the bands approved as
soon as possible. What is that
rush coming from?
Brian Keveny: It's coming from.
We're doing a movies call on
October 7. Bank is finished our
official statement and ready to
go to bidders in early November.
October. so the states and the
stage has been set town to
borrow $16 million in November.
So we've done all the paperwork
we've gone through one council.
all those three groups are now
looking at us and saying. Okay.
we're ready to go. What is
Wayland doing? So we really need
a decision no later than your
next meeting on September 29 on
the bands. because I have to
inform the bank what we don't
have asked him. Can I have a
two. three week delay? And
that's not realistic. is
everything on your side is in
the queue.
Unknown: So if that. if that
happens. so we've spent 140.000
without knowing whether the debt
would be reclassified. so kind
of at risk. right?
Brian Keveny: Well. you go back
to the sensitivity analysis. and
it's better in a year from that.
That's like you can speculate on
that
Carol Martin: Susan for one
second. I just want to make sure
and were you. were you finished?
And then I'm not
Unknown: really. because I want
to understand this a little
better. So what you're
essentially saying is that we're
all set up to do the bands. and
if we miss this window. then.
and they're all essentially
saying. What's going on here.
and if we miss the window. then
we have to essentially start
over.
Brian Keveny: No. um. no. So
we're all set to issue $60
million in bonds. Yes. the bank
knows that we're looking at this
option. We're definitely going
to issue 8 million in bonds.
That's a surety with the water
department. November. the
options are issue $16 million in
bonds. or issue $8 million in
bonds. an issue with a balance
in bands. which is a short term
loan. Okay?
Carol Martin: And we also have.
I did send out a meeting up to
the boards. and a couple
meetings ago. We also have some
bands that have to be paid off
by November. So this
Brian Keveny: expiring?
Carol Martin: Are they having
the meeting in I think it's
October 7. It takes a couple
weeks to do the paperwork so
they can issue the bands in
time. so that we can take care
of the ones that need to be
reissued and a left. so that
decision we have to make by the
29th so that Brian and hilltop
can proceed. Period. how's that
proceed? Period. sorry.
Um. meeting. Because any anybody
from the school committee? Okay.
we all said. I'm sorry.
Unknown: Please let me know. I
also think it's easier to
explain. I'm sorry. I think it's
easier to explain the fact that.
Like financially. the DPW
facility. more than likely
should have been excluded from
the levy at the jump. and it's
more of an appropriate
reclassification for that than
anything else. That's an easier
lift to me than to ask people to
approve. you know. be it maybe a
smaller one year override or and
then knowing that the next year
you're going to approve another
larger. three year potential
override amount. and that
there's. there'll be more
certainty around collective
bargaining. etc. when we come to
them for like an ask on an
override versus. let's do a
little dribble here. and then
we'll do another bigger one in a
year.
Carol Martin: I will tell you. I
think I mentioned this. You
might have been at that meeting.
I actually was on the Finance
Committee when that project was
recommended for debt exclusion
to the Select Board. So we went
before we did the presentation.
as we will ask this current
finance committee to make
presentations per code. I guess
there was policy to the Select
regarding debt exclusion on the
ballot. ballot questions and the
select what at the time. felt
that we had an a lot of unused
levy capacity. and they wanted
to reduce the unused levy
capacity. I believe. I'm sure
this will come out as we go
through this process. Should we
go that path? They wanted us.
the town. to make more mindful
decisions about budgeting. and
so they use the 12 million. 11
million. whatever it was of that
levy capacity. okay. Brian. Will
you hand them? Can you just
start it? Because it was you
just came in February and I had
just stopped. yeah. so I think
that was the reasoning of it.
And I'm sure that when this. if
we go that route. that will.
that will be part of the
conversations. Well. be
revisited. So. okay. yes. yes.
Unknown: I was just gonna say we
kind of need to. We don't
Carol Martin: know you guys got
a problem. Yeah. anyway. so you
don't need to adjourn or
anything. right? No. we'll just
start there. Thank you so much
for coming. Thank you everybody.
Presentation. Appreciate it.
Thanks. Michael and I'm
Unknown: going to drop as well.
Carol.
Carol Martin: thank you. Thank
you. April. and I think Pam left
as well. Hi. Anne. all right.
Exit. Would it be appropriate
for me to ask some
Unknown: questions the voters
see seeing on the ballot in
November. if it can be get. if
it can get on the ballot by
then. are they just being asked
to reclassify DEP talk to
another Yes. being asked
anything about the band? No. no.
no. that seemed like such a hard
asset. We're just going to fund
it from a different pot.
Michael McCall: Yes. so it moves
it into a different pot for the
calculation of your levy
capacity.
Unknown: Got it. I think that
was in the paper. the
Michael McCall: paper. and we
would work with town council
that you would be shell the
voters to win. and. you know.
reclassify the existing debt.
and we'd give the amount from
levy to excluded debt.
Carol Martin: Thank you. right.
We only have about 10 minutes
left. And the one I guess I'm
going to ask thanks for it as if
you would like us
Michael McCall: to go to number
four. Yes. considerably. Have
the updated. but I believe
number four is one.
Carol Martin: although we have
not made any decisions on either
of these. and I am going to ask
when we get to the next one. if
the sense of the board is to
wait until all five of us are
present on the 30th to take
These 29th so for Mr. But we've
also been asked to consider
asking the finance committee to
make a recommendation to us on
the 29th regarding the
classifying of the levy debt to
excluded because. as I mentioned
just a few minutes ago. that's
part of the process that we have
if we're considering a debt
exclusion ballot question. We
then request a presentation from
the finance committee. so then
they would have an opportunity
to vote on it on the 29th and
then they would probably come in
on the sixth to make the
presentation. because they have
to make a presentation to us. I
believe. on ballot on debt
exclusion. So. I don't know what
the success. but it is a
Michael McCall: like they may be
meeting the 29th maybe they make
it earlier. and they come in
that. I don't know how it will
work. I think that'd be up to
Mr.
Unknown: Judy's. All right.
Well. all right. I'd like to
offer motion to for the Select
Board to request that the
Finance Committee make a
recommendation and give a
presentation to the board
regarding the request. request
by the levy debt to excluded
debt for the Department of
Public Works facility at 66
River Road. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Any further
discussion? Okay. so let's have
a roll call.
Unknown: and that's pursuant to
the board's proposition to
invest policy in the Select
Board meeting. just for
Carol Martin: and that's what
you said in your motion. that it
was pursuant to the boards two
and a half the
Doug Levine: boards two and a
half.
Unknown: I think that's
superfluous. but accept the
friendly amendment. Feel better.
All right. that was not part of
my motion. All right. then I'm
going
Carol Martin: to Anne. yes.
Doug. yes. Bill. yes. Carol.
yes. that so that motion passes
four zero. So Mr. Manager. if he
would be so kind as to draft a
memo to do it. That's a letter
floating around. But I thought
that was a little more formal
than we need here. because we
aren't actually. we haven't.
We've kind of. yeah. so do you
want me to send it on? We can
talk. We'll talk about it. All
right. that sounds like a plan.
I know that Mr. Levine has a
hard stop here shortly. and I
did want to ask before we we can
discuss any of these that are on
the table. if you want to do
that. But I also want to ask if
we. if. again. if. what's the
sense of the board? Should we
wait until Tom is also present
and on the 29th before we
consider votes.
Doug Levine: The 29th is
acceptable. according to Brian.
for approval. if we so approve
for the bonds to Vance. right?
And on the other one. I still
don't understand when that would
have to be actually decided.
Michael McCall: I think as soon
as practical. when we first
flipped the memo and introduced
this formally to the board. we
were in August. And the theme
the thought process. then. was.
most people have it in their
minds. They come in in the first
week. the first Tuesday of
November. So the thought was.
shoot for that date. Can you go
later in November. even to early
December? I'm sure we could do
that and leave 60 some odd days
or more for some type of
informational campaign. Is Mr.
Kevin. He said. the closer we
get to our requirements under
the code to recommend a budget
to this body and then hand over
to the FinCom. we need to have
some decision. because then we
would be looking at going
through the same process of
requesting an operational
override and then having to come
Back and having to have the
board ask the FinCom make a
presentation go through that.
and you'd be then looking at the
spring annual election. so that
you would have time to campaign
for an operational and if we
didn't get the votes to put it
on the ballot or something. then
the worst case scenario. I
guess. is that whatever happens
with the bands happens. and then
you're looking at some
significant cuts across the
board. That's always the last
resort. And my philosophy is
town manager is I'm supposed to
present every option to you
folks and then follow through on
whatever. however the chips may
fall. as Mr. Whitney alluded.
even if we were to put the
question on. it still may fall.
but. you know. it could fail.
and then we would then either
have to see. you know. if we
could make some adjustments. and
if we couldn't. we may have to
come back and then ask this
board to consider an operational
over
Doug Levine: is there some
minimum threshold of votes that
you need for turnout? Because I
imagine turnout will be pretty
low on this one question. I
believe
Michael McCall: that it is just
a simple majority of the people
that turn out that day. I do
have a link to proposition two
and a half elections. It's a
primer. and it does go over some
of this in the Q and A. I
believe. So I can circulate that
to the board
Doug Levine: if you haven't. I
think we should probably have
substantive discussions about
both of these on the 29th
Unknown: on the agenda already.
Doug Levine: It's that agenda
planning.
Carol Martin: But we. we've we.
our intent was to finalize it
tomorrow based on if we needed
some other items. you know that
came from this meeting. So and
are you okay here? Because I
think we're just about ready to
wrap up. unless you have
something else you want to add.
or I.
Unknown: No. I am. I'm actually
doing a lot of absorbing of all
of it so.
Carol Martin: so I think you
missed it earlier. because I not
should be online. I do want to
say it again. I thank you all
very much for coming on such
short notice. and particularly
this particular week. appreciate
it tremendously. And so. having
said that I would
Doug Levine: entertain and move
that we adjourn the Select Board
at 727.
Carol Martin: and then Anne.
yes. no. yes and call. Thank
you. Kelsi. thank you.
Carol Martin: Good evening.
Carol Martin. chair of the
Select Board and I call this
meeting of the Select Board to
order. This is Monday. September
15. 2025 it's a hybrid meeting.
We are meeting in the Wayland
town building. and we are. in
fact. in the Select Board
Meeting Room. Join me in the
room this evening is Bill
Whitney being myself. and is an
online
Unknown: I don't see her yet.
Carol Martin: Mr. Fay will not
be joining us this evening. We
are also joined by level McCall
and the assistant Tom manager
Kelsi. and also assistant to the
town manager Jailyn Bratica.
read the agenda for the public.
So you may watch this meeting on
the link that can be found in
our calendar. and it's also on
the agenda pursuant to chapter
two of the FC 2025. this meeting
will be conducted in person and
via remote means. in accordance
with applicable law. This
meeting may be recorded which
will be made available to the
public on WayCAM as soon after
the meeting as is practical when
required by law allowed by the
chair persons wishing to provide
public comment or otherwise
participate in the meeting. They
do so by in person attendance or
by accessing the meeting
remotely. As noted above. we
request public comment be
limited to two minutes per
person. See me. We're going to
start our meeting with the
announcements of public comment.
We will then go into executive
session where we will have a I
don't have to read them with
them. right? But we will have a
discussion about strategy for
the collective bargaining with
the International Association of
Firefighters. And then we will
review and approve the executive
session minutes. September. 2.
2025 we intend to anticipate
returning to open session at
approximately 635. and then we
will have some appointments to
some committees we will
interview. and then we will also
do a reappointment to the route
20 South laneville. Virginia.
7pm we will discuss our
submission for the 2025 annual
report. followed by a discussion
on review of the rail trail
historic signage program minutes
for August 4 and August 18. At
approximately 720 we'll have the
Tom energy course. which will be
followed at 730 by the public
forum on the potential use of 14
West Lane Street. We'll be
following discussion review and
possible vote to approve
financial policies. And we will
have a follow up discussion of
the mass Water Resources joint
meeting. After that. we will
have a discussion of the fiscal
year 2027. budget test for
strategies. including. but not
limited to recommending.
recommendation residing
financing of 66 River Road and
borrowing DEP plan. then we will
have consent. respondents.
cycles. reports and concerns.
There are no topics not
reasonable. anticipated 48 hours
in advance. and hopefully before
930 we will adjourn. So is there
any announcements? Mr.
Unknown: McCall. thank you.
Madam Chair. members of the
board. the only one announcement
I'd make at this time. for those
who don't know. we had some
staffing changes in my office.
and I'm pleased to announce to
you. which I did inform staff
this week. that we are promoting
Jai and Bratica to become our
next management analyst. Now.
some you know our management
analyst position in the past. we
tried experimenting having that
partial procurement. We're
looking at a different solution.
This time around. We're
leveraging a retired procurement
officer to do some of our
procurement. and we're
decentralizing So Miss power
Spirlet in Miss Bratica. or
pursuing and cppo designations.
I already have one. so we can
handle some of the the medium
size. and some of this. you
know. slightly bigger than
medium cameras. But what we now
want Miss Bratica to focus on is
communications. I know this
board had wanted someone to be
focusing on communication. She's
a communications coordinator.
She has a background. She went
to Worcester. state. She has
community political science and
a minor in communication. I was
going from memory. but we are
going be going through a website
upgrade. so there are
opportunities to look at our
content. and she's been handling
our press releases. And we
thought this would be a good
progression. Question for her.
She works in here with this
power Spirlet. so we have Tom
meeting coming up in spring. It
would be a great time for her to
slide into that position. And
we've been interviewing some
great candidates to come in to
do the next administrative
assistant
Carol Martin: doing great. grand
care. Congratulations. Anybody
wanted to join into
congratulations? Fantastic. All
right. Does anyone have any
other announcements from the
board? Okay. I think we might
want to say. I don't know if you
want to say a moment. Did we
miss something? Mr. McCall said
that we were working towards our
ncppo designations. but we both
already told me how to keep up
with them
Unknown: and all of the required
coursework. They just need a few
years of experience more. and
then they can become MCP
Massachusetts. Certified Public
Procurement official. It means
you go through. take all these
courses. and then annually you
must. or every three years after
that. you have to take 25
continuing legal or continuing
credits in procurement. Perfect.
Carol Martin: Do we also want to
announce that on here. October
4. is our annual Wayland
Festival. It's been a
combination of help me out here.
touch a truck. and it's the
cultural festival doing
something Wayland 250 so mark
the calendars and look for more
information. All right. Public
comment. Everybody else was all
set on announcements. yeah. Sir.
did you have public comment? You
have to say just your name and
your address. please. Thank you.
Steve Michael. 14. Red Barn
road.
Steven Myerow: This is a follow
up on an item that actually I
brought up at the last town
manager meeting. And I was this
has to do with section 190
chapter 193. storm water and
land disturbance proposed
regulations. And the reason I'm
here to I was going to let to
see how things played out. but
listening to the Conservation
Commission meeting from last
week. I was a little concerned.
And I have. one of the concerns
I have is about the legality of
some of the things in the
regulations and the and the
reason I'm here is because a
comment was made at that the
meeting last week that they were
going to the chairman wanted to
force a vote on on the
regulations at the next Meeting.
At this point. tied bond and
environmental consulting firm is
creating a revision to the draft
that was put out in March. and
as of last week. they hadn't
even produced the draft yet. So
if. if that was really the case.
that they were to vote. they'd
be voting on something that they
haven't even seen yet. And so I.
and I know people say things in
the heat of the moment. maybe
didn't really mean it. but just
out of caution. I thought I
would come and I I will email
these to you also. But I. I did.
I printed up copy of the this
was the memo i i sent to you.
and I thought was some of the
legal concerns on it. and I
just. I mean. I have other
comments that I will provide in
writing when I have time to do
it. but I just wanted to make
sure we didn't end up in A
situation that could cause a lot
of problems further down the
road and and maybe this is
really should be addressed to
you because. but I don't know if
there's was any resolution on on
that I can. I can hand this out
to you. I can email it to you.
But I. I guess I just thought.
because the next select board
meeting isn't. I believe. until
the 29th or so I I just wanted
to put that out there right now.
just so maybe if you. if you
agree that there might be an
issue. you might want to give a
general nudge to The right
people to follow up on it. Thank
you.
Carol Martin: So we normally try
not to accept offs at the
meeting. but let's figure out.
do we want this email to us and
then we can put it in the next
packet. or do we want a hard
copy now we could do both. okay.
and then. would you do me a
favor? Also give one to Jailyn?
So. Fully do not I mean. I know
everyone. some people might be
remote. so
Unknown: thank you.
Carol Martin: All right. and
then please give one to Jailyn
for me. please. Thank you. All
right. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Is there anyone else
for public comment? I'll be
online.
Unknown: I've seen they'll be
with their hand raised.
Carol Martin: okay. great. Thank
you. So with that. I'm going to
I move that the Select Board
enter into executive session
pursuant to Massachusetts
General law chapter 30 a.
section 21 a three. discuss
strategy with respect to
collective bargaining with
International Association of
Firefighters. a of IO CIO local
1978 and the pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws
chapter 38 Section 21 a seven.
to review and approve the
Executive Session. Minutes of
September. 2. 2025. with the
intent of both said minutes. is
there a second to the motion?
Unknown: Second.
Carol Martin: yes and Carol Yes.
The motion carries three zero.
The Chair declares that a public
discussion of these matters may
have detrimental effect on the
litigating. negotiating or
bargaining position of the Tom.
oops. balances. roll call. Do I
do it again? No. I think you're
fine. Got it okay? The Chair
invites attendance by Michael
McCall. Town Manager. Kelsi
Power-Spirlet. Assistant town
manager. and Jailyn Bratica.
executive assistant to the town
manager. The committee will
rejoin the public meeting from
executive session. and the
meeting will return to open
session in approximately 25
minutes. Thank you. Select Board
returns to open session at
6:28pm. thank you. We are going
to do some appointments for the
committees. Going to start with
the two of you. would you like
to come up and join us? I think
you're both in applying the same
committee. Why don't you come
together? Oh. okay. is there
somebody else out there? No. you
see a young lady online in the
envelope? Yeah.
Okay. good evening. So since
you're both applying for the
same commission. Cultural
Council and flying for associate
position. there are two
positions. and there's two
candidates. we thought we'd
interview you at the same time.
if that's okay. So what I'd like
to have you do is. you know.
introduce yourself. and then
just give us very brief. you
know. explanation as to what
motivated you to participate in
this committee. We have your
information. and it's very
informal. This is not just
serious. just very informal. So
would you like to be first?
Should I have not said it's not
serious? We like to take it
serious. All right? We like to
take things seriously. I take my
Doug Levine: name is Mustafa
here. I'm a junior at Wayland
High School. and I first learned
about this council went through
my mother because I saw her
doing work with the council. and
I started asking her about it
and asking how if there's a
possibility of me being able to
get involved. and that's when I
learned I could potentially
become a youth liaison. And so I
want to just. I just want to. I
want to become a youth liaison
so I can. you know. give back to
my community. And also. have.
you know. I just have like a.
like a like a like that
connection between the youth of
Wayland and the culture council
to make it more engaging for
people like me and just provide
that perspective.
Unknown: Thank you. And
yeah. I'm Indian in 11th grade.
I just found out about this.
She's my friend. and also I just
like curious see. like. what
goes on in this town. like how
to get involved. So. yeah.
that's why I'm joined.
Carol Martin: Thank you. So we
have your resumes in our
packets. but I'm going to open
it to the board if I have
questions. Okay.
Unknown: good evening. Thank you
both for your willingness to
serve on the council. I wonder
if you've had a chance to attend
any meetings of the Council.
watch any of the meetings on
WayCAM. any recordings of the
meeting or spoken to the chair
about serving on the council.
So I was able to
Doug Levine: attend one of the
meetings with of the actual
Council. I was just spectating
and seeing how it was going. I
was able to see like. like. how
it was organized. like that. for
example. someone was writing
down what's happening and. you
know. just. you know. what
they're discussing. I got like.
a sense of. like. what I'd be
doing. I guess.
Unknown: yeah. I was here the
August meeting. We just kind of
swatch what happened?
Yeah. great. Thank you.
Doug Levine: And have you both
had a chance to connect with any
of the former student members of
the council? Did you know
anybody who served on there. and
you had a chance to have a
conversation with them. I
believe the person who served
previously went to the same
school. but I haven't had any
chance to connect. Okay? And
then my my last question is. we
do have a couple of different
boards and committees in town.
like our HR dei committee that
also have positions for
students. Why are you both
selecting Cultural Council? What
draws you to this committee?
Well. because I learned. well.
first. first of all is because
that's the one that I first
learned about. and the Second of
all is because. well. you know.
I learned. like. having learned
about it. I knew that. like. I
can provide that perspective for
the youth for grants that clubs.
for example. school clubs ask
for. And so I feel like I can
make it more engaging for people
my age. right?
Unknown: Yeah. I saw this seemed
like the most interesting to me.
so that's why. yeah.
Carol Martin: well. being last
is good because they asked the
questions I would ask so and if
you say. what
Doug Levine: at the screen.
versus
Carol Martin: us? Yeah. Okay.
sorry. And so you've both been
very impressive backgrounds. and
I. I'm always impressed your
students come forward with the
busy schedules you have and all
your extracurricular activities
that you're willing to share
your time with us. So I thank
you very much. Do I have a
motion.
Doug Levine: You could have a
motion Correct? Okay. I move
that the Board appoint Indian
Gandhi and Mustafa. How do i
pronounce your last name? You
can say here. here to the
Cultural Council for associate
positions with the terms ending.
June 30. 2028.
Carol Martin: second. further
discussion. And Anne hasn't
joined us yet. right? Okay. so
since we all just here by
ourselves. all those in favor.
Thank you. So that passes.
That's three zero speaks.
Doug Levine: So congratulations.
You guys have been appointed by
the board. but you still need to
both be sworn in by the town
clerk. so you should receive a
letter in the mail from the town
in the coming days. When you
receive that. come back to this
building and go to the town
clerk's office and swear in.
they'll also give you a conflict
of interest training and some
other information. and then
you'll be official to be on the
board. All right. Thank you
both.
Unknown: Thank you. Okay.
Carol Martin: Thank you so much.
I think the next person we're
going to interview will be
Sophia. because she's actually
in the Sophie. sorry. in the
building. Would you like to
please?
Unknown: How are you so I
believe you are looking to be an
associate member of the human
rights. diversity. equity
inclusion committee. So would
you like to just introduce
yourself. and we're not very
formal here. so just very
relaxed. Just going to ask you a
couple questions. and off we go.
So my name is Sophie Chen. I'm a
sophomore at Wayland High
School. so 10th grade. and
Carol Martin: I was. I initially
discovered this when I was doing
mock trials. participating in
mock trial my Raj. I think she's
also a member of this board. and
she was telling me about it.
which is why I'm here. right? So
just ask a couple questions.
Doug Levine: So thank you for
your interest. Sophie. can you
just tell us a little bit more
about why? Specifically the
human rights. diversity. equity
and inclusion committee kind of
similar to the question question
I asked those folks before we
have a couple of other
committees. But what is drawing
you in HR dei I
Carol Martin: feel like it's the
humanitarian aspect of it that
draws me in. Because I I lived
in Wayland my whole life. I grew
up here. but I still haven't
been very exposed to that side
of side of our town. And
whenever things happen. I don't
hear about it. And. Till it's
like it's gone around. There's
been huge announcements. and I
just want to be more involved. I
guess I want to learn more about
it. because I feel like it's
such a prevalent thing that's
happening in our society. But I
still don't. I'm still a little
unaware of all that's happening.
Thank you.
Unknown: You have any specific
ideas about things that you
would like to see happen while
you're assuming you're appointed
to the to the committee.
Carol Martin: perhaps. like I
was saying earlier. having more
awareness be spread around the
community. because. I mean. I'm
not sure if it's just because I
personally wasn't able to get a
hold of this information. but
I've just been living kind of
under a rock. I guess. maybe.
But I just want to see more
people get into this type thing
and contribute and be able to
spread their ideas as well.
maybe to schools or other areas
where a lot of people are and
the issues take place. Have you
been to one of the HR dei
committee meetings? No.
actually. a lot. They only meet
about once a month. Yeah. I
think the next meeting is today.
tomorrow. Okay? Um. anyway. I
thank you very much for applying
where. like I said earlier.
y'all have such impressive
backgrounds. When I went to high
school. is all I could do was to
go to high school in violin and
women have these classes. and
we're teaching language to
people. I'm thinking. what
happens? Oh. you all do it. and
then you come forward. So we
appreciate that tremendously. So
having said that.
Doug Levine: I move that the
Board appoint Sophie Chen to the
HR dei committee to an associate
position with the term ending
June 30. 2028
Carol Martin: more discussion.
Otherwise we're going to vote
all those in favor. Aye. passes.
Doug Levine: So similar to what
I said before. Sophie is so
you're formally approved by this
board. but you still need to be
sworn in by the town clerk. so
you'll receive a letter in the
mail from the town manager's
office. Take that letter to the
clerk's office. They're going to
give you some conflict of
interest training. materials.
other information. and then.
once you're sworn in. you can
officially be a part of the
committee. But if there's a
meeting this week. you're free
to attend. just not officially
on board yet.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Thank
you. Tom. Appreciate it. And
finally. that brings us to our
last candidate that we're going
to interview tonight. which is
Mr. Brown. Hello. Steve. Hello.
everyone. I may have to accuse
myself. Steve and I went to BAM
soon together for 55 years.
Unknown: I do want to say
something before we start. I was
looking through the calendar
today. I was informed that the
regular meetings of this
committee are on Monday nights.
and it looks like the next
meeting is on Wednesday next
week. and I'm not open to
meetings on Wednesday. so I
think that's something that I'd
have to check out first before
we move forward. Okay. I
apologize. I just discovered
that today. and I think I was
misinformed.
Carol Martin: So excuse me.
before we do any further
discussion. the board. Mr.
Gorom. is before the board for
consideration for a position on
the ECC. right. Correct.
correct. I just want to make
sure everyone who's watching and
listening to me understands what
we're
Doug Levine: It seems their last
meetings in the summer. I'm
looking up their previous
meetings were on Tuesdays. Oh.
okay. May 13 and June 10.
Unknown: That could work.
All right. Yeah. we would
Carol Martin: you like to be
interviewed. or would you like
to explore? Let's. let's go
ahead. Alright. so Mr. Brown.
please give us a brief we. as
you notice. we're not very
formal here. So just a brief
reasoning explanation why you
would like to and I also would
like to add in if you are
planning on remaining on surface
water quality.
Unknown: Oh. okay. sure. So I
think you all have my most
recent resume in front of you.
It's pretty long and it's pretty
extensive. so I won't go through
it. but just say some general
things about my experience. I
started out life as an engineer.
moved into a variety of
marketing roles. I was an
industry analyst. I am not
currently employed. and I'm
spending a lot of time on things
I think are related to this
subject area. I'm on a. I'm on
energize Wayland. I am on the
surface water quality committee.
and I'm I've got a really keen
interest in issues around
environmental correctness and
sustainability. so I really want
to continue that. I really want
to learn more. and I really want
to contribute in those areas. so
that's why I applied for this
position.
Carol Martin: Questions from the
board.
Unknown: I too may have to
recuse myself. but Mr. Garone.
daughter and mine attended
Wayland high school at the same
time. We're friends.
Carol Martin: Absolutely.
there's nobody that can both
Unknown: disclosure having been
made. Steve. as you've looked
into this area where. where do
you think we as Tom can do
better in this area of energy
and sustainability?
That's a great question. I
actually think the town has made
some significant inroads. And I
think it's. it's actually doing
pretty well. I would. I would
like to see. and some of this is
personal. but I would like to
see a little more infrastructure
around supporting electric
vehicles. And. you know. I was
surprised when I saw all the
solar panels going up at all the
schools that there were not
chargers that I couldn't find
anyway when they were there. I'm
a member of something called the
New Horizons band. and we
rehearse up at Lincoln Sudbury.
and they've just installed
chargers at their high school.
So that's one area that I think
we can we can maybe do a little
bit more. I understand there are
some chargers at the new COA
building. so I think that's a
good start. But I think in terms
of new construction and and
things that are moving forward.
in terms of building up the town
with new buildings and so on. I
think the town's doing pretty
well actually.
Doug Levine: Steve Doug Levine.
here. I will be I will
potentially be able to vote for
you this evening. You may be
appointed with a one zero vote.
My question is. I've been
following energize Wayland for
some time. and I'm connected
with Ellen on the Energy and
Climate Committee. Can you talk
a little bit about how energize
Wayland partners or collaborates
with the EC?
Unknown: Well. I know. I know
that she's one of the chairs.
And I think. you know I I'm not.
I'm not really. I don't know how
specifically I can answer your
question. I think. you know. I
see. I see a close alignment. I
know that some of your people
attend our meetings. I know that
some of your members. like Paul
Dale and Tom Siaka are coaches
that sort of work through
energize Wayland to help people
figure out how they can improve
their carbon footprints within
their homes. So I know there is
those kinds of relationships.
Okay.
Doug Levine: that's helpful.
Thank you.
Unknown: Yeah. Hi.
Carol Martin: Steve again. Could
you clarify if we make this
appointment to the ECC. what's
going to be your status and
surface water quality?
Unknown: Well. my plan was to
continue
Carol Martin: that. Okay. just
just wanted to. I think they're
closely
Unknown: related. Actually. I
think that's probably a good
idea.
Carol Martin: Thank you for
applying. Appreciate it. I know
you're very busy jet setting
here and there. so be able to
fit us in is very kind of you.
Unknown: That's one of the
that's one of the things that
has really it was a very busy
summer in that regard.
Carol Martin: And I think year
and a half is more like a Fay a
dog. I'll entertain a motion.
please.
Unknown: Oh. sir. go ahead.
Sorry. I
move that the Select Board
appoint Steve Herron to the
Energy and Climate Committee for
a term ending June the 30th.
2028. and
Carol Martin: so there's no
further discussion. Then we'll
go right straight to the vote.
All those in favor say. Aye.
Aye. Okay. Doug's going to give
you the one voting that was
going to give you. Hang on.
Steve.
Doug Levine: hang on. You'll
receive a letter from the town
manager's office in the coming
days. and then. with some
information. take that letter
over to the town clerk's office
to get sworn in. It's probably
similar to the process that you
did with surface water quality.
Quality. They'll give you some
information around conflict of
interest as a town volunteer.
and then you will be bona fide.
Unknown: Great. Thank you. Thank
you. Thank you. Thanks to see
you. Same here. bye. bye.
Doug Levine: Robbie. I think
Anne might be on 46 I'll see you
around the attendees area. and
not as a panelist. Oh. click on
my name and see if she comes up
that way. Yeah. she might have
used a link that I sent on under
panelists.
Anne Brensley: Can you guys hear
me? See it says Deb
Doug Levine: Levine is talking
go to panelists.
Unknown: He's already on. Are
you
Anne Brensley: able to hear me?
Or no?
Carol Martin: Yeah. very
clearly. So hold on. All right.
hold on. We're getting your name
sorted out here. Okay. so for
the minute taker and brasley is
joining the meeting at 686. 646.
thank you. Thank you. Doug. yes.
Are you leaving
Unknown: me? Yeah. As s.
get it
Carol Martin: fixed.
All right. Anne. I don't see.
Anne Brensley: I can't be seen.
I'm driving. I didn't that's
why. I wasn't sure if I should
participate or just wait until I
can have video. But I wanted to
listen in no matter what.
Carol Martin: Okay. so when
you're ready to but could you I
might need to load your volume.
or is it on our answer. it's
ours. Okay? You'll let Doug know
when you're available to be
seen.
Anne Brensley: Okay. yes. I just
want to make sure I at least
hear stuff so. so I'm not. I'm
not behind.
Carol Martin: Okay. so now we
are on item number six. correct.
correct. So we're making
appointments and item number
six. So when I pass the floor
here to Doug. because we have an
adjustment to make.
Doug Levine: First on the list
of appointments here. we have
one name that needs to be
modified from the route 20 South
landfill visioning committee.
and that is Brad Young. Should
be a member from the EDC named
Val ilchenko. il. C. H. E. N. K.
O. same term ending date. but
that is a the individual from
the EDC who will be appointed to
this committee.
Carol Martin: But we need to
make an amendment. Oh. it's part
of the whole motion. We have to
No. we need to make a motion to
amend the name. So we need to
make a motion. So I need a
motion to to replace Brad Young
with Bali chanco Similar. We had
made this appointment back in
this February. February or
March. and somehow we just
didn't get this updated. So
we've grabbed the need to
correct this. So that's the
first motion we need. Thank you.
Second. All right. so any
discussion? All right. we're
gonna have a roll call now.
Anne.
Anne Brensley: okay. yeah. I
shouldn't take a vote until I
can concentrate on with what's
being said. but I'm trying to
listen. so I will come off
camera and hopefully be an
active participant and
Unknown: just do the previous
Carol Martin: Okay. so all those
in favor of saying your name?
Thank you. Three Zero. now I
need a
Doug Levine: motion. I move that
we reappoint the following
volunteers to the route 20 South
landfill. visioning committee
with a term ending February 27
2026 Michael Spellman. Aaron
Gibbons. Almonte. you Junior
cliff. Lewis valley of chenko.
Mark Norton. Tom Fay and asima
Cherian second.
Carol Martin: All right. in
discussion. I'm just going to
explain those for yourselves as
well. For those listening to us.
the term for this committee was
to expire. I believe November 1
was November 1 in November. and
they need a little more time. so
they've asked for an extension
to the February 27 so that's why
we're doing this. Okay. all
right. all those in favor. yes.
So Mr. Dachenko is presently on
this Yes. See. we had voted him
in this February. People.
Gibsons. I believe. So. yeah.
you.
Doug Levine: Hmm. that's what
the note says. Yeah.
Carol Martin: we voted him in on
February 2025. but it was not
updated on the town court
system. and when we grabbed the
names was it was an error. so
we're fixing this. So all those
in favor of the reappointment
that basically extending the
committee for three months. Aye.
Aye. Motion passes three zero.
That brings us to the what
submission Should we wait the
hand? Or do you want to go to
this one? We can do it. Okay.
First of all. Doug. thank you so
much for doing this. Totally
appreciate it. so open it to the
floor. Do you
Doug Levine: want to talk about
it? Yeah. I the way that I did
this. when I was on the board
the first time. I went through
all of our agendas and anything
that I thought that was
substantial. I brought in here.
and then obviously did some
bolding to highlight what each
topic was. If anybody thinks
that I've missed anything
important that we should
include. I'm happy to add it.
It's a similar format that and
use last year. It's our mission
from the website. Might modify
that next year. And then our
goals at the end. and then in
between is I highlighted some of
our larger accomplishments. Nice
next bill.
Unknown: I had a suggested
addition yes on
2d
and I would echo Carol's
comment. Thank you. Doug for
putting this together. So this.
the sentence reads. posted
William Whitney: public forums
together residents input
regarding a town on Parks fault
located at 195 main street.
collaborated with the
environmental consultant to
address Department of
Environmental Protection
monitored soil I would insert
the words and groundwater
contamination. It goes on to say
it's
Doug Levine: at the top of the
second page of their foot.
Indeed. he isn't Doug. soil Tom
Unknown: and groundwater
contamination mediation process.
or is it my comments have
Carol Martin: a couple Are you
saying that the this last
sentence. roles or
responsibilities that starts
with last one. public works.
functions you're laying in there
that's in our mission statement?
Doug Levine: I'm just that's
just pulled right from the
website. Yeah. I think it's just
it needs
Carol Martin: to be that be
honest with you myself. so that
should update both. All right.
um. are we okay under number one
housing development be saying
the reuse of the subject to town
on property that sounds like a
lawyer wrote that. Mr. Reuse of
town on property of this town.
and should it say shared living
housing period? Because it might
be different kinds of shit.
Yeah. yeah. Is that okay? You
want to get that at it.
Unknown: yeah? Sorry. what was
the change
Doug Levine: she wants me to
strike that for persons with
disabilities to have it be a
Carol Martin: little bit long?
Yeah. because it's shared
living. Your chart says shared
living.
Unknown: I think the charge
talked about affordable housing.
housing for people with
disabilities. and
Doug Levine: one option and
Carol Martin: market rate
housing. Yeah. so shared living
housing. But do you want to
change it all together.
Unknown: Third living housing
might be a frat house.
Carol Martin: How would you
Kelsi? Because we wouldn't be
able to live there. Look at
Doug Levine: one. Be the very
last one be. how change it.
Unknown: It's a service chair.
Shared living housing for people
with disabilities. among other
uses.
Carol Martin: All right. down
under policies and governance.
Why do I have this market under
hosted joint meetings with the
Board of Public Works and town
staff? It's one of foreign
FinCom. so they've been with a
couple of joint meetings. What
letter isn't down here?
Unknown: Yeah. to see
Doug Levine: bad thing Tom.
yeah.
Carol Martin: And then the last
number four. oversight of legal
claims. Yeah. It says consultant
with Attorney security law. And
then says their town council. I
think we should say consulted
with Town Council. okay. rather
than the name of specific. yeah.
like naming anything like in the
articles. we don't usually name
that by not to name straight.
And my last question is. I know
we've done this in the past.
Yes. but I don't understand why.
It's just my name this. What
does the well together?
Doug Levine: And you know. is
the chair of each committee
submit these annual reports. Or
how do they come in?
Carol Martin: Typically. it's
typically the board of the Chair
of each board submits it. or
their representative. that's a
staff member. so. like Linda
will submit it on behalf of
Conservation Commission. Okay.
so I'm going to change it. if
it's okay. Respectfully
submitted on behalf of the
Select Board. How's that? Yeah.
because it isn't just me that
did all this work. trust me.
Doug Levine: Okay. I'll make all
Carol Martin: this change. All
right. I think this is lovely.
and I'm comfortable with a
motion that you to our or do you
want to wait until next meeting
and let everybody vote?
Unknown: I'd be prepared to make
a motion that the board. We need
a motion. but we needed to make
a motion that authorized the
submission of the draft 2025
annual report as amended for
inclusion in the warrant for the
2026 annual Tom meeting.
Carol Martin: Uh. excuse me.
friendly amendment it's put in
the annual Tom's annual report
isn't going okay in the annual
report. Thank you all these
annuals. I accept your annuals.
Okay. Okay. Thank you. And do we
have a second? I can't second.
All right. for the discussion.
all those in favor say. Aye. Aye
passes three zero. Thank you.
Yeah. we can take that off the
next meeting. Okay. so that
brings us under. Item is point.
Going to be item eight. Item
eight. Thank you. Discussion
review of the rail trail and
historic signage project. and we
invite Bonnie gossels. hi.
Bonnie. to join us. Hit them up
please. How are you? And because
it's not going to happen long
but please let the record. No.
I'm eight minutes ahead. Let's
bury the ground of it's not
gonna last. all right. So if you
would be so kind as to introduce
yourself just for the record.
name an address. Lonnie gossels.
15 Bennett road. and a member of
the rail trail signage
committee. Connor is also here.
who is really our railroad
historian and the most active
member. along with Tom Fay
Select Board. who I don't see
tonight. but he's been amazing.
Michael has walked the trail and
ushered this through the state
granting process. and Kelsi has
graciously taken over all the
work that Brian Luther was doing
to get the bids signed up. to
get this thing to actually
happen. This we just back up for
one sec. Smith. people listen.
So what happened was you came in
before us and asked for if you
could start with just two
sentences on that. and then we
can go forward with the request.
great. So the Select Board voted
the funding from funds that were
granted to the town. I believe
there was a $25.000 state grant
and $60.000 of a grant for a
railroad interpretive site. What
has happened is that the DCR has
jurisdiction over most of the
trail area and has a review
process that's like three steps
forward. four steps backward. So
maybe that's not the most
diplomatic way to say it. Tom
has been meeting with them at
times when I am at work. What's
happened is that we got approval
from your board. Thank you for
the 13 signs we asked for. We
hired. with your boards
approval. a graphic designer to
do 13 signs. At this point.
we've been told by the DCR that
we have to consolidate the
information on the sign about
the railroad terminal where the
Unknown: our the are the the
from the
Carol Martin: best way to
describe it? Probably Rick is
better at describing it than I
am. There was a three engine
terminal building and a
turnaround that they've.
volunteers have dug out. You can
see the giant stone blocks used
to be a metal frame on top of it
that was actually used to change
the direction of the trains. We
have to consolidate all the
information about all those
things onto one sign. where we
had separate signs in our
original proposal. and also the
sign for the grout. Heard house.
Wayland Museum and Historical
Society and the historic
district have to be consolidated
onto one sign that leaves us
with the ability to reallocate
what's already been approved
toward some signs that the
historic Commission has been
wanting to do. and members of
the historic mission have
graciously dedicated. shown up
to answer questions. because I
don't know the the information
that I asked about. but they can
all answer those questions. When
Kelsi graciously met with me to
go over the bids. we agreed that
rebidding this for fewer signs
would probably end up costing us
more. based on inflation and the
cost of steel. etc. then using
the bids that we already got.
which were Very good pricing.
and so I personally advocate for
using the actually honoring the
bids that we have already
accepted for the 13 signs. and
just supplying our graphic
designer with content for 13
signs. So what we're asking
tonight is to substitute the
content on the signs. The DCR
won't allow us to do for signs
in a couple of other historic
sites in Wayland. and the
historic Commission can speak to
the content and location of
those signs. So does everyone
understand there were 13 signs
initially. and I think it's
three that were had to be
consolidated. and those three
are going to be used in science.
the historical That's my
understanding. Commission.
commission. again. we're still
in the process. so in the DCR.
right? So I apologize that it's
still fluid. It's my current
understanding that that's the
numbers we're talking about. So
that's the request. It's there's
no dollar change. I was
concerned when Bonnie spoke to
me and I spoke to Tom and then
Kelsi. that there weren't two
different funding sources that
this needed to come from. that
we might have to do an internal
so much from this. so much and
that that's all one. municipal
purposes. fund. correct share.
if I may. Yes. you this for this
project. You allotted the price
for 13 signs for this specific
project. like. if you're going
to take away two from that
project. and then Historical
Commission is going to add to
more and less. unless the board
just stuck with how they want to
firm those other two sides. or
you can choose to spend it. It's
really it's up to you. I mean. I
don't know. I don't when I
spoke. had brief conversations.
they indicated they might be
able to put some money towards
it. I don't know how much. So
that's kind of that has fully
decided. but that's a choice
that we have here before us. So
why don't I open it to questions
Lonnie. you have any questions
about this? So the idea is. is
that it's the same amount of
money different locations. and
we're just going to.
Doug Levine: yes. explain what
the locations are.
Carol Martin: One is it real
quick? We're only allowing 10
minutes for this.
Unknown: Keep this short. That's
Gardner Westcott
five. Richard road. Thank you.
Gretchen Dresens: The signs have
been for several years waiting
to be done because we don't have
sufficient funds to finish them.
One will be at castle gate road
with the towers are the H and
the y. and two will be in Dudley
Tom woods that have already been
approved by everyone to get in.
but there wasn't enough money to
actually finish it. because
there's installation process
design costs and then the actual
Sign costs. So by allowing us to
partner in with you and get
those signs out of something
that you've already contracted
for would help us finish those
projects.
Carol Martin: So there was also
a timing issue here. isn't there
with the with the contractors?
Yes. I've had multiple so
there's two different aspects
that we've been out already.
which is basically the concrete
work to install all the
amenities and then to actually
fabricate the signs. So the
concrete work. I've been working
with the contractor. and I've
also brought Mike Fay into the
conversation. and he's been
extremely helpful. I think he's
reached out to you today about
where the. Because the
contractor really wants to help
us out and try to get this work
done. and I know that we're
being hamstrung by a couple of
different factors that are out
of our control. so that aspect
of it is fine. I have reached
out and spoken to the
fabrication sign and said that
we are dating. I did update her
again today and let her know
that basically be able to
provide the documents is
sometime in October when the
graphic designer is able to
transmit that to us. And I'm
waiting to hear that. see if
that's issue. if there's going
to be any contingencies. I
looked at the contract. I don't
believe there should be any
issues. My only real big concern
was the installation of the
amenities. because winter is
coming. it's harder to pour
concrete in winter. but I asked
for help from Mike Fay. and he
is able to push and help while
we can to get some of the work
done now and maybe some of it
done in the spring. So that's
kind of where we are with
timing. So I am going to say
this. though. because I've
already had a couple of these
conversations. but the real gist
here is. even if we approve it.
we've got to get it to get it
done. or we waste the cost going
up. and then we're back up.
We're back in here with a
different problem. So just
pulling up so questions from the
board.
Unknown: I guess my question
would be. I'm not clear on
whether the funding sources were
or the funders were specific as
to the purpose of grant. IE was
a confined to the rail trail. I
Carol Martin: certainly you
meant. Mr. Whitney. meant the
original vote. What the original
vote that the Select Board
understand
William Whitney: there's a state
grant. Yes. correct. And is the
state grant for specifically
signs for the rail trail. as
opposed to the other locations?
Carol Martin: One thing on
phone. I think the state grant
was 25.000 I think the total
project is about 85 correct.
Unknown: So whatever the funding
source is there. is it specific
to the rail trails.
Carol Martin: for the for the
earmark that we received. the
concrete work will pay for it
will pay for the concrete work.
Most of the concrete work. no.
So that that that earmark will
can and will be used for the
property work at the rail trail.
So there's no question about
that specific part of the
funding. I'm just doing a quick
little search in the minutes to
see what the wording was when
you allotted those additional
funds to the rail trail project.
I think what was the source? Was
the town. so Rail Trail get
funds.
Unknown: right? So should we
amend that vote? So I guess my
question. I had no issue with
the proposal. I just want to
make sure that violate any terms
of
Carol Martin: well. set to I
have no problems either. I just
want to make sure I say this
again. We've got to stay on
schedule so we don't come back
here and now it's more money.
Because guess what? That's when
I get my unhappy face agreed and
the bids that came in were
within our budget. But I also
noticed that. you we got. we got
to get this concrete working. or
whatever. So we have been
working with the vendor. and
they're very they're they're
very understanding.
Unknown: Michael. I have the
language from the state's FY 25
budget. and it said further.
provided that not less than
$25.000 she'll be spending for
rail trail improvements in the
town of Wayland. That was
submitted. I believe. by
Representative Linsky on behalf
of the town.
Carol Martin: and that's. I
think. going to the benches and
the concrete.
Unknown: Yes. that's when we
were using it right? We had to
obligate it within the fiscal
year. so we received it and
started the bids
Carol Martin: thank you for
doing that. We it says we just
discussing in review. and it
doesn't say we're taking on a
vote.
Doug Levine: So it needs a vote.
Do we need a vote here?
Carol Martin: Michael. do you
think we need a vote here?
Unknown: Sure if we do. I mean.
you can
Carol Martin: just mean. I'm off
here. I stopped Fay rose. my
being on time. Yeah.
Unknown: About right here.
Carol Martin: Thank you for
fitting us into the agenda. You
have a big agenda when you had
an appointment. if there. if
there are any questions about
the content for the historic
markers. the experts are here.
We're not really here to to
discuss. I don't think that's
not our goal. Our goal is to see
if you're if we're comfortable
with your proposal. which I
think makes a lot of sense. It's
the same dollar amount. whether
we get 10 or 13 signs. It's just
making sure that we have. don't
have to retake a vote. I'm going
to suggest. in the interest of
time. Why don't we just say
we're comfortable with this. and
then if there's an issue that we
need to rebuild something. we'll
put it. I'll put it on the next
agenda. Does that work? Okay? So
we're all set until we less.
Okay? Bonnie. that'd be great.
Thank you so much. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate
your understanding. Shape the
idea of having lemonade. I say
that all the time. lemonade All
right now then. speaking of
minutes. we are going to go to
the minutes
Doug Levine: to have a motion
move approval of the August 4
2025 Select Board minutes as
amended.
Carol Martin: Is there any
discussion? I mean any other
Unknown: under a two
the first sentence. I think
there should be a period after
guidelines in the second line.
commend capital S. she further
suggested.
I think in like fashion on page
three. 819. 19/4. Line of
legislation. which would allow
about participation panel Tom
meeting. I would add a period.
then capital H. He added.
Doug Levine: I see the numbers.
My numbers go a. 12. 1315.
Carol Martin: yeah. On page
four. I'm missing eight.
Doug Levine: The numbers seem a
little off. On page they
Carol Martin: go back and don't
they look at 12 or 13. I'm
Unknown: second history. I've
got a 1114. 1618. 1719. goes on
12. 1315. so that
Doug Levine: means I see we were
running and out of
Unknown: order. Yeah. took them
out of order. That's better.
Carol Martin: All right. I don't
have anything. Do you have any
other Okay. um. no further
conversation. All those in favor
say. Aye. Aye. All right. aye.
Okay. 818. there are no
Doug Levine: approval of the
August 18. 2025. select board
minutes as amended.
Carol Martin: Okay. second.
Thank you. Any evidence. a one
Unknown: in the vein of form
over substance? Chair. Carol
Martin. C Martin called the
meeting and select board to
order when the quorum was
present. I would add a period.
She announced each member by
full name. then under a two
second paragraph. Dresden's Main
Street joined the meeting via
teleconference and requested the
portal in person meeting. I
would say. to work with Van Gogh
license site professional. And
then she also requested 195 main
street. That the 195 main
street. I would insert the word
portion of the town's website be
updated with new information
Carol Martin: before. before we
go on a two. this is
announcements. and then it says
there were no announcements. And
then Michael had an
announcement. So I think we
should probably eliminate. there
were no announcements any more.
Unknown: Something here
a nine which appears on page
3/3. Paragraph. Michael McCall
reported. and then. then I posed
a question which was obviously
convoluted. follow. So I would
suggest W with a question. if
the board is obligated. is that
question if insert one. board is
obligated to general tax.
Revenue for amortization of
bonds to strike the word and
wants debt service excluded. And
three. the board chooses not to
fail us over the exemption. Sent
to Chapter mgL 5921 and I would
make a semicolon. One. would the
project be subject to
traditional vote by the
registered voters of the town
meeting. Question.
sorry to nominate the discussion
here on page 4/4. paragraph. the
second sentence. Van Gogh
responded that So containers
could easily reach class
location of I wouldn't
capitalize. no significant risk.
because it's a term of art Under
DEP there and in the middle of
that paragraph.
Carol Martin: so then all Those
in favor motion passes three
zero. We have about 10 minutes
before the next meeting. I think
we'll go to the next item.
Anne Brensley: Carol. I am I'm
Unknown: available now.
Doug Levine: What time? 718?
Carol Martin: 718. this
presentation study. Welcome. All
right. and we are on item number
10. Tom managers report
questions and comments that
Michael has 10 minutes any it's
the floor is yours. sir.
Unknown: I think we can go
through it in less than 10
minutes. Madam Chair. first
thing and I just want to
apologize coming out of the
gate. we typically schedule my
child manager office hours in
advance on one of the Monday
nights that we're not meeting
here that doesn't conflict with
anything else. And what happened
that fit in the schedule is next
Monday. and we didn't catch it
was the beginning of Rosh
Hashanah. I did have a couple of
people ask me about if they
couldn't make it. I'd suggest
people could send in email
questions if they wanted in
advance. and I would try and get
back to them. but we apologize
for not catching that. But my my
office hours will be here at the
town hall next Monday at 530 to
630 want to let the board know
that we had our first meeting of
the Capital Improvement Planning
Committee at last week. I was
there. Miss power spill. It was
there. Madam chair was there. We
had the five appointees. as well
as some of the other ex officio
members. We started working
already to get together and meet
so that we could work on the
capital plan for next year. as
well as review five year capital
plan. The committee selected
Kelly laughing to be the chair.
and so that is underway. I was
told to update everyone this
evening about the hydrant
flushing program that the water
division will be doing fall
hydrant flushing in the area of
Leeds Hill on Connecticut path.
starting this Sunday. September
21 it'll be flushing the
hydrants at night. between 10pm
and 5am on Sunday through
Thursday. You may notice some
discolored water when you turn
on your faucets. It's just a
mineral content that gets
stirred up through this. You
have any questions. please
contact our DEP W office. The
number there. it's 50835872. and
I wanted to make the board aware
I did send in. I believe I sent
an email late last week. we were
fortunate to get a grant from
the state that Miss Hanson had
applied for previously as part
of a reimbursement for our match
for $884.000 I know Mr. Over he
and some others had seen it
online and wondered why I hadn't
said anything until this
meeting. And I did that in part
because I knew there would be a
lot of questions. I was trying
to get a hold of FEMA. I did
speak with the Northeast
director of FEMA today relative
to the monies from the hazard
mitigation grant. we stand to
receive $1.4 million from the
federal government towards this
project and the issue that we're
contending with. And we've had
some conversations with Mr.
Kevin II. Miss Hanson. our
conservation agent in my office
will be having a conversation
tomorrow. We're using
approximately $600.000 for
engineering owners. project
management services that was set
aside. We now have this. Those
have. Be utilized by December of
2026. we also have a timeline on
this new state grant. So I had
written to FEMA saying we're at
a critical juncture here where
we're going to have to make a
decision. unless you can give us
any more information. that we
may have to go it alone using
the money that we received last
year at town meeting. You may
recall town meeting authorized
$1.4 million from the real
estate reserve to this project
in the event we didn't get the
FEMA monies. I'm happy to tell
you. or at least cautiously
optimistic. based on my
conversation with Mr. Burville
from FEMA today. that he said
that even though it's been about
10 months. he started seeing
movement in the large project
notification process. It hasn't
quite hit Congress. but he said.
this is a positive sign that the
grant is moving forward. It is
our we're going to have a
discussion tomorrow about
whether or not we want to start
doing the bidding process in
parallel so that we can get that
underway in the event this grant
comes through. so we don't lose
time. But I wanted to have some
of this information for the
board before I mentioned that we
received this $884.000 that's
huge. It's going to help us out.
It'll free up money that we
would otherwise bond. But we
really need FEMA to come through
for us for the $1.4 million so
that we can keep our reserves
for another day. So I'm happy to
answer any questions about the
project. Just a couple items
since we were here last. I want
to thank members of our public
safety. police. fire and DPW
held a 911 remembrance last week
outside the public safety
building. It was 10. but quite a
few folks from the various
departments some day for many
people. and it was nice that our
public safety and DEP W came out
that event. Shortly after that.
I went for a tour of Sherman
bridge with the DPW. We looked
at several of the issues that
are impacting the bridge. If you
haven't been there. I'd
encourage you to go down and
take a look. As we were there.
cars are going on the bridge.
The whole bridge shakes. There
are loose screws. loose boards.
and there will be a forum being
held between the towns of
Wayland and Sudbury on October
1. It was going to be at length
Sudbury high but they're looking
for a new forum. I've been in
contact with my counterpart in
Sudbury to hopefully have a
position statement on this. I
know I've heard from several
residents. This is a project
where mass the OT is looking to
give significant in kind
contributions to both
communities in terms of
materials and labor to bring
this bridge that's failing in
its current state back into
condition. However. the issue
that you may have already heard
from some constituents is the
state would like to put a
laminate surface in some
pavement on top. and there are
some concerns that will maybe
increase traffic or the speed
which people go across Sherman's
Bridge Road. So I will continue
with DEP W to work with the
residents. and I encourage folks
interested to attend the forum
on October 1
Doug Levine: that be publicized.
Michael on the way. as soon as
we get the new
Unknown: yes and Sudbury has
already put a page up on their
website with some shared
information about both suffering
Wayland and the contacts I have
heard from a couple of
constituents and members of the
board about the proposal that
was before the Zoning Board of
Appeals last week at 21
Cochituate. I did end that
meeting. and continue to work
with representatives in the town
to look at options for this.
this business I need to speak.
There's several people from the
library. I did speak with Mr.
Lindquist and Jeunesse about it.
In my position the other night
was. I was not. I could not
support the their plan that
would overlay their parking on
top of the library parking. But
the proponent did come back with
some suggestions and encourage
the CBA to continue and talk to
council about some of the ideas
there. and we will continue to
work with them. It's. I think
it's important to support some
of these endeavors. especially
one that is looking like we
believe was that advanced. it
seemed like otherwise. a nice
proposal for that building
utilize it. but the parking. as
you know. is a premium there.
And then lastly. people keep
asking what we're going to do
now. the COA has moved out. You
haven't noticed it's still. Of
these has started to occupy
downstairs. which is great
because now I have Mr. Charena
on the same floor. and we are
continuing to make improvements
in the building. We now have the
digital sign boards out front
here. We should be getting a
town seal. new TVs and some of
the other rooms. And so we're
continuing to work. And we
repainted this room. and our new
IT director is working on a lot
of cyber security initiatives.
so we're moving right along
action. and that's my report
this week.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Mr.
Town Manager. Mr. McCall. um.
does anyone have any follow up
questions for Michael? Well.
setting. okay. great. We have
three minutes. and I'm going to
switch something else in about
consent. Did I have a motion on
consent? So all those in favor
of the consent. this has to be
by roll call now. So Phil. yes.
that's yes. Anne. yes. Carol.
yes. that motion passes four
zero. so it was Bill. sorry.
okay. Review correspondence. So
I will mention that in the
correspondence. as we review it.
we did receive correspondence
from the library regarding the
views of the 14 West lane. and
we also received a comment from
another resident about thinking
there was not really totally in
favor and supporting of the
project. But other than that. I
didn't see anything else there
in the correspondence that I
needed to speak to. Does anyone
have anything.
Doug Levine: No. no. not beyond
that.
Carol Martin: That's great. All
right. is it okay? If you think.
if we start. I like
Unknown: them. sorry. May have a
mulligan from Maureen white
about a ceremony to honor when
Girl Scouts. Yes. I attended
that last year. and I wouldn't
want to deprive other members of
the board the opportunity to do
that.
Carol Martin: I think Doug and I
both like two years ago. right?
Two years ago? Yeah. if I were
careful. it's so smooth. it
really is lovely. And there are
lots of well on topic now. So.
okay. all right.
Unknown: we have a volunteer. We
have a volunteer to put the
date. It's September the third.
Carol Martin: October 3. October
3. Friday. I can try and be
there.
Doug Levine: I'm just gonna try
Carol Martin: and go to so we
haven't on our schedule. We're
just confirming ourselves.
Doug Levine: Yeah. you're
welcome to join us. We won't
deliberate.
Unknown: They do like that. or
someone speak. So we're going to
Carol Martin: have a forum.
We're going to have a forum on
the 14 West plain Street.
Welcome everybody. I do want to
check with Robbie to see if
there are folks that are also
participating. In case any of
them want to also raise their
hand. Maybe we could leave that
we leave that open. I want to
keep our eye on that they didn't
also could keep an eye on. Yeah.
thank you. Appreciate it. All
right. sorry to begin I can get
my credit.
Unknown: Yeah. all right.
Carol Martin: All right. So
we're having a public forum
tonight on the potential use of
14 West plain Street. which. as
you know. crossing the CVS down
and constituent this idea was
brought forth to the board back
in May or June. June. and we
have held. as a federal aware.
some discussion through
executive session. you know.
developing strategy looking at
this. There have been some staff
members who have looked at the
building and and. and we have
also commissioned and received
an appraisal for the property.
And so we have battered around
some ideas. you know. in
Executive Session. of what would
be good uses for this. this
property. and some of those are
represented by some of the folks
here in the room tonight. and
others. for example. we had
thought possibly it might be
something the trust might be
interested in for housing.
Unknown: So we
Carol Martin: they have. they
have felt it's just not
something that they can we
receive correspondence from them
saying that they are it's not
something they could accomplish
or take on at this time. And.
One of the big considerations
before we open this up tonight
is how we are going to possibly
fund this project. and that is a
concern. So as we go through
this. you may get questions from
the board as to how you propose
that we fund this. because
they're not only the cost of the
building. but there would be
build out and obviously staffing
operating costs. So having said
being Debbie downer here. let me
open it up. And also. there's a
number of people in the room. we
would like everyone who would
like to speak to have an
opportunity to speak during this
45 minute period. So we ask that
you be brief. or if someone has
said something you wish to say.
but you just want a second and
say when it's your turn. you
know. I second it. So you want
to get a sense of how many
people are going to present.
That's my next sentence. How
many people think they would
like to speak today or planning
on speaking. So what have I got
here? 123. maybe a couple of
five. Becky. I'm sure. Becky.
five or six. Okay. all right.
who would like to begin? And by
the way. if it's really long. we
try not to join the forum to
say. you know. you have a time
limit. But if it gets really
long. you are going to say.
Please wrap it up. The other
wrap it up. Thank you. Who would
like to start? So when you come
up. please introduce yourself.
You know your name. either a
title. your committee or your
address.
I think we received those. That
was our email correspondence.
Unknown: Yeah. Chris Lindquist.
I'm the director of Wayland
library. I'm here on behalf of
the Board of Trustees. some of
whom are here. Thank you for
coming. So we did submit a
letter with a proposed use of 14
West plain Street. and I'm just
going to briefly summarize that
letter. We strongly support the
town's interest in purchasing
the property in order to serve
the needs of Wayland residents.
including the desires of parents
and caregivers to provide a
quote third place for tweens and
teens to meet and gather. As
you're aware. it's an unmet
need. and it serves the long
term goal of the community for
additional facilities and
activities that promote cohesion
and a sense of identity among
waylands residents. one of the
main features of the property is
its strategic location within
walking distance of Wayland
Middle School. as well as its
location on the bus route from
Wayland High School. about six
minutes away. The building
design and layout is very
attractive. We did tour the
building with Michael and a few
other department heads a few
weeks ago. it offers a number of
opportunities for students to
gather for individual and group
study. socializing. recreational
activities and club meetings.
Indeed. it's an ideally
organized space for study and
homework space. as well as
collaborative project space.
particularly on the ground
floor. which has its own
accessible entrance directly
from the parking lot. In
addition to individual study
spaces. we envision a common
space that can be used for
library and recreation programs
on early release days. on
weekends. during school
vacations and during the summer.
We would like to take the
opportunity to partner with the
recreation department and other
town departments to offer
programs and services targeting
tweens and teens in support of
academic. creative and social
development during the school
year. with a focus on
recreational reading and
programming during the summer
months. when we sponsor our
popular summer reading series.
by pooling our resources. staff
and expertise. we think we can
create a vibrant. multifaceted
hub. The library will work
collaboratively to determine
staffing needs and skid and to
schedule a schedule that will
best serve the community. We
will help ensure the building is
a cornerstone of student support
and engagement by offering the
following service. It's a
satellite library. a road
hitting collection of high
interest books and materials. a
dedicated librarian and free
books available to students.
programs and activities.
including a venue for the teen
advisory board. which meets at
the library currently. and other
programs of interest between
teens. study and meeting space
for tweens and teens provided
much needed quiet study rooms
and collaborative spaces for
students and student run clubs
addressing a direct need
expressed by teens. And finally.
technology access. Wi Fi enabled
laptops available for academic
research. access to library
databases and recreational
gaming. And I'm sure you're
aware that recreational gaming
is very popular with that age
group. So that is just a summary
of our proposed use. And I'm not
sure if any
other board members
happy to take any questions. I
just want the board.
Chris. thank you for your
comments. Have you given any
thought to what the fit out and
equipment cost would be under
this proposal. as well as
operating expenses in library
current expense?
So we have not. I think that our
original task was to kind of
present some ideas. a concept.
if you will. And I think those
details will come in
consultation with the IT
director and facilities and as
well as the town manager's
office. Having toured the
building. it looks like it's in
very good condition. We
certainly have books and
materials that we could bring
there on a rotating basis. and
we also have laptops and
technology that we can provide.
So I think it is a question of
getting into the details. Once
you know some kind of concept
has been approved.
Doug Levine: sounds like a lot
of thought has gone into this. I
appreciate that. Chris. I know
the current library has parking
challenges that has come up so
many times over the years. What
are your thoughts about the
availability of parking in and
around that site?
Unknown: Right? My understanding
is there's 23 parking spaces. So
you know that would obviously
take the pressure off of parking
at the library on five Concord
road. there are times when our
lot is full. And certainly that
would allow us to kind of. you
know. provide services at that
location again. which is very
pedestrian friendly. certainly
to the middle school students.
And so I think it would kind of
take the pressure off of the
lack of adequate parking at the
Main Library. if you
Doug Levine: will. have you
worked in any other communities
that had a satellite location.
And how did that work
Unknown: out? It's a great
question. So Pam. McEwen. who's
our head of children's services.
has gotten some feedback from
other libraries. She did reach
out to some libraries that have
satellite services. I have not
specifically. I've worked in
libraries that had full
branches. right? So a smaller.
full service library. if you
will. but not a satellite
location. which this would be.
But we did get some good
feedback from other libraries
who do have. what I would call
pop up services. or satellite
services. where you don't have
somebody there full time. then I
kind of temporary. you know.
part time basis as the need
arises. So I think once we get a
kind of a foothold there. so to
speak. then we would. you know.
be able to work with recreation.
hopefully in other town
departments to develop kind of a
presence there. I think getting
a full hold there. and kind of.
you know. seeing what the demand
is. and then. you know. trying
to develop our services around
that
would be important.
Carol Martin: I noticed in the
proposal that it says. you know.
you would do joint library and
recreation programs. And I know
the library trustees as part of
their mission statement and
operators. motive is they do not
charge programs and the
recreation does. So you expound
how that would
Unknown: work. You know that
that is an interesting question.
We are non fee based. and I
understand that recreation needs
to kind of raise monies in order
to for the revolving account
correct. So that is a
conversation I would be happy to
have with the Recreation
Commission and Cape Brenna about
how we could. I guess.
coordinate services in that
respect. we are not proposing to
charge any fees. We're currently
providing services to Queens and
teens at the library. The issue
there is transportation. and
this would obviously address
that issue. So I can't speak for
recreation. but we would be
happy to meet and talk about
ways we could collaborate
together.
Carol Martin: yes. because you
see that would be an additional
cost to the Tom understood.
operate this facility. So not
only are you happening in staff.
you know. it's. it's. yeah. cost
the programs apply. and there is
a fee based model. right?
Unknown: Yeah. I think important
consideration also. you know.
again. this gets into the
details. but I think there would
need to be somebody staffing the
building just to be in the
building present. you know.
perhaps directing people who are
coming to the building. And
somebody would need to be
responsible for the building. So
we're not proposing that we be
the custodian of the building.
but that we provide services. So
again. that would be another
consideration once you talk
about operating costs as well as
ongoing maintenance costs.
obviously. So I can't speak to
those unfortunately.
Carol Martin: Dan. did you have
anything? Otherwise we're going
to thank Chris.
Anne Brensley: yeah. I just had
a quick question. So we have
the. obviously. the new senior
center slash community center.
and then you have the existing
library. What programs do you
feel you're not able to do with
those two uses. with those two
buildings as uses?
Unknown: You know. I think we
are limited because of the size
of our buildings. 13.000 square
foot building. as well as the
parking and those are the
challenges. We did a strategic
planning process about a year
ago. and we got a lot of
feedback from the community
during focus groups and
community forums as well as the
survey. And a lot of the
feedback was around just the
constraints with the building.
We have a lack of meeting room
spaces. and we don't have enough
places to hold programs. So when
an outside group wants to use a
Raytheon room. for example.
we're not able to hold a hold a
program in that space. So we're
kind of limited in the physical
space within the building. as
well as the parking space. No
challenge. And so I think we're
looking to be able to provide
more services to that between
Team cohort. they are challenged
by a lack of transportation.
They're dependent upon parents
to get them to our building at
500 but we think that the 14
West plain would be a pedestrian
friendly. walkable within from
the middle school. as well as on
the bus route from the high
school. So we wouldn't have that
Anne Brensley: if. even if you
had programs. weren't you
thinking? Would you be thinking
after school programs or evening
programs?
Unknown: We are. yeah. we're
primarily thinking about after
school. but also during the
school vacation week. on
weekends and during the summer.
And we think that evenings. I
mean. we may be able to provide
some. you know. programs to
tweens and teens. but we were
primarily thinking between. say.
230 and 16.
Anne Brensley: okay. but then
the parents would still have to
pick up. There would still be
transportation. It would just be
on the pickup side. It would
thank you so much. You're
welcome. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Thank you. All
right. Does anyone have you
don't want to be next? The next
chicken. I guess who would like
to be next? Oh. go ahead. Go
ahead. Becky. we'll let you go
next to me.
Rebecca Stanizzi: Willowbrook
drive. we brought this building.
this potential. to the attention
of the Select Board for a lot of
reasons. one of which we don't
know the perfect answer yet. and
let's buy ourselves some time.
right? The interesting thing
about this building. if it just
came on the market. it would
come and go and we wouldn't be
able to wouldn't be able to do
anything. We could never move
fast enough this building. the
owner is willing to wait till
time. I think I'm speaking out
of turn. willing to wait until
town meeting for proceed. which
is unheard of. That's great.
They are also in place and have
a lease through the end of 2026
they've been there for 27 years.
They're the ones who built the
building. They just don't need
the whole building anymore.
They'd like to hang on to the
upper floor so we could keep
that lease going through 2026
for longer. while we figure out
the highest and best use for
this building. But the most
important thing is this building
right now. the sales price at a
million and a half. and that's
list price. I don't know where
the appraisal came out. over
5000 square feet. That's 283
bucks a foot. We just spent $11
million on 13.000 square feet at
this the community center over
800 square bucks square foot. So
for us to build any facility is
so much more expensive than this
building. So much more so when
people say. you know. people
love this idea. or they're like.
oh my gosh. MWRA is coming. We
have all these things. The sky
is falling. This is exactly why
we should be looking at this
building. because it's cost
effective. because it has a
tenant in there who will
continue occupying and paying
the bills. It buys us the time
to figure out the use that makes
sense of the space. From my
personal opinion. we now have a
capital improvements committee.
So in as much as this could be
office space that saves us money
from building somewhere else. in
my mind. that would be number
one. If capital improvement
committee doesn't want to do
that. or departments don't want
to move over there. then you
look at it as an amenity the
community forum. The number one
thing was. we want more spaces
for community gathering. So
let's figure it out now. I would
put out an RFP to town
departments to non profits. etc.
if the town doesn't want to be
burdened with operational costs.
like arts Wayland right now.
over town center. they get their
space for free. but they cover
all the utilities. all the
management. all the cleaning.
the landlord doesn't set foot in
it. right? There are probably
many non profits who would
happily do that. or it might be
a library who suddenly they can
work with recreation and get
some of that cash flow going.
They could rent the space for
events. whatever it is. How is
there a way to generate that
short cash flow that makes it
sort of cash flow neutral from
the town's point of view? That
would be my number two. And then
number three is. if we're
feeling flush. let's you know.
trick it out like the best new
amenity. but we're. Just not a
town that. you know. separates
that $36 million in the
community center. We just don't
have that. and especially with
the things facing us. So what
this building is. and I don't
have a dog in the hunt. it's
mostly. this is a great building
from a town perspective. It is
right next to the playing
fields. There's tons of parking
around. It's wall to everything.
We will figure out a lot of good
uses for this. but we just need
to act on it. and by keeping the
accounts in place. at least to
the end of 2026 we could. I
don't know the Masons of town
finance. but float a short term
bond until we know exactly we're
going to do it. and if those
costs would most likely be
covered by keeping those
accounts in place. So I would
advocate. don't necessarily make
up your mind right now. but it
is such a great asset that
certainly something will perk to
the top with a lot of analysis
and with the capital
improvements committee to make
it a really good asset for the
town. so that five years from
now. we don't come back and say.
Why didn't we buy that building?
Why? Why? Why didn't we buy that
building? So I came back. Thank
you. Um. who wants my next
question? I think was first. and
then I better check to see if
anyone online
Gretchen Dresens: doesn't 155
main street. I'm not on the
board or committee for non
profit. I can just think for
myself. I would love I live in
the area. I would love a
library. I would love an art
center. I would love anything
there. but if I could just sort
of boil it up to a higher level.
because I'm a little bit
confused about the idea of
purchase. I know that there was
an email sent about advocating
for it. and I know moved quickly
into executive session. so I'm
not sure if there was discussion
that I miss. So some of my
questions are based on not
understanding maybe what you
talked about. We have an
override. Potentially come in.
we get some large expenditures.
We've got water problems. We've
got cleanup problems. I know
that the schools are doing an
analysis of our facilities. and
we don't know what. what? That
means. And so being financially
conservative right now seems to
be in the best interest of
Wayland. and to be prudent. I
hear from boards and commissions
and all that that are one of the
problems Wayland faces is that
we have a really small
commercial tax base. That is
sort of the reason that a lot of
the projects that that come
before the boards are we just
don't have commercial tax space.
So why would Wayland want these
are just questions. I mean that
not necessarily answers tonight.
But why would Wayland want to
take a commercially zoned parcel
and give up those tax dollars to
resume that to municipal and
then I'm aware that. you know.
there's been conversation about
selling town building and
relocating town offices. And I
took a quick look through the
capital projects list. and a
really. really rough estimate
looks like there's about $7
million needed to repair for
this building. And I'm wondering
if there where I can find an
analysis of the cost for
Wayland. selling town building.
buying. relocating. supporting
town offices spread throughout
town. versus actually repairing
what we need in town building. I
think that analysis would really
inform or help understand the
decision whether to buy or not
14 left planning. then there's
sort of well. until we figure it
out. maybe we could keep the
current tenants there. and maybe
we can use it for offices and
what the cost is for that. in
terms of insurance. for
liability. in terms of building
maintenance and all of that. I
think it's great that there's a
lot of if. if cost was no
option. and there's a money tree
outside. and. you know. perfect.
There's a lot of great uses for
that building. but that's not
the case. So I'm hearing a lot
of wants for the building. but I
don't know if there's needs for
it. It also seems to be at a
somewhat disconnect of
purchasing that property. where
quarter of a mile down the road.
we're contemplating giving away
a larger parcel. 195 main
street. And so if we're looking
for space. if we're looking for
all of that. there seems to be a
disconnect. So I think it makes
a lot of sense for Wayland to
keep that commercially zoned and
to get. you know. the effort
that we're doing trying to. you
know. fill vacancies at Town
building. you know. filling
vacancies at natumberland Town
Center and the whole foods plaza
that that is a why we would give
up a commercial parcel and
rezone it for municipal
financially. Just I can't
understand that. especially with
some of the projects that we're
facing. And again. in a perfect
world. I mean. my family. I've
got four boys. the library was a
home away from home. and the
thought of having myself host
you. Be fantastic. An art center
will be fantastic. All of that.
it just to me. financially
doesn't make sense. We have a
lot of other expenditures that
are coming down the pike. and I
think we're not being fiscally
responsible thinking about
finance. So those are some just
sort of general questions that
may be over time. Thank you. Mr.
Carol Martin: Stress. Mrs. Which
one of you wants to be close? I
think Chris had his hand raised
before. and you know what you
can be next. How's that sound?
Is that fair. sir?
Doug Levine: Reynolds. 24 Charma
down as a gesture of respect and
efficiency. Madam Chairman. I
want to take advantage of your
point earlier that we could just
say. I second somebody's
remarks. I second Miss Denise
remarks. I would add or amplify
just three things over and over
again. I hear that if the town
wants to build a building. it'll
cost 1.6 times what it costs to
buy a typical building of the
same like to like basis. I think
the 3x Factor for square footage
speaks for itself. and I hope
and trust that your board will
look at this on the basis that
we may actually not be able to
afford not to do it. If the
numbers work out. then let's do
it. If the numbers don't work
out. then let's not do it.
That's essentially what Becky
said. All I would add is. during
the time it takes to figure all
that out. You could still sell
the building again. right? You
can take control of the
building. Do something Wayland
does. well. analyze this. make a
great decision. And if the
decision at the end of it is.
you know what that actually
doesn't does that dog doesn't
hunt? Great you can sell the
building. Thank you very much
for having this commerce space.
Asa Foster: chairman of the
Recreation Commission. But I'm
speaking on behalf of myself.
We. as a recreation department.
Recreation Commission. currently
in this building. this building
is open maybe five days a week.
Recreation is seven day a week.
Operation and the way it is
currently for us here is very.
very difficult. In the
summertime. the building is
pretty much closed up on Fay all
day. The air conditioning
function appropriately in this
building. We would very much be
interested in talking with the
library in terms of doing
something based we haven't
discussed this as a commission
in our meetings but I did on the
agenda to discuss tomorrow. and
it will certainly be very
interesting. as I mentioned to
myself in the library. because
the current situation as it
exists for us in this building.
location of that building in
particular would be terrific for
us because of the location
chicken field. You got a
basketball area there. but you
get stop loss a number of
activities go on it. So maybe
something would be very. very
interesting in pursuing I think.
as we mentioned before. it's
like. but I think it is
something that we don't do. You
should now is
Carol Martin: this questions on
the board.
Unknown: functions
do you feel are compromised by
being in the town building. as
opposed to a standalone
Asa Foster: building? Well. the
building is primarily closed
during trials. The air
conditioning is off 90 degrees
and the other side is 90 degrees
the instant. just it doesn't. We
can't provide the programming
that we would like to provide
based on the function of this
con.
Unknown: Double. Is the issue
that the offices aren't
accessible? Is it that you have
equipment stored here that you
can't access? I'm trying to
understand specifically you can.
Asa Foster: you can access. we
have access to. know. yeah. but
all the things that make
building function. no air
conditioning. It's somewhere
we're working in a facility and
and and you had in the
summertime. four days in a row.
That's nine degrees and nine
degrees. You know. it's just
it's not happening Tom this.
this building functions. Space
for school. environment and
other offices that are
functional does not functional
buildings for the regulation.
Doug Levine: I think what Bill
may have been driving at is 14
West plain. depending on how you
reconfigure the space if you
partner with the library. Do you
envision that wreck could have
some meaningful programming in
that space? Because it's not
like space inside. There's no
type of athletic space inside
that building.
Asa Foster: No. absolutely not.
No. We could do some programming
there. We also do program at the
way council meeting. Facility in
on which point produced. But
that. even that. that hasn't
been fully vetted. we have
access to that building as much
as you would. That's changed
well. but I think the location
building is very favorable.
directly. I think the town would
the town would love the
opportunity to have recreation.
basically. as opposed to having
most of the construction in
North
Carol Martin: Wayland. Anne. do
you have a question for
yourself? Otherwise. I'll pop
in.
Anne Brensley: Do you foresee
any resources that you would
need from the town to support
these programs?
Asa Foster: I don't. I mean. I
think. I think. with our
programs. basically fee based
programs. no matter where they
are. that's we were still
operating as a female we just
Anne Brensley: need to cover the
expenses and then expect that
the programs would pay for
themselves.
Asa Foster: Well. I think not
necessarily a program that would
be held there. but the program
that we have throughout the
town. it's it's not. we don't
necessarily say. okay. math.
we're going to have certain
programs at this facility or In
this building or another outdoor
facilities. all of them. my
perspective. they all go in the
same pot. and that's what we pay
for. Thank you.
Carol Martin: So you actually.
well. I'm listening to you as I
had a thought. which is always
dangerous. So you're ready.
Ready? Okay. Would the record if
we were to purchase this?
Because I think I said at the
beginning. one of the big
challenges is a funding source.
I Okay. so I don't hear that
funding source. How are we going
to pay for this? So if we were
to go forward with this and
recreation were to go in there.
would you be willing to support
the cost of that building
through fees. I don't see. I
don't Well. I can't I can see
Yes. I can't say yes. but I'm
saying throwing it out. what
legal? How legal that would be?
Because basically. our fees go
support the programs that they
charge the cost of. There's no
cost to you to operate in this
building. because this building
is here. and we've already this
building we own. right? That
building. this is my mind
working on an odd idea. I
haven't thought it out. So it
may not be 100% clear. but we
don't own that building.
therefore we have operating
costs that are greater in those
buildings. So that would be a
cost in the program. and I
believe in the initial
Modernization Act. you would
have. that's a legitimate
expense. So the question is.
would that just a food for
thought? Because. you see. we.
everybody's so far saying that
we like this food. like this
building. However. I don't hear
anyone saying. Oh. we're gonna
pay for it.
That's not the full cost of that
book. Person. I'm just saying.
Okay. so I'm just asking my
thought. Food for thought.
There's no. obviously no answer
to it today. But if.
Asa Foster: if. if you could do
it well legally. we would have
no problem in terms of. from my
Carol Martin: perspective.
because I'm just. I'm waterfall
back to talk it over with the
Commission. I'm just throwing it
out. Thank you for your time.
All right. Miss Lewis would like
to be next
Anette Lewis: Lewis Claypit Hill
Road. A number of years ago. the
wrap report Wayland real asset
planning committee looked at all
the land owned by the town. Uh.
and work with other boards and
the community and figuring out
what those lands could be used
for in doing that. And that
committee was sponsored by the
board of selectmen at the time
and also by the planning board.
One of the big recommendations
was that we do not do
independent buildings at various
different locations around town.
that we consolidate things into
one area. or try to consolidate
them as we're getting new
facilities because of the cost.
When you have snow plowing. when
you have road maintenance. when
you have utility issues. if
everything is more consolidated.
you can keep the cost down.
Plus. we felt on the wrap
committee that. for example. if
one were to do it at the pain
estate in the municipal parcel
that is off of old Cochituate
oak. Connecticut PIF that you
could do at the time we were
looking at a library. rec
facility. playing fields. and
those things would allow The
community to come together. They
would allow parents to be using
those different facilities with
their different age group
children and being at one
location. So the idea of just
buying a building without
knowing really what you're going
to use it for. and using
taxpayer dollars to do that. to
me. doesn't make sense. I don't
think that we collect tax
dollars to be in real estate
development. I don't think that
we collect tax dollars in order
to just have a facility or a
building or extra land just to
have it. I think at this point.
when we're at the point of
needing an override that our
taxes are going up considerably
this year. I think we really
need to think about how we're
spending dollars and why. Also
this building just came up. Like
a number of other things have
just come up. It's not in the
long term plan. If we don't
stick to a long term plan. we're
never going to be able to get
out of the dog house. We need to
know what we need for the town.
We need to know how much we're
willing to spend for each of
those things. and we need to
plan it out so that we can get
everything that we want. not
just something that seems like a
great idea today with the
library we built. we just built
a community center. and it has
lots of meeting space. It has
storage space. It was. I
thought. to be used by
recreation library. anybody who
wanted to use it. And I don't
understand why we would need yet
another building when we just
built one. cost of any new
facility. and we've seen it with
the community center and people
didn't want to deal with it
before. But we need to have
janitorial staff. We need to
have more staffing in general.
and that comes with added costs.
The salary is insignificant as
compared to the health care
costs. the OPEB costs. It's
Other Post Employment Benefits
that we have to accrue for our
employees and retirement costs.
we need to think about all of
these things. and they need to
hopefully come before the new
capital planning committee. The
wrap report was very clear in
recommending that that's how
everything should flow. And It
troubles me that we seem to
think that we have just an open
pocket book taking taxpayer
dollars to just be ready for
something in case or because
somebody wants it today. There
are things that we might want
today that in five years. we
wouldn't want. So we need to
plan for them. make sure that
everybody's bought into them.
and move from that point
forward. And I agree with the
idea of not taking tax producing
property off the levy. It
doesn't make any sense to me.
Unknown: I think that's about
it.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Miss
those thank you so is there
anybody else? Miss Ma. wants to
speak. You're all set. Okay. Do
we have anybody online that has
their hand raised? Yeah. Carol
plump. has your hand raised.
sorry. Carol plum. oh. yes.
please. Carol. I recognize you.
Okay.
Carole Plumb: I believe I'm on.
I just want to second what
Anette Lewis just said. and I
will stand by my ongoing
conversation about we should
have a master plan for the town
where we actually know what
we're putting in and why. And
again. all I can say is I'll
just second what Anette had
said. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Carol.
Um. it looks like mister Turner
also has his hand raised. May I
recognize Richard? Richard I
recognize you. Go ahead. please.
Richard Turner: Oh. yes. This is
Richard Turner from Northville
road. Anytime the town purchases
property like this. It comes off
the tax rolls. and I believe
this property is appraised at
$1.5 million that's a lot of
money. Also. you have a big
project coming through the
pipeline. which is the
Massachusetts Water Resources
authority connection for Tom
water. although some of the
ideas for that building are very
good. but I echo what Carol said
is. how are we going to pay for
it? And that is. that's the big
question. right there. Also. is
it ADA compliant? Does it meet
the criteria for the Americans
with with Disabilities Act? I
don't believe there's an
elevator in there for the second
to get up to the second floor.
It's a very nice piece of
property. but it's. I don't
think the town right now can
afford it. and we have a lot of
other projects in line to be
done. Thank you for your time.
Carol Martin: Thank you.
Richard. yes. How are you?
Leslie. I'm a members Recreation
Committee. but my comments are
just individually. I live at 281
main street. um. I've thought a
lot about this property. but I
don't have anything. even a plan
set on behalf of recreation. I
think. you know. the space they
are currently in is
unsatisfactory. just for the
workers in that that office. But
what excites me is the proximity
to the park. the playground. and
how it could be a more breast
robust Youth Center. A lot of
kids are traveling south after
school. somewhat aimlessly. It
makes me a little concerned.
There have been incidents of
people who have been
questionable in the parking lot
by the playground bike to it.
And I know some kids have
mentioned feeling unsafe in that
area. It would be really great
if there was a youth services
location grounding them so that
they could travel south together
and tax and the purpose rather
than aimlessly. I also really
like the proximity to the
cotituate Lake. which would be
helpful for recreation to keep
tabs on their other offerings in
that location. I'm also a little
hesitant to remove recreation
staff from the town building.
because I know working amongst
their other departments is a
very big benefit I've thought a
lot about. and I don't know the
answers to. but what department
could be severed successfully.
and I. you know. I don't know.
Maybe it is our patient. Maybe
there's not. But I just want to
share my thoughts about the
bringing another entity south.
which would be nice for the
members of digital. Thank you. I
think everyone has had a chance
to speak.
Anette Lewis: I am gonna how
much has been spent so far on
Anette Lewis Hill Road. How much
has been spent so far on the
appraisal and on the so that was
in on the appraisal. And also. I
just wanted to mention that we
did have a satellite location
for the library years ago. and
it was closed because of cost
Carol Martin: before anyone
answers that. probably one of
the few in the room that
actually went to that satellite
location when it was Thank you.
Mr. McCall. did you want to
answer that
Unknown: question? I don't have
the final invoice. but the
estimate was roughly $3.000
i We
did several tours of staff time.
So while I don't have an invoice
for that. I mean. we did
circulate quite a few
folks through their
money come from.
don't quote me. but it was
either my expense account. Of
the select list. That's okay.
Thank you.
Carol Martin: One of the two.
Madam Chairman. may I ask the
question. yes? I'm going to
close this out after this. And
has everybody had a chance to
speak the first time for yes?
Okay. go ahead. Chris. Sorry.
Thank you. My question is.
there. is there a process built
into the master planning process
for opportunism. when something
terrific pops up that may be a
particularly juicy site. as has
already been described so Peter
Tom. or just a nice price. or
does the master planning
process. in the spirit of
thoroughness. get things so
bogged down that things have to
be planned out so far we can't
unveil any opportunity. Thank
you. Thank you. All right. I
want to thank everybody for
coming. The purpose of the forum
was for the board to hear. you
know. not just in ourselves. but
to hear from residents about the
project and proposed project.
and we. I believe. have
committed to make a decision.
probably by the end of the
month. So we will most likely
have an executive session on
this at our next meeting. which
is on September 29 I will say
this. the money is an issue. And
I will also say this. that case.
everyone doesn't realize the
process should. should the board
elect to go forward? We didn't
have to go to tell me. because
this will have to be an
expenditure approved to tell me.
So just everybody knows it isn't
just because it's on the
property. like. you know. in the
market. like. like. if you want
to buy a home yourself. you put
an offer. and then you buy it
six weeks later. We have to go
through the due diligence and do
the process. Should we take that
route? I'm not saying one way or
the other. What we're doing is.
I don't know. So anyway. gives
you something you look like you
want to say something?
Unknown: Yes. I could just
comment a little bit generally
on what Mr. Reynolds asked. I
went through this in my hometown
when I was involved. Oftentimes.
if a property comes up where the
town has to do in response is
hold a special election. a
special Tom meeting those types
of things. things that we would
also have to contemplate is. you
know. absent getting FEMA money.
what funds we have readily.
readily available. we probably
have to look at borrow. and then
we to avoid further problems
without dwindling levy capacity.
You probably want to go and do
this as excluded yet. but you
would have a principal and
interest otherwise that would be
in your operating budget. But
you move that over. and those
would be something to consider.
And well. we looked. we had a
lot of different staff going. I
didn't find a great combination
of departments that would fit in
there. Maybe library on for one
floor of rec on another. It was
not big enough to handle the
school administration. Ideally.
I would have liked to have
something that could or one or
two departments come in and
occupy it. That would make it
really easy to justify. But to
some of the points that came up.
we thought we might have to get
some level of janitorial
service. depending upon what was
going on. might need some
additional staffing during the
day. I don't know if the library
could transfer someone down or
you would be looking so these
are all things that went through
our minds when we were looking
at as well. But to some of the
comments that were made. our
inspectional services went
through. They thought the
envelope of the building was
good. They didn't see they do a
lot of major upgrades the roof.
The issue. you see. all these
things were good. although it
doesn't have an elevator. it
does have ramps to each floor
that's adequate parking. So
there's a lot of busses to the
building. But then again. you
know. what is the ultimate use?
What can we do in the interim.
if we were to acquire those all
things have yet to be determined
before.
Carol Martin: Alright. again. I
want to thank everybody for
coming. We appreciate your time.
We appreciate the input. It is a
big decision. and we will take
it under advisement. I guess at
our next meeting. Thank you. Do
would like to take a five minute
break while they are
the Select Board is back in open
session at 823. 823. thank you.
All right. so the next item on
the agenda is going to be item
number 12. which is discussed
review and possibly vote to
approve the Wayland financial
policy manual. This is actually
page 121.
and then i can't i. It. I'm
here. Sorry. I hope you've heard
me say that we're back in
session and we are going to do
Agenda Item Number 12. which is
the review of the Wayland
financial policies manual
prepared for us by the Division
of local services. It's in the
supplemental packet. and it
starts on page 121. so I will
let somebody else lead this.
because this is not my
Unknown: Thank you. Madam Chair.
thank you the version you have
this evening. I did take the red
line out because there were a
lot of legacy comments that were
left in there by me and other
staff members. but this
incorporates the comments that
were provided to miss powers per
left by Select Board Member Fay.
and the the email list of
questions and comments that you
had the other week. I most
notably it starts off. and it's
no longer just the policy
manuals. the policy and
procedure manual. and it says
that I says that several times
throughout Mr. Fay had some
minor grammatical changes. I did
go through. I don't have to go
section by section. but I sat
with Mr. Kevin. and we went
through some of the comments and
notes that were in the margins
previously by the treasurer to
ensure that we either we had
answered her question or we made
changes it was brought up in the
budget process. we incorporated
the references to let me see if
I can get down there for the
under the first annual budget
process. Second paragraph. we
brought in comments about making
reference to the town manager
act present the recommended
operating budget to the Finance
Committee for reviewing
subsequent presentation annual
Tom meeting for the Tom code. So
we did make some of those
changes that you had suggested.
Madam Clerk. We did go back
Carol Martin: to second meeting
week in a row. You called me
madam Clark. Excuse me to do
that. He means over says to me.
you got to
Unknown: I think it's muscle
memory I paid
Carol Martin: position. That's
true. Oh. well. all right.
Unknown: sorry. madam chair.
okay. that too. Position comes
with ISD. yes. we're just split.
These are new. yes. but as you
go throughout many of the
suggestions you made. we need to
review them to make sure they're
accurate processes. or added
some of the suggested language
you had some typos and
clarification. so we Kevin AI.
went through all those and made
sure those changes were
reflected. Or if he was happy to
say we didn't need to do. excuse
me
Carol Martin: one second. I do
see that you did that I did like
I would like to clash another
conversation that section. Is it
okay to hop in here? No. I just
said. everybody has things as we
go through real quick. I mean. I
am going to say this is Michael
is correct. This thing has been
looked at. And I have to tell
you. you know. I even volunteer
to go in. I don't know how much
help I was with the staff. but
we would go through things and
having help with editing. So
we've been through this a lot of
times. And I'm saying this too
because I also received a couple
emails. you know. about. you
know. who has reviewed this.
this. And I explained was the
consultant put them together and
you better staff. And I held. of
course. because he's done it.
Michael Stone. and I just want
to reiterate that at the
beginning. before we start
calling each other Mrs. Clerk
and all that. So but on this
particular one. I'm really still
concerned about the wording
about the Finance Committee.
because it implies I just want
because it's pursuant. That is
straight out of the brand new
code review. It says for review
and subsequent presentation. Tom
meeting. So it's the Tom manager
presents a recommended operating
capital budget. survival
capital. finance committee for
review is. I agree. but it's
their recommended budget that
goes to tell me it's not the
budget that tell me ownership
puts together. Because if they
make an adjustment. and I think
that's kind of bounce back. we
looked at the new section. 19.
two. that's what it says. Okay.
I just want to make sure we not
having to revisit this. because
they make a recommended budget
at tell me all right. sorry. And
then down here in B. where it
says the second sentence. first
part of. Finance Committee will
review for eventual occasion. in
the annual town meeting one and
present to Tom meeting. Just
think the wording needs to be
clearer. and it's the finance
committee makes a
recommendation. We'll review and
make a budget. They don't make
one review and recommend a
budget.
Unknown: any wording in 19 two
says the finance committee.
Carol Martin: Okay. that's
homework for me. Sorry. Revisit
some anybody else. and I know
Bill. you also had questions
about including a finance
committee when we looked at
this. Sorry. you also had a
question. which time we looked
at this. about making sure the
Finance Committee was. you know.
enumerated here in the process.
So. all right. sorry. Michael. I
think
Unknown: it'd be easier if you
went through your list of
questions and asked me. Does
anybody else have any Okay?
Carol Martin: Page eight.
capital planning. Oh. I think we
just have a typo here. Second
paragraph. Tom manager. assisted
by the finance director of
recommendations. capital
improvement. responsible delving
the town's annual capital
budget. which will be derived
from the multi CIP. That makes
sense. No wrong. I don't think
you need to be. We don't know it
works that way. You can say
which will drive wrong. Thank
you. Good. That's done.
Item c. this was one I and I
raised this question in my
comments. submitting the capital
projects. So beginning in
October. into the town manager.
the finance director. solicit
capital project request farming
heads. At the same time. the
department heads will assess the
current. prior capital projects.
and requested some
recommendations to add. withdraw
or adjust the project to cost of
the capital projects based on
Anne Brensley: where are you
right now. I'm sorry.
Carol Martin: Items page 10 of
the documentary. 139 in the
supplemental. So this was the
question I raised. Is that we
are trying to train the process
to not be a whole redo every
year. The idea is. is that it's
a five year plan. and then the
one year that gets done comes
off. So years one for four
there. and we're adding in year
five. So I had asked on my
notes. you might want to just So
Brian. is Brian okay with this
language?
Unknown: Or we looked at it. we
thought it was okay because CIPC
will now be the gatekeeper in
reviewing those and then make
the recommendations back to us.
because it's
Carol Martin: okay. You're okay
with it. then.
Unknown: yeah. if you're okay
with it. I'm okay with it.
So Michael. tell me about the
relationship of the CIPC to the
five year capital plan.
So the way we envision it is
they are
Carol Martin: the departments
have to
Unknown: take the five year plan
that we have now. and assuming
that we're through the previous
fiscal year. they have four
years. and they're adding to the
end of it. right. so that the
CIPC would be looking at the
plan that's Coming forward in
the queue for this year. and
looking at that five year plan
and starting to have an eye on
years from five up to 21 years.
But we also discussed the other
day a mechanism that if. if
something needed to be some
horse trading. for lack of
better words. had to happen.
that somebody needed something.
let's say they had an equivalent
size project in year four and
maybe one in year two. And do
the need. they had to flip them.
They would present that idea to
the CIPC to see if they felt
that merit a change in the in
the queue.
my sense was the CIPC was longer
term capital planning. and not
so much the five year capital
plan. And making adjustments in
the five year capital plan the
project in year four maybe needs
to go to year two. Is that
something that a long term
capital planning committee.
but they're called the Capital
Improvement Planning Committee.
They're not the we had a working
group called Long Term Capital
Planning Committee. and this was
a product of that long term
capital working group. It was to
create this committee to help
review the five year plan and to
start looking at long range
planning from years five out
through 20. And I believe the
article that went to town
meeting old conflict. madam.
madam chair has it
Carol Martin: starts at 20.2 if
you want to contend
Doug Levine: also on the they
have the language on the page
for the committee. and in the
end. it says committee is also
charged with developing a long
range capital plan of at least
five years. Committee shall
study current and long term
proposed capital projects and
improvements involving non
recurring tangible projects and
assets. I think it could be
Carol Martin: both my name. but
I think 20 the first. the second
one down there. 2022 something
is the one they want.
Unknown: 20 dash three says the
committee should prepare
annually the capital plan.
recommending a capital
improvement budget for the next
fiscal year in a capital
improvement program with
recommended capital improvements
for the remaining fiscal years
of the capital planning period.
A term of years. It should be
determined by the town manager.
but no less than five
years. right? I mean. when we
talked about that. initially. we
talked about 20 years. Then
there was a draft that had no
term. We talked about the fact
that it should be longer term.
And came and I think the
language.
you know. the minimum was five.
but we looked at expanding.
My question is. is this the
right group to look at switching
something from next year to the
following year or vice versa?
We did discuss it the other day.
I think ultimately the chair of
that committee. who currently
would be moved lane. could make
those recommendations. I do
believe there has to be some
mechanism if there are some
emergencies for people to appeal
to. and it felt better a panel
of these folks than to make some
recommendations to me. So I I
seem to
like to change in my view. I
don't know. I thought the longer
term committee would talk about.
when do we need a new elementary
school? Or. oh. that's all
coming in. We need a Tom
building. But if somebody said.
you know. really need to buy a
piece of fire apparatus. not
year three. but year two. is
that the group that should be
talking about that.
somebody would have to address
it. One of the things that I
think there's a line in there
that says. Tom meeting cannot
consider anything unless
reviewed by that committee.
because we're also trying to
capture the people who try and
bypass the five year plan by
putting in something through
CPC. I know
I completely agree with that
this is probably not a perfect
mechanism. I I do think it is a
good planning tool to have a
larger committee looking at
these things. rather than just
me and Mr.
Carol Martin: Kevin. I just had
one thought. I don't know if
this will help. Um. my days of
Finance Committee and have the
plan. Brian would say. Okay.
this is the full and you come
the next year. and they'd be all
a request from the various
departments. No. no. we don't
want that. We want this. And so
that's what this is really
trying to do. is create. which
is why I raised this question.
because I think the goal. one of
the goals here is. was to create
a little more. I don't know
quite what is stability in the
plan. you know. to make it a
little more solid. so it's not.
oh. well. we changed our mind.
We don't want phase force last
year. We pushed for that to be
in that next year.
Unknown: And the thing so
anyway.
the question is whether this is
a change. kind of an expansion
of the role of the long term
capital planning committee to
address the shorter term
reshuffling. or
it's just part of the first day
discussion. I mean. they'll be
bound by that bylaw. and so it's
part of the conversation.
Carol Martin: They're also
advisory. because they present a
report to the Tom manager. who
then looks at it. by extension.
also the project. And then from
there. you create your capital
plan. and if you don't agree.
you go back. So there is a
conversation that goes back
before and I ultimately present
that the board and to the
Finance Committee.
Unknown: Everybody gets a
chance.
Carol Martin: Are you all simple
on that? For the moment
Unknown: I heard what was said.
Carol Martin: You all said for
the moment. I could tell the
look. All right. So back to my
question. Ryan there. Reviewed
the language. and he's
comfortable with it. right?
Because we're trying not to
have. yes. totally new plan
every time. Was my own concern.
Okay? PAGE 14 is a thing called
DEP. Oh. wait a minute. Page
Kelsi on page 12. there's one of
these charts where she uses. you
know. FY. 2122 2324 and I know
she put those in there for us
when we were developing the
policies. But you want to take
the charts out. because
otherwise you got to keep them
up. So there's one job I saw. I
know you wanted to have all I
thought you want to have a page
14. the stat management policy.
And I think it's somewhat new.
and I think we should. Maybe. if
you don't agree. that's fine.
but if you think it is somewhat
new. maybe we just kind of
review this separately with the
board and just so they
understand trying to accomplish
here. my thought that One. may I
ask? What. what concerns you
might have had about the debt
match. I mean. it's noon. Let me
take this one under advisement
too. You know. it's been a while
since I looked down there as
well. So. and then Kelsi.
there's not one of those charts
in here on page
Unknown: 1616. Yeah.
Carol Martin: Finance results
page 20. And do you have
anything in any of this? By the
way. I'm just sort of talking
all the time. Sorry. No. I
Anne Brensley: mean. I looked at
this in comparison. I think.
Carol. you had brought this back
to my attention. But. um. I
looked at this in comparison to
other towns and so. you know. I
felt a lot more comfortable some
of the changes we already
discussed and kind of talked
about. but some of this. I think
even the stuff that you know. I
might not understand fully on
how it works. will be flushed
out by using it. So. you know.
unfortunately. I think it's one
of those scenarios where it's it
feels to me. it feels sometimes
like it doesn't completely match
up. but we have to try
something. right? So. I guess.
in a way. I'm just thinking that
we shoot first. uh. shoot for
bullseye.
Carol Martin: I think. I think
you hit it on the head. I think
it's terrific that we're
formalizing this. and as we go
through it. we may end up
finding a few things that we
need to tweak with we'll revisit
it next year. I mean. that's
part of our job. right?
Anne Brensley: I think one of
the biggest things too that bill
is bringing up. that was brought
up every single time we've gone
into any of the sections. is
even in this meeting. is timing.
and you know exactly how that
works. and what is. what is our
real goal. and what is the time
horizon we're all focused in on
and again. I think some of
that's going to come when we
utilize this on our specific
needs. I think we're going to
find ourselves saying. Oh. this
makes sense. Maybe this should
be three years. first five
years. Maybe our focus should be
more a shorter term or a longer
term. So I do think some of it
we could try to get perfect. but
what would still need to be
changed based on actually
utilizing
Carol Martin: it absolutely. I
do think that time is kind of
the essence of the policies. I
know we are really and we've
been working on it for about a
year now. I It is my
understanding that our auditors
have been repeatedly
recommending that we write down
and have financial policies on
the books. and I understand that
they are also coming around
shortly to do their review. So I
think it might look good to them
if please take that chance and
and get something on the books
and play it out to echo what
Anne just said. You know. we
might go through this exercise
and find those old tweets. but
we can always back. go back and
fix it. I think it's worth
jumping into the deep end. so to
speak. and trying to get
something to show that. You
know. after a year's work. we've
really put our best foot
forward.
Unknown: and not only the
auditors. the rating agencies.
and they're coming in in early
October. and they've. they've
requested several times. and
just if anybody's interested. if
you go to the Division of local
services. which is a part of the
Department of Revenue in In just
search for the financial
management resource Bureau who
helped provide the basis for
these policies. and they have a
page you can look at their
projects. and you click on
financial policies. 37 other
towns have utilized them. And if
you click on any one of their
policy management and I don't
have anything to show you. At
home. they are going to look
very familiar to you. because
they use certain amount of mass
general law. a certain. I'll
say. a template. And then one of
his Boheme did in working with
the staff is they come in. go
through our code. our bylaws.
and seek staff then tweak that
basic template to customize it
for when.
Carol Martin: So you've taken
that's my speech at the end. The
mood is the bond rating. folks.
or the meeting is on October 7.
and we have committed as a group
to get a vote on this by the
October hopefully before the
October 6 lane. and hopefully
next time. I wasn't going to
take a vote tonight. because I
think it's important that all
five of us opine on the votes.
but it is going to be on the
agenda next time. But. and I
have spoken to some of you
offline and said. Get your
editing. If you have any edits.
they have to be in otherwise.
Michael's blood pressure is
going to go to 29 points. and
then he's going to call me see
this is how this is going to
work. And then I'm going to call
so. But seriously. I agree with
everyone. but there's a couple
more edits here. I'm just going
to mention one more. and then
I'm going to take my other
laughs. four or five offline
with Kelsi. because I don't have
anything really big. just a
couple of things. but like on
page. I just want to throw this
one out while I'm looking at
page 20. I think there's another
one of those charts. But I also
think at the top Special
Education Revenue Fund. it's 2%
2% of current year school
budget. 2% of school budget. And
I thought. Now. where is this?
And I looked in the wire and it
wasn't there. And then I spoke
reading father down about two
paragraphs. there was the
answer. So it's 2% there. and
that's about it. So I think that
I have. like a four or five more
of a little arrogance. They did
most amount.
Unknown: It was blank before Mr.
Kevin recommended we put between
a quarter and a half percent of
the budget.
Carol Martin: What we voted in
the code is 2% I don't want to
be difficult here. but maybe you
should check that. because I
think it said we voted it on
2023 right? That should be in
the article for 2023 so we need
to be consistent with what's in
the code. I think. right. So
we'll finish this up on the 29th
everybody's going to be
prepared. Okay? Great. Thank you
very much for that. The next
item from the agenda will be 13
follow up discussion on the
masses. water resource authority
joint meeting. including. but
not limited to the next steps.
So as you know. we had. or you
remember. we had a meeting. last
meeting. with Finance Committee
and the Board of Public Works.
and we then talked about the
financing options for this
project. this $38 million
project that's coming forward.
And obviously. just to recap.
the project can be funded three
ways. fully into the water
rates. fully through the DEP. or
a hybrid. So I thought we
should. we heard all that. and
we also heard at the meeting
that the Board of Public Works
has asked us to support the
project through DEP. And so I
think we should have a general
conversation amongst ourselves.
And again. I don't think we'll
make a decision tonight. I think
we need to decide probably. and
we're going to find. like early
November meeting. so that we can
advise the Board of Public Works
what we're going to do. and then
they can make a plan. So the
article. And also. I think after
this meeting. if it's okay with
the board. I think we should
reach out to the Finance
Committee for a recommendation
of what they think we should do
in terms of what those three
options. So if everyone's on
board with all that. then I open
it to the floor to discuss what
you think about finance and this
project through DEP. because
that's the question before us.
Who would like to start?
Doug Levine: I'm curious. I feel
like I have least experience and
knowledge around some of these
funding questions. What would be
the drawback in pursuing the
hybrid approach where we figure
out a percentage on the water
rates and a percentage of the
death instead of moving toward
one or the other? Well. I don't
when we sat down with the boards
in the past. I don't follow was
there. was there a drawback to
that idea of doing a hybrid
approach and and I just remember
a lot of focus of the discussion
was the the water rates are
going up some 32% no matter
what. Up and that if we did it
completely on water rates. we're
talking about a combined
increase of the mid 70s. I
remember. 75% but could we back
off that number somewhat still
have a water rate increase.
which obviously will impact the
users. And we. they gave us a
breakdown mass time and of the
four tiers. because I was very
curious about the fourth tier.
tier one was 15.000.002 was 10
million. Tier three was also 10
million. and tier four was 6
million. So I I'm wondering if
does it not make sense to pursue
both avenues? I I want to
understand the benefit of going
all debt and and is the reason
that they're recommending that
because the water rates are
already going up by a third.
Carol Martin: I think we had in
the first meeting that we have.
this is an. I think. right. the
first joint meeting we had. they
have a chart that showed that
with the capital projects that
they have in place. not
withstanding the connection to
the NWRA that their debt service
plan. you know this. Michael. by
fy 29 FY 30. somewhere around
there will be about 50% of their
expenses without this. 50% of
the expenses that won't impact
water. right? Yeah. so the
water. when they look at the
water budget. the Enterprise
Fund budget. I believe it was. I
think it was a physical
question. Now. 50% I believe. So
the issue is. if we take this on
42 what's the percent? So that's
a good question. I'm going to
find that
William Whitney: out as I've
thought about it. I guess I can
add it from a different
perspective. which is. why
should the town depart from the
kind of accepted practice of
financing water related capital
expenditures from water Rate
users?
Unknown: The Enterprise Fund has
its own revenue stream. its own
operating and capital budgets.
As to my knowledge. always
finance system wide capital
projects through DEP. the source
of repayment of which are the
water rates. As we look at our
draft financial policies manual.
in Section four. it says the
finance director will seek to
ensure that each Enterprise Fund
budget is self supporting.
Therefore the goal is to avoid
or minimize any subsidy from the
general fund by raising revenue
through rates and fees necessary
to support all direct. indirect
and capital related costs to run
the operations through user fees
only. So for me. that's kind of
the default. And so why would
you depart from that? The
explanation. I guess we've heard
from the Board of Public Works
at the prior meeting was. well.
this is for infrastructure. But
as Phil judici said. Well. you
know. it's kind of low all the
capital projects are
infrastructure.
The second water tank is
infrastructure.
Doug Levine: They also mentioned
the tax benefits because of
people are able to take that
deduction on their real estate
taxes. versus you can't deduct
if your water rates skyrocket.
well
Unknown: skyrocket or increase
compared to what you know. I
thought it was surprising that.
knowing that they've got to do
capital improvements that will
raise the rates 30% and
possible. and whatever
contribution the enterprise fund
would make to the $38 million
project. instead of kind of
increasing the rates to build up
a reserve and to acculturate
everybody with higher rates. the
rates are Frozen last year's
rate.
So I didn't understand that.
You know. are there
and are we keeping the rates
artificially low by subsidizing
the water infrastructure
through taxation? What does that
do to. Water conservation.
And then there's also the
question of using this chapter.
5921 and why is it that only one
committee in Massachusetts has
used that in the last 30 years?
As I've thought about it. it
strikes me that one argument
would be it gives future
flexibility. The other side of
that argument is it might lead
to real uncertainty about what
the relative contributions to
the debt service would be from
the general fund or from water
rates.
you could have
dramatic swings year to year
depending on who's on the board.
And we're also talking about 20
years or 22 years or something.
And select boards don't always
make good decisions. We're right
now talking about.
gee. we wish that the debt for
the Council on Aging was
financed with bond proceed or
was financed with an old right.
rather than that of a general
fund. Two years ago. majority of
the board of selectmen fired.
who I thought was a very capable
town administrator. ended up
costing him down a lot of money.
So you know. are we kind of
rolling the dice. not knowing
what a future board would do.
versus blocking a debt service
that everybody understands and
can budget for. rather than have
to have the back and forth?
Also. I don't know if I would
want to have this discussion
every year.
just for the debate so.
so I'm just trying to understand
why we would depart from what
has been done here before. And I
don't know what every other
community say one in
Massachusetts has done for the
last 20 or 30 years.
Carol Martin: Dan. do you want
to hop in here? You had. I think
I didn't get to connect with
you.
Anne Brensley: So no. I hate to
say it. but everything that bill
just said makes complete sense.
And I say that I hate to say it
only because he's right. but I
think from a financial cost
standpoint to the town. it
really came down to the excluded
DEP being paid and being able to
be paid more and more as time
went on. So it would be more
debt. It would make up. it would
make up a larger percentage of
what we are paying down. So I
think they said something like.
in 2030 the ratio would be.
like. just a little adjusted.
like third. what was it? Carol.
30% Levy. and then 70% excluded
debt versus originally.
originally. it's like a little
bit more like 3565 or something
like that. My point is that over
time. this just becomes a
cheaper option. Yeah.
Unknown: To
Anne Brensley: tough call
because
Carol Martin: becomes a cheaper
option. Call.
Anne Brensley: isn't that what
they isn't that the big sale?
Wasn't that exactly what they're
explaining to us. that
essentially it's over time.
something happens once you hit
50% of the payoff or something?
Carol Martin: Yeah. I think what
they would now. I'm guessing.
because I don't remember that.
but I think they were saying
that their debt service will be
50% of their expenditures. what
they spend their revenue on in
about 40 years. because they're
adding on a second water tank
and some other things that we
just need. general
infrastructure and then that
eventually. of course. would
recede over time that's within
theirs. That might be why you
would want to revisit the
Anne Brensley: thing about the
total debt servicing going down.
Carol Martin: No if the if they.
if the water level works. funds
it. they'll be in the water
rates. It's not dead. Oh. wait a
minute.
Anne Brensley: No. no. no. no.
They said something. Wait. let
me pull it up. Okay. Michael. do
you know what I'm talking about?
They said something. Like. it
goes from like. like eight.
Million to 5 million or
something
Unknown: over time.
Anne Brensley: Yes. hold on.
Carol Martin: if you're going to
borrow some money in your rates
and your expenditure score 50%
but then you don't add any new
capital as you pay up to
capital. Of course. it
decreases. That's what I
thought.
Anne Brensley: Okay. so total
debt service 7.599 2025. total
debt service for 2030. is 5.4
Carol Martin: is a difference
2.1 million.
Unknown: Yes. interest over
time.
Carol Martin: and that's FY 20.
Nine. that's 2030
Anne Brensley: and then it goes
to 30. 70% which isn't a big
difference. except I thought
there was a financial gain in
all this. and they were
outlining it that way. which is
true. I'm looking at it right
now. That's why I think they're
recommending it
Unknown: so well. It's. it's an
interest only. or it's. it's
zero interest loan. so over
time. so sort of making level
principal payments.
Carol Martin: Or is it we need
Brian to answer this somebody.
Unknown: but I don't see whether
it's town DEP. water debt or
combination. It's still. you're
still borrowing $38 million
paying it off over 20 years.
right?
Carol Martin: So I was just
thinking out loud here. if you
the reason why you might want to
revisit the percentage. which
you wouldn't want to revisit. I
think. annually. But there is
the risk. Like you said. the
makeup of the boards changed.
but as the debt service dropped
in the water rates. you might
decrease the water you know. the
percent the towns paying as they
are able to take on more debt.
So essentially. we would be
looking at the portion there. if
we were going to do it that they
can't sustain. But then as their
cost. we might go to Yes. that
makes sense. What I'm saying
yes. So the debt service is 5
million. and then in the next
year. they can and we're
covering the other the balance
of whatever the debt services.
But if as their debts. as they
pay principal and interest.
their debt service will drop.
because they're not going to add
on any more large capital
budgets for quite some time. we
then. every couple years. could
go back and increase them.
decrease our portion as their
debt rolls off. thank you. As
debt rolls off. we would add it
back in.
Anne Brensley: Yeah. that's the
shift. That's what I'm talking
about. That's exactly what I'm
talking about.
Carol Martin: No. I get your
point now that we could it gives
Anne Brensley: us more
flexibility. It gives us more
flexibility in how we handle it.
but it still comes down to what
Bill said. which is. yeah.
except what if there's a Select
Board that doesn't understand
all this and makes the wrong
moves. then we did kind of
create this entire Unusual
system where only very what was
it? One. one group had has done
something like this. One town.
Unknown: as I said. the town
that said they did. it was
Bellingham. because they also
had a split tax rate. they were
able to shift it. There's a
couple things that came up that
I'm just mentioned. that we do
have several large non profits
in this town that are currently
looking at very large
expansions. and that they not be
paying taxes. although they may
be using a lot of water in the
future. which will be captured
by rates. There is. however. you
know. an argument to be made.
depending upon how high your
taxes were. that you might be
able to itemize and deduct these
because they are temporarily
bringing back state level tax
exemption. And there is some
level of exemption that the
state is supposed to cover. but
having only one town done that
before. I don't know. You know.
it says in the fine print in the
bulletin that the state will
reimburse the Tom for the $200
residential exemption for the
people over 65 but I don't know.
but to me. I still think there's
a part of the equity. It's not
fair if we move to protect Well.
I say we. I. I work for you
folks. I make suggestions that
some of the nonprofits may not
be paying their fair share if it
goes all the way over the taxes.
And then again. there may be
people that don't use as much as
others who might be unfairly
penalized because of the size of
their home if. Up just factors
to
Carol Martin: consider. Could
we? How could we. I think. is a
better question. How could we
assess a water construction fee.
or add a water construction fee.
infrastructure fee. I'm going to
get there to the tax bill. If
you're not. you're not a
resident residential property to
the non residential so those are
exempt. Maybe would get in for
some agency. How you would do
this? But that was a question
that what I heard this. I wanted
to raise. that
Anne Brensley: you could take.
you could itemize specific
costs. like a like a maintenance
fee. like whatever costs were
going into things that were not
specific to the
Carol Martin: tax we currently
pay. Kind of a maintenance fee.
it's called administration fee.
and somebody smarter than I am
is gonna have to tell us what
Anne Brensley: it is tax every
Carol Martin: bill you have that
admin fee. and then you have a
PFAS fee. But so I'm thinking. I
was thinking when they were
talking about it. why couldn't
we have or non residential
properties. we put it all over
in the tax. we paid any portion
of in the tax. why couldn't we
capture those we wouldn't be
captured by the tax. They helped
me out there because the month
thinking. I don't I
Anne Brensley: couldn't. You can
do that. You can call it
maintenance. You can call it a
service fee. So mass save uses
service fee. There's a lot of
ways to do it.
Doug Levine: I was just setting
up something to make a pilot.
yeah.
Carol Martin: So we haven't done
that
Unknown: yet. but I've already
identified a list of our major
non profits in town and working
on a draft letter to go out
concrete experiment with this.
The CFO there is in transition.
but he recommended they speak to
his assistant. I've written to
him to give it. give draft
policy and how they were going
to do it. So it's something that
it's on our radar here. that we
want to write to them and ask
them to contribute. especially
given type of renewable levy
capacity. if.
if the Tom were to assume some
portion of the DEP as opposed to
the debt service. right? Are we
talking about two different
pieces of debt? Are we talking
about just relative
contributions of debt service to
the bonds that are issued
Carol Martin: anyway. I think
the way that request was made.
we would assume X millions of
the debt and on which we would
pay the debt service. which is
the principle of the interest.
which is why. if we did this
chapter 39 we could then maybe.
like we say. the percent
periodically as their debt
rolled off. well. their request
was 100% 100% so where would be
which is a non starter for me. I
mean. I just think it's so the
issue. it's
Unknown: a hell of a deal
if you can get somebody else to
pay for you.
Carol Martin: I know it sounds
good. so it's the same issue
that we talked about I
mentioned. on behalf of the
board earlier. things that we
don't necessarily have readily
available funds to support that
request. You know. we don't have
them. You know. the debt service
on $38 million is that like 3.8
well. they said 2.1 million.
because there's no interest.
that they'll get a no interest
loan. But it's over 20 years.
Unknown: There's some there's
some debt. I think the there has
to be a separate borrowing for
the design fees. which are not
subject of 100% or the 0% loan.
right? I don't want to say that
again this. I think there are
two pieces of debt. One is the
MWRA. or whatever it is that is
the 0% but I think design fees
don't qualify as an eligible
expenditure. I think their
financial consultant told us
that.
Carol Martin: yeah. well. we
have funded the design fees
already through capital project
capital requested Tom meeting
this past year
Unknown: and the Enterprise
Fund. From the Enterprise Fund.
it's the water Enterprise Fund.
2023 and 2025. there were two
slugs. and it was funded with
water fund DEP. the
Carol Martin: guy. well. don't
you think that that we wouldn't.
we wouldn't fund that. So it's
probably not 38 because they've
already bought. Into some stuff.
Well. yeah. sure. I confirm it.
It was in the capital fund
budget coming out of the water.
Enterprise Fund for 1.23 right?
So it's already over there. and
a part of it was funded through
ARPA funds. which is there was
1.016.000
Unknown: enterprise fund that
approved at the 2023
alternative so
all the all the DEP. because I
understand it beautiful for it's
been water fund. But
in that guideline. it says that
the the debt exclusion will be
to pay the watering and sewer
get certs. which is sort of
certain. sort of like that.
Carol Martin: So. um. I'm gonna
say two things. I think. as
well. Tom here. you know. we
might have to be repeating some
of this discussion. I'm gonna
suggest we revisit this at the
next meeting.
Doug Levine: Do you want to
come? When do we need to come to
a conclusion by Well. I
Carol Martin: said that to Mike.
I just looked at Michael when I
said it early. I think early
November. We need to have it
done end of October. So we've
got a
Doug Levine: couple anybody else
we need to bring in. We want to
be able to ask questions soon.
Carol Martin: Right? Anna. yes.
yes.
Anne Brensley: One more person.
yes. One more person. I have a
guy from the MWRA that I want to
have come in. and his name is
Fred Lasky. and I really want a
better understanding of the
trends that the MWRA is seeing
when it comes to these
determinations of these wells is
unusable or usable? I know I am
beating a dead horse with this
entire can can we really go 100%
what would it mean? Is it
really. you know. do we have to
keep happy hell. either way. he
can come. and He was highly
recommended by several towns as
an expert at this. and he's
been. most importantly. very
familiar with some of the trends
that the MWRA is seeing. So I'd
really like him to
Doug Levine: just Fred last
week. He's the Executive
Unknown: Director. yeah.
Executive
Director of the Boston Water and
Doug Levine: Sewer Commission is
the current MWRA Executive
Director
Carol Martin: Kelsi in two
seconds. yeah.
Brian. I want to think Brian
Kevin a
Unknown: So. but it's the nwrc
determination transfer. Okay.
we're
Carol Martin: going to go. We're
kind of going off track here a
little bit. The the agenda item
is to talk about the follow up
from the meeting and so. but I
do think we should kind of put a
hold on here and then revisit on
the 29th maybe Brian could come
in and speak with us.
Anne Brensley: Okay. I just want
to I Googled something. and I
want to get it on the record.
because I'll forget so. So the
mass save charges what they call
a mandatory energy efficient
charge. and that charge is
charged even to nonprofits.
right? And I just say that
because. in case. we need to
really understand how we make
sure that everybody who's
benefiting from this in our town
supports this. supports the
program.
Carol Martin: Okay. that's it.
right? So the next steps is
we're going to ask Brian to come
in. and we'll wait for Tom Tom
together. and then we'll after
that. we'll probably ask Brian.
Kevin. come in. Okay. am I on?
Brett. no. okay. So the next
gender item is going to be the
next page. We're gonna have a
discussion of the fiscal 27 year
2027 Budget Task Force
strategies. including. but not
limited to and these are the two
strategies that we've been asked
to look at. reclassifying the
levy debt to include a debt of
66 River Road and issuing bands
versus bonds for the outstanding
capital projects. So in this. in
the supplemental pack that there
is a memo Michael. he's written
it again on behalf of the Budget
Task Force. And it's also in
there. if anybody saw it. I
tried to. based on comments that
I was listening to at the last
meeting. Stab at. kind of just
delineating steps each one of
these details. So I don't know
what that is. Optional.
Unknown: Michael. would you like
to start
in addition at the very last
page of your supplemental? Oh.
my.
Carol Martin: That is a budget
Unknown: summary slash forecast
that Mr. Kevin brought to the
last budget Working Group
showing that the structural
deficit that we have due to the
lack of commercial tax base.
inflation driven increases in
healthcare. retirement OPEB. and
he's projecting. you know. well.
first of all. in my memo. I say
we're on a collision course with
an override whether it happens
in FY 27 or FY 28 is something
we're trying to work through
ideally. we think it makes the
most sense strategically to do
it in FY 28 so that we can get
through our collective
bargaining. I know Dr Fleishman
was there. He concurred that we
wouldn't want to be negotiating
and going for an override the
same time. When you look at that
last page. you'll see that right
now. it's approximately a
deficit of $1.8 million and the
numbers in yellow are
accumulated numbers as we go
across. But if you go up to line
33 that's each year what he's
projecting for the deficit. So
looking at line 39 you'll see he
needs forecasting. We might need
a three year operating override
every three years. We're using
worst case scenarios in a lot of
these numbers. and we're
predicting way out. but we could
come back and have a good year
like last year with health care.
But for right now. reason we're
showing you this is we're hoping
to postpone a multi year
override until FY 28 and the two
main strategies that the budget
working group came up with the
first being the request to
consider shifting the levy debt
to excluded debt to free up
approximately $750.000 in the
existing Levy. And the other was
to refinance some of our debt
using bands and issuing certain
bonds to free up approximately
$800.000 that would give you
approximately $1.5 million of
additional levy capacity. And
then it would be incumbent upon
Mr. Kevin and I and Dr fleissman
and his business manager.
Christine Patterson. to close
the remaining gap. The point of
the memo was. the other week. we
had a conversation. I should
say. Mr. Genius. the Chair of
the Finance Committee. as part
of this working group. as well
as some other current and former
elected and appointed officials.
Dr Fleischman. And then chair
attendance is that that the
group felt that. although the
board has indicated they may be
in favor of one. they're really
asking from both because they
feel just one won't be enough to
get around requesting an
override. and they had asked me
to put something together for
the board to indicate that
unless the boards inclined
really to support both of these.
the next step for that group
would probably be asking you to
consider placing an override on
the ballot in the spring and
then fall policy and get input
from the finance fee. so that
that's the memo in a nutshell.
And that last page. as I
indicated. is that is what Mr.
Kevin had shown us all last
week. Is worst case scenario
where we're going to go in the
next few years. It and I would
say that Wayland is not alone.
Many other communities are
dealing with this same problem.
Cost of goods and services are
going up everywhere. and we're
content with many unfunded
mandates. and the money's just
started coming back cities and
towns the way we would like this
in terms of a federal state.
Doug Levine: What if somebody
asks these mechanisms that we
potentially employ this year.
can we employ them next year and
the year after? Can we continue
avoiding overrides by employing
these methods? And what would
the drawback of that be. if so
well. I believe Mr. Kevin. he
has identified some other levy
debt that would be
Unknown: do something similar in
the future. I think he chose the
DEP W. It's the biggest one. I
think at one point he
contemplated agri. Dating it all
and putting it before. but
thought it would get it's
already complicated without
fight. I think the group decided
to pick one. a large one. There
may be ways to creatively
finance our Tom. We don't have
this option. but some towns are
looking at whether or not they
could use their surplus Debbie
levy to generate revenue to pay
off things we've had a
discussion about. should if
interest rates come down. should
we borrow money to pay off our
OPEB obligations in some of our
pension. hopefully accelerate
those payments like you would
prepay a mortgage or pay it down
quicker. so we may pick up some
benefits if the Feds lower rates
a couple of weeks. Conversely.
that may hurt our investment
income that we've been getting
because we don't necessarily
invest in the most speculative
vehicles. we're more in to long
term conservative investments in
bonds.
Doug Levine: My next question.
Michael is in the Martin memo in
the first option. delay. delay
the November 2025 bond issuance
by issuing the bands. It says in
the at the end of the first
paragraph. the town would pay
interest only during fiscal year
27 which is approximately
$160.000 freeing up $900.000 or
approximately half of the
forecasted deficit. So my
question is. if we didn't employ
this mechanism. would that then
cost the town minus $160.000 in
other words. by employing this
mechanism. is the cost an
additional $160.000 that's what
we're paying to be able to avoid
the override. Yes. you're
Unknown: paying that additional
interest to avoid it.
Carol Martin: And I do want to
add in that. since we put this
together. Originally. the
deficit was one nine was closer
to the 2 million. I think
Michael refers to 2 million in
his memo as well. But then. when
we got the grant last week. a
snake book that dropped it by
the 100.000 so I would be
freeing up 800 here. but I still
have Yeah. so I'll have
Doug Levine: but if somebody
stands up at town meeting or
just ask us. what is the cost to
employing this mechanism. that
is The cost for that
Unknown: answer option. right.
right. So the interesting thing
here
is Select Board would only
really need to be to approve it.
because you sign off on the
band. So that wouldn't be
something that would go to the
voters. However. based on our
conversations with town council
to do the levy to exclude a debt
conversion. you would need a
four out of five of you to
support that. Then it would have
to go to a special election at
some point. and that doesn't
have to go back to Tom me.
because we've already F bomb.
Carol Martin: Well. we have down
here. Michael that we'd have to
have Tom lane to take that
change.
Doug Levine: This is the
reclassifying 66
Carol Martin: Yeah. but you
know. with it. because you know
why we'd have to have a two
birds. Well. if there was
borrowed. because that money
will be in the budget article.
you reclassified 66 River Road.
and we utilize all our portion
of that increased levy that's in
the operating budget. and we
have to vote that until meeting.
although afterwards two thirds
Unknown: until meeting already
approved the issuance by
Carol Martin: two thirds. Yeah.
Michael switched to the next
one. This is why I did the
charts. He switched to the
reclassified. And what happens
with that? He said there would
be no extra debts with that.
We'd have to have a special
election where. with the
delaying of the issuing. the
bands versus what is no
election. because we've already
voted at it. Tom you this. I
hope you found this a bit
helpful. Everyone knows.
Doug Levine: but you can't have
that election at our annual town
election. because that's too
late. If we did it in April.
Unknown: Well. the idea would
be. is. if we did. if we agreed
upon these earlier. sometime.
you. This late fall. early
winter. we we'd have a pretty
good idea to how to focus on
cutting that last three to
500.000 depending from loop B.
But if we didn't have either.
we're looking at. say. a $1.5
million deficit. and some of the
committee members said that
might as well just have to
remember it
So. Michael. if you had a
special election on
reclassifying the debt. it
failed. But if you then did the
band's routine. is it
conceivable that you could
present a balanced budget to the
town meeting. recognize there'd
be some cuts. there'd be some
cuts.
I think it would be significant
amount. Really. what you would
be then looking to see is what
happens in January and February.
We get our cherry sheets in
January. That would indicate
when we got a bump in chapter
70. chapter 90. money. but the
big one is the health insurance
and last year. you know. we
usually plan for the 10 to 12%
increase year over year. and
last year was only 4% that helps
saves if we had a number like
that again this year. Yes.
conceivably. that would help us.
Otherwise. you know. you're
looking at over a million.
roughly a million. And last
year. we cut spent budgets and
we eliminated some positions. at
least on my side. through
attrition. I know the schools
had to let some people go. we
would be beat face problem with
letting some people go. If we
had to do that.
Carol Martin: like I just want
to put my numbers. Go ahead and
just
Anne Brensley: have a question.
and it's kind of a crazy
question. so I expect the answer
is going to be no. but we just
had that meeting on 14 West. And
the reason that we had that
meeting. and the idea of
purchasing it was because we had
this million dollars that was
allocated for some real estate
spend. expenditure. Is there any
way that we can utilize that in
some way. shape or form. towards
maybe the debt servicing on the
Okay? You guys are all in your
hands.
Carol Martin: Okay. There is.
this is a Oh. thank you for
bringing this up. I'm going to
start. if you don't mind. this
is a fallacy. There was a thing
called Real Estate reserve. Tell
me what it is.
Unknown: Receipts reserved from
the sale of real estate. sale
Carol Martin: of real estate. I
had it back. It's been another
one. There it is. It was 1.6
million. The originally was over
2 million. and then we bought
something. and then we used
about 400 to support a budget
one year. leaving about 1.6 1.6
and guess what? That money is
being used to support the snake
book game in
Unknown: 20
Carol Martin: and the route 20.
there was no there was no money
in the real estate full 1.5
Anne Brensley: I'm sorry you'd
have to pay the 1.5 for 14 West.
Carol Martin: Find a way to find
it. We have no funding source
for that project.
Anne Brensley: No but. but you
say that's
lot you say. you say that we
can't. that you're sensitive to
the spend. So sometimes it's not
necessarily that we don't have a
it just would be we'd have to
move money around. not have a
funding
Carol Martin: source. But that
Anne Brensley: was a terrible
statement made to me. Okay.
Unknown: so in all like me.
well. somebody thought that very
early on. that we hadn't
utilized that 1.4 million. but
Tom meeting did last year. In
all. they appropriated for snake
Brook Dan. The only way we would
get that would be if FEMA came
through. gave us the grant. then
we. I think Tom meeting would
have to rescind that
authorization. Otherwise. we
would have to go out and borrow
the $1.5 million and we would
wind up paying the debt service
on interest.
Anne Brensley: Okay? And um. to
Carol's point. Carol has
mentioned it at every meeting
that we don't have identified
funds for it. I just thought it
was one of those where we don't
identify but then we find it
someplace else. Now I realize
it's not there at all. nor was
it there. Okay. good.
Carol Martin: It's kind of like
my whole budget when things the
Express bill comes into my and I
say. we have to reign it in. And
then my husband says. What does
that mean?
Anne Brensley: I. Yeah. well.
then that's not good news.
Sorry. So bad. Back to this. So
we really. besides spending 1000
for 900.000 or we get an
override.
Unknown: Michael. in the bad old
days before Doug moved to town.
we had regular overrides. right
overrides. and what was
important in seeking approval of
those was support from parents
and other supporters of the
schools. So query. what is. what
is your crystal ball say about
whether we could mobilize
sufficient support for us at 50%
plus one at special election to
reclassify the debt and and what
happens if that fails? What does
that? Does that bode ill for an
operating over
so I think there's a couple of
factors. The reason we were
talking about this and started
talking in August is you really
need to have that decision
point. you know. the Fisher cut
bait. we'll call it. sooner than
later. so that you start an
informational campaign. and you
would need to enlist people. And
I think it would all depend upon
who. how. when. and when those
cuts were going to happen if.
because everybody uses services
differently in this town. if you
just hit one department or one
side of the budget. you would
probably bring out a lot of
support for that. We've been
when we did this last year. we
tried to be. you know. good
about shouldering it
proportionally. Obviously. the
school has a bigger budget than
the town. once you subtract out
a lot of the unclassified. But.
you know. we eliminated a couple
of positions. but then we also
had to add somebody back in COA
so that you didn't really see
the the the true number of
people that we cut. But to your
point. I think if a lot of the
cuts came down on schools. I
think you'd see a lot of people
coming out. you know. in support
of the schools. and asking for
it. depending. it really depends
upon where you start the
cutting. I guess. and what would
then happen if we determined we
wanted to put an override
question on the ballot? Policy
says you need to get a
recommendation from the finance
committee. and assuming you said
we will put one on on the
ballot. you could then decide
you want to have that boat now
and years ago. when I was a
Select Board member. my town did
it. and when it failed. They
repackaged it. It was actually a
debt exclusion to get a major
addition to a school. They kept
retooling and bringing smaller
and smaller. Hopefully it with
the hopes it would pass. Here
you some towns go all the way to
their annual election a week
ahead of Tom meeting. and then.
in the warm book. they have two
different budgets. They call it
an A a budget and a B budget.
The passes. This is. this is
what we'll continue to do if it
fails. These are the cuts we're
going to make. And that's part
of. I think. what you're you're
asking. what would be in there.
and that would probably drive
the people to Tom me.
what is the top what is the
timing of that vote relative to
the town meeting? Does it have
to precede the town meeting? Or
would the town meeting vote on
the two thirds. and
subsequently. would there be an
election where you need the 50
plus one?
Know. the talents that I've
looked at generally have the
election in almost every case
I've looked at it's had the
election prior to Tom meeting
that does. that doesn't so I'm
Tom meeting. they
could still so do we have time
to organize it? To organize it.
an information campaign.
There have been other
communities have been on this
timeline. I think if you look at
Natick. there about this. this.
this point in the process. some
other towns have done it.
You could work 45 days from
November the first
well. I thought you talking
about next spring. I mean.
you tell me. is that what you're
suggesting. or is that the
proposal?
Well.
we also thought in a perfect
world it would have been the
first Tuesday in November.
because a lot of people seem.
Dave. authority. Could it go a
little later than that. I
suppose. But if you probably
want to have an answer before
the calendar year. so that you
could adequately plan for the
spring. I know in South Bridge.
they wanted to do a debt
exclusion to build a fire
station. I think we made the
decision to go forward and do
the informational campaign right
around February or March. and
then put the vote on the city
council just give timing voted
conditioned upon the outcome of
the election. So they made the
authorization first. and then
the vote happened out.
Carol Martin: So I have to say
that I when we have this Budget
Task Force. meaning. you know.
Michael and I were talking and I
said. let's put in this book.
This is the forecast budget they
have. Not just everyone
understands. Michael and Brian
are putting together the
guideline. Yeah. we're setting
up the guidelines will then
perhaps be a little bit
different than this. But I also
want to just. we want to. I want
to just make sure we all have
the same number in our head.
because the way that the grant
has popped in. we're now looking
at this 1.8 and if and the
number. we would say by doing
just on this one. delaying the
replacing bonds with bands. so
they're saving 900 we save
eight. so then the delta is 1
million. all right. and it's
unfortunate that everybody takes
so late in our cycle to Michael
and Brian's point for us to show
up those numbers. The insurance
additional stated. but the tax
recap after the we get our tax
recount accepted. Brian is going
to be able to ask for an
increase in the local receipts.
and because ours have been so
positive. he's hoping to ask for
a couple $100.000 he's going to
ask for a lot. but it's hoping
to get 200.000 if I said it
correctly. so that. of course.
in my mind. would bring this
down to About eight about 800 so
if we got that. and nothing else
bounced our way. because there's
a number of things can bounce
our way. So I think I'd like to
also have the board see that the
other tab that shows the tax
increase. because it shows the
tax increase. you know. over
from 20 what are we in now? 26
and then the one into 27 because
they are significant. And I
think what we need to understand
what
Unknown: we are agreeing to.
Carol Martin: I have service the
task force and the bench almost
Unknown: booed out of the room.
I didn't hear anybody booing me.
Carol Martin: I think we need to
see that. Could you repeat that
I'd like us to there's another
tab on this huge worksheet that
Brian has put together. and
it's. um. what's it called? Tax
something. tax rate. not
Unknown: tax rate. Well. it's a
multi year plan that he has. but
it
Carol Martin: shows that the tax
what the amount of tax dollars
would be. what the percent would
be. what the percent was last
year. what the percent would be
five point 27 based on this
proposed budget. This is a
forecast. right? So we don't
know the thing. So it's a real
challenge. because they don't
want to have to do two budgets.
And at the same time. we're
trying to. you know. pull on
Michael's trying for the third
year in a row and pull out a
Hail Mary here. And I want to
say that up front. but at the
same time. it's a timing
situation. I mean. do we wait
until after we hear from the dor
that maybe they gave us some
local receipt money? I don't
know. What's the answer? One of
the things that
Unknown: you know. I've thought
about at different times in my
life. I've worried about having
to do an operational over you
can start the planning. New
numbers could still break your
way. And then you might say. we
don't have to put it. You only
have to put it on the ballot 35
days before the election. So
that cut off usually comes
somewhere in March. You might
start the planning and then say.
You know what? Things broke our
way. We don't need it. but we
will need it next year. and
we're playing
Carol Martin: right now. right?
So I think one of the big other
considerations for us is to look
at that chart. Would that be
okay with you for sign that next
week. I'm sure the committee
will be thrilled. Didn't make a
decision. I was kind of meeting
Unknown: again this Wednesday.
Oh. I
know I always
Carol Martin: I was hoping
myself that the board and John
here. that's the other thing
that concerns me. I think should
both. But I was hoping that we.
even though the committee is not
thinking it's it's what they
want. I was hoping that to show
that we're interested. we're
Team players. and we understand
as an issue. and we're trying to
achieve the same goal that we
would be able to support. you
know. delaying the issuance of
bonds. which would generate that
800 they have said. and Michael
has written it. and Michael said
last time that they only want
both. But I still think I was
going to recommend that the. The
board. consider supporting. you
know. issuance of the bands
while we work out the details of
whether we want to election or
when. And you know. but I do
think you need to see that LF
number. the lower expense.
William Whitney: the the 800
Carol that you got from you got
from one eight to 1 million. The
800 is that just principle that
is deferred until the a year
out. basically. So we're just
basically pushing the whole
Carol Martin: bond issue out. So
what we're doing here is
basically the dog's point. It
costs 160.000 or $460.000 we're
keeping all our capital projects
moving because they will be
right funded to go forward. We
don't jam up the capital because
more new projects are coming
through the product. You know
the plans coming. It does sound
like a lot of money. And you
know how frugal I am. I think
it's a good price.
Unknown: You're basically paying
interest only. instead of only
paying that's the 800 the 800 is
the principle that you're you're
not spending now. but you're
right. You're pushing the whole
bond issue out of you.
Carol Martin: And for me. the
other concern about that was.
how did that impact the level of
debt service? Because when you
adopted debt service
significantly. and it could fill
up the operating expenses. you
lost that spot. but there's not
a big drop year or in limited
service. So in other words. easy
to get back in the bus. if you
will. and not to fall. So I was
hoping we would. we would look
at that favorably and and
support that. And I would. I
don't know. but when asked
Michael. but I would think he
would. that would help. maybe
the committee discussion. I
don't know. So is there any
appetite to further discussing
that?
Doug Levine: Well. do you need
to hear from the budget
committee again? If. because it
doesn't sound like from the memo
that an option was to just be on
board with one. it was either
both or an override. So do we
have that as an option? Because.
of course. I would need.
Unknown: I think we have an
Carol Martin: option to do
whatever we want.
Unknown: I mean. we're doing.
but I
Doug Levine: think we pursue
both. Maybe we. if we
Carol Martin: if we voted this.
here's a thought. and then we're
saying we'd like to see this
other information that I just
mentioned at the next meeting.
And we are continuing to
consider the reclassifying of
the debt. because we I think
that's on the table. I think
that's the absolute truth we are
considering. To look at it.
there's some more numbers I
think you need to see. But in
the meantime. I'm wondering if
everyone is comfortable enough
with the first one. and we could
support that. and then we would
have one less major decision
before us.
Unknown: I personally feel more
comfortable with the election to
reclassify the debt. that seems
to me pretty straightforward. I
mean. it's easy to explain. kind
of
Carol Martin: I don't I think
that's far more complicated to
explain. But that's
Unknown: another question. I
guess. is. when do we have to
pull the trigger on this thing
if we want to do
Carol Martin: it? So to
Michael's on the reclassify
Unknown: no on. on the demands
and all that jazz.
I think we can do. I think Brian
would like to do it this fall.
So it
Carol Martin: probably wait a
minute. Brian is meeting with
Moody's on the steps. and then
hiddle top. I saw that schedule
top is coming in. like. the next
week. He said he could forego.
like. a few days. but we really
need to give him some time to do
this. So I was. I think we're
really on the if not on the
deadline. Close. What do you
think the ban is more urgent to
make it more time they're both
time sensitive. but the ban is
very time sensitive. Brian
doesn't have much window outside
of us deciding
Unknown: because. because the
standing bands are going to
expire or. or has to be
essentially refinance. yes.
what's the what's the maturity
date of the bands?
I believe they're on six month
schedules. and as Brian
indicated it. you can only do
reassure them a couple of times
before you have this penalty.
because they know you're now
employing some dilatory tactic
to avoid doing a true author
bond authorization.
Michael. what's your
recommendation?
2 million. 2 billion. Lottery
prize is already gone. so one
can't play a ticket.
Carol Martin: We get halfway
there. All. Um.
Unknown: you know. I wish we
could say there was a perfect
world we could do this. I think
this. you have some good people
on this budget working group.
and they've come up with some
decent ideas and their strategy.
and I buy into it. was to try
everything within our power. to
stall a multi year override to
fiscal 28 and to try and get a
question before the voters to
see if they have an appetite to
convert to the limited debt.
Otherwise. you know. by the end
of the year. we would know that
we have to commit planning. You
know. probably early November.
we would start the informational
campaign and then just kind of
keep your fingers crossed. then
some of the numbers broke our
way in the spring.
I'm sorry you didn't hear what
was your recommendation. On
behalf
of the budget working group. we
would respectfully request the
board consider both of our
strategies and improve
Carol Martin: them. So his
question was. are you
comfortable with supporting one
at a time? Perhaps we get this
one done and then we're still
looking at the other one. Was
that your
Doug Levine: question? Our
recommendation?
Unknown: I'd like to hear
Michael and say this is what you
guys should do. Well. I think I
just heard that from Michael.
yeah. I did.
You did? I mean. it's in the
memo. Want
Doug Levine: to make a motion.
Unknown: I think. I think we
would ask the chair and vice
chair to put this on the agenda
for the next meeting. So Tom can
right. participate. but I hear
the sense of urgency.
Carol Martin: So there's right.
there's more urgency. I think
the person. but we'll put it on
for the next time. So the first
one being the bonds. the bands
versus the bonds. See about
questions we were talking about.
This is what I wrote this
because we're talking about the
bands versus the bonds. And then
someone asks a question. and
then someone else starts talking
about the reclassifying. and so
they I keep getting mixed up
rather than staying on topic.
All right. having said all that.
I think we are going to Are we
all set? Good? We're moving
select boards reports and
concerns. Anybody have any?
Unknown: I met with the planning
board a couple of weeks ago to
discuss a couple of items. One
was. we had been approached by
the chair of the Design Review
Board. seeking. basically the
board's intervention and
updating the design guidelines.
Subsequently. the Design Review
Board and the planning board
have met and come to agree
conceptual agreement as to how
that will be done. So then we
also discussed the notion of the
appointment of a working group
to advise on the route 20. It's
gonna say zoning. but not
necessarily zoning. per se. But
what? What's the recommendation
as to what we. whatever. whoever
we. is would like to see there.
recognizing that the planning
board would do the drafting of
the zoning and the planning
board was less enthusiastic
about that. They pointed out
that they've had a number of
public sessions on the data
work. that they are continuing
to work on the zoning. that it
will be the subject of. you
know. not only the kind of
statutorily required public
hearing and report. but also
that there will be ample
opportunity for comment. So
that's where we came out on
that.
Okay. Doug. I'm good. Anne. I'm
good.
Carol Martin: okay. Michael
mentioned to be newly
established Capital Improvement
Planning Committee met for the
first time. They are probably
very much delighted. Going to be
delighted to have a liaison. So
unless somebody else is dying to
do it. I'm planning on
representing us that I went last
week. I did want to point out
last week about the schedule. We
had a really. really long
meeting. and you know. I had had
a conversation with I didn't
have a chance to tell. Any of
this last week. but I had had a
conversation with with Michael.
and he said his preference was
longer meetings versus more
meetings. which is why we had a
couple long ones last week. But
I do think that the extra long
meetings are challenging. and
I'm going to review this as you
go. If it looks like we're
having too many that are too
long. We may have to have an
additional one. I do want to
remind everyone we're meeting.
And speaking of that. I want to
remind everyone where I'm
meeting two weeks in a row. on
September 29 and October 6. it
didn't already get that our
draft agenda. Or excuse me. next
week. we are going to be doing a
number of things. including
having the report from on site
insight. right? We're going to
be reviewing that.
Unknown: I have note you're
right back. They just finished
updating the COA segment.
They've done most all the other
buildings. So I will check when
we're getting the final
Carol Martin: draft. So I had
hoped we would. we do have it on
our schedule. and we'll look at
that. and then we'll say. Okay.
we'll release that with capital
planning meeting from the 30th I
think so that'd be great. I
think we're also going to be
discussing next meeting. the
call. incentives
recommendations. that report has
come back and
Unknown: given us our final
draft. We were supposed to meet
with them. and I believe it got
canceled. With our feedback.
I'll reach out to them.
Carol Martin: Okay. well. we had
it on for the 29th so that's
when it was. The other thing we
have on our on our draft agenda
list. is we had said we'd like
to meet with our advisory
committees. you know. and be a
little more proactive. And in
the meantime. we received some
correspondence from the EDC. so
we're going to have them in on
the on October 6. and then the
ECC has also reached out to us.
They want to come in. and we'll
have them also in October. But
the idea is that we will. you
know. have them come in and talk
to us about that. just
Doug Levine: to respond to that
Carol. the chair of the ECC.
this is scheduling. yeah.
wouldn't want to come in on the
earlier side of October. She's
going to be out of the country
for a month
Carol Martin: starting. Well. do
the best I can. We're leaving
October 6. and then we're not
meeting to the 20th. right? The
sixth fiscal. So have her reach
out to me and we'll see what we
can do. yeah. um. because maybe
something will come up. So
anyway. just want to mention all
those things. just to give
everybody. you know. a heads up
where we are. And then after
that. make a motion to adjourn
at 951
Doug Levine: so moved. Thank
Carol Martin: you all those in
favor and yes.
Unknown: Do Yes.
yes. now. yes.
Carol Martin: Thank you.
everybody.
Unknown: Thank you.
Carol Martin: Good evening.
Carol Martin. chair of the
Select Board and calling the
meeting on the Select Board for
Tuesday. September 2. 2025 to
order. we are in a hybrid mode.
We are in the town building. and
then we are meeting in the large
hearing room tonight. With me in
the room is that Bill Whitney.
Tom Fay. Doug Levine online. we
are being joined by the
assistant Tom manager. Kelsi
Power-Spirlet. and could you see
it on the attendees?
Carol Martin: Okay. great.
Robbie Bullard: I don't see her
yet
We are also joined by Jailyn
Bratica. the executive assistant
to the town manager. and we
anticipate being joined by Miss
Brensley and Mr. McCall. the
town manager. and within a few
minutes. So tonight. pursuant to
chapter two of the acts of 2025
this meeting will be conducted
in person and by remote means.
in accordance with applicable
law. This meeting may be
recorded. which will be made
available to the public on
weightcam as soon after the
meeting as is practicable. when
required by law or allowed by
the chair. persons wishing to
provide public comment otherwise
participate in the meeting may
do so in person attendance or by
accessing the meeting remotely
through the link that you will
find on our agenda. which is
also in the town website. on the
calendar. we request public
comment be limited to two
minutes per person. So tonight's
agenda is going to be after
we've reviewed the agenda
announcements and public
comment. we will then enter into
executive session. and pursuant
to Massachusetts General law
chapter three. a section 21 a
three. to discuss strategy with
respective status of and develop
strategy the town council with
respect to a number of
outstanding litigation items.
type. right. And for that. we
will invite our town counsel.
Carolyn Murray
okay. after we have executive
session. we will also do review
and approve the executive
session minutes of August. 4.
2025. for The intent to hold
seven minutes. approximately 710
we anticipate returning to open
session. which will be followed
by a discussion review of the
process and the procedures for
Executive Session. Minutes.
periodical review. And we will
be joined by our town counsel.
Carolyn Murray KP Law.
approximately 720 we hope to
hold a follow up joint meeting
with the Finance Committee and
the Board of Public Works to
discuss the Massachusetts water
resource authority financing
options and next steps that will
be followed by a discussion of
the fiscal year 2027. budget
tactical strategies. including.
but not limited to recommending
recommendations regarding
financing of the DPW building at
66 River Road and borrowing and
DEP plan that we will have been
joined by Brian Keveny. finance
director. then have a discussion
meeting the town of Wayland.
equity. health. equity. equity
assessment. including by limited
to next steps. Joined by Karen
Blumfeld and Eden Renee Hayes
for that discussion. after which
we will have a discussion review
of the Massachusetts Water
Resource Authority. possible
third party review. followed by
a discussion review on the draft
Select Board scheduled for
September through December 1
appointments. confirmation
appointments will be made at
9:05. approximately 9:10. we
will hear the Town Manager
Report followed by consent
calendar minutes of August. 4
and August 18. 2025. a review of
correspondence will be followed
by the Select Board members
reports and concerns. There are
no topics not reasonably
anticipated by the chair 48
hours in advance. and hopefully
at 940 we will adjourn. So
please allow me to note that
Miss Brensley has joined us.
Good evening.
Anne Brensley: Good evening.
Carol Martin: How are you? 6:18.
right. Okay. So. having said all
that. does anybody have any
announcements? I
Anne Brensley: just have one
Carol Martin: Sure.
Anne Brensley: So Michael got
back to me that he it is
actually in touch with the MWRC
and DCR regarding some questions
that I had that I was going to
present to everybody regarding
the hook up for the water and so
I will have some updates on
that. so there'll be some
information passed along to all
of us regarding that topic.
Carol Martin: Anybody else? Have
any announcements? Had one. but
I forgot what it was. and so
we're moving on. So do we have
any public comments? Yes. of
course. You've got your two
minutes to do what you want.
Karen Blumenfeld: So do we stand
?
Carol Martin: I don't mind.
I just don't know where to
stand in terms I get it. there
and okay.
Karen Blumenfeld: Good evening.
everyone. I'm chair Karen
Blumenfeld. 113 Oxford road. I
am so excited to introduce to
the Select Board and also anyone
members of the public who might
be listening. Pam and David
Griffin. they are the founders
and owners of chocolate therapy
in Wayland center. a wonderful.
wonderful chocolate store. which
you've tried to know they have
the best chocolates ever.
including dairy free chocolates
for those of us who need that.
And I wanted you. because what
inspired me to come tonight.
this is a recently one for the
second year in a row. best of
Boston chocolate. So in the
entire Boston area. we have the
best chocolate right here in
Wayland center. So I just wanted
you and others to leave. David.
I'll say a few words. awesome.
Pam Griffin: Thank you. I want
to live up to all of that. So my
name is Pam Griffin. and
I'm David.
So we are thank you for allowing
me to be here. and thank you for
providing us. So yes. we Boston.
Best of Boston. Two years in a
row. we were over certain things
last year. We've had really a
lot of opportunities. Good
Morning America. Really great
friend. Robin Roberts. who also
has been in our kitchen. And so
we've just been been in business
going on 14 years. and I work
with my husband. but that's the
book. I must be gone for another
day.
So we're just looking forward
to. you know. finding our place.
It'll be two years in the town
center in November that we've
been there. and we're very happy
to be here. and looking forward
to seeing all of your faces. We
are great for gifts. Summer.
winter. fall. Doesn't matter if
chocolate is a great difference
or what the occasion is. Thank
you. Very excited for you.
Carol Martin: Could you state
your address for the minute
taker?
Pam Griffin: absolutely our home
address or business address.
which is my home. so that's what
I was coming 63 Andrew Avenue in
Wayland Town Center.
Carol Martin: Great. Thank you
so much. And congratulations.
Thank you. Karen. You got it
done. We talked about this about
a month ago. and then we had a
disconnect of a meeting.
Karen Blumenfeld: We showed up
in person. but you all were
online. So that was an
unfortunate moment. but here we
are. Thank you very much. Have a
good meeting.
Carol Martin: Very exciting. Is
there anyone else comment? And
also. like. Excuse me. I'd like
to recognize that Mr. McCall has
joined us at 6:24.
Robbie Bullard: on line.
Michael McCall: The only thing I
could do. Madam Chair. I did
bring our new mic director.
right?
Carol Martin: So there's public
comment. I'll circle back to.
Are we all set on public
comment? Yes. we're all set.
Alright. So guess what Michael.?
Michael McCall: good evening.
Madam Chair. members of the
board. I had the privilege this
evening. I'm introducing Nick
Lombardi. He's a resident from
adjoining Sudbury. Nick comes to
us as our new IT director. He
comes from the commonwealth of
Massachusetts. where he was
responsible for one of the
larger agencies doing their IT
work. He was soon as I met him.
I knew he was going to be a
perfect fit. If you like Mike
Faia. what he's doing
facilities. I think you'll like
Nick Lombardi with what we're
doing it. he's already come in
and already come to me with a
lot of cost saving measures.
ways to improve our security.
just a whole host of ideas. His
background in it. He went to URI
he also went to one of the
Suffolk leadership programs that
several of my staff have gone
to. So I think he's going to be
a great fit. He's here to answer
any questions and just say hello
to the board so people put a
name in the face. so you'll
probably see some stuff from
him. I might add that we're
going to be upgrading our
website later in in this
calendar year. beginning of next
calendar year. And one of the
things Nick's already working on
is getting us a consistent name
with a lot of the other
communities. Wayland. ma.gov The
ma.gov extension. So he's he's
been here for not even maybe a
month. and he's got a lot of
things underway.
Carol Martin: So. so we welcome
you.
Nick Lombardi: Thank you.
Tom Fay: Good you have your
board.
Nick Lombardi: I'm sorry.
Tom Fay: good to have you aboard
you have an important job
Nick Lombardi: thank you. Yes. I
consider IT being one of the
backbone. or part of the
backbone of any organization. so
I'm excited. To be here.
Doug Levine: Thank you Welcome.
Nick Lombardi: Thank you
Anne Brensley: welcome
Nick Lombardi: any questions for
me?
Carol Martin: that you shouldn't
ask us that
Michael McCall: we've talked
about electronic voting and how
ways that we might be able to do
some of the technology in house
and save some money rather than
renting. So he has a lot of
ideas. They're all about saving
money and efficiency and
Doug Levine: interesting timing.
I spoke with a constituent who
has his own IT business today.
who talked about one way of
modernizing our town government
is to make all at least more of
our forms electronic. So I was
going to connect to folks. Now
I've got a facefor him .
Michael McCall: We're moving
forward with our Online
Permitting. but that's one of
the things we talked about
trying. is paperless as
possible. right?
Unknown: So fair.
Carol Martin: See procedures. So
if
Unknown: So Carol. we're
submitting online
Carol Martin: all kind of with
this executive session with you.
Thank you for submitting the
materials to us from the State
from KP law. but I think we just
want to make sure as we review
our session. I'm sure
everybody's read the materials.
so I think that I'd like to do
and doing interesting time. So
let's open up to the four days.
so there's a process so this so
we can have a greater
complement. It's not just those
of us who have been here for a
while. I can tell.
Doug Levine: So thanks. Jailyn.
that memo was helpful. and I
wanted to drill down on one part
of it. because I don't think
that we knew specifically. and
obviously it's subject to
interpretation about reasonable
interval. Have you read anything
or in your work with other
towns. does it make more sense
to review a set of executive
session minutes. If there's been
some material change. for
example. in the case. whether
the case is closed. for example.
then we should bring it back up.
versus if there hasn't been any
change. are we still reviewing
every X number of months or
years.
Carolyn Murray: etc? I think
that's a that's a fair question.
And similar to our conversation.
we just had executive session
going over status litigation.
once we've reported that any
cases have been closed. those
would be a perfect time to pull
out those executive session
minutes. Because I. I agree with
you. you could have.
executive session minutes that
you could pull out every 30 days
and say. still litigation. still
ongoing. still ongoing. So that
can be. you know. a bit of a an
onerous task for someone. What I
have seen some boards do is they
might calendar saying three to
six month intervals that they
will go through the list of not
yet approved or not yet released
executive session minutes. And
sometimes this is delegated just
to the chair. not to create more
work for the chair. but it could
be someone else as well who goes
through periodically just to
say. Okay. I reviewed these 10
sets of executive session
minutes. and it appears that
everything is still an open
piece of ongoing litigation. So
we'll wait another three to six
months for the next review. or
something like that. so that the
board doesn't have to meet the
executive session to reaffirm
that the matter is still
ongoing. it should not be
disclosed.
Unknown: Anyone else have any
questions?
Tom Fay: Yeah. well. thanks for
joining us tonight. Clarified
for us what we're obligated to
list concerning documentary
review. excluding documents
for review
Unknown: So are we just talking
about for Executive Session or
just minutes in general?
Tom Fay: minutes in general
Unknown: So the Open Meeting Law
requires that we list any
document that is used at a
meeting. discussed at a meeting.
or referred to in a meeting. So
it could be the draft. It could
be. you know. a red line to copy
of something. It could be the
final version of it. whatever
the document was. whatever.
however it existed on the night
that you met and discussed it.
That is the document that should
be listed at the at the bottom
of your minutes of. you know.
documents discussed or documents
used. and a copy of that needs
to be maintained somewhere. It
doesn't have to be attached
physically to your minutes of
that meeting. But. if. but. if.
some but. but if somebody were
to request a copy of those
minutes and say. GSC. you
haven't you reviewed a draft
purchase sale agreement on such
William Whitney: Just indicated
that if something is settled
and such an evening. I'd like to
see that draft P and S agreement
they should be able to go
somewhere in. you know. the town
manager's office. to be able to
get a copy of that. or maybe
even online if it's something
you put say in your packets. for
example. which you guys do a
great job of preparing digital
packets so
that would instance where there
are both pending and settled
matters. would you advise that
the board issue the minutes
reflecting the settled matters
and redact the portion of the
minutes relating to the ongoing
Unknown: that's a great
question. So just because. just
because something that was
discussed in executive session
has been resolved or settled. or
maybe in this case. only
partially resolved. you can
still meet as a board and you
can review the minutes. and you
can approve the minutes. meaning
that is nothing more than this
board saying yes. that's
accurate representation of what
we discussed at that meeting.
Approval of the minutes.
however. doesn't mean release of
those minutes to the public.
There's still that added step of
even if the minutes are ready to
be approved. we then have to
look at it through the public
records lens. Is there any
information contained in those
minutes that should not be
released to the public for a
variety of reasons? It could be
that perhaps we partially
settled the case. or we settled
with one party. but we still
have ongoing litigation with
another party. or another claim
is still going to go forward. or
it could be that there's some
very sensitive information in
there. or some information about
somebody's medical condition. or
maybe some a statue. such as.
like a record of a Child abuse
or something like that that
statutorily must be redacted. So
we still want to go through
those minutes and redact
anything. but you don't
necessarily need to redact the
minutes unless you've got a
request to produce those
minutes. So in other words. you
could vote to approve the
minutes to say. yes. they're an
accurate representation of what
we discussed. but they are not
yet ready to be released to the
public because there's something
that's still ongoing. or in the
case where there's a partial
resolution. we might say we can
release so much of these minutes
as it pertains to The matter
that is now resolved. but we're
still redacting or withholding
the other portion of something
that's still ongoing and with
something that's partially
resolved. I think we have to
really look at that carefully.
because it's one thing to say.
well. we've settled with. you
know. John Smith. but the case
with Anne doe goes on. We have
to be careful that even though
we may now be able to release
information about John Smith.
that we aren't releasing
something that reveals something
about the ongoing and Doe case.
William Whitney: So if there
were two unrelated matters
discussed. and there was
resolution on one panel and the
second was ongoing. Minutes were
approved. Is the board or is a
body obliged to release the
minutes reflecting that portion
of the discussion pertaining.
Into the settled matter and
redacting that portion relating
to the pending matter.
Carolyn Murray: I think that
would be a good practice. yes.
especially if we were talking
about. say. one is a piece of
litigation. but suppose the
other one has to do with we're
negotiating the purchase of
property right now. We've
purchased the property. people.
you've even built something on
that property that can now all
be released to the public. but
the other matter would still be
redacted.
Carol Martin: I would like to
what are you thinking. because
Jailyn is our person here
available to know this? Do you
have any questions?
Jailyn Bratica: I don't think
so. I think this was good and
gave me more clarification on
what should do going forward for
them. So I think I'm good.
Carol Martin: Yeah. just want to
make sure she's our main person.
You know? Have Executive Session
days. You kind of get a
refresher as well. This was good
timing. or from you.
Carolyn Murray: So do you feel
like you're going to how you
want the process to go
Carol Martin: chair with the
designated
Anne Brensley: fresh Yeah.
Carol Martin: I mean. I I will.
I learned from other board
members. and I think when we ran
into some questions. I said. you
know. we all need to have a
refresher. because. you know.
that expert alone. I said. it's
an important but one thing we're
not talking about plenty of
things that we discussed in
executive session that aren't
necessarily part of the
location. So for example. we're
talking about holding the West
Plain. So when we finish
discussing that topic. I think
so it's not just the
litigations. but it's also the
topics we need to go back.
Carolyn Murray: Yeah. just that.
I am happy and available to
Jailyn. She has questions or has
a backlog of minutes and wants
to know whether or not maybe
it's time to bring something
forward to the board for review
that's happy to work with. Use
it to hard years of like
reviewing specific minutes every
month and then having Carol
decide whether she feels or
should processed for release.
And then everything
Carol Martin: we do the board
does to stop good opportunities
to just kind of recent So
alright. thank you very much.
Carolyn Murray: You're welcome.
Carol Martin: You going to stick
with this conversation.
Unknown: Sorry. we're running a
little bit late.
Carol Martin: Finance Committee
and the Board of Public Works to
discuss Massachusetts Water
Resource Authority project. and
we're looking really kind of
honing in on financing options
and our next steps. So I do want
to make sure now it's
affordable. Would you like to
call us to order?
George Uveges: Call an order?
Carol. I don't have to go
through this posted field.
Carol Martin: Just call to order
George Uveges: A roll call vote.
okay. yeah. with people that are
here. Michael Wegerbauer
Carol Martin: think I left
out. here. Does
Michael Wegerbauer: here.
Unknown: We are? Um. and I think
we're all sharing. Oh. sorry.
George Uveges: Tom
Tom Holder: here.
George Uveges: So we have 100%
participation.
Carol Martin: being joined by
Tom Holder. Brian Keveny
Unknown: Yeah. sense.
Carol Martin: Cliff Lewis. I
recognize him. Please.
Unknown: Dom. in
Pam Griffin: Carol. do you have
a microphone?
Unknown: No she needs to speak
up. We're hard to refresh. I'm
hearing me all right. Beautiful.
Carol Martin: Offices. So I
think we all have that in June.
I think it was June 30. We had a
very productive joint meeting.
Oh. excuse me. did I also say
that we are being inviting
Carolyn Murray. KP Law. and also
we'll be joined tonight by
Graham Cecil Paul from KP Law.
And we asked her to come to join
us really
productive discussion project
that's coming. and we had a
bunch of questions. and then we
answered the questions.
Our clock at the time was we
would reconvene the second just
today for another meeting to see
where where we are. We're
recapping. I think we did ask
for the Public Works perhaps
come down and give us a
recommendation. you know. so we
can start having a little bit
more in depth discussion of
financing. And so I just the
chair of the Public Works.
technology present the Board of
Public Works.
George Uveges: Well. again. that
recommendation has been provided
to everybody FinCom and the
Select Board. So I'm not sure it
makes a lot of sense to read two
pages worth of documents
Carol Martin: give us an
overview. I think it's in the
following has has seen it as
well. So the public. it's on
page 13.
Stake in the room. Obviously.
I'm just going to recap. for
everyone who's listening. there
are three options to finance
this project. all through the
water rates. We can fund it. The
Board of public works can ask
the Select Board to find it
through a debt exclusion.
through chapter 110. right? Or
we can have some kind of a
combination hybrid. and we need
to kind of narrow in from what
direction we'd like to look at
at least initially. and then we
can select. or will seek input.
obviously. with a finance
committee. Town Counsel and
others. So.
George Uveges: Gee. thanks. I'm
not going to go there's two
pages of considerations that
we've looked at the front part.
and the real issue then becomes.
as you said. combination water
rates. debt exclusion. or. as my
call has said. there is another
provision out there that's
available where the board of
selectmen can take part of that.
what's in water rates. and pay
through that through real estate
taxes. and has the ability to
change that over time. And that
is that the MGL 59.21c and
that's subsection a. yeah. it's
under the recommendations on the
second page. So that's a really
another option that gives the
most flexibility. We believe
that the best way to go is to
have the interest cost and debt
service pay for in real estate
taxes. because it is
infrastructure okay. and is not
tied to the amount of water that
somebody uses. Okay. it's the
cost to get the water available
to the town and lot of other
considerations. But again. you
know the issue is same people
are going to pay that's going to
be the residents may change the
amount. may change the
deductibility that they may get
on some of it. And those are all
things that the Select Board.
you've got to consider. okay.
but the 74% rate increase. if
it's all in water rates. is. in
my mind. at least very extensive
to expensive to the community.
And so their recommendation was
the real estate taxes. and can
be done in one of two ways. or
can be split. So. and I would
ask you. please read through the
considerations. because that
gives you the thought process
behind why we came up with this
recommendation.
Carol Martin: Yeah. would it
just consult with Mr. McCall?
First. are you comfortable with
this? Just went for questions
and maybe shared information
that you want to share. or would
you like to speak first?
Michael McCall: I don't think it
really matters. Madam Clerk. the
only thing that I would be
adding. we do have a counsel
here. Carolyn Murray to answer
some of the questions that have
already been sent to me.
including whether or not the
boards were so inclined to do
this change back and forth at a
future date. based on the
opinion I received counsel that
would be positive. Taking a cue
from Select Board Member Levine
last week about using the list
circle. I did throw this out to
my peers on the MMA to see if
other towns had tried this. The
only Tom that responded to me in
affirmative was Bellingham and
they indicated that they did
this in part because they had a
split tax rate and they had a
large number of commercial
properties. So by shifting it
over onto the taxes they were
getting commercial water takers
take full so that was the only
feedback that I received from
your list serve about utilizing
this particular portion of the
statute.
Doug Levine: That was the only
town that responded generally.
or the only town that utilized
this map.
Michael McCall: So I only had a
handful of responses. In
general. most people were asking
me. how did you do that? Or how
are you but Bellingham was the
only one who said they have
utilized it. and that's how. and
they do a review every year so
they could change and make
adjustments.
William Whitney: Michael. you're
referring to 20 1c. K.
Michael McCall: and this is
splitting of the fees. portion
on the water rates and a portion
on the excluded debt. And I
guess there was a question that
came to me from someone. I think
attorney Murray can ask. But I
think if you go all in on
subsection K through a
traditional debt exclusion. you
can't. once you do an entire
debt exclusion.
Carol Martin: Alright. that
question first. because I
wanted.
George Uveges: well just one.
one thing had to Mike. is that
the other benefit that you have
if you go with n versus k is it
gives you an extra time period
to have to make that decision.
Doug Levine: because you have
until 2029.
George Uveges: till till the
first debt service
Carol Martin: to UDC.
William Whitney: Because I think
he has a just
Unknown: he's going to have to
speak up or come up. because
Michael Wegerbauer: my question
was. you were laying out that.
since this is infrastructure.
let's put it into debt service
as sort of an organizing but we
have other infrastructure
investments we have in our
making in the water department.
and we have put them into rates.
George Uveges: You want to put
those into real estate taxes
too. Thank you.
Phil Guidice: What was the logic
of why wasn't that done
George Uveges: has never been
done before. We haven't had this
differently?
large of a project.
Phil Guidice: Got it. But the
other current capital projects.
the tank and water main work.
that's going to be a 32%
increase in rates. because
George Uveges: already with
that. right?
Phil Guidice: Yeah. So isn't
that large enough? What was
large enough to look at debt
service for this? I'm just
trying to understand the logic
that we're applying.
George Uveges: We have a hard
enough time getting this one
group. so
Phil Guidice: So one perspective
is it feels like it will be
easier to get it funded.
George Uveges: I'm saying that
if we had got those before with
the others. I'm not sure the
reception we would have gotten.
And this. this is such a large
amount and so unusual. You know.
the water main that we do. we do
understand periodically. You
know. the water tank is part of
an overall system.
Phil Guidice: right? It's just
that we're 32% rate increases
due to those already committed
projects. yeah.
George Uveges: and we would love
to have more put in there. but
I'm not sure. looking at the
faces on the board that that's.
you know. I
Phil Guidice: think there is the
open question. and Michael.
you'll need to take the lead in
informing us as to what's going
to be doable. From a town
standpoint. We'll all have our
views and. you know.
conversations with neighbors and
like. but with all of the other
financial strains that are going
to be coming on the town. in
terms of possible proposition
two and a half overrides and
other things that are out there.
it's going to be important that
we have a very compelling
strategy that goes forward. that
I would hate big projects like
this to not go forward. because
we haven't thought about the
reception. that it's going to be
very
Unknown: we are very aware of
that.
George Uveges: yeah. and you
know. the the issue too is
whether it's real estate taxes
or water rates. Yeah. same
people are paying. It may be a
little different in the
distribution. okay. but they're
still going to have the same
concern. Is somebody we've
talked before. you know. going
to town meeting and saying. I'm
looking at a 74% or 32% increase
in water rates. I can't afford
an increase in real estate
taxes. Conversely. you know. I
see it's in my taxes. And you
know. at least my water rates
are not going to jump.
Phil Guidice: Yeah. I don't
personally have enough of a feel
of how the town will react.
George Uveges: I'm not sure
anybody does.
Phil Guidice: Yeah. yeah. no.
Iris Hoxha: sorry. just to
clarify. water rates are going
up 32% regardless. Like. okay.
sorry. So you just said. like.
two things that. So water rates
are going up 32% regardless of
the options
Carol Martin: So what I'm going
to do tonight.
George Uveges: unless. look.
unless is my friend here says he
wants to put it all in the in
the real estate taxes
Iris Hoxha: but there's a
baseline that water rates are
going up regardless of what
solution right
George Uveges: the 32% it was in
the prior meeting was on a in
the exhibit. and that was tied
to the water tower. the water
main.
Iris Hoxha: existing capital. So
I want to just kind of
Carol Martin: alternate to the
Finance Committee and the Select
Board. So anybody on the Select
Board have a question?
William Whitney: I have a
question. Carolyn. Carolyn.
could you just very briefly
outline the process. the
approval process for essentially
issuance of bonds and the
repayment of wants upon a you
know. if they're issued pursuant
to 21cK and 20 21cN. and also if
They are entirely on the
ratepayers. So there are three.
Are three. So I'm just curious
about action by Town meeting and
possibly a vote. I guess it's a
debt exclusion question.
certainly.
Unknown: So if we just take this
as a straight debt exclusion
question to start with. you need
a town meeting vote to
appropriate the money and
authorize the funds to be
borrowed. You will also need. as
a debt exclusion be the ballot
question. and the debt exclusion
question in town meeting.
because we're borrowing is the
two thirds voted meeting. you
also need a corresponding ballot
question that the Select board
votes by a two thirds vote will
place that ballot question on
the ballot for the voters. but
it only requires a majority of
the voters to pass. and you need
both parts so you don't just
pass town meeting and then fail
at the ballot box or vice versa.
Now. in terms of timing of those
two pieces. you could have a
ballot question before you have
a town meeting appropriation.
Some communities do that. That's
just works out that way. perhaps
better for to coincide with your
local election and save some
money that way. Others prefer
doing town meeting first.
because there's a sense that.
well. if town meeting isn't
going to approve. us to borrow
this money? What's the point of
having a ballot question? But
that's really a policy decision
for this board today. If you go
the traditional debt exclusion
option. if the debt exclusion if
the town meeting vote occurs at
an annual town meeting. You have
to have the debt exclusion
ballot question voted by
September 15 of that year. If
you put a debt exclusion
question voted at a special town
meeting. you have 90 days from
that special town meeting to
then hold the election as to
whether or not the tax cut that
the debt exclusion is approved.
So that's your conditional
process for that exclusion and
and it should be clear that
assumes that all of those funds
for whatever the project is.
however many dollars have been
borrowed. That's all going to be
paid for through the tax levy.
What 20 1c does that is a little
bit different. is you are still
going to need an appropriation
found in town meeting. I
suspect. based on the dollar
amounts. you're also going to
need a borrowing authorization
as well for town meeting. The
question then becomes. how is
that being repaid? It could come
from Exclusively from the
lottery payers. It could also be
just as I described. the debt
exclusion of 100% through the.
Of the tax line. But let's just
assume for a moment that we go
to town meeting with a question
to appropriate $24 million
whatever it is for connecting to
the MWRA. for example. and to
authorize the borrower for
saying that assumes that
question by itself. assumes that
those funds are going to be
repaid through water rate
payers. unless the Select board
votes. pursuant to 21 Sean to
shift that water debt to the tax
side. So one of the things. or
perhaps the most important
difference between the two
procedures is you're still
borrowing money. still going to
town meeting for authorization
follow that money. but under 21
cm. there is no ballot question.
It is exclusively a decision
made by five member Select Board
as to whether or not you cannot
shift all of that water debt to
taxpayers. or whether you just
want to ship a portion of that
debt. But that's the process.
essentially. It's the
elimination of a ballot question
substituted for a Select Board
question instead.
George Uveges: and that
percentage could change over
time.
Unknown: just because. let's
suppose you start off deciding
we're going to ship 100% of the
water debt to taxpayers. You can
revisit this as a Select Board
as often as you want. You
probably don't want to revisit
it too frequently in a fiscal
year. because that'll cause some
degree of uncertainty and chaos
for your finance director. But
yes. you can revisit this. and
you can change the percentage.
You could decide you just want
to ship a set dollar amount and
million dollars whatever you
know. pick your pick your pick
your set amount. If you want to
do it that way. you can revisit
that periodically. Every time
you vote to invoke 21 cn. we
have to send a notice in the
Division of local services. the
Bureau of accounts. to let the
bill voted to vote into a go
statute is a form that they give
you that has to be filled out
and sent in with a recap sheet
by the imported assessors. It
gets a little more complicated.
Maybe we should talk about this
later. in terms of you can ship
all or just a portion of the
debt. You could also vote only
to exclude the residential share
of the water debt. That gets a
little bit more complicated in
terms of just what I'm going to
say is record keeping. because
if you decide that you're only
going to shift or exclude the
residential portion of the water
debt. You're adding this now to
the residential tax bill. but
you then have to correspondingly
reduce residential water charges
by the amount that additional
tax levy that can have raised.
where they have shifted. Can you
say that last part. then you
actually sorry? Everybody else
got that. But so one of the
options you're allowed is you
could just exclude just the
residential portion of the water
debt. But if you do that now.
all of that residential share of
the water debt. whatever that
dollar amount represents. that's
the amount now that it's going
to be excluded under 21 cm.
that's the amount of additional
taxes that are going to be
raised in the levy. But they're
going to be raised against the
residential taxpayers. So folks
are going to see their tax bills
go up. but the same kind of on
the other end of the the
equation. if you will. their
water and sewer charges for the
residential rate payers is
reduced by a corresponding
amount increase of those taxes.
Or
George Uveges: said another way.
we can't double dip if we get
some of it in real estate taxes.
we can't then build in
waterways.
Doug Levine: Question on the
second bullet. I wanted to drill
down a little bit on the
consideration around town tiers.
Maybe it's a question for Tom
holder or public works. Do you
have any sense of percentage of
water revenue is opened by the
high water users. the tier four.
also the tier three. is that a
meaningful percentage?
George Uveges: Well. remember
that your bill was built up.
Your first x is a tier one. your
next x is in tier two. right?
Doug Levine: i'm wondering if.
at that rate. $17.77. is that a
big portion of the overall water
revenue? Take any year or it's
not
George Uveges: I have it here.
believe it or not.
Doug Levine: I do you believe
that.
You did you the Board of Public
Works. in way. the decision
about potentially doing a hybrid
form of payment. where some come
the water rights and some is
excluded yet. but the taxpayers
Michael Wegerbauer: we. I mean.
we discussed. I was. I was
writ large.
thankfully on vacation at the
last meeting. but. but we did
discuss that in the past and and
we had some ideas around that.
either the full MWRA portion on
water rates and the other the
Happy Hollow portion on tax. And
then. I don't know.
Doug Levine: back to that
solution
George Uveges: well again. and
I'll go. I got the answer for
your other question. but it all
depends on how you want to shift
and who you want to shift on.
There's no right or wrong
answer. So it depends on what
you think is first of all going
to have the best chance of being
approved at town meeting.
because that's the number one
concern. and then get the split.
And the question is. you know.
you since you're already looking
at 32% increase. how much of
that additional 45% are you
going to want to shift? Because
you're just going to drive up
that 32%
Doug Levine: so that becomes a
32% anyway. and it's not another
74%
George Uveges: No. it's 70.
yeah. split between the two. And
in terms of what billings. Tier
1 is roughly. This is in terms
of water build 15 million
against 43 million. And then
tier 2 is 10. Tier 3 is 10. and
tier 3 is six. So that that's
your split. Because remember.
somebody that's in tier 4 as
part of their water bill at the
first three tiers.
Carol Martin: I do want to say
before anyone else speaks that
if you're not going when you
speak. please identify yourself.
so that those who's speaking
also for the minutes. Sorry I
haven't been enforcing that. but
I probably should be. I know I
sounds hard
George Uveges: does that answer
your question. doug
William Huss: I'm Bill Huss. I
serve on the Finance Committee
and also on the Energy and
Climate Committee. and I was
just wanting to see if people
have considered the Climate
Action Plan recommendations with
respect to water. because one of
the objectives is to reduce the
number of large lawns for a
number of environmental reasons.
climate reasons and so forth.
which I won't go ahead and go
into. but one of the ways of
doing that was to raise rates
for the highest users. We
already have a tiered system. so
it's not clear how much one can
raise the burden. but it's also
the idea is at least that should
be part of the discussion. I
think. and people should be
aware of what's in that plan.
which was voted for by the
Select Board as a result of the
climate emergency. voted by
county.
Carol Martin: So I believe that
the tier 4 rates are almost
three times as much right?
George Uveges: $17.77 against
$6.21.
Carol Martin: I do believe in
attended that meeting that was a
lot of rate hearing. There was
quite a bit of discussion about
upon certain percent across the
board. because it just creates a
bigger. feel free to respond to
that.
William Huss: I'm sorry. Carol.
can you wasn't clear what your
question was.
Carol Martin: I think I was
responding. yeah.
Michael Wegerbauer: Mike Wayne
of our Board of Public Works.
Vice Chair. we have discussed
the tiering. and there has been
some discussion that it's
growing wider and wider. Is that
fair? As you mentioned. is three
times the amount right now. We
did not go into depth because we
kept the rates the same this
year. So we kept them the same
as the prior years. So. but it's
always been a concern. Duration.
making sure that we have the
requirement of our permit as
well.
George Uveges: that. just for
comparison. our average cost of
water is $11.44 so your first
three tiers are all less than
our actual average cost.
William Huss: less cost
George Uveges: less than our
actual average cost. and it's
made up by the tier four. Now
that cost is. and this is just
very rough back of the envelope
is probably about 75% fixed and
25% variable. Which is why. when
we have an issue and we you
know. water rates drop or water
usage drops. our expenses don't
drop proportionately because of
the high fixed cost. and we have
to keep that in mind also.
Anne Brensley: No. I just wanted
to share that I asked Carolyn
about in the end. though public
work controls the tax rates for
rolling.So the approval process
for a debt exclusion would
include getting it on the
ballot. getting it approved at
town meeting. and making sure
public works is willing to do
that just putting it out there
as the overall process. And
then. you know. just keeping in
mind that. you know. the the
bigger your house. the more
water you use. and so you're.
you're already being taxed
additionally. because the value
of your home is higher. so it's
assessed higher. So there is
some. there is some level.
unless you. you know. held on to
your house and have a very
unfair assessment on your home.
it's likely that the water rates
will adjust a little bit to
usage. or assume usage. but if
you have a bigger house. you're
probably using more water.
George Uveges: It also assumes
you don't have well water for
the water.
Unknown: Well water
Tom Holder: to be watered.
Anne Brensley: That's true. and
that you don't have a pool. So
there's a lot to it. but I'm
just saying that there's at
least some level of adjustment
that you have there. And then
looking at the math at 7.6
million. 5.300 homes. it's about
$1.200 per home. That would be
1200 is how much per year.
George Uveges: It's about 2% of
their real estate bill. because
total real estate taxes are
about 100 million and so it's
about 2%
Carol Martin: just a little
clarification on what behind
that comes from is that?
Anne Brensley: But no. it's
just. yeah. okay. just math so
that we can all kind of
understand what this really
looks like from an tax bill
Carol Martin: I think when we
talk about next steps. that's
going to be something that the
Select Board is going to have
some question on you know. the
impact on the capital projects.
the plan. the capital plan put
us into the tax rates. the total
impact. the full cost to be
individual for the average
taxpayer. increase the water
rates. plus our normal
increases.
George Uveges: And the question
is. in terms of getting
approval. do you think that a 2%
increase in real estate taxes is
going to have the same effect as
a 74% increase in your water
.just even though they may be
the same dollar amount. the
percentage impact has a
different impact on people and
how they're going act
Doug Levine: to say 74% and 32%
is automatically happening to
like the 43. 41 % right?
George Uveges: You and I may.
they're going to talk about.
what's my water rate going to go
up.
Doug Levine: Is doing up 32% no
matter what
George Uveges: I I don't
disagree with you that's
Michael Wegerbauer: That's the
decision already made.
Carol Martin: right. No. I
think. I think that's right.
because 32 was going to occur
long before the cost. long
before the cost of the NWA book
construction costs. Kick in the
32% kick in around FY 27. 28 and
the others kind of kick in
starting around FY 29 but I
think we're getting really.
really weigh in the details. I
want to keep it a little more
high level.
Michael Spelman: Mike Spelman.
member of the Board of Public
Works. Back to the tier grading.
Also keep in mind all of our
municipalities. They're all
they're all regardless of use.
they're all here over the tier
one. right?
Phil Guidice: Just real quickly
did Phil Guidice. FinCom. I did
want to get clarified. I I
understand our actual bills are
likely going up right now by 12%
with the new meters and that
we're collecting. We weren't
collecting all of what the
consumption was is that. is that
panning out?
Carol Martin: That's a question
for Mr. Holder. not myself.
Phil Guidice: Okay. yeah. so if
that's the case.
George Uveges: I can answer part
of that because we just went
through this with the DOR. we're
still the forecast is that with
the new meters. what we've been
advertised is 15% increase.
Phil Guidice: We built a volume.
George Uveges: We built 6% in to
our model in terms of the
revenue increase. now recognize
that whatever is billed in
addition. is going to be at the
user's highest rate
Phil Guidice: understood.
George Uveges: Okay. so how much
is the question?
Phil Guidice: Well. does that
get us halfway to the 32%
already. if we're already and do
we know? I mean. we've had at
least one billing period since
the meters have all gone in.
have they come in for those
customers 15% higher?
George Uveges: Unfortunately.
our billing timetables don't
provide that opportunity because
they're semi annual versus
usage. So trying to make apples.
Phil Guidice: I get it. but
Carol Martin: we don't recognize
talking out of turn. I recognize
Tom Holder
Tom Holder: Tom Holder the
public works director. So what
we did to answer to at least get
a feel for where we're at at
this point in time. we've had
two billings. one. route two. we
compared 2024s. which had the
old meters. the 2025 which has
the new meters. Route one. it
looked like we had 7% increase.
Route two. which was the August
billing. it looked like it was
even with what was 24. so it's
an indicator
Phil Guidice: too soon to tell.
Tom Holder: Part. it's too soon
to tell. yeah. I mean. room
three is going out this month in
September. So each month. you
know. passes by. we have a
better sense the board of public
works. As George stated was. you
know. visioning the 6% increase
in volume. so that the first
July Bill kind of match that
leads. did not we'll see what
three there's six routes in
total.
Phil Guidice: Yeah. It gets back
to this question as to what
decisions have already been
made. and what have the revenues
reflected? Of that in some
amount is related to the meters
and then one step already been
made going into rates. So the
only question on the table is
really the next raise. which is
about 30 or 40% increase as a
possibility. And
George Uveges: you would think
it would. it would go down. but
remember that they're going to
be built at the higher volume.
so get back to where they
started.
Phil Guidice: Yeah. we'll see.
Yeah. I get it Sure.
Tom Fay: Carolyn. you said of
municipalities for many years.
do you think that the
recommended hybrid approach is
most common for this type of
plans?
Unknown: I can tell you that
when this question was posed. I
reached out to the bureau chief
at the Division of Local Service
bureau house. and also reached
out to Bond Counsel. They can
only identify one community that
has adopted the 20 1c and
approach since 1993 statute. Now
I heard McCall mentioned
Bellingham today. not saying
that. that's not accurate. but
you are supposed to report to
the Bureau of Accounts when you
adopted the statutes that they
can also track. because they
also request certification that
the water and sewer rates are
being reduced in a level
commensurate with the tax rate
increase. and the Bureau counts
still only shows one community
as having actually adopted this.
It's been out there since 1903.
It's curious if it was popular.
You know why we would see more
communities taking advantage of
this? But now. when I talk to
people with a good explanation
for that.
Tom Fay: thank you.
Carol Martin: I had one
observation to them. currently.
there's a surge of a flurry of
communities that are because of
this obligation for them to
leave facing the same situation.
And I think prior to something
about the correct age. but I
think prior to the last 10-15
years. Most folks just went all
and 100% MWRA. They didn't
necessarily have to maintain
those sources and all those
kinds of things. The costs were
a lot less. And it just. it just
went all down.
William Huss: There are. there
are dozens of communities out of
a 63 surge. There are dozens
partially users.
Unknown: so but I think this
might be projects. Does anybody
in the highest grade have a
question? Yes. there's
Iris Hoxha: access. I just think
Doug's point. and yes to Doug's
point and to Phil's point. I
think this is fundamentally
going to be a question of
marketing and trying to help the
constituents in the town really
understand. not the fact that
the funding and the project
itself is necessarily up for
debate at this point. I think we
all agree it needs to move
forward. but it's a question of
just the funding. And I think
the numbers are important to get
correct. And to me. it's not 2
versus 74. 77 it's two versus 42
right? Because then where do you
want that? Do you want 2% in
your real estate. or 42% in your
water bill. because that water
bill is still going to go up 32%
regardless of the choices made.
And we have to make sure that
we're being transparent. And I
think the other piece here. just
like listening to this. is the
21 cN. It sounds like. perhaps
it's not typically been invoked.
but it sounds like what I'm
hearing is that gives us a lot
more flexibility to move in
either direction. regardless of
the future. So if. in the
beginning. you start with water
rates. and then move more
towards real estate. and then
something changes. maybe we can
all hope the project comes in
less we don't have to use some
of the contingency. You move
back in the different direction.
right? So to me. that seems to
be like the clear
differentiator. plus the process
difference. Maybe I'm not
understanding something else.
but you have a lever that
doesn't seem possible in the
other option. 21k
Unknown: Carol. can I say
something
George Uveges: I think one of
the reasons that people go to K
versus N. because we've had this
discussion. is if you go with N
you're at risk of a change of a
Select Board that changes the
decision and it's no longer tax
exempt. All of a sudden. your
water rates take a big jump.
versus if you use K. that's set
for the time of the borrower. So
you there is a risk to the users
that all sudden. it could change
and bounce because they want to
use that money for something
else. All of a sudden you get it
in water rates. So that'll be
one of the questions that will
come up as we go through this
education process. which has got
to be expensive.
Doug Levine: is your sense that
the majority of the tier three
and tier four. heavy user water
rights is mostly based on
irrigation. Is that the general
accepted idea. and that's why.
when we have a water band. we
say no outside irrigation.
that's kind of where we're
cutting back
Tom Holder: yeah. so I can. I
can tell you. I think it'll ask
the question. because that's
when we do implement the water
ban. we actually see a
significant drop in revenue
based upon a reduction in tier 3
and 4. okay.
Carol Martin: nine. I did when
we met a couple years ago.
because I think the emphasis was
more on a little bit more on the
system and and the proposed
project. And so Mr. McCall has
done a bunch of research. you
know. on that. because he
thought those questions are
going to be raised tonight. Did
you want to speak to the level
that you got to the Select
Board. Finance committee and the
Board of Public Works. all the
way around?
Michael McCall: Well. yes. but
there's a couple things I'd just
like to touch on my last
community I helped them with the
debt exclusion traditional
21c.K. and what I think would
help during marketing and for a
lot of people to understand this
is what we did. Was what I was
just here. is take a look at the
median and mean water takers.
the average per household. and
then take tax bills. median and
mean. and say the 25th 57 500%
and show the breakdown to folks.
What happens if it's all in on
water. what my median mean bill
is going to look like. or if I
have a house that's in the 25th
percentile. smaller home. What
the impact on my taxes is going
to be? One of the things that I
thought about a lot here is the
equity factor. because I do not
in this town. but I have older
parents who live in a large
hill. they use a small amount of
water. and I have siblings and
others that live in smaller
houses with a lot of kids who
play a lot of sports. use a lot
of life. So I think that has to
be factored in. One of the
things that's interesting. or a
couple variables that I think we
all need to consider. is that in
the recent legislation passed
over the summer. there's going
to be a temporary increase in
the state and local tax
deductions. So the other thing
that attorney Murray talked
about is you can shift a portion
of this to taxes. and you could
shift portion and exclude just
for the residential portion. To
me. that seems like a very
interesting option. because it
will allow people to claim that
on their taxes. provided.
however. it was some equity
between how much they use. but
I've noticed. on my own. as the
manager. we have a lot of
nonprofits that are expanding in
this town. The last time I
checked. a fee is not a tax. so
if it's all in on the fees. I
can deduct this. but I couldn't
deduct the tax. But if we
shifted it all in a traditional
K. 21 parenthesis subsection K.
some of those non profits would
not be paying some tax. Would
they still would be paying fees
if we split it in that manner.
So I know there's a lot to think
about. but those are all factors
that if we show folks the
options in Dave We're paying a
large sum for this solution. We
have safe. portable drinking
water. and it can come out of
one pocket or another. or a
little bit of both. but it's
what's going to be most fair and
equitable. And while I'm not a
big fan because of what Mr. Judy
said before about trying to deal
with the psychology of what may
and may not pass if we were
allowed to ship something to the
residential so they they could
deduct it. get the benefit of
that tax deduction. and still
have the fees on the commercial
and the nonprofits to pick up
their usage. That might be a
fair and equitable breakdown.
It's just a possible suggestion.
but I still think breaking some
of that down by water usage
media mean. and then the tax
impact on various priced homes
would would really help people
understand what the actual cost.
Carol Martin: I want to make
sure everyone has has a
question. It's an opportunity to
ask it. But I am also going to
do a little is ask the Select
Board again. just as collectible
if we have any other questions.
because this now is shifting.
This decision is shifting
somewhat to a select board. It's
not going to be 100% moderates.
and we need to put some thought
into this series. Not sure my
timeline here. but I think few
meetings. So we need to have
some kind of sense of what our
our same thing. Carolyn. does
Doug Levine: this decision need
to be
Carol Martin: found? Well before
that. because we have to submit
the article. So we would have to
be submitted. So I would think
we need to make a decision about
middle and Michael. Middle
October. we need to make a
decision on November. on what we
think is financing.
Michael McCall: Well. we have
Mr. Kevin here. I think a lot of
it will depend upon if you're
going to do a traditional 21 ck.
you're going to have an
election. is attorney Murray
pointed out his various dates we
could do with the annual
election. right? We could wait
some time meeting does and then
call an election after the fact.
The determination needs to be
made for which course Tom and go
all rates. a traditional debt
exclusion. and that one can take
what we have to put things On
the Barry the ballot question
Doug Levine: with the election
Carol Martin: tomorrow. March?
And then we would go to tell me.
alright.
Anne Brensley: I just wanted to
from the town managers talking
about aging parents remind me of
what I would. And have I given
much lip service to and that is
one of the provisions when you
want to see and choose bathroom.
is there's an automatic property
tax exemption for those who are
65 and older and who are
homeowners. and it depends on
how they run a house etc. but
there is. there is some relief
that is granted to them by
virtue of their tax bill going
up by the water DEP ship.
Doug Levine: regardless of
income level.
Anne Brensley: No. there are.
there's. there's a whole
formula. you're single. etc. But
I didn't want to feel like be
remiss if I didn't actually
mention it to
Tom Holder: you. Is that the
only $200 cap.
Anne Brensley: yes. yes. and I
have not found any proof that it
has been raised since 1991
Michael McCall: can you think to
that before anyone. I just want
to put it on that. Well. it's my
understanding statement versus
Nick Lombardi: the task
Jailyn Bratica: subject to
appropriation. Yes. they do. but
yes. that's what I was going to
say.
Carol Martin: They
automatically. you don't have
enough to fly. right? They just
send it to us. subject to okay.
it's just one of the other
questions. Tom had one.
Unknown: So just to clarify.
$200 cap on that. yes. So my my
question
is. I appreciate the Public
Works recommendation. I sense
the finance community hasn't
discussed this topic. Point of
making a recommendation of your
own intention. Would you prefer
not?
Phil Guidice: Not sure yet. We
are meeting next Monday night.
and we'll put this on the topic.
But I don't see a finance
committee need to weigh in here.
Nick Lombardi: Okay?
Necessarily. yeah.
Pam Griffin: Jay lane. Board of
Public Works. I just wanted to
reiterate that when you raise
water rates. people tend to use
less water. just like when we
ask for a ban. and then we have
to hear that people are
complying. But that worries me.
from the point of view. there's
a certain dollar amount you have
to pay back and borrow money.
and you're like. Oh. I'm not
collecting enough to cover our
75% fixed cost. What happens
then? So that's just one
consideration. Throw it out
there for you guys.
Carol Martin: I would like to
Anne Brensley: go ahead roll in
response to camera.
Carol Martin: Is there a
consideration of or could you
insert sort of a flat fee that
would be some insulation
against. you know. we have the
water management drop and into
the interior water
and a regular
Anne Brensley: and no one's
going to like that. But no. it's
going to like the increase
anyway it's being born. You
know. one way or another. it
just means. like you it might
just kind of even out.
Tom Holder: Yeah. I mean. in
response to that. I have seen
periodically. communities will
implement. you know. a capital
improvement fee. Bellingham has
one. and it's flat regardless of
how much water you use. So by
doing that. you run less of a
risk of worrying about somebody
that's using less water because
of higher rates. So that that
strategy is regularly that
Carol Martin: would also help us
capture. for example. non
profits or those people who are
not paying taxes. Okay. I do
just as you're looking at here.
because I know a lot of other
towns are connecting to MWRA and
are looking into it. and the
costs are very high. just the
change in water rates that
others have other towns or are
anticipating.
Infrastructure. So I do want to
call on the stores I am
suggested you might attend
because I thought we might be
talking more about the actual
project tonight.
Michael McCall: It was the chair
with public works. Yes. before
we go to the project. I just
wanted to hear select forward.
remember Whitney had asked I
just wonder
further questions attorney
Murray again. with the others
here to benefit
everyone hearing it. But. So
under mgL 5921 CE. and the
Select Board makes the decision
without ballot question. But
that wouldn't preclude the
Select Board from putting. say.
a non binding question on the
April election. so that they
would know at some point. either
between Tom media. right Tom
meeting. that they could take
that information and make their
vote. if they so. shows that's a
possibility for them. If they
want to get into the public.
Unknown: you certainly can not
to cloud the issue
Michael McCall: as it's written.
It's just the five members of
the board that would make the
decision. And I know that Select
Board Member Whitney had asked.
if I'm not mistaken. how could
we have a vote with the
electorate determine whether or
not they wanted to have that
Doug Levine: ship. but then we
have to have a subsequent ballot
question. a
Unknown: separate election?
Michael McCall: No. I think you
could put the non binding
question on the the town
election before town meeting.
could still have the
appropriation question on the
warrant that someone could then
decide whether or not to share.
But if we do a dance solution.
you still need the bathroom. not
if you're doing it under 21 to
see subsection again.
William Whitney: But that
actually was not my specific
Michael McCall: that's how I
interpreted. Sarah. I'm sorry.
Carol Martin: what is your
specific question? So. Mr.
Lewis. I thought we might I
wasn't sure where we look on
them. So like I said. he was
then from the Dave who started
as the chair of 29 iterations of
this project. So we didn't
really talk about that. We
focused just on financing. But I
want to give you an opportunity
to say something if you probably
wanted to answer this.
Unknown: I have no comment on
the finance. and find tenure on
the board pendant before the
finance so this discussion is on
that topic. and it's
Anne Brensley: somewhere between
25 and 40%
projected increases in water
rounds in various times around
25 All
Carol Martin: right. so I think
that
Carolyn was offset. Michael was
offset. and I think that I am
going to thank everybody for the
time. and
Michael McCall: you would ask me
to speak about the email that I
received earlier.
Carol Martin: Well. I actually
do want to address that. Now you
want to address that without
talking scope of the project
that we're
Michael McCall: just talking
about. Well. the email that I
see today was really about the
interbasin transfer. right? Did
you want to
Carol Martin: speak to it
briefly? Because I'm going to
close this.
Michael McCall: I did send folks
earlier. Are we
William Whitney: getting in
trouble with the agenda? Because
we talk about
Carol Martin: relevant. because
we're talking about
appointments. I was giving I was
getting left to that they made
it so. no. sorry. Okay. I want
to thank everybody very much for
focusing on this and getting
their parts done and coming. We
really appreciate this decision
select what obviously will take
this under advisement. starting
with a next discussing this.
Somebody will give us the
timeline and the deadline and
when they need to be done. and
we will make a decision by that.
yeah. I appreciate everybody.
Sounds tonight.
Unknown: thank you.
Thank you.
Yes. Georgia.
George Uveges: Thank you for
keeping me in trouble.
Carol Martin: Experiment.
Experimenting. In a budget
tactic has two strategies last
week. one option.
And and we have questions about
that. which was the DEP Public
Works building on 66 River Road
from levy debt to exclude. See.
we had questions. So he's come
back to answer those. And in
addition. the task force has a
second proposal they would like
to run by the board. and there's
quite a few documents in our
packet. so I'm going to
recognize Brian. Kevin. the
finance director. and let him
have the floor for this agenda
item. Thank you
Brian Keveny: so good evening.
Carol. Which? Which one did you
want me address first.
Carol Martin: what's the board's
pleasure? Will we like to get
the follow up questions? 66
River Road. Larry. Dave. or do
you want to hear the The second
proposal that's now on the
table?
Brian Keveny: Well. let me
suggest that I can just bring
the board up to date on where we
are on the budget group. and we
can segue right into these two
topics. So back in July. we put
together the task force team.
the budget group. We've been
trying to meet at least weekly.
every other week. I think we're
heading into our seventh or
eighth meeting tomorrow morning.
And so where we're at is that we
got together with the school and
we developed a forecast for
fiscal 27 and the goal here was
to try to put together a budget
that would be within proposition
two and a half and would not
need an override. So I know that
in the packet. there's a
schedule there. and you probably
need a pretty big magnifying
glass to read the numbers. but
let me just give you the numbers
here. So we came up with a
forecast on the town budget.
about $114.3 million other
expenses. a little under 800
$900.000 for a total Tom budget
of $115.2 million given the
state aid. local receipts in
transfers. we're projecting that
we would need about 80. $98
million in tax to support this
budget. That leaves us a
proposition two and a half
problem of being under the levy
by $1.7 million now what I did
was I added another $200.000
because the $1.7 million brings
us right to levy. We wouldn't
want to go to the town meeting
with a budget that's right at
the tax levy. So I'm adding
another 200.000 so the forecast
is producing a deficit of $2
million and there really isn't a
clear road on how to fix this.
There's different options.
There's different ideas. The
budget group wanted to come up
with a solution by the end of
September. and we're on that
timetable. So first thing we
want to consider was the
excluded debt back in 2013 for
the fiscal. I believe it was
2012 annual Tom meeting. No. it
was 2013 because I was that was
my first one. It failed in the
spring and passed in the fall.
an $11 million appropriation.
The town voted two
authorizations. one for
9.000.001 for 2 million. Back in
February. 2013 two of the
members of the Finance Committee
presented to the Select Board at
that time their recommendation
to fund this as excluded debt.
For different reasons. The
Select Board voted three to two.
It was not a two thirds vote. so
it did not pass. So it went to
town meeting to be funded by
levy debt. The conversation back
then. if you read the minutes
was that at some point this is
going to come back. and this
will be in the conversation when
the town needs to create an
override or has to do budget
cuts to. you know. balance the
budget. So here we are with the
2027 budget in this $700.000 of
debt service is sitting in the
levy bucket. not the excluded
bucket. So one of the
recommendations that came out of
the committee was to revoke this
as excluded debt the town back
in 2013 Believe it or not. the
Tom finance committee had a
policy. Brian Earl. he was nice
enough to send it to a bunch of
us today. But Incredibly. the
level. the level that the town
would vote excluded. that was
around $100.000 which is
extremely low. I mean. you want
to vote excluded debt projects
that are over a million in plus.
not. not 100.000 I don't know
where that number came from. but
that. in fact. was in place back
then. So the Tom voted this as
levy debt. and we've been paying
this under the levy debt for a
period of time. from 2013 I
would say. through 2018 it was a
significant amount of free cash
used to balance the town's
budget. So this never became a
problem using levy debt to fund
a large project. So it never
became. A problem again. because
of the use of free cash. we
opted off for free cash around
2018 knowing that eventually the
math is going to bring us to it
prop two and a half percent
problem. So the committee got
together and said there's $5
million left in this debt. We
could have the residents in a
ballot question revote this from
levy to excluded. That would
extend what they refer to as the
max Levy. which I actually have
highlighted in green. if you can
see that it just increases the
max levy number in order for
more tax to be raised. So that's
one component of the 2 million
is to take the $700.000 in re
voted from levy to excluded. The
other recommendation that we
came up with. and I work with
hilltop. who's our financial
advisors. we had every intention
of issuing $60 million this
coming November for long term
debt. It's a mix of water
wastewater in general fund
projects that have been voted at
prior Tom meetings. But the the
debt has not been issued. We
issued issued. It hasn't even so
in talking to hilltop. one of
the things we at least mapped
out for the budget group was a
scenario where in November we
would issue debt on the water
projects. Only the water
projects currently are mapped
into the five year plan that the
Abrams group is working with the
DPW and the Board of Public
Works on the waterfront. and
those projects are ready to be
issued by long term there's no
reason why we shouldn't do those
now. So the proposal is to issue
debt around $8 million in
November. and at the same time.
reissue the bands that are
outstanding on the general fund
debt. which is approximately.
you know. we're on $1.3 million
now with the bands. One thing I
forgot to say is we currently
have bands outstanding for both
water and general fund. They all
expire in November. so they all
have to be either rolled over
for new bands or issued by
bonds. There's a few in the
water that we don't want to do
that with. because we'd be
subject to what's called a pay
down. which is a penalty. Once a
band goes over two years. you
end up paying money as a as a
charge or sort of a penalty. So
we don't want to do that so that
the plan is to issue the full
debt for the water in the
wastewater funds to the tune of
$8 million then issue bands for
the existing general fund bands.
which. again. like I said. is
1.3 that still leaves us with a
bunch of general fund projects
that Need some level of
financing. And one of the things
that do are allows is for the
general fund to I use the word
loan. It's more of that you
borrow the money at known
interest rates. So the way it
would work would be. after free
cash is certified. we would get
permission from dor to move
approximately $6 million from
the general fund into these
capital accounts. interest free.
with the requirement that the
money. the $6 million would need
to come back to the general fund
by June 30. It's called. it's
called advancing. That's the
term that is used. I did put in
the form simply for you folks to
take a look at it. The earliest
we could do this advancement
wouldn't be till we have free
cash certify. which wouldn't be
until December. So in June. the
bands. in June. we would then
take the $6 million and put it
back into the general fund. and
then we would issue bands. a
three month band. a four month
ban. or a five month band. We're
indifferent to the duration of
that right now. in the model
you're looking at. it's five
months that can all change to
three months. and we reduce our
exposure. So we would issue
bands in June. and then in
November. 2026 all bands would
expire. and we would issue long
term debt. So the question is.
so what does this do? This
changes the debt service we had
mapped into the budget. into our
forecast. which is a million
dollars. Change that to only
paying interest on bands for
different periods of time. So
there's will be a direct savings
off the forecast of over
$800.000 but there's a cost of
the town. To do that. we would
have to pay the interest of
approximately $160.000 that
would be due bins. Wayland has
used bands in the past. They
they are a bridge of money
between a town having an
authorization the project and
incurring expenses. And then the
town actually listen. listening.
listing long term debt by
municipal bonds. So it's a
mechanism. a financial planning
mechanism. that cities in town
use routinely. So net. net. what
this does is it removes about
$800.000 from the fiscal 27
Million forecast. So the
combination of the 700.000
excluded that this $800.000 of
you know. shifting from bonds to
bands. still leaves us with
about a $500.000 deficit. I'm
rounding it up to $500.000
because the fire contract has
not been settled. The school
department is continuing to work
through these numbers. so the
budget group would still need to
come up with an additional
$500.000
given if these two events
happened. Now. the all the board
of selectmen need to do every
year is they would sign the
bands. they would sign the bonds
and they would sign the advanced
form that goes with this inter
fund borrowing that I just
described. That's what they
would need to do with that. They
would also need to. if they
supported the levy. to exclude a
debt. as Michael talked about. I
believe maybe the meeting before
was they would have to call a
special election and a ballot
question. even if the Select
Board approved that in support
of that. there's no guarantee
that's going to it's going to
pass. So in October. November.
assuming you call one for that
period. if that failed. a
finance group or a finance team
would still be having to deal
with a $700.000 deficit. So I
kind of broke up this $2 million
into three different buckets.
and they're all very different
situations. Like I said. there's
no clear path to coming up with
a budget under the levy. A lot
of work was done with this by
the Budget Group. Like I said.
we're meeting again tomorrow
morning. and we put a schedule
or timetable on ourselves that
we needed to come to some
conclusion on the direction of
this budget. the 27 one by the
end of September. So that's
that's the information on these
three different issues that
we're dealing with and coming up
with a balanced budget. Now. the
budget for 27 has a few things
that I will take I will know the
budget that's been submitted is
a little one to 6% only because
debt service is going up 18 8%
not 18 8% we have retirement
going up 6.5% health insurance
in the model is at 12% last
year. Michael can correct me if
I believe our increase was
around three or 4% it was very
low. So we kind of hit the
jackpot last year. But you never
get lucky twice. So we have in
the model 12% for now. We're not
going to know that number till
February. very close to Tom
meeting. So amount our model is
carrying 12% and our general
insurance is up 10% so the
majority of increases in the
town budget is really in these
four areas. The school is a
placeholder because they're
still working on their number is
at 5.5% the town forecast is a
little over 3% as Michael has
talked about in prior meetings.
What's going I wouldn't say
against this. but what is a
challenge for 27 is that we
don't have the labor contracts.
Then we don't know what the
labor contracts hold. We're
making assumptions. and those
assumptions are in our model.
and we think they're at a number
that's conservative and that
we're not going to get in
trouble if a settlement comes in
higher than our number. So like
I said. there's a lot of moving
pieces to this. and there's no
clear path like in prior years.
So that's what the budget group
has been working on. I hope I
explain each one of the three
scenarios. The last one is
something that we'll be talking
about tomorrow. is that the
forecast that we have now really
needs to come down anywhere from
three to 500.000 given where we
are. $2 million so I'd be happy
to entertain any questions you
may have.
Carol Martin: So I just the memo
outlining page 15 in the packet
just going to the board. But for
those who might be watching
along here explains this.
Wayland. the DEP financing
proposal. This is the new
proposal that the task force
review last last the last
meeting and Brian presented five
different options that he had
come up with. And then he also
opine which ones were made the
most sense for Wayland. There
were two. And then the task
force said. Let's present this
item. this one right here. And
basically what it does is. it's
just issuing bans response.
We've done it before. Very
creative. again. Clever idea as
to. you know. how do we avoid
trying to find ways to. how do
we avoid and operate an override
in 20. Seven where we have this
big water project that we want
to get through. Tom leaders. I
think Michael wanted to speak.
He raised his hand on call. and
of course. and then you guys can
have questions no sense.
Michael McCall: So one of the
theories strategies that we have
had since the get go. and I'd
say we primarily been Mr. Kevin
and I trying to talk about how
we would get through this period
where we have a confluence of
things hitting us financially.
We have potential debt
exclusion. We have potential
override situation. We have the
financing of the PFAS problem.
We likely have a an award of
some sort. where we're having
arbitration hearing later this
month. one of our unions. And so
all these things are going to
come due. And I've always been
worried. as Mr. Judy said.
indicated. about people being
concerned about all these things
hitting at once. and what could
they pay for. and what would
happen in town. So we from the
get go. Mr. Kevin and I have
been trying to come up with some
strategies. and then we brought
this to the working group to
how. how do we get through this
FY 27 so that we would have time
to complete all the collective
bargaining and have a good idea
of what we really needed to go
out and ask the voters one time
for a multi year override for FY
2829 and 30. So that has been
the motivation here all the
time. It just seems. with the
rising costs getting harder and
harder. and it's almost a goal
post moves every time we have a
budget working group meeting.
But I have to give Mr. Kennedy a
lot of credit. He's come up with
a lot of these ideas. I just
wanted to comment that although
in the first proposal that we
talked about in the previous
week talks about shifting levy
debt to debt exclusion. which
does free up levy would allow us
to raise taxes. That is not the
only reason we're doing that.
and including in your packet is
some literature from movies and
Mr. Kennedy. I'm sure can tell
you that it's one of their
recommendations that have this
as exclude debt and also for
planning for a future override.
If that money. it's not in the
levy. it will allow us to look
for a smaller number. Otherwise.
we have to factor that that
money into the amount when we go
out. So again. our goal is to
try and get us through FY 27
settle all these contracts. have
a better understanding of what
the number is. that we need to
go ask for the voters. and also
get through the decisions that
need to be made about the the
MWRA connection and the proposal
to fix the PFAS problem.
Carol Martin: So I think it's an
open it to questions for the
board. but it's want to just
give Brian questions in general.
Do you want to do one. one
proposal first and then do the
other?
Doug Levine: I just had a couple
of quick questions. Brian. can
you hear me? Yes. Just a couple
of quick questions about the
guess. We'll call it the
advancing method. Would that in
any way harm our Moody's rating?
Does Moody's look at that in any
particularly negative light? Or
is that neutral? No. it's
neutral.
Brian Keveny: The only people
that would look at it would be
our auditor will see the
transaction going from the
general fund to the different
capital accounts. and then the
money coming back from the
capital accounts to the general
fund. Moody's would have no
interest in it at all.
Doug Levine: And then my other
quick question is. what would be
any drawbacks of doing this? You
mentioned something about having
to pay interest at some point
is. is that the overall drawback
of this method. or why would we
not choose to do this?
Brian Keveny: Well. the the cost
to doing this is. like I said.
it's $160.000 based on a five
month band in in June. So that's
real money the town would spend
to avoid that. You could issue
all of the 16 million debt in
November. That would probably
assure an override for 27
because that's a million dollars
of actual debt service that
would have to be paid in 27 so
by having the issue of 16
million in November. you're only
paying the interest on those
projects one time. There is no
band cost. So that's really. to
me. the main difference. If you
do a full 16 million. it almost
assures the potential for an
override in 27
Carol Martin: Uh. there's a
chart in the packet on page 19
that shows the fluctuations of
the DEP service. So currently in
FY 26 the total debt service is
seven point 2.000.027 it's 6.7
Brian. that's not include the 16
million.
Brian Keveny: uh. yeah. it does
these. those numbers do include
it? Yes.
Carol Martin: Okay. so if we
didn't. we didn't. if we adopted
this second proposal.
Brian Keveny: let me back up.
Carol. I'm wrong. I'm wrong in
that it doesn't include the new
stuff. That's just existing debt
service.
Carol Martin: I have to say it
didn't look like it. like it
did. So that would be the debt
service. So we're going to drop.
to your point. The issue. one
issue you look at is the debt
service is going to drop
$500.000 but we're still trying
to determine what's the
appropriate level when we want
to have level of debt service.
We haven't quite gotten that far
yet. But then you see it goes
down more 2829 blah. blah.
Brian Keveny: So the whole
purpose. the whole purpose of me
putting that together. really is
just to show the Select Board
the impact of excluded debt.
Cities and towns would never be
able to operate and fund large
capital projects and stay within
Prop two and a half. As you can
see. the biggest one is the high
school. So using excluded debt
is something that every city and
town needs to stay out of a prop
two and a half percent override.
Well. they simply wouldn't be
able to
Anne Brensley: do it. Just so
that I understand the bands and
the how you're proposing to use
them. it's essentially freeing
up about 700.000 Is that about
right? Right? 800.000 but the
cost is 126.000 160.000 160 so
that's about 20%
Brian Keveny: about that. Yep.
you round up. So like I said.
bands are used routinely by
cities and towns for a variety
of reasons.
Anne Brensley: Yeah. I get it's.
it's. yeah. I get it.
Carol Martin: Anyone else have
any questions on this?
William Whitney: So Brian. it's
Bill ban is an acronym for bond
anticipation. you know. right.
right? And so when you say.
auto. municipalities use bands.
it's. you know. the town meeting
approves a project in May.
additional design work needs to
be done. or other space work
needs to be done. And then once
that's done. you've been the
project. you know what it costs
and you issue the permanent
debt. This proposal. as I
understand it. would extend the
bands. effectively by an
additional year.
Brian Keveny: Is that. right?
Well. the existing. the existing
general fund bands. there's. I
believe. there's four of them.
There's four of them. Those
were. those are already in place
in November of 2025 the options
for the towns are. is you must
reissue the bands. or you need
to issue bonds. You cannot. not
reissue them and then try to
issue bands at a let another
date. So those ones are
restrictive. The other ones we
have an issue bands on. So the
town's in a position where it
must. must either reissue those
four bands in November or issue
bonds. You can't flip flop back
and forth with beans.
William Whitney: So fans. are
those interest only? Are you
paying amortization as
Brian Keveny: well? No. you just
pay interest.
William Whitney: So you're so
basically. rather than issuing
bonds and paying principal and
interest in that fiscal year.
you're you're essentially paying
an additional years of interest.
Brian Keveny: Yeah. in the case
of four of them. yes. In the
case of three them. four months.
yep.
William Whitney: So I don't
understand the whole 6 million
thing is that an advance to pay
off the November 2025. bands.
which are then subsequently Re
and once they are reissued. then
the proceeds of the band sale
goes back to the
Brian Keveny: general fund. No.
the proceeds for the beans never
go to the general fund. They
stay in the capital accounts.
Can you rephrase that first
question on the 6 million? The 6
million from the general fund is
just a temporary loan. because
you have probably 12 projects
that have been authorized that
will be incurring expenses
those. those projects need to
have funding in fiscal 27 they
cannot end fiscal 26 I'm sorry
they're going to have expenses
in fiscal 26 They can't close
fiscal 26 with expenses without
associated revenue. or we're
going to get deductions from our
free cash from Dor. So the
projects need funding. The
funding from the general fund is
just a temporary loan until
those projects actually see band
proceeds in June.
William Whitney: and where's the
6 million come
Brian Keveny: from the general
fund. The general fund fund
balance
William Whitney: out of the
piggy bank.
Brian Keveny: Could you say that
again. out of the piggy bank?
William Whitney: Yes. Biggie
bank. We'll put it back together
after we sell the bands.
So what action. if any. is
required by Tom meeting? With
respect to this. I was going to
call it scheme. but definitely.
Brian Keveny: Tom meeting has
already done the action. They've
approved the projects by debt.
The only action that takes place
now is the Select Board signing
the bands slash bonds or
advancements from the general
fund. Has the Tom ever done
anything like this before? Not
to my knowledge. but other teams
have
Carol Martin: fans in general.
on specific projects. I think
Tom Louise. I think introduced.
it was my first year. I think on
the board. and I think she said
we should do this. and she
explained why. and we agreed.
And just oversimplifying here.
but I remember that we've been
doing it for a while. Honestly.
on the smallest
William Whitney: camp. right? I
think. you know. the committee
have done a terrific job in
advancing some alternatives. But
I just wonder if it's kind of
axiomatic that we need an
override. you know. if. if. if
we pretty well earned our but
available. Which term is
available Levy. and we have a
two and a half percent cap plus
new growth. And we have
budget proposals between three
and 5% of maybe. maybe we're
looking at an override.
Brian Keveny: That's clearly an
option. Because. like I said. if
you issue the bands. if I'm
sorry. issue the 60 million
bonds in November. it is an
override.
Michael McCall: Ethical. Complex
question is. then. do we plan
for a one year override. just
for FY 27 or do we try and come
up with a number that's going to
help us out for two. three or
four years. and that number is
going to get very large at the
same time all these other things
are before the voters and the
members of town.
William Whitney: Now. local Tom
is what it is. You know. you
have different constituencies.
you know. for an operating
override. I think you're going
to have supporters in the
schools motivated to get out
there. I don't know. It's just
one person's off the cuff
reaction. I really this is the
first I've understood of having
three times Brian's given us a
very given me a very helpful
explanation. I don't think
Michael McCall: we're afraid us
as members of the finance team
going for an override in if that
in a perfect world. and that was
the only issue before us. I
think it's we have multiple
issues. and if you can eliminate
some variables from equation.
you have a better idea of what
your outcomes may be. And it's
really hard all of us to sit
here and anticipate what what
could happen. Yes. we could. We
just go forward and do this. I'm
just worried that I've talked
about voter fatigue. If we do
one year. then we're coming back
next year or something similar.
You know. a lot of towns are
going through this. We just
happen to have our PFAS problem
coming at the same time. and
some deferred maintenance issues
coming at the same time. You
know. we're doing our best. our
very best. to try and come up
with some alternatives to give
folks options. And whatever we
come up. collectively. we'll
make it happen.
Carol Martin: I kind of agree.
Anne Brensley: I kind of agree
with Bill. and that's one just
from a basis. On this one. then
Carol Martin: you don't agree
with them normally. No. And I
knew some levity. it's been a
long weekend. Um. no. I mean.
Anne Brensley: in the end. this
is just a problem of revenue and
expenses. right? And we have
more expenses than revenue. so
there's really only two
solutions for that. right? Or
three. One is to reduce
expenses. get more revenue. or
get more revenue. But the third
is what I'm kind of hearing.
which is you play around with
the numbers. and very slowly but
surely. the money that was
earmarked for certain things to
be used in a certain way starts
to increase fees. and those fees
end up adding to expenses. And
though you get a short term gain
in the long term. it's just not
sustainable. So it becomes a
question for everybody to
answer. you know. are you
prepared to reduce your. you
know. expenses. or are you
prepared to increase the
revenues by paying a little
more. And sometimes it's it's
got to be presented as black and
white that
Carol Martin: way. So I know I
go last. but go ahead. please
indulge me. gentlemen. I'm very
much in favor of this particular
proposal. You know. last week. I
have reservations with the other
one. I don't still have all my
answers. I think this is a very
good option. We're in the spot
we're in. I don't have. I don't
have any of the reservations any
of you have on it. It is the
only other thing we we could do.
which Brian. I'm sure it doesn't
want to do is we could not fund
these projects and delay in the
beginning of all these projects.
but now we're going to just back
up. because we keep improving
more capital projects. So the
conveyor belt and we're trying
to go anything will. So firstly.
I think this was. there's a lot
of thought went into this. There
were five proposals. like I
said. and I really think this
was a good choice. When we're at
the meeting. I specifically
asked Brian which one that he
liked.
Anne Brensley: But can you tell
me a little bit about why. what
you like about this? But there.
it's amazingly well thought out.
like. well. it found a solution
for a problem that had no
solution. So amazing. Thank you.
Carol Martin: What problem when
we're trying to avoid an
operating override in 27 and we
do know that we are most likely.
pretty much most likely. going.
to have an operating override in
28 and we're trying to just not
bombard folks who can increase
voter rates. and then we're
going to put them in the water.
and then we're going to do an
override at the override at the
same time. What this does is
this allows the capital projects
that have been approved by Tom
game. the $16 million of
projects and and actually it's
half. some of them will have a
funding system to go forward. so
they get to go forward and we
delay. It's kind of like we're
paying I'm really
oversimplifying game. ready?
It's like we're just paying the
minimum payment on the credit
card as opposed to the full
balance. right? It's really what
this is to me. And I really
think that this is a one that
the Select Bush should really
consider. and. and and given the
community the task force the
sense that that we would support
this. If we do sign this. we
just the final bus we've already
been authorized by town meeting
to finally borrow. That's just
my thought. Sorry. Thank you.
Unknown: Michael. if I could
clarify a comment. actually to
repeat a comment you made a few
minutes ago.
Tom Fay: If this plan
Unknown: was adopted went
through. you think that would
not need to seek an override for
three years.
Michael McCall: Noi. we're
buying ourselves time to one day
and board member bransley
mentioned. you know. expensive
the two years. I think so far.
we've done level service
budgets. And actually last year
was. I would say. a level
service. you know. plus. because
we actually cut back certain
overtime budgets. So we didn't
do anything with salaries. We
made some minor reductions last
year and staffing on both town
side and school side. We
eliminated about one and a half
positions at town hall and
schools. I think. eliminated to
buy the thing that I would call
your attention to Mr. Kevin has
said about most of our increases
in a lot of non discretionary
areas. our health care. we
reduce some staff members.
You'll have some life savings.
but health care is just going up
year over year. We're obligated
to pay. you know. into the
pension system to get our. Of
our fund. we have insurance. we
have debt service. we have all
these things. Hopefully we'll
get an interest rate cut major
that will help us a little bit.
But those are the figures the
budget that we can't cut out
about so and I'm not saying this
scary by anything. but a lot of
at the end of the day where we
would have to make cuts.
probably in personnel to to
close some of the $2 million
gap. And you know that cuts into
service. I mean. I think most
people don't see those other
things. You know. when they pay
their taxes. they come down here
and they want to make sure
there's people here. They want
to make sure there's people. you
know. in the rec department.
when the fields being
maintained. road to being
plowed. that's probably what
most people think of a new
service for their tax dollars.
They don't think about how much
is being put into OPEB. put into
the pension system. going to
debt service. So that's the
thing. We're just trying to
balance out. If you have an
override question it doesn't
pass. or if we implement a
portion of these solutions. So
we still have to have an
override because we're over a
million dollars. You know. I
said we'll we'll do what it
takes to get us through. Over
again. we're trying to avoid an
override this year. get through
collective bargaining and then
plan for a number that we know
it's unavoidable in FY 20. and
make you ask for more than one
year so we don't have to come
back every year for an over so.
Carol Martin: Doug and Tom. did
you have an incomprehensible
Unknown: Well. I'll say this.
You know. one of the benefits of
really in this town is people
that serve both staff. Faith
staff and volunteers and budget
working group that's put
together Brian's expertise. I
put a lot of stock in that. I
also the last soccer chair's
opinion. given her
Carol Martin: experience. it
Michael McCall: might be
beneficial for Mr. Kevin even
mentioned who all was on his
working group. So to cycle
another phase.
Carol Martin: let's let go.
Doug Levine: I was going to add
is I moved to town in 2013 so
coming up on 12 years toward the
end of this year. and I have not
experienced the joy of no
horizon boat. And so I don't
know what kind of energy that
creates in town or what kind of
divisions that creates in town.
I can't speak from experience. I
do know. though that we have a
very important vote to take in
the spring with the MWRA water
hookup. and I would prefer that
we just focus our efforts on
that right now and not have two
big less pass ticket items
instead of one. So that's where
I see.
Carol Martin: I mean. I
personally. now it's my
knowledge. That's my turn. even
though I got the line sorry. I
personally would like to be able
to go to the task force meeting
tomorrow and say that the board
supported at least this DEP
concept. or was willing to have
merit and was willing to. you
know. revisit it as I think it
was almost half the money that
they're looking for. It has been
frustrating. as Mike pointed
out. because you go to a meeting
and the delta is one thing. and
then next week. it's gone a
couple 100 and something up. I
mean. and Brian has done a huge
amount of work on this. so
mister. Miss McCall would like
me to identify who's on the
committee. It's Brian's
committee. but it's without me.
I want their name new. the new
school business manager.
Question. Christine Patterson.
Patterson. there's Phil juicy.
the chair of finance training.
There couple school committee
members have come a couple
times. One has come in. There's
superintendent was there last
week of schools. Michael. of
course. is there. Kelsi. since
our manager is there. I
volunteered myself on as a
representative for the Select
Board. They didn't buy me. I
volunteered myself. Brian. he's
on this. Cathy Steinberg is on
the committee. And I think I've
got every body. but it's two
hour meeting and it's a lot of
work. but. and I know they are
hoping to hear back from the
Select Board that we would
support one or the other or both
of these proposals. I. You know.
like I said. arena. I don't know
William Whitney: if everyone
understands the second option
sufficient. I completely agree
with that. Nobody wants to I was
not personally big fan of see
the debt exclusion DEP that's
already an issue. but that's
something that I could explain
to a neighbor 30 seconds. Not
explain this 30 seconds. I think
it might be helpful. This is
really a package of different
things. And I think it's. I
mean. I found it confusing as
the third time. about once the
$6 million advance. And what
does this have to do in advance?
The answer is it's not. It's a
$6 million advance to avoid the
necessity of issuing payments or
something.
whereas what we're doing. the
thing that gives me a little
pause is
we're essentially refinancing
some payments. I Think tend to
be. I think of a short term
borrowing. commonly permanent
financing. kicking the can down
the road for a year. It's not
crazy. but I personally need to
get my RC promise to get better
Anne Brensley: before. I think
the word supports big what. what
do you? What are you hoping?
Because this is. this is
masterful. like. it's really.
really. I understand it. but it
required. like every algebraic
cell in my body to figure out
how you're placing one area into
another. and how you were
essentially borrowing to borrow.
But so I don't want to stop the
work. but I don't. I also think
sometimes. in the end. you have
the answers to just put it out
there and say. this is the
situation. and this is what it
might require. And this feels
like it could be an option for
sure. especially if everybody
can get their head around it.
especially if most of the Select
Board supports it. But I don't
know if saying I just. I just
not clear on what you're asking
from us and what that would wait
to it's
Carol Martin: fine. That's
making the ask design as as I
explained how I'm over there.
then task force to make the
recommendations. But here I
actually have a vote. and we are
responsible to the taxpayers for
these the decisions that we
make. it's a little more due
diligence is necessary. I agree.
I don't really need to. just to
Bill's point. just talk about
this one next week or something
like that. I don't I'm trying to
get a sense what you want to do.
I do think if we're going to
like a little upon you. but I
think he has said it eloquently.
far more eloquently than I will.
that the gap has gotten up to
about 2 million. something very
difficult for us to close that.
even for the one year. even if
you said. you know. for all
these positions. for the one
year remaining. it's. it's going
to be no. most likely. very
noticeable. and some numbers we
won't know until after the first
of the year. So some of this
could be. hopefully just
insurance. You know. for
example. if the state aid
increase. you know.
exponentially. or something like
that. you would use those funds
first. That would be the first
lever that you pull. If the
insurance went lower. the one of
the first levers that report to
help out. you know. reduce the
downtime. But I do think the
Select Board is going to have to
Michael's point. We're gonna
have a hard decision. We don't
accept one or the other of
these. or even both of these.
Then we are going to be looking
at an operating override. And
then the question becomes. I've
just written it down here on my
list. you know. do we have that
conversation? So. and I have to
be honest. the same process. So
little more my skill set. you
know. because I Municipal
Finance. so. but I really do
think this is one we. Really
could? We could get behind it's
not difficult to explain. We
just make the decision. We're
already authorized to do this.
There's no vote involved.
Doug Levine: Two weeks.
Carol Martin: yeah. Michael.
that'd be alright if it
revisited this on the 15th our
city limits. that Brian. Brian's
the charge of the committee.
Brian. would that be okay if we
revisited this. the DEP band
proposal again in two weeks?
Yeah.
Brian Keveny: I mean. you can
even. I mean. the Budget Group.
probably. You can go to the end
of September. early October. to
get a sense of the Select Board
where they want to go with these
ones. So it doesn't have to be a
next meeting. You can always
spend a couple of meetings going
through this and talking about
it.
Carol Martin: Well. I think we
need. we still have some
questions to wrap our arms
around this. and I think we
probably would benefit from
another conversation in the next
meeting.
Brian Keveny: Well. we'll be
meeting with the budget group
every single week. so maybe we
can compile some of that
information for the board.
William Whitney: Okay. right?
What's your preferences between
seeking debt exclusion on the
general front and this latest
idea? Which do you prefer?
Brian Keveny: Are you asking me?
Bill. yeah. really. it takes
both of them. They're both very
different. I think the excluded
debt is an easier sell. Like you
said. it probably should have
happened in 2008 13. It's sort
of a correction of that. The
other one is far more
complicated. It has more you
know. formulas and numbers to
deal with. When we went into
this budget group. we realized
that we we got by the fiscal 26
one. thinking that there's no
way we're not going to have an
override for 27 but when Michael
and I started looking at the
numbers. we decided. well. maybe
there's a shot we can get by 27
with no override. And in putting
this budget group together. we
talked about our uses of free
cash. And historically. we don't
use free cash to do operating
subsidies to the general fund.
We We stopped at about 2018 so
we talked about using free cash
like that. and we decided. no.
we're not going to do that. The
town does not use free cash to
balance this budget. The other
one was OPEB. Do we not fund
OPEB to the full amount of
$500.000 by tax? Do we do
something differently with that
for next year? So there's a lot
of other areas we looked at. and
in looking at all the other
things we could have done. we
kind of came back to these two
debt financing mechanism you
reviewed. and the DEP W building
excluded a levy to excluded now
that one has been talked about
over a long period of time. I
remember Finance Committee
talking about that. you know.
years ago. So that conversation
is not new. So like I said.
these are the two resolutions
that we kind of ended up with
after turning over all the other
rocks of how we can avoid an
override. Michael may have
mentioned. there's there's no
new FTEs in this budget. both in
the town and the school side.
There's no known in initiatives.
There's nothing new except
reoccurring general fund
expenses. That's all that's in
this budget. And like we talked
about earlier. we had to put the
health insurance at 12% because
we didn't want to have it at 6%
get to February. have West
Suburban tell us at 12% and have
a $500.000 problem. And so these
are the only two solutions we
have if. if these two both
didn't work out. I think the
Budget Group is prepared to. you
know. support an override.
There'd be no other alternative.
William Whitney: Same way both.
Carol Martin: Yeah. they want
both. Let's just try it shows
you. and then he would end up
with a Delta of only 350.000 and
then he wants to round that up.
Yeah. so I think we're really
late. That's beside the point. I
guess. And also that the
conversion of the levy debt
requires us to the debt
exclusion requires us to hold an
election. So we have been have a
whole ad campaign with that.
which is why I was kind of
leaning towards this one.
because this one is just. we've
already been authorized to issue
debt. We're authorized to fund
funding. I mean. if. if Michael
came forward said. you know. we
have $6 million of extra free
cash. And do you want to use it?
We suggest that we are
authorized by Tom meeting to
fund the projects. because
they've been approved. so that
one's it's a lot easier. What
are you saying?
William Whitney: I'm confused.
We're saying we need both the
DPW building debt exclusion. And
the support.
Carol Martin: That's what that's
what the task force committee is
saying. That's what the chart
shows
Anne Brensley: for debt
exclusion. though we need
permission the debt exclusion we
need. we don't need it for the
other. we don't need it for the
other. Which one would be more
complicated. so you don't
Carol Martin: know so easy for
us to say support this one.
Michael McCall: So the ask to
the Select Board from the budget
working group for DEP called the
special election. right? That's
one asking. The other is. would
you sign off on the bands and
the form for the transfer?
Carol Martin: Okay. so I'm not
so sure we're gonna have songs
tonight. So should I move to the
next title? Yeah. okay. Brian.
did you have anything else you
want to add? Because we're going
to go to the next agenda item.
Brian Keveny: No. I'll see it.
I'll see you tomorrow morning in
the budget group.
Carol Martin: Okay. thank you.
Brian.
Nick Lombardi: Thank you.
Thanks. Brian. Thank you. Did
Carol Martin: you want to ask
something like the No. I just
Michael McCall: noticed that we
have Mr. Holder Lewis here. I
think they're holding out. I
didn't know they are taken out
of
Carol Martin: they are. But the
problem with me doing that is. I
believe I also have this online
who's waiting for their 10
minutes. which. no. I just. I
know. I'm sorry. So Barbara. can
you see Karen bloom coming a
couple
Tom Holder: of beers.
Nick Lombardi: Yeah. she's on.
right?
Carol Martin: Karen. how are
you? Is even? Is even there?
Thank you for joining.
Jailyn Bratica: Thank you.
Carol Martin: Dr Eden Renee.
yep. I apologize. Spoken about
how late we are. This next
agenda item is to take it back.
Go back. You do have the
discussions for the Tom of
Wayland equity assessment. Now
we have this discussion and
presentation on our June 30
meeting. And then. of course.
with only one meeting in July.
then there was some adjustments
they were making and having some
conversations with the report.
It's finally ready a couple
weeks ago and has been posted
online. and so we are going to
probably have a series of
discussions about this. But I
asked. and unfortunately. only
allowed 10 minutes. has been
tight tonight. and we're already
running almost an hour late.
Sorry that. Come back and talk
to us. maybe show some of the
positive highlights. you know.
from the assessment. and then
start talking about. I think
Karen wants to talk to
recommendation number one. which
is on page 26 of the of the
report. which is an hour
supplemental package. Just to
link to it. So Karen. it's your
turn.
Karen Blumenfeld: Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. I'm going
to be as quick as possible
because this is. this is your
conversation. I just want to tee
it up. So I'm Karen Blumenfeld.
and I'm here with Dr Eden Renee
Hayes. Dr Hayes is the town's
thought partner for the Wayland
community life and engagement
study. and I'm the chair of the
Wayland human rights. diversity.
equity and inclusion committee.
we were invited to talk with you
about the community life and
engagement study. which is also
sometimes called the equity
assessment. which is now
available. I just want to make
clear to members of the public
who might be listening. it's
available on the Select boards
web page. under the external
reports tab. quick recap of the
findings. which Carol just asked
me to do. So a main finding of
the study is encouraging. Three
out of four survey respondents
rate their experience in Wayland
positively. yet the 25% who are
not having a positive experience
are likely to be from
underrepresented groups.
specifically. lower levels of
belonging and satisfaction and
higher levels of mistreatment
were reported by people from
racial and religious minority
groups. People with limited
means. people living with
disabilities and member of
members of the LGBTQ plus
community. So the
recommendation. the consultant
made a bunch of recommendations.
And I. you know. I would. I want
to say the report
recommendations embrace the curb
cut principle. And the curb cut
principle is the idea that when
we remove barriers for one
group. such as creating curb
cuts for people who use
wheelchairs. the benefits ripple
out to everyone. for example.
caregivers with strollers or
people on bikes. It's a
metaphor. It's literal. but it's
also a metaphor for the kinds of
recommendations that you'll find
in this report. A couple of
examples reveal the richness of
the recommendations and the
commitment required to bring
them to life. On page 26 you'll
see that they recommend
developing a three year action
plan based on the study results.
You'll see that they recommend
providing a budget for this work
and a whole bunch of other
recommendations. One is a.
Offering community based
discussion groups and cultural
competency workshops. On page 27
you'll see that they recommend
implementing an equitable
selection equitable selection
processes for hiring and
volunteer and volunteer
opportunities. making
accessibility improvements in
town communications and also in
physical public spaces. On pages
28 and 29 you'll see that they
recommend launching a companion
study in the schools. You'll see
they recommend convening a
school. town. Metco working
group. and then just also
establishing a process for
reporting bias incidents. which.
by the way. has already begun
thanks to the spirit council
with the establishment of the
new Wayland freedom team. So
tonight. as Carol said. we
recommend focusing on the first
recommendation theme on page 26
which is building strong. The
overarching theme is building
stronger foundation. foundations
of action. belonging and shared
values. and Ms brensley as the
liaison to the human rights.
diversity. equity and inclusion
committee. Would you like to
open the discussion with your
thoughts?
Anne Brensley: Yeah. so Karen
and I were going through all of
these recommendations. and
obviously we want to see some
action for this recommendation
only because that was part of
why we even did this right was
to hopefully change. to look at
what might be working and not
working in town. and figure out
how we take some action steps.
And so looking at all of the
recommendations. you know. we
wanted to focus in on one that
we thought kind of aligned with
where we are right now. Uh.
first. I just wanted to also
emphasize that community life
and engagement study. just that
concept of community life and
engagement. I think. is a really
nice way of encompassing all of
the community of Wayland. so
that it doesn't feel like there
are specific groups that are
being targeted in one way or the
other. but rather like. how are
We engaging with each other. And
so the first recommendation. I
just thought would be a nice
place to start. And in this 10
minutes. I think Karen and I
were just hoping to say. hey. we
want to move forward with some
of these action steps. And we
just want the Select Board to
say that's okay and that they
support it. And so one is to
launch a three year
implementation plan. which is
really more looking at what
we're already doing in town. So
some of these multicultural
events. the fact that we're
celebrating waylands
anniversary. the fact that arts
Wayland has been putting on some
new shows and events. the fact
that the we have a police
department that seems very
engaged with the community
overall. we have this new
community center. so just being
able to say. hey. why don't we
start utilizing what we already
have that we're under utilizing.
and then look at how we can
incorporate just the need to
bring the community together and
everything we're doing. And
there are certain events that
hrdic has been kind of backing
like the multicultural event she
comes. Karen has come multiple
times to ask for support on it
from Select Board. But looking
at more a budget that would just
say. hey. within all everything
that we're doing. let's. let's
try to create a calendar of more
consistent events that we're
already doing pretty
consistently. But give you know.
arts Wayland the opportunity to
say. hey. we want to do this
event every May. which they've
started to do. Hey. we want to
do the multicultural as a
Wayland day. You know. when
should we do that? And just
always keep in mind some level
of a budget that would be
already allocated to support
those events on an ongoing
basis. and that would be under
this idea of bringing community
life and engagement to Wayland.
And I think we could easily do
that also by utilizing a lot of
the organizations that have
already started to do this
independently. either inspired
by specific events that have
happened. like Wayland can or
groups like the hrdic that were
created. you know. as as a means
to start some of these
conversations. So I think Karen
and I mostly just want to say.
hey. we want to really start
looking at how to implement the
first recommendation the Select
Board support that and see a
value to doing that.
That's it. Cameron. did I do it?
Was it good? Karen. did I
encompass what we wanted to
accomplish? Sorry. you're
talking to me. I'm sorry.
Karen Blumenfeld: Did you want
to talk about a statement?
Anne Brensley: We can talk about
that for sure. which is just
ongoing communication with the
town. Karen put together a
statement just to say. Hey. this
is something that we want to
really focus in on town. She has
a draft of it. I know Carol has
seen it. I can pass it to
everybody. but for select board
to be kind of accepting that is
normal protocol. Hey. we want to
focus on community engagement.
Um. we think we'll just
formalize the conversation. so I
will pass it along.
Carol Martin: So before you pass
it along. I had conversations
with Michael. Luke. He needs to
see it first. and then we're
going to pass it to town
council. I mentioned that to
Karen when she sent it to me in
between vacations and all these
deadlines. he and I haven't had
a chance to meet yet. but it is
on our list. Awesome. so great.
Karen Blumenfeld: And I think Dr
Hayes might want to add a word
about statements. Would would
this be a good time to say
something about that?
Carol Martin: Dr Hayes
recognize? Dr Hayes. please. I'm
sorry.
Carolyn Murray: I'm not sure if
you're looking at me. because I
see the back
Unknown: of your head. Yeah.
okay.
all the heads are towards the
back.
Carol Martin: Yes. please. Would
you like to say something?
Unknown: Yes. I Yes. I would. So
what I'm what I'm hearing is a.
is a request for for budgeting
around this. And I hear a lot of
of the of the word events. and I
just want to offer a couple
things. is that. specifically.
that when we are talking about
trying to make change as it
relates to doing a better job
around underrepresented groups.
events are. are something that
tends to be more performative.
And that's something where we
need to be focused. like just as
much. on things that have to do
with education. things that have
to do with policy changes.
things that have to do with
ensuring that there are
structural changes that help
people feel more welcome. And
events are one of those things.
but we want to ensure that
there's other things that have a
greater impact on people than
events. and that's a relatedly.
I know that there's a request to
do a statement. and I think that
that statements can certainly be
great. but in order for those
those statements to be
impactful. I said this with the
HR deic. so I'll just say it
again. Here is that in order for
a statement to have the intended
impact. It's important for it to
be that same statement to be
followed with specific line
items that say what actions are
going to be taken in order to to
support whatever that statement
is. So we want to make sure that
we're having having impact. and
not just showing that we intend
values. We want to say that we
want to support those values
with the things that we are
actually doing. So that's where.
you know. what is it that the
Select Board is going to follow
up. you know. with? And we know
that there are other groups and
towns that are also following
up. We know that the library is.
you know. trying to hold moments
of community and education. We
know that that the Wayland
Freedom Team is helping to
ensure a response to bias. which
was a specific recommendation.
We know the HR deic is also
focused specifically on what the
recommendations are and how to
figure out ways to implement
them. So just wanted to make
sure that we're focused on those
things that are going to have
impact. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Anne has spoken.
Doug Levine: It's a lot to
digest. It's his. I'm glad you
guys are also having offline
conversations. I think that
that's important. I think that
we need to have a conversation
among the board of what it makes
specific sense to do for our
specific next steps. because
these are a lot of actions in
terms of sequencing here that we
want to focus on. The first
couple here on page 26 but I
think we should talk through
each of those and how we would
actually operationalize
Anne Brensley: each of the
points under the first
recommendation. or all the
recommendations.
Doug Levine: I think you're
talking about a statement. and
then that launch and action
plan. I would just. I guess.
focus on those two. We might as
well throw in continued support
of the HR. DDI committee so that
that age. I think we should have
a focused discussion on
Carol Martin: right I think that
is going to be sort of our plan.
Is not because we haven't done
this a real good follow up to
just after the presentation. And
was just good to kind of refresh
our minds and get us to be
thinking about this and get some
steps. We will. we will put this
back up on the agenda two or
three meetings. I know there's
some schedule conflicts here.
and we've got some deadlines
we're going to meet on some
other things. So I'm thinking.
you know. probably early
October. we'll. we'll revisit
this.
Anne Brensley: Well. I think
that's exactly the support we
were hoping for. Well. honestly.
let's talk about it.
Carol Martin: Yeah. it's a it's
a bit start. so to start. So
great. All right. Are we all
set? Karen. you also. yeah.
Erin. you. That. Yeah. I've seen
you here. but I
Anne Brensley: gotta talk to you
over here. I know I like I'm
looking at you. but really.
Carol Martin: thank you so much.
We're terribly sorry about how
late we are. Sorry. Thank you
Karen Blumenfeld: doing
important work. These are long.
long meetings. and thank you for
your service to the town.
Carol Martin: Thank you so guys.
Thank you. Dr Hayes. well. I
appreciate it. So alright. So
the next item on the agenda is.
thank you. Good night.
Jailyn Bratica: Thank you. Thank
you.
Carol Martin: Discussion review
of the Massachusetts water
resource authority possible
third party week you. So we
talked about this a little bit
last week. We still have some
more questions. We had Mike to
go off and gather some
information for us on this. And
I think do we want to start with
that? Yeah. Madam
Michael McCall: Chair. do
speaking.
Carol Martin: we asked you to
gather what you like to use the
list
Michael McCall: serve again.
select board member. I used it
for a couple of questions in
total. to find I get a lot of
beneficial results. Usually
people say. Hey. if you're doing
that. could you tell me. like I
asked about. you know. what the
costs were. and didn't get a
chance to speak to the one
community that had done a
similar peer review of the
school to get the cost. I only
have the two firms so far. They
gave me the variables between 25
and 50.000 and that's consistent
with the number that Mr. Hurley.
he mentioned back at the FinCom.
back in 2023 I did send an email
to the chair and at least one
member of the board saying that
I spoke with our town engineer.
and we pre qualified several
engineering firms at least a
half dozen. so we wouldn't have
to do an RFQ. It's really just
defining the scope. And I know
several members were interested.
so I've been working on scope
that I can get to folks. and I
was going to elicit a little
assistance from our town
engineer on how best to put that
scope of work together. But it's
really been based on a review of
the MWRA connection. following
in line with the interface and
transfer act and do. doing
analysis of what boils down to
whether we have any in base and
viable alternatives. And so that
brings me to the point of the
email that I got today. I know
we talked about it the last
time. whether or not the scope
of this project is is just right
or too big. and several members
had mentioned that there's
really nothing that has been
circulated in writing explaining
why Wayland is doing what
they're doing. So I wrote
shortly after that meeting to
miss row. who is the head of the
mwrc. and some of her related
counterparts in the Department
of Conservation and recreation.
asking for meetings so that I
could get a better understanding
about this. I was very pleased
that they came back and invited
me to come and sit with all of
them. I told Mr. Holder. I asked
him if he would like to join me.
So the two of us sat there. and
I got an education. First came
from them. They walked me
through the interview with basic
Transfer Act. They answered all
my questions. And it says right
in the enabling act that before
anybody can get one of these
interface and transfer permits.
that they have to ensure that
the only way they could do 100%
connection to the WRA. to show
that they had no viable in basin
water sources. and I also had a
follow up call with the DEP.
because they are the agency that
these others rely on to help
determine whether or not we have
a viable alternative. Now
viability means is it
environmentally. economically
and technologically feasible.
Now. in that memo. they went
over some of those same things
with me. They showed me several
decisions. And you can read it
as most lawyers. there's
conclusions and there's rule
issue. rule analysis and
conclusion. and they talk about
all of that. And they gave us
two decisions. Linfield in
Burlington. to show how those
folks have to show demonstrate
viability or non viability of a
local source. So in the end. I
said to them. could you please
put in writing why you think it
was more likely than not that we
would not. Not be able to do the
100% connection to the MWRA. And
they explained that. given that
we have at least one well. they
could supply roughly 80% of our
water that is an in base and
viable source. environmentally.
technologically. in their
opinion. financially feasible.
They're not going to give us the
permit without us including
that.
Anne Brensley: To get some
clarification. 80%
Tom Holder: I believe that it
can do up to 80% happy also. the
proposal right now is to have
happy hollow. during normal
operating times of the year. to
buy 80% of the town's water.
Doug Levine: But happy hour.
actually. happy and hollow were
not viable. At some point. you
can switch to MWRA for 100% of
your water if needed.
Carol Martin: So I'm going to
recognize Mr. Hollow. but I'd
like to let Mr. McCall finish
first I'm back.
Michael McCall: So there were a
couple of things and full
disclosure. I mean. I've
listened to all the board
members comments. and I want
this for my own education. And I
know up until that point. we
hadn't had anything. right. but
I explained to them I should
preface this. I did speak to
Hopkins because several people
said. You better look at what
hopping being is doing. They're
going 100% all in when I spoke
to the officials in hoppington.
they said they were hearing the
same message that we were. that
they were going to need an
alternative or a viable source
within their base. And strangely
enough. hoppington got an
audience the same day that I did
with these same folks down
there. and I and I explained our
position. financially. what
we're doing with an override the
questions that come out of this
board. And I said it's really
going to help me one way or
another. if you give me
something in writing. And I did
indicate that the board had
tasked me with putting together
an RFQ. and I asked some
questions about doing a peer
review. and they said to me that
a peer review is really not
going to be a good use of town
resource. that really what I
need to do is speak with the DEP
and understand how they
determine My ability. which is
why I had the follow up call
today with the gentleman
Tom Holder: division has Yeah.
Michael McCall: and I'm not
saying that we wouldn't do that.
but I just wanted to get enough
information from these folks
Give it to us. I don't have
anything in writing from DEP and
I don't think Ms Curran says
anything about a peer review
here. but I wanted people to at
least have the knowledge.
Because I said at the very
beginning I thought 100% MWRA
was the appropriate solution. I
didn't fully understand why we
needed a dual source. and I
wanted clarification for my own
benefit. as well as get
something in writing for all
three boards who are looking at
this. I won't speak for Mr.
Holder. but I know his
experience comes from working in
communities at Marine and WR and
Carol Martin: Alright. so what?
Hello. Mr. Hollow. Mr. Lewis.
please come down here and I'm
going to recognize you. but I
would like the board to speak
first. Or does the Board want to
ask them questions? Yeah. okay.
so we're going to ask questions.
Oh. thank you. So all. I'm
recognizing mister Fuller and
recognizing mister Lewis. Okay.
thank you.
Michael McCall: This was just
information. in fact. finding
with them to bring back while I
was doing this and understand
while I was working on the scope
it was
William Whitney: under order.
What does this have to do with
the third party doing?
Michael McCall: Well. there's a
couple of reasons I want to
understand the scope. I also
don't at this point. we don't
have an identified source of
funding. so I went back and was
doing everything that I was
supposed to. I don't think I did
anything out of order here.
Carol Martin: Let me ask you.
though. what is what I mean to
hop in here? What is in your
mind the third party scope for
third party peer review would be
the work
William Whitney: that's done
today? Yeah. to examine the
alternatives. to make a record.
Carol Martin: Recommendation. So
think that's what Michael is
thinking is. because does that
also include possibly we would
have considered 100% into the
RA? Well. I have.
William Whitney: I've heard
consistent others. That you know
between the Massachusetts water
resource commission DEP. that
probably. if you seek to go 100%
MWRA. going to be out of line.
So I accept that.
Carol Martin: So what? So we
don't need this anymore in that
discussion. because that
supports that we have to go to a
source. right? Okay. so
William Whitney: it supports the
notion that if you were to go to
MWRA. you need to open source.
Is a specific proposal that's
the most cost effective and is
it the only viable term we've
heard that there are comparison.
gentlemen of the road cost over
some hypothetical five or 30
years. So what's the cost of
going MWRA. 100% source? It
sounds like there's no first
alternative. Going. going 100%
MWRA. It sounds like that's not
really alternative. We know now
it's not well. okay. so.
Carol Martin: but it was at the
time they did the due diligence.
and they were even.
William Whitney: I'm curious to
learn what the next basketball
journal is. Okay? I'm sorry.
Anne Brensley: No. I don't I. I
would like to know for sure
there's so in everything I read.
even in the Linfield thing.
we're talking about a seven and
a half million dollar debt. We
have to service seven and a half
million dollars a year for this
entire project.
Carol Martin: One isn't the debt
service. 29 is 2.10 they
Anne Brensley: did it over three
years on our financials. They
did a what they did it over
three years? That was. it was
seven and a half years. seven
and a half over like three
years.
Carol Martin: So it's 2.1 it's
2.1 and starting at 129 I've
asked George list number. yeah.
but that's how I work. and I
think that's what it was come
through. So since the issue is.
one of my concerns popped in
here onto your question. sorry.
was that's only a 20 year term.
and what would in? What would
happen if we ended up paying
like. a couple percent? Well. we
went 30. that's what would
happen. But that's another
question. So it's over 20 year
term. and it starts at 429. it's
2.1 million.
Anne Brensley: I think in the
budget. they gave us seven. but
maybe that that's over a three
year period of time of servicing
that debt.
Carol Martin: Well. 7 million
over three. Well. would be six.
three over three years.
Anne Brensley: Okay. it's in our
finance. It's in our package.
Yeah. I'll find it. and I can do
either way. It's millions of
dollars.
Unknown: So it's basically
interest free loan. It's not $7
million for 20 years to come up
with $40 million it's
Carol Martin: say that again.
interest free loan. right. for
20 years. So then what we're
just paying by principal. just
paying principal 2.1 but over 20
years. should bring us
William Whitney: to that now the
well. the design process is not
0% right. correct
Carol Martin: part of the design
$0 in total. because we use ARPA
funds.
Tom Holder: right? Yeah. so
we've got three appropriations.
or three funding sources. We got
the ARPA. the town
appropriation. We have an
additional time appropriation
for the design. for the design.
Carol Martin: So one thing
that's interesting about this
project is it's built at 30 I'm
popping in here. Sorry. that's
okay now. all right. Well. I
guess it's 38 million. It didn't
look at me. it's $38 million but
I asked cliff to be able to
speak to the contingencies.
because there's contingency. and
then contingency. and then they
make a total and a contingency.
right? And I want and then the
contingency is significant.
right? It is contingent. like.
like 30% or something. yeah.
it's like $8 million
Anne Brensley: and a half
million. Item. the third party.
So. so what we're talking I
would like to know. I would
appreciate some more information
about how we would we would fall
as far as looking to get this
permit using the fact that this
is not financially viable. yeah.
it's. I can give you the
wording. like the actual wording
that's required that.
Unknown: yeah. so on the
internet. yeah.
Anne Brensley: Sorry. Hold on.
I. The DEP definition is it's it
whether it's a viable source.
and the viable source standards
can include not being
financially viable.
Doug Levine: but we have an
opinion on that Earth. We have
to go dual source. because it
seems like for us to be able to
treat the PFAS at Happy Hall
would be financially viable. So
if we say we can. it's too
expensive. then we're going to
be denied the permit under the
interface and Transfer Act.
according to the conversation
Michael just had with
Anne Brensley: these folks. and
what he has in writing is what
he sent to us. and it doesn't
Tom Holder: state that. So the
innovation. the innovation
transfer guidelines state that a
in basin source is economically.
technically and environmentally
feasible. economically copy
hollow source in the minds of
the Water Resources Commission
that had mass DEP and DCR a $14
million freaking plans is
peaceful just going on.
Doug Levine: It's viability.
Like you assume dual source.
yeah. the
Tom Holder: word viability
applies more to have a happy
hollow well field produce. Is it
a viable source? The DEP having
a strong background in this
during our conversation today.
affirm the BS Indeed. it is a
viable source. And that's what
the Water Resources Commission
and the Department of
Conservation Recreation staff
look to the DEP to say. is it a
viable source? They didn't write
it. Yes it is.
Anne Brensley: They didn't put
it in writing. So I'm saying.
and all I'm saying is. if we're
going to do a third party
review. it would be nice to have
that in writing.
Doug Levine: Well. this
Unknown: question
Doug Levine: at this stage of
the game.
Unknown: but we'll need
interesting work done today. Is
prudent. and the
recommendations.
William Whitney: my concern has
always been the fact that we're
investing dollars to provide 50%
Doug Levine: 15% for now. with
each option. like he said. to be
able to go up to 100% if needed.
So it's like we're planning out
for decades for that
contingency.
William Whitney: So query. could
a happy hollow well treatment
plan prove or prepare over time
without query. could there be a
second wealth field activated In
town. avoiding the necessity we
did?
Unknown: There is no good other
source that we could get more
water.
You need the water there. You
can't just drill a hole in the
ground
and expect water to come up.
There's 1.000.003 additional
Tom Holder: we have a total of
four. So what I was talking
about earlier is we have to
demonstrate that the source is
economically and environmentally
feasible. The other three
locations are not the real
estate that we have is not
adequate to build PFAS
treatment. which is what we will
have to do. having all of us.
only one of the four that is
feasible to do.
Doug Levine: Ask that question.
Tom involved in Chamberlain
Campbell. can we treat us? And
the answer sounds like we don't
have the real estate to build a
treatment plant there. and we
require
Tom Holder: it's in the
wetlands. It's a wetland. so
it's not
Doug Levine: a matter. You'd
have to treat it somewhere else.
Yeah. yeah.
Phil Guidice: And that would as
well.
Unknown: You could take the ball
of water pipe into a treatment
plant happy hollow.
William Whitney: and put it in
the system. Very expensive.
Unknown: Basically build the
same pipe that you'd be
George Uveges: building actually
ready
William Whitney: about the
option of air structure.
Tom Holder: So the happy hollow
treatment plant is permitted as
a temporary pilot system. It's
located wetland. It's
constructed as a it's a leased
system. You don't even follow
his house. literally. a fabric.
Probably see the newsletter
today. It was a photograph of
what it looks like. Happy to
give a tour. It's located in
wetlands. We did not. Be able to
we were permitted to do it as a
temporary pilot program. They
would never permit this to be
located there. and the State
Revolving Fund would not finance
it if it's located
Unknown: is. is there any
permanent solution? There's a
quick and dirty. let's get
something done to argue. Send
them dog bottled water to
people. Let's get something
done. Something done solve the
problems of band
Anne Brensley: aid. Is. is there
any reason why we shouldn't try
to argue that it's not viable
Nick Lombardi: so financially?
Anne Brensley: Yeah. I mean the
reading standard. economic
economically not feasible.
Standard for water transfer
includes the review of whether
that the alternatives are so
substantial compared to the
project. project proposed
project cost that a reasonably
premium water utility would not
proceed with the
Unknown: alternative. And that
financial analysis has been
done. and the cost of doing to
have the Howard treatment plan
is actually less buying the
water from the MWRA on
Carol Martin: a long term basis.
If you have asked. when I have
an exhibit on that. right?
William Whitney: I'm sorry.
after eight years. basically.
Anne Brensley: But is there any
reason not to try
Tom Holder: to argue? So what
they told us? They told us two
calls. So I'm going to say two
things during two calls. We were
told by DCR and WRC. you can
apply. you can do whatever you'd
like. You will likely deny it.
and then you will wait a year
before you earn in queue. To do
this again. we don't have a year
to try.
Carol Martin: On top of that. we
run the risk of getting outside
of the entrance fee waiver
period. So it's only in effect
until 2827 27 December of 27th
in a little round. What's going
to 27 in a little while. it's
going to cost us
Anne Brensley: $7 million yeah.
Tom I do. I hate waiting. So
Carol Martin: more expensive
when you Wait. Excuse me. 7
million extra.
Anne Brensley: No. I do not like
paying $7 million
Carol Martin: extra. We also
need to talk a little bit about
the happy Hall of Fame. My
knowledge of this is not big.
This is not finance. so forget
it. But anyway. right? It's
temporary. and there's been one
problem or issue issue after
another with a piping there's
Bens and it's PVC or whatever.
it's not broken. Our ability to
get the capacity and the water
from the happy hollow that we
should be getting. that we were
getting prior to putting in this
eating this temporary system to
take care of the PFAS. So we're
taking care of the PFAS. We have
non detect water. but we're
getting less out of it than we
were. because it's not the
piping
Tom Holder: that bends. and
there's a plan. and we've got it
funded. It was to have happened
in September. Want to convert
all of the plastic to welded
steel. right? That will resolve
all of the problems. but we had
to delay that. because we have
to be publicly spoken about this
before. As part of getting this
permit. if we have to do a pilot
on the actual PFAS system in
LeBlanc table. it's a six month
pilot. right? We have to get
that started. We could not start
that and then take happy hollow
offline for a month to make this
retrofit. So that plan the
solution to prevent further
breaking of plastic pipe. which
eats a WW. a standard. it's
allowable fire. but it's just.
it's it's tired. it's replaced
as scheduled for March. So there
is a plan that's not going to go
on. you know. any longer than
March. and that will get us to
the finish line for 2029
activation of the WRA.
Carol Martin: So back to Bill's
question is in any way it could
be done to reduce the cost of
the happy hollow proposed plans.
I know there was a couple add
ons that were put in initially.
but is there anything else that
could be changed from that? So
that comes more palatable. I
Michael McCall: guess so. I
guess you know. what I would say
is that we talked about it a
little bit earlier. There are
two heavy contingencies included
with this 38.6
Anne Brensley: heavy
contingencies.
It's. it's smart to do heavy
contingency.
Unknown: The one is a general.
you know. in any design and
construction project of this
magnitude. there's always. it's
on the corners
Cliff Lewis: on the plant we
got. We see what. what happened
Tom Holder: we're constructing.
sometimes within nine feet of
the home and aqueduct they the
MWRA is very nervous about that
we've been redesigning it as
recently as meetings this
morning. but that we were
redesigned so there is a
likeliness or a possibility that
we may encounter unanticipated
conditions whereby a contractor
would be justified asking for a
change order. So we have to have
that contingency. The State
Revolving Fund also requires. on
their own. that there's an
additional contingency. but it
doesn't mean that we're going to
spend it. I'm saying that you
know. the kind of work. the
proximity of the work that
we're. you know. performing
within feet of the Altman
aqueduct. Sure. there's a
possibility. but it would not be
our intent that we could be
spending this entire
contingency. So there's millions
of dollars in contingency there.
And the one thing that I wanted
to stage was that. you know.
with all due respect. I am
opposed to a peer review. and
there's a number of reasons why
I feel this way. The primary one
is that at this point in time.
we need to be developing a
unified message and solution to
the voters. and we are within
eight months of town meeting and
to conduct peer review. At this
point in time. we are going to
get an unknown result. I'm very
confident that the solution that
we presented to the board. you
know. anticipating presenting to
the town is a solid. very good
solution. the best that is
available to us at this point in
time. But a consultant. a firm
that's hired is going to want to
give the town their money's
worth. They're going to come
back with a deliverable. whether
it's in October 15 or November
10. They're going to come back
with a deliverable that will
likely support what we're
proposing. but they want to feel
the need they gotta. They gotta
give the town something. They
gotta say. Well. you should look
a little further into this. Look
a little further into that at
that point in time. I would
never advise the town of the
Select Board to go into this
blind eye and not evaluate
alternatives. We've done that
over the last four years. You
take a look at the magnitude of
information. it's on our web
page. I think there were 24
alternatives that were
evaluated. So I feel we've done
that. and I'm confident that
what we're proposing presenting.
what we're hearing from
regulators is saying that the
dual source is what we need to
do. We have. you know. shaved
off things. If I had my
brothers. I'd like to get staff
and vehicles out of Baldwin pond
property and put them in happy
hollow. but that's extra
building. garage space and
office amenities. So we said.
You know what? We're not going
to do. that we'll make do with
what we have. The contingencies
will likely decrease the cost
and ties. But I compare
ourselves to what other
communities are investing under
certain similar circumstances.
and we're right in line or less.
but I think we've done a really
good job at providing a solution
that is the most cost effective.
Oh yeah. Just really concerned
that that a peer review is just
going to be unnecessary and. you
know. a distraction that's not
going to produce what you want.
I think it's gonna I think it's
gonna cause real project
problems. They give a massive
amount of money out of the
project already.
Cliff Lewis: $7 million at risk.
George Uveges: I don't think
they're the prudent thing to do.
William Whitney: As you probably
know. any building that's built
in Massachusetts. ready size has
to have a structure. Structural
engineer does their work under
state law. They don't say. Oh.
the client is going to expect me
to redesign all the trust. and
so I better do that. And the way
the project can cost them a lot
of money. it's a peer review
address. what's people that want
to see affiliate College? Is
this the right approach? Is
there a way to take the $2
million on maybe. but is it
prudent to get a second not not
for the purpose. but sandbag the
Board of Works by public works?
People. but is this the most
cost effective
I hear? You're concerned. I
would share it. I've had another
project involving civil
engineers who swore this to be
done in this way that would
adversely affect the property
where I
was represented. a much simpler
design. saving the state law.
save the property. That's the
spirit. There are good people on
the Board of Public Works
George Uveges: who actually came
we
Unknown: wouldn't have taken
this amount of money out of the
project. I came at this from a
very
Anne Brensley: different angle.
So I just at least want to tell
you where some of my desire for
this third party review came
from. which is. I do a lot of
environmental cleanup stuff
right now for work. and
everybody. like those guys who
know chemicals and issues. every
single one of them. have been
telling me PFAS is they're never
going to get rid of it. It's
only going to become a bigger
problem. You're going to need
this. these big treatment plans.
And when I see that trend in my
mind. I think that the future
for Wayland is going to be that
the happy Hollow is eventually
going to close. and that the
cost of really dealing with PFAS
is going to be something that
the MWRA is going to have to
really substantially help out
with. It's just my thought. and
it's my prediction. and I've
been really wanting to hear from
somebody outside of our group
that has been working on this
telling me it's not worth
looking into just going 100%
that's been where I'm coming
from on this. It's my thought.
We'll see we're going to
Michael McCall: be trying to
attempt by getting them to put
something.
Anne Brensley: So either way.
that's where I was coming from.
Unknown: We're taking the PFAS.
Basically. there's. there's no
more.
Anne Brensley: okay. so that's
my that's where I'm looking at
it from. But at the same time.
I'm. I am one of those people
who knows that in the end. you
have to make a decision. And not
making a decision can be the
worst decision you make. And if
you're telling me that this is
going to hold things up. that my
little idea of continuing to go
down this path is going to hold
us up. and that the peer review
itself may hold us up. then to
me. that's compelling.
Carol Martin: So I also want to
say that which I did not hear is
there were two staff members
present. and both around from
the beginning. because.
remember. I've been the Board of
Public Works liaison for both
years. both staff members were
not in favor of maintaining any
of waylands water equipment is
going to speak. They both were
given 100% MWRA. but
unfortunately. the information
that they had learned
Tom Holder: and speaking the
truth like the origin 400% MWRA?
Yeah. I mean. much of my career
has been with MWRA communities
that were solely provided with
MWRA. So I am quite comfortable
with the MWRA capabilities of
providing all of our water. but
for us and the circumstances
that we have and the regulations
that we have to abide by. that
is not a. you know. a feasible
solution. yeah. and we Know how
frugal I am. and I would have
been very happy to have only one
system. But unfortunately. after
attending all the meetings and
watching that for Public Works
and go force the church don't go
through iteration after
iteration after iteration after
iteration. they made that. it
Carol Martin: became clear that
we do have to hopefully do a
search as like to move at this
board authorize the town
Unknown: Andrew Ira companies
work associated with potential
as planned. Well.
is NWRA?
30th budget?
Carol Martin: Box. So that's
been a budget. Hang on one
second. I just need a second
before we go into discussion.
Michael McCall: I mean. the
problem we don't have that. I
don't know. Yeah. I don't have
that on the agenda. Do.
Carol Martin: So can you do
that? The next Can we have a
second person there we know in
your discussion? Oh. sorry. can
I go into the discussion first?
Yeah. we. Michael's going to
speak. We don't have a funding
source for this. something. We
need to determine that
discussion. I also think we need
to determine. like. like we were
doing a little bit tonight.
which I love. just narrowing
their scope would be that we're
looking for. we might be just
looking for someone
Anne Brensley: to what if. what
if we don't need it? Shouldn't
we know if we even are going to
vote for it before we talk about
the budget. because it feels
like it's actually
Carol Martin: like we're going
to do it. understanding how
we're finding some. of course.
Anne Brensley: no. it's other
way around. Let's see if it even
Unknown: Okay. Reason why I'm
making a motion tonight.
We're going to do we're not
going to do it. We're not going
to do it in time.
Carol Martin: So then. is there
any other discussion? And
Doug Levine: I haven't weighed
in. and I'll briefly. since it's
midnight. feels like so my dad
is I appreciate this due
diligence. and generally. it
would make sense for me to get a
second opinion. Just the concept
of a second opinion would seem
to make a lot of sense. perhaps
even help us sell this. For me.
I'm strongly opposed. because
it's so late in the game to do
this. I have enough faith people
who've been working and not that
you're disparaging those folks.
but they've been working in the
ins and outs of this for the
last four years. According to
them. they've lived with nearly
two dozen alternatives. There
was an RFP process that ended up
with client filter. which was a
multi month in depth process. So
at some point. I think our board
has to defer to others. and it's
how this town works. We are the
chief policy making board. but
we are one of 40 boards. The
Board of Public Works is elected
and has its mission under its
purview. and the town people
elected them. and I'm going to
support what they've
recommended. And I think
everybody is on the same page of
wanting to have the best project
at the lowest cost and have to
be viable long term. And we are
working on something where we
are planning for future
generations. 50 years out or so.
And I want to go into this vote
next year fully united. which
means. and I think that starts
now like the Finance Committee
was talking about. we have to
get our messaging. We have to be
able to sell this. So I am
strongly opposed to any second
opinion right now. if I may.
Madam Chair.
Unknown: high regards
that are in the works would be
solving plans for all my
concerns and a third party so
come up third party affirmation.
And finally. pure user acquire
statement.
Project engineering.
This is a series that's where
it's not created into types
of I think
third party suggestions from
Carol Martin: so before we take
a vote. I'm going to say one
thing that said this before this
is not our project. because
until we make that decision on
the level to support this
through the general fund. this
project still belongs to the
Board of Public Works. And so
I'm. I'm very sympathetic to
what what we say. I have 1.000%
confidence in the thoughts and
the ideas and but I'm also
really conscious. especially
being a chair is to be
respectful of other boards. This
is not our project until we go
back. if we pull back love on to
fund. So just want to say that
to your point.
William Whitney: the Board of
Public Works has asked this
board to support a debt
exclusion from property taxes
indicate. has not indicated any
willingness to Deming to
designate any of the water
revenues that would be received
toward that debt service. And
it's squarely different purview.
I believe. given the request to
make an informed decision. well.
Carol Martin: we have to make an
informed decision. Nobody.
Bottom line is. we didn't. we
didn't agree to find the
solicitors top project. Will it
be out warning this board. It
won't be our warrant. I never
believe it cosponsor.
Unknown: Well. nobody on the
weekend.
Carol Martin: excuse me.
nobody's asked us to co sponsor
yet. either. So in my mind.
technically. it's still not our
project. So anyway. alright. so.
having said that. let's take a
vote here. So Phil. on the
motion. Sorry. rather wait. I'd
like to hear Alright. Mister
fair. yes.
Anne Brensley: Wait. yes to
what?
Carol Martin: Dave. third party.
Anne Brensley: So you're saying.
yes. you want to engage a third
party for review.
Was hoping you guys would make
it really easy. I just don't
know how you do a $36 million
project without doing somebody
else look it over.
Carol Martin: You go Carol along
last I think there'll be ways
for us to get in some review
besides this as we go through
the process.
Anne Brensley: No. and there's
going to be a minimum or a
maximum fee. I don't think we
need a fair review. I think we
need to
get through this answer is no.
Doug Levine: sorry. yes. yes.
Carol Martin: I'm sorry. I'm
sorry. I am going to warn you.
we are going to do some
reviewing. I know Bill's got
some good points in the past.
Tom Holder: Thank you for your
time. Consideration
Doug Levine: by all the states.
okay. I
Unknown: did want to thank the
board for approving the
emergency connection. Otherwise
we wouldn't be drinking water.
Anne Brensley: I've been a
little bit rough and tough on
this entire thing. and I know
how much work you guys have put
in. and I feel like I've. I've
just asked the billing
questions. and I've done a ton
of research. and I know. and you
guys really coming down. came
down. It was just. and I just
have such a high. So thank you
so much.
Doug Levine: Offline. since it's
Carol Martin: scheduled. right?
I did not hear what you said.
but what I was going to say is.
I'm going to put this item on
the
Unknown: next agenda. Everything
we do it off at the schedule.
Carol Martin: okay. but it's a
draft. and I have to explain one
thing on it. so let's do it next
time.
Anne Brensley: See I got my
second
Unknown: move that this board
appointment. yes. K garden West.
confirm the appointments. Off to
the Community Preservation
Committee. Confirm mandated.
June 30. 28. second. we're
confirming the
Carol Martin: appointment.
Appointments. Right? Yes. Okay.
any discussion. all those Fay.
all those in favor. enough to
vote. Okay. good. We're done.
Tom managers report.
Unknown: I'm going to move madam
chair that this board appointed
Brian or Hurley Oh. to the
Capital Improvement Planning
Committee. pointing board
meeting. school committee of
June 30.
Carol Martin: and discussion all
those in favor. Alright. and now
we're going to have a Tom
industry support.
Michael McCall: Thank you. Madam
Chair. First up. it is the
opioid settlement Working Group.
Purple flag display. if you
haven't already seen in their
purple flags out something
replaced the area right here in
the center. flags represent or
commemorate the international
overdose Awareness Day. which
was this past Sunday. August 31
and it's also signify that
September Recovery Month. and
that we will be honoring that
with several activities that
will be listed on the website
forthcoming to bring people's
attention as part of the use of
the fees that we get on the
opioid settlements. as well as
the fees that we use for our CO
response clinicians. Uh. as
Mister Lewis mentioned. I just
wanted to make sure everybody
was aware that we did have a
need to turn on the emergency
connection with the MWRA. the
Board of Directors approved the
emergency withdrawal the special
board meeting last week. the
repair contractor is awaiting
parts and expected to have the
repair done this week. Emergency
connection is working as design
is replacing water that would
have been produced at Happy
Hall. The MWRA and mass DEP are
both being updated regularly by
our DEP WM Water Department very
quickly since we met last. I did
arrange to have meetings with
the PCRs. which noted the DEP
regarding the MWRA. Also sat in
with the Board of Public Works
on the Dr when they reviewed
their setting of rates. I
attended a Middlesex Regional
Emergency Communications board
meeting and making me the vice
chairman of the newly informed
regional communication center.
As I alluded to earlier. 14 West
plain Street. The appraisal is
due on or before the 10th. and
as soon as I get that. all make
members aware of that. we've
returned to summer hours. so
this will be the only we're here
tonight because of the holiday.
but Mondays will be the only
late night now. Otherwise.
Tuesday. Wednesday. Thursday.
we'll be closing at four. and
we'll be open on Fridays again.
from the eight to 1230 just so
you're aware. of some of the
unions have already reached out
to me to start collective
bargaining for the contracts
that end on June 30. 2026 I've
made them aware of what's going
on with our finances. and I've
encouraged some of them to come
forward see if we can get some
numbers for town meeting. Do you
notice we're hearing to work on
the lobby we had some property
corrections assistance with
painting. putting in the digital
sign boards. We're getting a new
town seal that will go right in
the center. And I do apologize.
We typically take the Monday
night. but I do not have a
Select Board meeting. Is when we
have office hours. and Jailyn
Put it in the newsletter. and it
is September 22 and I already
did receive notification from at
least one person that got the
newsletter indicating that that
is the start of Rosh Hashanah.
And then I may not get folks.
certain members the Jewish
community be able to attend. I
would just encourage anybody who
can't attend. just send me an
email and I'll be happy to
answer and that is really all I
have for this abbreviated
version. Okay.
William Whitney: Separate. Okay.
Carol Martin: yeah. yes. go
ahead.
William Whitney: We typically
see memoranda that we have large
purchases. talking about the
bidding. maybe a sufficiency of
the budget and so forth. Tell
us. Michael. about the process
and to which this bidding is
consistent with the budget.
Michael McCall: So this was in
the capital budget. and that we
just passed the Tom meeting. I
do not have my public with me.
but the number comes in less
than they believe it would
authorize at Tom meeting. I
think was approximately $1.1
million in the funding source.
exclusively capital plan I was
involved with the tail end of
this. This was negotiated
through a cooperative.
cooperative purchasing
agreement. which is run by one
of the I believe the state it's
either don't have enough
funding. I call it. It's either
Michigan or Wisconsin. one of
the central states. But I did go
to its website. and I did verify
that all of the information
that's required under the mass
two. six. general law for
procurement. So 1.1 9 million
was authorized capital plan for
FY 26 for this particular item.
It will explain further here
what the source was. The source
here was going to be borrowing.
So that was on page 52 of the
budget. So all of we're allowed
to use another political
subdivision for. Cooperative
bidding process. whether it's
within the Commonwealth. in
Massachusetts or outside.
provided that they do certain
things. that they do the same
type of vetting that we would do
within the Commonwealth. and
that they display all of their
documents. they list all the
people that submitted their
criteria for selecting it. and
how they make their awards. and
all of that was contained on the
website that was put together by
the persons that conducted the
bids. Will be the fire chief.
and we did get this bid. and the
number is locked in for the time
being. I do need to get them an
answer back. We are down
procurement person. We were
trying to use some consultants
in the short term. We I'm going
to be changing the position that
we have in my office. We
experimented with it. This is
just an aside. just so you
understand
Carol Martin: we have to stay on
topic. please.
Michael McCall: yes. well. I
don't. I don't have a full time
procurement person. but this is
an allowable method with within
the Inspector General's office.
under a public procurement to
use a cooperative purchasing.
Carol Martin: And we're going to
save 30.000 now repayment.
30.000 more. So we've saved
almost 200.000
William Whitney: Select Board
prove the town manager Michael
McCall to be our signatory for
improvement contract for the
purchasing fire opera. fire
department. emergency vehicles
that allow save for total of
everyone paying 68.002nd
Carol Martin: discussion.
Otherwise. all those in favor
550. I'm going to recommend we
table the rest of the topics.
and I will take a motion to
adjourn. Please say move seven.
Oh. my God. a new world record.
Nice. So all those in favor.
thank you so much. Wow. We
apologize. I knew this was going
to be long. I'm hoping to be up
by 10. It's four.
Zoom Speaker: State recording in
progress 25 to order.
Carol Martin: one may watch this
meeting with the meeting link
that can be found on the Wayland
calendar or on the agenda
pursuant to chapter two on the
acts of 2025 this meeting will
be conducted by remote means.
only in accordance with applica
law. It may think this meeting
may be recorded which will be
made available to the public on
WayCAM as soon after the meeting
as is practicable. when required
by law or allowed by the chair.
Persons wishing to provide
public comment or otherwise
participate in the meeting may
do so by accessing the meeting
remotely through the link noted
above. We request public comment
be limited to two minutes per
person joining me this evening.
In the room are board members.
Tom Fay. Ann Brensley. Bill
Whitney. myself. We are waiting
for this eminent arrival of our
fifth member. Mr. Levine. We're
also joined by Michael McCall.
Our Town Manager and our
assistant Tom manager. Kelsi
Power-Spirlet. alright. So for
the agenda. after we have
announcements in public comment.
we will interview a candidate
for the Conservation Commission.
We will take a vote to finalize
and formalize the annual
election date for 2026
approximately 655. we will have
a periodic review of the Wayland
visitors code of conduct. which
will be followed by a discussion
and update from the regional
housing services offices. and
also a discussion review and
possible vote to authorize their
town manager to sign the current
IMO. I am sorry. Approximately
seven. approximately eight
o'clock. we'll have follow up
discussion at Massachusetts
water resource authority joint
meeting. which will include the
questions at the Select Board.
follow up questions that were
deemed for the Select Board.
We'll have next steps and
possible third party review
discussion. somebody 820. we
will have a discussion of 195
main including. but not limited
to the next steps to address the
site contamination. We will be
joined by our licensed site
professional Van Gogh for that
discussion. which will be
followed by a discussion of the
fiscal year 2027. budget task
force recommendation regarding
the financing of 66 River Road.
Shortly before nine. we hope to
have the Town Managers report
Consent Calendar minutes for the
meeting. July 15 and July 29
2025. review correspondence.
Select Board members. reports of
concerns followed by topics not
recently anticipated by the
chair. 40 hours in advance. if
any. there are none. and
hopefully around 930 we will
adjourn. I've said a couple
times we have a really. really
tough agenda tonight. so I'm
hoping we make it by 930 Off we
go. I'd like to note that Mr.
Levine has. in fact joined us at
632 Thank you. All right. Having
said all that. is there any
public comment this evening?
Robbie Bullard: Gretchen Dresens
online.
Carol Martin: yeah. okay.
please. Can you bring her over?
Thank you.
Hi. Gretchen.
Yes. please. You're recognized.
Gretchen Dresens: Gretchen
Dresen. 155 Main Street. I just
wanted to say that I'm really
looking forward to CMG
presentation later on this
evening regarding the
significantly elevated levels of
PFAS found at 195 Main I'm also
aware that an in person meeting
would be currently be a hardship
for Mr. Gould. and I do
appreciate the efforts he is
making to attend remotely this
evening. and since this meeting
is fully remote. the public
really doesn't have an
opportunity to ask questions or
get further clarification of the
consequences of this findings.
So sort of in the spirit of the
PIP. I respectfully request that
the board set up a meeting at
some point when Mr. Gould's
schedule allows so that the
public can ask questions and get
clarification as what these
findings mean. And it also
doesn't appear that Wayland has
updated the 195 Main Street
page. and so if that could be
updated. and it appears that
only the raw data from the mace
sampling is in the Select boards
packet. And in the case that CMG
has sent a written report that
explains the raw data. I would
ask that that report be put also
on the 195 page. And if the
request has not been made to
CMG. I ask that the Select Board
authorize CMG to write up. sort
of like a complete report that
makes sense of the data the
public deserves to understand
what is going on and what the
implications are. And my last
point is that our last request.
maybe. is that there was a great
deal of talk last year about the
aggressive timeline for the
cleanup. and we really haven't
heard anything from the town.
So. About this timeline. and can
you let Could you mention or
speak later to how these
findings impact that timeline
and what that means moving
forward? Thanks.
Carol Martin: Thank you.
Gretchen. is there anyone else
for public comment?
Robbie Bullard: I see Cliff
online.
Carol Martin: Cliff Lewis.
please bring him over. Uh. Mr.
Lewis. I see you and recognize
you. Go ahead.
Cliff Lewis: Thank you very
much. Madam Chair. you have MWRA
on your agenda. and I wanted to
comment very quickly on that
subject. This project has two
parts. One is the permanent
connection to the MWRA system.
and the second is a treatment
plant. basically for PFAS. This
was first proposed in 2021 and
the expected cost at that time
was $7 million for a pump
station. $12 million for 4.3
miles of water mains. $7 million
for MWRA entrance fee for a
total of $26 million on Apples
to Apples. Comparison. the
proposal we have today is a pump
station for $2 million and only
two and a half miles of water
mains for $10 million a total of
12. The cost of this has been
cut in more than half. and it's
been cut in half because the
design teams run out the cost.
letting more than two dozen
alternatives. and now we have a
short main a small pump station
and a treatment plant. This is
as simple a system as you can
get. and no amount further
amount of review is going to
produce a more cost effective
system design that the treatment
facility. unfortunately. is not
quite as dramatic in its cost
comparison. but the goal post
moved there. We need to clean
out the PFAS. Happy Hollow is
the only set of wells where this
can be done. The temporary plant
that we have there now was never
intended and is not a viable
long term solution. It's the
cheapest solution to use Happy
Hollow. and the stated purpose
of the state's Interbasin Water
Transfer Act requires the towns
fully. fully utilize local
sources. So the treatment plant
isn't really optional. The
system was designed in
conjunction with one of the
country's top experts on
municipal water systems. which
is board member. Dr Ed Chang.
and there's only so much blood
you can squeeze out of a stone.
and everyone with this project
had made sure that that blood is
already out on the street and
there's none left to squeeze.
Peer review will only
collaborate. corroborate what we
already know.
What we do need going forward to
lower the cost is solid project
management. not peer review of
the design. There are a lot of
contingencies. if you look
closely in the estimate. that
add considerably to the cost.
The state has mandated that
these be included. so it's not
really. again. an option in the
project proposal. But the
contingencies are not free money
to spend. Our track record
unfortunately in Wayland. for
project management is not
stellar. but to further lower
the cost of this project. we
need the same kind of project
management discipline that has
been applied to the project
design. Personally. I have full
faith in Michael and Tom Holder
and the Board of Public Works to
enforce the spending discipline
in the same way that they have
enforced the design discipline
as a tom. We need to get solidly
behind this project. and once
approved. we need to get solid
project management to get the
cost out. Should it please the
board? I'd be more than happy to
expand on these three points. So
take 10 they take 10 minutes of
an agenda item. and I'd be happy
to do it so it please the board.
but let's get this project done.
and I appreciate your
consideration.
Carol Martin: Sorry. Thank you.
Mr. Lewis. is there anyone else
for public comment?
Robbie Bullard: Mike Lowry.
Carol Martin: Mike Lowry. okay.
Mr. Lowry. I see you and
recognize you.
Mike Lowery: Thank you. madam.
Chairman. Mike Lowery 120. Lake
Shore Drive. like an earlier
speaker. I am very concerned
with how much PFAS was
discovered Monitoring Well 21.
the level there is more than
three times the level we
originally reported. So I have a
question. does DEP require us to
file some sort of updated
report? Because the difference
in PFAS is so substantial. and
if so. have we filed it? I too
would like to have a meeting so
that Mr. Gould can explain and
interpret raw data that is in
your packet. It's the level of
the data is so substantial that
I think the public needs an
explanation and interpretation.
Otherwise. speculation will
follow. Finally. in the maps
prepared by CMG. there is
something missing that I would
like to have added other maps
that the town has show the
subsurface drainage lines that
go underneath this site. and
even bring drainage from north
of the access road back to South
of the access road. and deliver
it through a culvert on the
other side of 27 to the marsh
leading to Dudley pond. being
able to see these drainage lines
on the maps would help us
interpret the data in terms of
its threat would also help us
perhaps identify places we could
intercede and intercept flows in
a way that might allow us to
remediate more quickly. Thank
you very much. Madam Chairman.
Carol Martin: thank you. Mr.
Lowry. is there anyone else for
public comment?
Robbie Bullard: Richard Turner.
Carol Martin: okay. please bring
him over. Hi. Richard. I see you
and recognize you.
Richard Turner: Yes. I just want
to let you guys know that
Hawkeye a contractor for
Eversource. who is. they're
getting ready to put in the
Automated Meter system for for
your electricity. They were on
my street today. Nob Hill Road.
and they put up an antenna on
one of the poles. and you'll see
more of these antennas being put
up. because they send a signal
back to their office in Westwood
where the bills are generated.
So I just wanted to give you a
heads up on that. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Mr.
Turner. is there anything else
for public comment?
Robbie Bullard: seeing no one
else.
Carol Martin: Thank you. I
skipped announcements. So does
anybody have an announcement?
No. Michael. do you have one?
You're muted?
Michael McCall: Well. just one
announcement. There was a water
main break down near the Dudley
Chateau by Dudley Road. Earlier
this evening. Mr. Holder
informed me that crews were out
working on the break at
approximately 530 or so. we put
it up on the main page out to
social media as well as the DPW.
I know some people in the area
reported having rusty colored
water. Once they get the main
repaired. and water starts
running back normally and it
settles down. that should go
away. so I'm sure there'll be
additional information from DPW
and water department. but just
wanted to alert anybody that's
what the cause was for the
change in the water.
Carol Martin: Thank you. I
actually have a couple of
announcements that. although our
agendas speak otherwise. our
summer schedule and break is
over. and the Select Board will
be returning. starting its next
meeting. which is on September 2
to what we call our hybrid
format. I'm not sure what room
we'll be in. I'm not sure if the
technology is working in the
Select Board meeting. so just
double check our agenda. But we
will be hybrid from September
starting again in September. on
September 2. And I also want to
announce that next week there'll
be a announcement or a press
release or whatever the right
phrase is going out. that the
board is going to be holding a
public forum on September 15. as
we continue to gather
information and input about the
property at 14 West Plain
Street. Um. not sure of the
time. but it will probably be in
the 715 730 start time. But just
do check the agenda and check
the watch for the press
releases. Okay. so think we've
got all that done. How about if
we pull away so far. I don't
think I see her anymore. Miss
Aubin. is she available there?
Robbie.
Robbie let me see your um.
muted.
Robbie Bullard: repeat the name
again.
Carol Martin: I'm sorry.
Robbie Bullard: what's what's
her name?
Carol Martin: Oh. she's already
there. Thank you. Okay.
Lisa Aubin: um. can you hear me?
Carol Martin: We can. Are you
going to you do have camera
capability?
Lisa Aubin: I do. I do. I'm. uh.
I thought I had it activated. So
now I'm trying to find it on
this. Okay. I see it. Sorry. I
am a long time teams user with
work. So Zoom is a little new to
me. Thank you for your patience.
Carol Martin: Thank you so Miss
Aubin has applied for a position
on the Conservation Commission.
This is for a term end in June.
30. 2028 her information is in
the packet. and I'm going to ask
her to just give us a quick
couple minutes explanation of.
What's what's intriguing about
this position. and then the
board members will have a chance
to ask questions. after which we
will have a vote. So as well.
Unknown: thank you again. I'm
Lisa Aubin. and you know. first
of all. thank you for giving me
the time to introduce myself and
express my interest in the
Conservation Commission and get
a chance to meet you all
virtually. as you probably read
in my letter of interest. my
husband and I have been
residents of Wayland for over 10
years. One of the many things I
love about the town is the many
conservation lands we have. the
trails they offer. and some of
the beautiful wooded
neighborhoods like the one we
live in. on Moore Road and we're
backed up. in fact. to one of
those conservation properties.
Sedge Meadow. So I've always
been interested. always had a
strong interest in conservation
in my spare time. I'm a self
taught native plant gardener and
also an avid hiker. And more
recently. earlier this year. I
took a conservation advocacy
course with Mass Audubon. and
have recently started
volunteering with the trustees
of reservations as a
biodiversity monitor. which I'm
very excited about. And the
reason I've had time for some of
these things is I'm a very new
retiree. so I just retired in
May. and so I am looking to get
more involved with the community
in conservation efforts. So when
my neighbor. Shannon Fisher.
who's on the Conservation
Commission. mentioned to me that
there were a few openings and
would I be interested. I kind of
jumped at the chance. I did do a
little homework. I met with
Linda Hanson. I dialed into a
few meetings. participated in
the chapter 193 revision.
hearing and learned up a little
bit about what the
responsibilities would be for
the commission. and like many
people who had public comment
earlier. just a concerned
resident about the quality of
our drinking water. You know. I
I'm well aware of the challenges
we've had with water bands. with
capacity issues at our wells due
to PFAS. and also just ongoing
and more current. more more
frequent droughts. So it's not
lost on me how much this is
costing the town. So for that
reason. I feel like it's a great
opportunity for me to be more
actively involved. And in terms
of my. you know. experience.
obviously. I have a finance
background. not conservation.
but I think a lot of the skills
I developed over the years will
would serve me well. So
obviously. I'm very analytical
and detail oriented working in
finance. but I've spent many
years. especially recently.
reviewing countless customer
contracts for financial terms
and conditions. So I'm used to
reading a lot of detailed
documents. which I think would
serve me well with reviewing
proposals. I know I would have a
lot to learn on the wetlands
regulations. but Linda had
informed me that there was the
Massachusetts Association of
Conservation Commissions which
provides learning resources that
she would connect me with. So I
feel pretty confident that I can
invest the time to do that if
appointed. And. you know. I
think the other thing is. I'm
very accustomed to having to
deliver and present complex or
difficult financial results to
executive teams. So. you know.
please know that if I were
appointed. I. you know. I would
actively participate in these
meetings and speak up. That
being said. I recognize the town
has a challenge of me. you know.
managing development. but also.
you know. preserving our water
quality. our tree canopy and
flood prevention. So I hope that
with my business background and
interest in conservation. I
could provide a balanced
approach to my voting and just
make sure I listen to all sides
and help with any problem
solving we can. So that's a
little bit about my experience
and interest. but happy to
answer more questions. Thank
you.
Carol Martin: Anne. would you
like to start
Anne Brensley: that is
incredibly impressive. by the
way. so thank you for sharing
all that information. No. I I
looked at the letter that you
had sent. and we are very. very
fortunate. So thank you so much
for volunteering.
Carol Martin: Thank you Bill.
William Whitney: Thank you. Good
evening. Lisa. I'm Bill Whitney.
member of the board. excuse me.
one of the areas of frequent
discussion is the application of
the wetlands regulations. the
development of orders of
condition when a proponent seeks
to develop a piece of property.
What? What's your general sense
about the balance as between.
you know. the town's desire to
promote development.
particularly residential
development. and and the
concerns about natural
resources?
Lisa Aubin: Well. I knew in one
of the meetings I listened to.
there were some there were other
options on the table as to. you
know. where to locate a driveway
for new development. whether or
not trees have to come down if
they're mature trees. So. you
know. I still have a lot to
learn. but it does sound like.
you know. especially with
someone like Linda. who works
for the town. it on the
commission. there's always an
alternative. right? It may not
be the favorite alternative for
every party. but it sounds like
there's always an alternative.
And. you know. I understand too.
that when we're trying to
maintain a certain level of
affordable housing. and ADU play
into that. and that could help
with development simply because
it's already on existing
properties. But I think overall.
you know. we do have to make
some concessions. And when I
make what I mean by that is we
have to make some hard decisions
as a commission. because we just
can't allow unfettered
development. That's just the
truth. We we don't want floods.
we don't want issues with water
quality and but I think there's
a way to get at it. I think
that. you know. it might take
some time. but I think there's a
way to get there.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Mr.
Fay. and you're muted.
Tom Fay: Good evening. Ms Aubin.
pleasure to meet you. I look
forward to voting for your
appointment. I noticed that your
interest in environmental
studies will go back to Boston
College. excellent. an excellent
institution. So tell us a little
about your interest in
environmental world going back
to those days.
Lisa Aubin: Well. you know. I. I
will admit. when I went to
school and my father wanted me
in a profession where I could
pay off my tuition bills. So at
the time in the in the early
90s. conservation was not a big
field. and the concentration
that I did with BC was rather.
rather new. and there weren't a
lot of specific paths to follow.
but it was interesting. But I've
always been an animal lover and
a nature lover. and I think
that's just how I've always
been. And so. you know. I'm
grateful for the career I've had
in finance. because those are
life skills that you need. and
it served me well. personally
and with my family. in addition
to professionally. But I would
say I just I'm very active
outdoors. I love to hike. I love
to bike. I used to run until my
knees gave out. But like I said.
what I really loved when we
moved here was when we drove
into Wayland for the first time.
and I saw the wooded
neighborhoods and all the shade.
It just was beautiful. I'm just
someone who appreciates that.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Doug.
Doug Levine: Hi. Lisa. Doug
Levine. my question is kind of
the flip side of Tom's. and you
touched on it briefly. and I
know you mentioned it in your
letter. but with all of this
experience and expertise in
finance and financial modeling.
strategic planning and
accounting. did you give any
consideration to submitting your
application for an open slot on
the Finance Committee. And is it
something you'd think about down
the road. is the time is very
much in need of that expertise.
Unknown: I am laughing because
Shannon. who's on the
Conservation Commission. I told
her recently. I said. I think
someone's going to see my resume
and ask if I would be interested
in the finance committee
instead. And I noticed that they
had openings. I certainly would
not. would not rule that out in
the future. I think because I'm
recently retired from finance.
and if anyone's worked in
finance. it's very long hours. I
need a little break from the
spreadsheets and want to get
into something a little bit
different. just to challenge my
other side of my brain. But it
is something I've considered I
would have a lot to learn in
terms of. like. local town
finance. because it is so
different. I mean. I've read
through our. you know. our
warrants. it's very different
approach. So I'd have some
learning to do. but it is
something I think I could do in
the future. And I have noticed
that many of you have served on
multiple committees over the
years with the town. So I would
hope that I would be able to do
the same. And I think it's good
that people rotate in and out
over the years as well.
Doug Levine: Great. All right.
Lisa. now that you're in. you're
going to be with us for the next
I was waiting for someone to ask
that question. and I'm honored
to be asked so
Carol Martin: well I was going
to ask that question. Mr.
Levine. thank you for applying.
We appreciate it. This is an
important commission. There is
obviously. like Bill pointed
out. this balance that you know.
how do we maintain Wayland? But
at the same time. you know. have
developed. And what have you.
The only thing comment I have is
Mr. Mr. Fay mentioned to your
undergrad work. I'm going to
mention your alma mater from
your post grad work. because
that's mine as well.
That's it. Babson. yeah. yeah.
yeah. Alright. All right. So
here we go. I'd like to. I think
we've asked all our questions.
so I'm going to ask if we are
prepared to make a motion.
Doug Levine: sure I'd move that
the Board appoint Lisa Almon to
a term on the Conservation
Committee and commission ending
June 30. 2028
Carol Martin: I have a second.
please Second. Thank you. Any
further discussion? Okay. since
we're remote. we'll be roll call
tonight. Anne
Anne Brensley: yes.
Carol Martin: Bill.
William Whitney: yes.
Carol Martin: Tom.
Tom Fay: yes.
Carol Martin: Doug.
Doug Levine: yes.
Carol Martin: and Carol. yes. So
that's five zero. Did you want
me to do the speech doug?
Doug Levine: go for it. Yeah.
Carol Martin: Okay. you'll
receive a letter.
Congratulations. Number one.
you'll receive a letter from the
town manager's office in
probably about a week. and then
you get that little take the
letter you get down to the town
clerk's office. You'll get sworn
in. She'll give you information.
open meeting. law. conflict of
interest and other important
documentation. after which you
are sworn in. you may vote. I
mean. you're obviously welcome
to go to a committee meeting if
they have one this week. but you
need to be voted in in order to
to this morning. in order to
vote. Understood. Thank you very
much.
Unknown: Thank you. Thanks to
all of you. I'm very excited.
Thank you. Thank you. Have a
good evening. Thank you.
Carol Martin: Okay. so the
fourth item on our agenda is to
vote the 2026 annual town
election date. which I believe
we once we set Tom meeting the
Tuesday prior is Tuesday. April.
28 2026 and we just need to vote
that in. So any discussion on
this. otherwise. I'll ask for a
motion. Can I have a motion?
Doug Levine: Go for it. Tom.
Tom Fay: the move. So moved. Ie
that this board approved the
2026 annual town election date
of April. 28 2026 for a second.
Carol Martin: Second. Thank you.
Any further discussion?
Otherwise. we'll go to the roll
call. So Doug.
Unknown: yes. Tom. yes. Bill.
yes. and yes.
Carol Martin: and myself. Yes.
Motion passes five. zero. and we
will let the town clerk office
know that the next item is a
periodic review of the Wayland
visitors code of conduct. This
is in the packet. I don't have
my page numbers really well
defined. Doug. if you do. you
could shout out for those who
might be listening as we go
along tonight. Page eight. thank
you. I'm going to ask Michael if
he would like to speak to this.
Michael McCall: Thank you. Madam
Chair. Good evening. everyone.
This code of conduct is
something that I published
shortly after I arrived here. I
looked back. It was in May of
2023. in response to just
something minor. I had utilized
it in my prior town and
developed it really when I was
an assistant town manager in my
previous town. This is just
guidelines for behavior of both
staff and visitors. Really. we
have our own policy internally
on code of conduct for staff.
but this was really for visitors
to understand what would be
acceptable. We have had a few
outbursts recently. We've had
some people. as I mentioned in
the phones calling in. and
unfortunately. one incident has
led to us getting involved.
Legally. I had to issue a no
trespass letter to someone who's
been coming in and harassing
staff. But for the most part. we
don't have any major problems.
But this is posted at every
window and around the building.
and we just remind people. if
they. you know. start to raise
their voices or or say things
that wouldn't otherwise be
appropriate. that we have a
visitors code of conduct. We
just ask them to comply. and if
they can't. then in the extreme
measures. as I said. we've had
to ask the Wayland police
department come over and ask
people to just leave the
premises.
That's happened twice while I've
been here. I know
Carol Martin: also. because
Kelsi. they are front and center
as well. Would you like to add
something on this agenda item? I
know I didn't warn you in
advance. I was going to call on
you. but I know you may have
some thoughts on this.
Kelsi Power-Spirlet: Thank you.
Madam Chair. I don't have
anything to add. Then. just
agreeing with this is a great
idea to have. you know. to set
the expectations of how people
should interact with. You know.
public. Their local government
workers and and so. yeah. no. I
think it's a great idea. I think
it's helped at least set the
stage for. you know. positive
interactions. And I. I don't
think there's anything that
needs to be adjusted to it.
Carol Martin: Okay. I'm
wondering. I'm gonna just throw
one quick thought in here. Is
this posted like at the doors
when you come in?
Michael McCall: I think it may
be. but a lot of offices have it
in a clear plastic. self
standing display case that are
usually either right adjacent to
their window or right on their
counter would come
Carol Martin: in. Okay. Does
anybody have any other comments
on this? Just wanted to hop in
with that one question. Yes. Tom
Unknown: Michael. can you
clarify? Is this a revised
policy. or is it just a packet
to discuss it and bring it up. I
Michael McCall: think speaking
with Madam Chair during the
course of the agenda
preparation. I think it was more
to illustrate what we've been
doing in response to the
comments I made the other week
where we were having some
incidents where people were not
being civil. So this is
something that we've had in
place. and it has been working.
but we've just seen an uptick
recently. and some behavior I've
had to tell staff. you know. if
we have repeat callers that are
not civil. we often see the
telephone number. We know who
the individuals are. and I've
called some of them back just
saying. Listen. if you know. if
you can't conduct yourself
professionally with our staff.
then I'll just have you submit
your requests in email through
our contact forms. and we'll get
back to you that way.
Unknown: Thank you.
Carol Martin: Sorry. Anybody
else wishing to add in
commentary? Yeah.
Anne Brensley: So I just want to
make sure that that. because
usually the the visitor code of
contact conduct falls under the
Town Manager. right? So I think
Michael kind of answered my
question and my my thought too.
but it was a little different
than Tom's just in. in saying.
you know. the task is just to
keep us informed. not to ask
Select Board to do anything
specific with it. right?
Carol Martin: I think this is
just. you know. it's an
awareness. It's also an
opportunity. because many people
who perhaps are not visiting the
building might watch our
meeting. And so this is just
another opportunity for us. as
it says a periodic review. Maybe
we should say periodic
discussion. or whatever the
review is that we looked at it
and we because we're not. we're
not making any changes to it.
but awesome. Thank you both. We
want to make sure everybody is
understanding that even if we
disagree. we need to disagree
respectfully. So all right. I
think if we are good with that.
then we'll Could you pull over?
Liz Rust. please? Is she waiting
to be invited?
Doug Levine: Yeah. she she
hopped on earlier and then
hopped off. So she must be on
standby.
Carol Martin: Oops. There she
comes. All right. hi. Liz. thank
you. Do you have camera
capabilities. or do you want to
remain?
Liz Rust: No. no. I do. I'm just
getting there.
Carol Martin: There you are.
Thank you. Welcome How are you?
I'm very good. Thank you. I know
you come to speak to the Select
Board periodically. So you're
probably not familiar with
everyone. We do have our names
here. but around the table that
we have Bill Whitney. who was
the chair for the last couple of
years. We have Anne Brensley on
my other side. if that's good.
if you've got the same setup I
do. I have Tom Fay has been on
the board. You've probably seen
Tom before. And then. of course.
this Doug Levine is down here.
He's the vice we welcome you.
And obviously you know Michael
and you know Kelsi. so we're
look. there you go. Welcome.
Thank you. So I think you have a
few slides that you submitted
into our packet. Are they going
to be on screen share. or are we
just. you're going to speak to
them? In general. it's up to
you.
Liz Rust: I could. I could
screen share and go through them
very quickly. or whatever your
preferences.
Unknown: I think that some of us
have not had this presentation
before. I would think a quick
run through would be good. If
you don't mind doing that. that
that would be great. Do you need
some help? Screen sharing? Oh.
you want me to do the screen
share? Sure. Don't ask me. I
don't know how to do this. Yeah.
Liz Rust: Very good. Okay. is
that? Is it screen sharing?
Carol Martin: Yes. thank you.
Very good. Okay.
Liz Rust: so I'm going to go
through this. There are just a
few slides. Slides here. and
then we can take any questions
at the end. My name is Liz Rust.
I'm the director of the Regional
Housing Services Office. which
is a regional collaboration
between Acton. Bedford. you can
see the towns there. Today we'll
talk about the overall RHSO
management. and you know how
it's all put together what our
last year looked like. what
we're looking at for this year.
and then a general summary. So
the RHSO service model was
established in 2011 so it's
really been around for quite
some time. We've had communities
join. communities terminate.
terminate and rejoin and and so
on. I think it started with a
five. five communities. and so
now it's up to 10. The it's held
together through an
intermunicipal agreement.
You might be familiar with that
for some of the other functions
you might be sharing with other
communities. So it's not a
nonprofit. it's not a separate
entity. It's really an
intermunicipal agreement between
these municipalities. And the
intermunicipal agreement is
amended annually because it
contains the budget. and that's
the voting action for you
tonight. is to authorize the
town manager to sign the inter
municipal agreement amendment.
And so. yeah. So you can see on
the left what we have in the
middle. Sorry. the town of
Concord is the lead community.
So that means that they're the
host. They provide staffing and
contracting. There are five
people in the RHSO. and we are
all 1099. through Concord.
Concord does the RFP and all of
that procurement. So in many
ways. this is a procurement
model for housing consulting
services. aside from. you know.
other staff assistance. but it's
a way to tap into housing
expertise without having to do a
separate RFP or any kind of
contract separately for Wayland.
Concord provides the that
staffing. administrative
expenses and all the accounting
and office support. technology
and rent. We have an office
there in Concord. You know. we
have a emails and copier and
like all of that kind of thing.
every municipality pays in once
a year.
We assess what the membership
fee would be based on how many
hours. It's really an hourly pay
by the hour kind of model. and
each our hourly rate runs
between 75 and $82 an hour. and
based on how many hours you
purchase. and we'll look at that
later on. is what you pay. And
you pay in the beginning part of
the year. in July. the invoices
were sent out. and you pay in
advance for the services. And at
the end of the year. if you
haven't used all your hours.
they're rolled over to the next
year that money. and if you need
to buy more hours. that's done
in the fourth quarter. So the
member towns receive various
housing services for this annual
fee. and those are listed on the
left. and we'll talk about those
in a little bit more detail.
In terms of the leadership. the
lead community is the overall
management. So the town manager
of Concord is. is. is
essentially responsible for the
operation. Should there be any
reason to escalate there? Each
member community. we have a
leadership meeting in May.
usually in May of each year.
with the town managers. town
administrators attend and the
IMA comes out of that process.
It's a three year term. I
mentioned the annual amendment.
and so next year would be the
next three year term starting
up. There's also an advisory
committee that meets quarterly.
They don't have much business to
do. but they. you know. because
it's really the service is for
each community specifically. but
they. we do have this advisory
committee. and they work
together.
The annual budget process starts
in September. so we're already
working on FY 27 and the hours
are based on the work plan. and
the hourly rate is based on the
staffing mix. and then members
make budget requests. CPC
articles or other appropriation
materials. I'm going to say of
the 10 communities. three use
general funds. some with a mix
of CPC. Others use all CPC. So
the funding of the program takes
various forms. depending on the
community adjustments as needed
go through the year. and then
the final budget is in the IMA.
and the invoice is sent in July
for payment.
As I mentioned. throughout the
year. we do a status report. We
do monthly tracking of hours.
We. Monthly status meetings with
the communities and support
boards and committees as
requested. And this is the work
plan that we execute every year.
And I'll just quickly go through
what this all says. But we do
the ownership monitoring. We
have 435 units that we monitor.
We have rental monitoring a
little over 800 restricted units
there. We manage the SHI and
documents and assessment values.
We'll note that 17 162 SHI units
have been created or added to
the SHI since community started
with us. we manage moving on to
program administration. rental
and mortgage assistance. We
administer the HOME program. So
Wayland is part of the home
Consortium. We manage and
administrate small grants
programs for these six
communities. We also provide
trainings. property manager
support. and then on the local
board support level. this would
be development projects. any
kind of feasibility and planning
and that kind of activity. It's
a little variable.
So our FY 26 goals on the left.
we really just continue our
requested levels of support. We
support a lot of different
constituents. resident. owners
and tenants. We do the HOME
program. as I mentioned. program
administration. monitoring. and
we support the local staff.
boards. committees. property
managers. residents. as I
mentioned. And in terms of our
office. we have hired a co
director or someone else who is
also the director. We have two
RHS directors for this year. and
we're going to working on a
transition. Kristen gishard was
the planning director from
Acton. so she's joined the RHSO
and so she's just started a
couple weeks ago. We'll continue
to offer workshops and training.
website and outreach and
promoting the RHSO. So model and
structural support and staffing.
So we'll have some other
staffing additions.
The budget. Here is a lot of
numbers. I'll just read the the
bottom part there. then the
blue. So last year. we delivered
almost 500 hours. Was a Little
29 plus. plus from the IMA. So
act and had a little bit more
Lexington. I mean. less than
Lexington had a little bit more
the this year. the budget
includes an additional 1000
hours for the CO directors. We
had asked every community for
more money. That was than usual
for a one year transition. It
was less than than we had
initially thought. And and then
the first budget is coming up
for FY 27 will likely increase
the Concord admin cost. You can
see there that the
administrative cost is a $21.000
administrative fee that Concord
takes for all of the the rent
and the technology and what have
you. And then on the top. you
can see the member communities
and what they gave last year.
and what they're looking at from
this year's budget and the
percent of total. and you can
see that the percentages really
vary. Wayland is the lowest.
with Maynard that you know. only
4% of the total. and Sudbury and
Concord are are on the high end.
with 16 and 17% and that really
that really relates to the
amount of services requested
this year coming up in FY 26
we're looking at a $75.18 per
hour rate. So that's pretty good
kind of a bargain. I think.
right.
But anyway. so that's the
budget. and the summary
completing 14 years of operation
really due to senior leadership
and sponsorship. This is not
required by the state. This is
just one way that municipalities
have come together to help help
them with their with their
housing. We think that through
this model. you have proactive
compliance monitoring. which is
important. It's a resource
efficiency model. sharing
resources and being able to tap
into that technical expertise.
It's always a little bit more
complicated than you think it
should be. as well as providing
a regional approach. and we can
draw on things that are going on
in neighboring communities and
enhancing your municipal
services and helping you
strengthen what you're doing for
housing. So. so that's it in a
nutshell. and I'll just stop the
screen share and glad to take
any questions. I.
Carol Martin: Yep. Thank you
very you were right. Very quick.
Thank you. Lots of information
there. Who would like to start
the questions? Bill.
William Whitney: thank you. Liz.
I'm Bill Whitney. thanks for
joining us this evening. Two
questions in looking at the FY
26 budget. and comparing it to
the actual for 25 it seems that
there was. you know. a material
increase. And I think you
alluded to the fact that you
were providing for a one year
transition. and perhaps you
haven't expended the entire or
don't expect to expend the
entire budgeted amount. Could
you talk a little bit more about
that? And what you see. as far
as the budget for FY 27
Liz Rust: Yes. we are planning
to spend that entire FY 26 so
that's the amount that Wayland
was actually invoiced. And so
that invoices in process. I
believe. now. and we're working
on FY 27 so I don't have a
sense. It'll be lower than 26
but will it be the same as 25 I
don't I don't know. so we're
evaluating that. and I don't
have it yet. but it'll be out in
September for sure.
William Whitney: Okay? And one
additional question. if I may.
does the RHSO have a particular
interest or expertise in housing
for people with disabilities.
Liz Rust: So we. we assist
municipalities in in their
projects. So we don't. we don't
provide housing right. We don't
have property right. So in terms
of going forward with I know
that some of the interests and
some that you've been working on
for some number of years. we've
had conversations with it all.
all various parties in town
about how to maybe craft an RFP.
and I know that that's sort of
in the works. and how to solicit
interest and to look into that.
I'll say it that way.
William Whitney: Thank you.
Carol Martin: So I think from
that. I'll transition right to
Tom. because he's probably got a
similar question.
Tom Fay: The state law that came
into effect in February on
accessory dwelling units does
something that you and other
members and these other towns
have discussed. and you
anticipate any significant
impact with Wayland and
neighboring communities.
Liz Rust: Well. I think that
everyone's trying to see how
that would apply. And I don't. I
don't know how. I don't know.
for Wayland in particular. I
know that the Planning
Department is working on. you
know. the various bylaw that
that needs to be done. What we
have talked a lot about is how
affordable housing. like the
housing authority or other
housing centered organizations
might use ADU to create another
unit on their property. So we've
we've worked with many towns.
and I don't know that it would
apply here in Wayland. ADU are
very difficult from an
affordable housing perspective.
They might be very helpful in
terms of providing some
diversity in housing. but in
terms of restricting them or
getting them to count on your
SHI that's very. very difficult.
and no one really goes after
that in any real way. except for
if you were renting both units.
like you were a housing
authority. or you were a 501.
c3. or something like that.
where both units would be
affordable. there's really some
opportunities there for some
larger properties. and we're
looking into that in Lexington
and in Concord and in Acton. So
we talked about that. We just
had a quarterly meeting with the
housing folks in Wayland. and we
talked about whether that could
be something that could be done.
Alright.
Tom Fay: Thank you very much.
Carol Martin: Thanks Tom Doug.
Anne Brensley: wait. I just. if
you wouldn't mind. I just. I
absolutely. can you. um. clarify
that. because I'm I kind of
lost. I'm confused by that. So.
um. trying to to use an ADU as a
two unit and ordered or like. or
maybe have your primary home
being rented as well. So then
it's two dwellings. Is that what
you were? Well.
Liz Rust: let's say you were a
housing authority and you had a
scattered site property. so you
have a single home on. I don't
know. three quarters of an acre
or something. And you know.
you'd be like. well. maybe I
could get an ADU here and be
able to have two. Units as the
Housing Authority. so you're
already renting that property.
It's not for it's not really
designed for private property
owners renting. I mean. you
could. but there's way more
barriers there. But if you were
a housing authority or in
Lexington. they have the
Lexington Housing Corporation
that owns a number of
properties. and one way to
expand their inventory is to add
ADU as like. I need one
bedrooms. There's a lot of need
for smaller one bedrooms. using
the ADU bylaw at versus building
a full duplex. Interesting.
yeah. just a different it's a
smaller. nuanced part of the
ADU.
I'll say most of the focus is on
the private homeowner and what
their potential is. But this is
not for the private homeowner.
that's what we're talking about.
And I'll just say the two
barriers for private homeowners
to create affordable units
through the ADU. there are two
barriers that we've run into
over and over. One is that the
private homeowner does not want
a 20 year restriction on that
ADU. 20 years is a long time.
and that's what would be
required to count it on the SHI
and the other barrier is that
they have to be leased in a
transparent process. so you
cannot pick the tenant. And
that's another barrier as a
private owner. So both of those
things when. when really coming
down to it. private homeowners
say no. and then you say. Well.
you know. so. so then they
don't. They not SHI eligible.
but they still are. you know. a
good way to diversify housing.
but it's difficult to encourage
them from a affordable housing
perspective. because of those
barriers. Yeah.
Carol Martin: So what she's
saying. anice that it might be
affordable unit. but we wouldn't
be able to count it. You know.
in our they call it our housing
you index. which gives us the
percent that formula that we
that we strive to maintain and
achieve exceed through our
production plan. there are
numbers. There are some units
just real quick. I'm not going
to name them. but in town that
don't have the 20 year
restriction on them. and
therefore. although they are
affordable. they are not on our
index something. It's basically
Liz Rust: Yeah. it's the
restriction. And then it's also
the same.
that marketing piece. because if
you have ADU and you're living
in the other side. you want to
pick your tenant. usually.
right? I mean. you don't want
some other lottery agent picking
your tenant. And you know
that's. that's kind of fraught.
my opinion.
Carol Martin: all set. Okay?
Doug. I'm
Doug Levine: I'm sorry if you
already mentioned this. Liz.
just a brief question when I was
looking through the materials at
the end about the fee schedule
chart to the percentage of hours
and attendant fees vary from
year to year. depending on how a
municipality wants to use the
services. Or does that stay
relatively static?
Liz Rust: I think that they're
relative to each other. but
certainly they change if a
municipality has a specific
project that's going to increase
the hours. you know. but. but it
usually doesn't move more than a
percentage or two. you know.
sometimes we help with housing
production plans. and those
might. those are significant
enough. they might swing the
hours one way or another. but
they're pretty consistent. I
mean. unless people. you know
less. municipalities. want to
change the level of service.
but. but usually we're pretty
set in what we do. Okay. thank
you. That was informative. Thank
Carol Martin: you everybody. Um.
I'm going to follow up on Bill's
question. because I'm. my focus
is always the financials. And I
actually is our worst. the
liaison to the CPC group. And
they were. they bought that
funding for two code for the co
director funding when that came
before them. and they also said
it really didn't qualify. So
they're pushing the town to fund
this through the general fund
going forward. And so I am also
wondering it. because this is a
is a 50% increase for us from 13
to 18. is almost a 50% increase
year over. So I'm also curious
as if. once we go back and once
we have one director. will the
funding request we be reduced?
Liz Rust: Yes. as I mentioned.
fy 27 will be reduced. FY 26
you've been invoiced for that
already. So hopefully that that
is something that you that
continues to be something that
you'll support funding. and
we'll say that. Um. CPA funds
and eligibility. You know. in my
experience. varies by by
municipality. So it's. you know.
you bring up a good point.
Lexington does not use CPA funds
at all. Concord uses half CPA
and half operating. Natick uses.
Natick just passed CPA. so they
didn't really have much money.
but Acton is 100% CPA. Bedford
is 100% CPA. Lincoln is 100%
CPA. Sudbury is 100% CPA. Weston
is 100% CPA. I don't know who
I'm forgetting Maynard is.
Maynard is mostly their trust
fund and a little bit of
operating fund. And their trust
fund gets it from from CPA. So
it's kind of a pass through
request there. So it. that's
what I mentioned. It varies by
municipality. you know. in terms
of where people are feeling that
this is the most appropriate
place to fund
Carol Martin: true. All right.
thank you. I think there's no
more questions. We have a pretty
packed agenda tonight. so I'm
going to move to the next item.
I'm sure you don't mind moving
along either. So the next one is
to discuss and review and
possibly vote and authorize
Michael. the town manager. to
sign the Inter Municipal
Agreement amendment to share
services of the regional housing
service officer. So obviously.
I'll let Michael speak to this.
but obviously our invoice is
this. 18.400 Correct. correct.
Michael. it's your turn. You're
on the floor.
Michael McCall: No. um. we
participated in the past. I know
our planner. Mr. Hummel. is very
much support of this. We do have
the funding to cover it for this
particular year. It is a
transition year. so that is why
it is slightly higher than the
past. But I I feel that we've
had value whenever we need
anything. We've been able to
reach out to the RHSO for
information and support. In a
case in point. when we were
dealing with the the foreclosure
of that affordable unit
recently. they were. they were
somebody that we can go to for
their expertise. So again.
Robert has relied on it. Mr.
Hummel. so I have no problem
with asking for the authority to
sign.
Carol Martin: So having said
that. may I have a motion
please.
Doug Levine: I move that we
authorize our town manager. Mr.
McCall. to sign the inter
municipal agreement. amendment
to share services of the
Regional Housing Services
Office. as laid out in our
packet from this evening.
Carol Martin: I have a second.
Anne Brensley: Second.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Do we
need to add in the dollar amount
into the motion somebody smarter
than I am on this.
Doug Levine: I can do it anyway.
And amount would be for a total
of $18.400 for fiscal year 2026
representing approximately 284
hours of service.
Carol Martin: Terrific. Okay.
and we're still seconding Great.
Is there any further discussion?
Right? This is a worthwhile
services with. it's
unbelievable. 10 communities
pooling resources. rather all of
us having to all hire our own
housing. You know. ex gurus.
this has just really been a good
program. So all those who
support the motion. I'll start
with Anne.
Unknown: yes. Bill. yes. Thank
you. Tom. yes. Doug. yes.
Carol Martin: Carol. Yes. Motion
passes five zero. Thank you very
much your time.
Doug Levine: Thank you. Liz.
Tom Fay: thank you very much.
William Whitney: Thank you.
Carol Martin: All right. so next
on our agenda is going to need
some help here with a page
number. It's a little bit
farther down
Doug Levine: here we do the
financial policies manual page
with page 20.
Carol Martin: It's about 100
pages right from there. So yeah.
so it's we're going to have
discussed some of you the
Wayland financial policies
managers. prepared by the
Division of local services. and
in particular the financial
management resource bureau.
Michael has spoken to this a
couple times. We've worked on
this for about almost two years.
I think. I think it's been at
least a year. year and a half.
since they first came in to
speak to us. And really and
truly. this is going to be. as I
mentioned prior. meetings.
There's there's the Select Board
manual. there's some policies
we've created. We're going to.
Multi. multi part discussion on
these. these policies.
procedures and what have you.
But the goal here is to
formalize and review our current
practices compared to the state.
and ensure you know we are
adopting best practices. This is
also great to have this ready
for our soon to be put together
and have the first meeting the
Capital Improvement Planning
Committee. And also this will
help us to be once we have this
all formalized. it will be great
for when we have to have our
bond discussions. which I think
will occur in November. So I
will say that some of these are
policies for which the Select
board votes. and some of them
are what we call process or
procedure. which is developed by
the staff. but we put them in
here so that we can see what
they are and also help us to
understand how how we run the
Tom. So with that. I'm going to
pass this to Michael. and he'll
tell us how he wants to go
through this.
Michael McCall: Thank you. Madam
Chair. so as I've indicated in
the past. we we've been informed
by the rating agencies that we
do not have written policies.
About nine years ago. the town
received a grant. and they
engaged the Collins Center at
UMass Boston to help them
develop some policies. financial
policies. similar in nature to
what we have here. Though. there
was a draft generated and pretty
much ended after it was
presented to the Select Board.
So when. when I came in. I
wanted to pick that up again and
move forward speaking with Mr.
Keveny that we didn't have
anything on the books in terms
of codified financial policies
and procedures. And when I
looked around. I found out the
Department of Revenue. their
Division of Local Services as a
financial management resource
Bureau. and you could get in the
queue and get free assistance
from them. they had developed a
series of financial templates.
and most of these folks are have
been career financial directors.
accountants have worked in the
municipal field and now work for
the state.
And so we were assigned someone
from their office. We were
fortunate to get slotted and
they started last August. The
individual is Marcia Bohinc. She
came out and met with. I'll say.
what I would call my financial
team. We had the chair sat in on
these we had the finance
director. Mr. Keveny. our
assessor. Mr. LaRoux. our
treasurer. collector. Ms
Marasco. and the assistant town
manager. also participated in
these discussions. and so they
interviewed us. They met with a
lot of folks. one on one. to see
what we what we do internally.
They also reviewed our bylaws
and any existing standard
operating procedures. and they
took those back and integrated
with their basic templates to
customize those templates for
the town of Wayland. Those were
delivered to us late last fall
and around the November
timeframe. And then what we did
was we went through as a group.
we looked at them. and then I
had each one of those department
heads. as time permitted. go
through and review them and give
me their feedback. although
there are some red line changes
in there from through track
changes on the version you have
that doesn't show you all the
iterations. I think that was
just an oversight that we didn't
shut that off to give you a
clean copy. and I'll ensure that
the board does get one.
But we were making progress.
Then we got into Town meeting
season. and then we picked up
after town meeting. And Mr.
Keveny and I. Mr. Keveny and I.
completed the last review a
couple weeks back. and we were
just trying to find word or get
an okay from the financial
management resource bureau that
we could go forward and present
these to you. whether or not we
needed someone from their office
to come out. I did speak with
one of the officials there
recently. and they said we that
unless there was some real
specific need. that they
typically do not send somebody
out. and they're okay with us
making these minor tweaks to
ensure that they comply with
what we've been doing. So what
you have there has been put
together by the state and our
staff. and reduces to writing
best practices and what we have
been doing to date. And one of
the main reasons we want to have
this in place is if we go out in
the future. as we will likely do
later this fall for borrowing.
we want to demonstrate to the
rating agencies such as Moody's
that we have taken the
initiative to get these
financial. Policies in place
which will help us retain our
AAA rating. So that was. that
was the rationale behind doing
this task.
Carol Martin: Okay. great. So
should we go through these see
if anyone has any questions on
any of these or comments. So we
do that. All right. we'll do
that. So we'll start with the
first one. which is the annual
budget process. You'll see some
a lot of these edits too. Are
changing things to say Tom
manager. And then. you know.
Select Board versus board of
selectmen. because in other
communities. sometimes it still
bought a select one. so we had
to make a lot of those edits.
I'm going to just go through
these. If you have an edit or
any page. let's speak up. I have
one. actually on page four. But
does anyone have one before the
end? Tom and Bill are both
looking at me. so yes. go ahead.
Unknown: Well. I've got. I mean.
some typos and things on this
document. but this one clear you
want to go to the entire 100
pages.
Carol Martin: although I guess
I'm going to ask. does the Board
want to go through this? I mean.
do you have there are other. not
necessarily. typos. but do you
have actual questions about any
of the wording on anything?
Michael McCall: If I could be so
bold. Madam Chair. it might be a
good use of the board's time
this evening where we've
introduced this and given an
explanation. If board members
want to jot down their
questions. comments and any of
these typos or other things. and
I can get an updated draft with
the typos generated for a future
meeting. and at which time we
can try and answer many of those
questions as well.
Tom Fay: And this was a product
of a working group. Michael. is
that right?
Michael McCall: Essentially a
working group that the state
played a major role in it. So we
had this liaison from the
Division of Local Service come
out and participate in meetings.
They generated the underlying
document. And then we had a
working group of our financial
people. We sat around a couple
times and went through this. and
then I had each of the
department heads review it. give
me their feedback? And we
incorporated those in
Unknown: at least one member of
the finance committee was part
of the working group.
Michael McCall: I can't. I don't
believe we had somebody from the
finance committee. This was
really to incorporate what we
have been doing on staff. how we
handle some of the processes the
member of the state's team went
through using our bylaws and any
existing financial policies. and
wove those into their template.
Carol Martin: So the consultant.
I may hop in here. Michael the
consultant. basically gave
Michael the template. or the
Town manager. the template. of
who would be on the committee.
and asked specifically for the
various staff members. obviously
the Town manager and the
assistant. And then also asked
for the chair of the Select
Board. Bill was not able to go.
I was the vice chair at the
time. and then he said. Well.
can you go and fill in? Because
we need. you know. the woman's
from the States coming. And then
I just stayed on to do these.
because their financial policies
are more my skill set.
Anne Brensley: So it's really
important to note that this is a
financial planning policies
booklet like this isn't
financial policies. It's just
outlining the planning process
of putting policies in place. So
when I looked it up. like a lot
of the definitions. a lot of the
the almost like the Table of
Contents. those are very
standard across the board. And
it's not. I would say it's
incredibly substantive in
creating the foundation of how
you go go and approach financial
planning. But there's nothing
specifically substantive to
Wayland per se that would be so
detailed that I would feel like
as Select Board members. we
needed to interfere too much on
it. because it really is just a
process for planning. So it's
not. I don't know. That's what I
got when I read it. I didn't
know. I'm just
Unknown: the extent or any
typos. I'll send an email to
Kelsi. make note. I'll give her
a call. I'm not going to take
the board's time up with those.
But
Anne Brensley: I actually
noticed a couple myself. So Tom.
if you wanted to. we could break
it up like. because it's a lot
of pages. and I'm not the best.
but I could. you know. red line
a little just up to you. just in
case you didn't want to go. Or
100 pages there. there's some
typos. but it's nothing major.
just. you know. not to something
either or material. Just. you
know. missing a o or to the word
T things like that
Carol Martin: . Before we go too
far afield. Bill had also raised
his hand the same time as Tom so
I want to go back to him first.
and then
Unknown: we can go back. Would
agree.
William Whitney: though. line by
line review of 100 pages would
be taxing our ability to
complete this during the current
month. I had a slightly
different take on it. One theme
that I thought was reflected is
I didn't see the Finance
Committee mentioned the role.
The finance committee mentioned
is I might have expected.
particularly when I know that.
Michael. we're not supposed to
look at the red lining. But when
you look at the second paragraph
under policy on page three.
reference to the finance
committee's role is stricken.
pardon me. So there's that also.
I would find it helpful at some
point to be joined by the
finance director to talk about
some of these specific things.
such as the notion that the debt
service shouldn't exceed three
to 5% of the capital of the of
the general fund budget. There
was reference to no more than
10% of I guess. the general
fund. yeah. Visa V. you know. a
target of 6.8% but not to exceed
10% that language got softened.
So I'd just be curious to get
Brian's take on some of those
specific things. And again. I
could put together a note saying
suggesting where I personally
would find it helpful to have
him or Michael describe to us.
you know. where we are now.
where we are. where we might be
prospectively. with some of the
borrowing that's going to
happen. and the extent to which
we might run into some of these
as constraints In our capital
fund financing.
Carol Martin: So the consultant
did take our existing took the
templates. and then would take
our existing policies practices
and plug them in. And so what
you're referring to are two I
think they're the debt metrics
that we've used in town. so and
the amount of the capital
budget. She'd say. this is what.
you know. best practices. state
average. or whatever the item
was. And then we'd look and see
what we were doing and say. We
fit. I do agree with what you're
all saying. When you find in
here this. when you have these
paragraphs that say. purpose do
we don't really need that.
because it's we just need the
policy. Also. there's a lot of
charts that show where we are.
So in other words. as you
establish this policy or this
benchmark or whatever. like the
six to 8% it shows where we are
have been over the last three or
four fiscal years. You know. are
we in that parameter or not? So
I think that. but I think it
would be a good idea to have
Michael come in. I sorry for
hopping in ahead of you. Doug.
but I also want to speak to what
Bill's point is. I did notice on
page four about the finance
committee that this language. I
think. was more similar to them
when we realized we were making
them language fit with the Tom
manager act. because this says
the finance director will
prepare an annual budget
proposal. and the finance can we
will review and send it to the
warrant. which is not
necessarily how our code reads.
nor does it accurately reflect
down here. when we talk about
the budget document on page six.
it says the Town Manager and the
Finance Director will work
together to prepare the budget
document when. in fact. the
information that's to be put in
that document is actually what
the finance committee's annual
report or report to them the
residents that runs in the
warrant. So I think we have a
little. like you said. a little
tweaking here and there to do on
some some things. But I'm very
proud of everyone. No one called
me and said. I can't believe you
put 100 page document in here.
William Whitney: No one thought
it. either. Carol.
Carol Martin: what? What'd you
say?
William Whitney: No one thought
it.
Carol Martin: Well. they may
have thought it. but they didn't
call me. So. all right. so where
um. Kelsi. feel free to
participate as well. because you
were very much integral part of
the all these meetings that the
ones I were at. you were at. So
and what do we how do we want to
approach this? Do we want this a
little more streamlined so it's
more in the politics. like a
policy. plus the typos fix. plus
everyone submits their. That is.
what would we like to do here?
Oh. so Doug. you didn't even get
to opine the first time. Sorry.
I should go back and fix that.
Would you like to say something?
Doug Levine: The only thing I
would add is from the preface to
I think of as the executive
summary. so to speak. it talks
about this being a living
document. so I have a sense then
that people are going to be
referencing it frequently.
Finance Committee. budget
director. us. and does that
mean. in your mind. Carol. that
this is something that we're
reviewing periodically. maybe
not as often as every year. but
it's constantly being updated
for the purpose of reflecting
what we're doing for the ratings
agencies. or are we actually
turning to it for guidance to
try to make sure that we're
somewhere consistent each year?
Just trying to understand
Carol Martin: both Michael and I
have a response. I'll let him
speak first. Well.
Michael McCall: last week. I
spoke with Melinda Ordway. who
is one of the senior people at
the Financial Management
Resource Bureau. and she said
exactly what you just said. I
can member Levine that this is
something that should be
reviewed periodically and
updated based on the town's
practices or any changes that
are made. It's not something
that you just sign off on. put
on a shelf and check a box say
you there it is. I mean. I we do
need to be able to tell that to
some of the rating agencies that
we have some of these codified
so that we can look to them when
we're doing things. but we
should be reviewing it
periodically and making sure
that it accurately reflects what
what our needs are. the numbers
that Select Board Member Whitney
mentioned earlier. those numbers
may change over time. how much
debt we want to incur. what.
what the percent of our capital
budget is. So I would say. yes.
we do want to review this
periodically.
Carol Martin: So this. this
dovetails with what we discussed
about and created our
objectives. that as we
transition more and more into a
policy board. that we will be
reviewing X amount of policies
every every year. So anyway. all
right. So now.
Kelsi. did you want to say
something that's No. okay.
Michael. feel free to make a
suggestion how we proceed and
see if that's what the board
wants. And
Michael McCall: I'll reiterate
what I said earlier. Madam
Chair. that I think it would be
probably best if board members
submitted their comments
questions as Select Board Member
Fay and Brensley indicated they
have some typos and few things
we could incorporate those. make
a clean copy. send it out and
show up another night with the
finance director and try and
address the questions the board
has
Carol Martin: that work for
everybody
Unknown: does.
William Whitney: Those comments
should be directed to Michael or
to Kelsi. so as to avoid any
deliberation. Yep.
Carol Martin: Numbers. yeah. And
that's good question. just. just
to Kelsi. So because she'll sit
down and have a call. put them
together. and I believe Tom
deciding what you're going to
do. and then have a conversation
with Michael. If there's any
other than typos or whatever
formatting or what have you.
were minor things. they'll
they'll work it out. I'm sure.
Okay. alrighty. Well. all right.
So that brings us to number 10.
which is the discussion of 190
Main but I don't believe Mr.
Gould wanted a later meeting
time.
Michael McCall: I don't. so he
can be available to at least
828.
Carol Martin: 20. So I'm with
that. I'm going to move on to
number 11. which
Michael McCall: is skip number
nine. madam.
Carol Martin: I skipped number
nine. So well. right? Sorry.
number nine. Let's do that first
the following. We're gonna have
the follow up discussion of the
Massachusetts water resource
authority joint meeting.
including answering the
questions. or we're looking at
the draft answers and then
discussing next steps and
possible third party review. I
would like to start with the
draft responses to the questions
I had. They're in the
supplemental packet. and I thank
Michael and town council and
everyone else who helped me.
because the ones I put together
were needed help. And I think
this is it. these questions. if
I you remember. came from the
the joint meeting. And in the
joint meeting. there was finance
committee had submitted. And
now. Were questions. Most of
them were answered by the Board
of Public Works. and they have
done that. And then these last
five or six are ours. and we
should just have a quick look at
these. see if we're happy with
our responses. And then the
finance committee is meeting on
the next week. I don't think
it's a 25th and they would be
great if we could just. you
know. give them our responses
that would be ahead of the joint
meeting on the second so is
everybody on the page? So.
Unknown: so
Carol Martin: do we want to go
over them one at a time. or do
you just want us opine. So go
ahead. Tom
Unknown: question. could you
clarify how these responses were
prepared? Were they reviewed by
town council? Is it a
compilation of town council
opinions. as well as the town
manager as well as you? Just
give us some context here. but I
just said that.
Carol Martin: Michael. do you
want to I drafted them and then
I sent them off and said. these
really need help. So then they
go ahead. Michael.
Michael McCall: so as madam
chair had indicated. the finance
committee submitted these
questions. madam chair had put a
sentence or two in there. and
then asked the finance director
and I to take a look. I went
back and read the directives
from the Department of Revenue.
and I consulted with town
council on some of the questions
in there. And so with a little
editing from the chair. I took
all of the information that I
gathered from the finance
director. the bulletins. Town
Counsel and the chairs feedback.
and drafted those responses that
you see in front of you and
Tom Fay: you're pretty
confident. Mr. Town manager.
these are accurate. accurate
answers.
Michael McCall: Yes. the
interesting thing when speaking
to town council about this is.
most of the information it comes
here comes from a directive that
was written well over 20 years
ago. It's a it's a bulletin. an
informational bulletin from the
Department of Revenue and Town
Counsel had indicated to me that
that this is seldom used. this
special debt exemption. And I
believe they said they were only
familiar with one town that they
work with. that ever explored
that. And they said their. their
words. not mine. that this
speaks volumes of the the
complexity and how often this is
utilized. the idea of shifting
the debt from the water rates to
the taxpayer as excluded debt.
So I Miss Miss Power-Spirlet was
on the call when we went over a
couple of these items. I was on
the call with town counsel for a
variety of issues that we have
on the agenda tonight and for
other upcoming matters. But the
the bulletin was from 1993 I did
reference that. I know there was
also some information forwarded
by then finance committee
member. Mr. Herlihy. He
originally had written something
about this. so I tracked down
some of his sources as well. So
as far as I know. those
bulletins are still good
standing order those
informational guideline
releases. and it is something we
can do. Town Counsel has
verified it. Thank you.
Carol Martin: So just for a
little levity. Mr. Fay. the only
one of my answers that stayed is
the one about the timeline.
Don't all the rest of them seem
like they're much more legal
responses? Okay.
Anne Brensley: I feel like we
took some positions on some of
these questions. Are we okay
with that? Michael.
Tom Fay: well. when
Michael McCall: initially it
looked like there was going to
be a Draft Board of Public Works
response. the Select Board
response. and I originally
thought that the board was
looking for my statement. so my
there's a little bit of my
opinion in here. relative to
making sure that we interject
the discussion about equity and
fairness in there. I tried to be
objective with some of these
others. where. you know. we make
the final decision only after
we're asked by the Board of
Public Works. Then it's up to
the. you know. in the first one.
it's up to the board to make
that vote. It doesn't require
the Tom voter approval. so
that's why I put that there. The
others. you know. they aren't
just cut and dry. I think you're
going to have to have some
discussion. as I indicate. Data
in there on the scope and the
amount of the exclusion. and you
have to consider the fairness
and equity. whether you're going
to capture people just based on
the size of their property or
their actual water usage.
Carol Martin: So I think that
the whole issue here is. before
we go around is unless the Board
of Public Works asks us to
support some of these costs
through the General Fund. which
we would do through this debt
exclusion. This is not our
decision. So Michael was trying
to stay a little bit in the
middle the one where it says.
should it be treated like the
schools? He does a pretty good
job there. We get to the end.
Think the next to last sentence
says. Therefore the Board of
Public Works is responsible for
setting the water rate. The next
sentence. I think Michael should
say. if the Board of Public
Works asked the Select Board to
vote. and the Select ask the
Select Board to vote. and the
Select Board. then we'll vote to
shift. because if. unless they
ask us. if they come to us on
the second when we have the
joint meeting and say we've
decided to fund this to the
water rates. we have no vote
other than when the article
comes through. we are then not
funding anything. because we
vote on the funding in the in
The general fund and the capital
projects. So it was. it was a
little bit challenging. Tom. is
this anybody else Doug? Bill.
Doug Levine: I think that. I
think that that is all
technically correct. But for
something of this magnitude. it
would certainly make sense for
everybody to be rowing in the
same direction and all boards to
be on the same page. because if
I'm the average town meeting
voter. and I'm looking for some
guidance on this. I want to hear
what all of the boards who've
delved into this for a number of
months. and some. obviously. for
several years. feel about this.
So I think that that's an
important signaling how each of
the boards votes. whether or not
we have that the the authority
or not. I think it's such a
critical signaling just as a
leading board in the town.
Carol Martin: So do you think
these questions. are these
answers are good. or do we need
some a dean looking for an
adjustment on something? I
Doug Levine: mean. they're just.
they're very technical. I guess
it depends who's the audience of
this document. because if it's
the average voter. then no. they
don't. they don't answer the
mail.
Carol Martin: These are going to
the back to the Finance
Committee. then
Doug Levine: that's that's
probably does answer the mail.
if that's the right
Carol Martin: so the Board of
Public Works is meeting. Just
give you this little bit of info
and then build your turn meeting
tomorrow night. And I have
suggested that they include on
their agenda to vote a
recommendation. So when they
come to meet with us on the
second. they'll have a
recommendation. I believe the
finance committee is meeting
next week. They're going to
review all the answers to the
questions. which is great.
They'll have done it ahead of
the meeting. therefore we won't
have to spend a lot of time with
what. 19 people discussing the
answers to the questions. yeah.
and then I'm I believe they are
going to discuss what they think
the recommendation should be.
although they probably should
wait to hear what the Board of
Public Works wants to do first.
But nonetheless. my sense is
that we will have at least one.
if not two recommendations on
the at the meeting. on the
second. but we do need to get
the answers out to the
questions. I do agree. they're
very technical. But you know
what? When you think about it. a
lot of our work is technical
because we're dealing with debt.
If we're dealing with debt.
we've got to follow the
procedures. So anyway.
Doug Levine: it's true. it's
just. if you want people to take
away a message and you just have
technical language. you're not
going to necessarily have them
luck away with the message. But
if it's these specific questions
for the Finance Committee. then
I'm sure that they can follow
along.
Carol Martin: All right. okay.
so. Bill. you didn't get to
speak out. Sorry. yeah.
William Whitney: With respect to
the first point. the question.
or the first bullet. the
question is. who makes the final
decision on any debt service.
the answer is the Select Board.
But the response goes on to talk
about. should the finance or
should the Select Board decide
to agree to the dead shift? This
is how it happens. I think
that's leading the witness a bit
frankly. and and also just very
confused about procedurally. how
this would work if. if the. for
instance. the Select Board may
vote to adopt. but it needn't
right it. it could go to a vote
of the town Meeting is or to the
to the registered voters the way
we do normal debt exclusion
items and query would. would the
Public Works Board need to do
that in any event? I know.
obviously you got to have a two
thirds vote of the Tom meeting.
But do you. Also need a two
thirds vote of the voters absent
the the Select Board taking this
action in either event. So I
don't know the answer that
question
Carol Martin: isn't the answer.
Michael. isn't the answer to
that question that the Board of
Public Works sets the water
rates.
Michael McCall: So I made some
notes when I spoke with Town
Counsel. and they said that
water and sewer raise are not
part of Proposition two and a
half. So there doesn't have to
be a ballot question. You could.
conceivably. you could do a non
binding question. and that was
something I asked so you would
do a non binding question. You
could either do it by ballot or
you could do it at town meeting
to give direction to the board.
But the way I envision this
happening is the Board of Public
Works is going to make a
recommendation. which they're
planning to do this week.
whether they're going to do it
on the rates or they're going to
ask the Select Board who has the
authority under this statute to
have this special exemption. The
reason I put in the part about
it doesn't go to the voters. I
just wanted to reiterate to the
board that this is the decision
can be made without a public
hearing and without a formal
vote. That's why it was given
this. and that's why town
counsel said it's seldom used.
I'm just going throwing off the
technical responses that I've
got to the questions when I
submitted them.
William Whitney: but if the
Select Board is asked to um.
shift some of the debt right
from the water rates to the
property taxes. It. it seems to
me. the Select Board is under no
obligation to hold this hearing.
but rather. it could have a a
debt exclusion vote.
Tom Fay: It would be non
binding. right?
William Whitney: Not
necessarily. if. if we're
looking to again. I mean. who's
issuing the bonds? Is it the is
it
the the water? Commissioners? Is
it the town of Wayland.
particularly if we're using
property tax revenue to
underwrite a lower portion of
the debt service? Isn't
Tom Fay: this an exclusion.
though.
Unknown: technically. the town
underwrites every bond because
we are responsible of the
default. but then we have
certain programs. whether it's
CPC or whatever that we are
anticipating will pay that debt
service. So Michael. did you
want to add to that? So there's
a couple of questions that are
coming through. but
Michael McCall: what this does
is. at least as I understand it.
this is a mechanism to keep the
rates from going up really high
by putting a portion of it on
the taxes. but as a debt
exclusion. once those that debt
service is paid off. So
I don't think it's one for one.
So if you were going to do it
all on the water rate. it would
be based on your usage. If it's
split. some people might pay
more or less depending upon
that's
William Whitney: not my
question. It's not my question.
My question is if. if the board
is obligating some tax revenue
general fund tax revenue for
amortization of these bonds. and
it chooses not to avail itself
of this specific exemption. Is
it subject to vote of of the
registered voters?
Michael McCall: I guess. I don't
have an answer to your
questions. like board member
Whitney. my understanding would
be they would have to include
the debt service as part of
those water fees. They're asking
us to put it on part of their
debt service on the tax rate.
That's my understanding.
Carol Martin: No one has voted
anything. And I want to be clear
with that maybe they're going to
ask us? Well. I
Michael McCall: don't think this
subject would have come up
unless somebody wanted to do
right. but I want to
Carol Martin: be I do want to
say Bill. My original answer
here was that it was who makes
the final decision is the Select
Board. I said. with input from
the fine from the town manager.
the finance. Director and town
council. That was my original
answer here. Do you think you
would be more comfortable with
William Whitney: Think it does
answer the question. I mean
that answer?
this. I mean maybe there's a
separate question. which is.
how's how's the board feel about
it? And I don't know if it's
Town. you'd have that discussion
now or to wait for
recommendations from the Board
of Public Works and the Finance
Anne Brensley: I'm sorry. Bill.
can you? Can you repeat that
Committee.
question? I just don't want to.
I don't want to not follow you
like I want to be able to
understand what you were saying.
because I think I get it. but I
in which case it is a really
good and important question. So
do you mind saying it again?
William Whitney: The issue Anne
is not you didn't follow it.
It's I'm sure I wasn't clear.
Unknown: So again.
William Whitney: I have kind of
two questions. One is. if tax
revenue is to be used to
amortize all or a portion of
these bonds. if and we want that
debt service excluded. and the
board chooses not to avail
itself of mgL. 59 section. 21
cn. then is it subject to a vote
of the registered voters in the
Tom meeting? Much of the way a
debt exclusion for anything else
is handled? And that's a lot of
ifs and hypotheticals. but I'm
just unclear as to how all this
works. Visa v you know. if you
have one or two sources where
you're amortizing or you're
paying debt service. I should
say on the bonds. I understand.
you know. the water rate thing
is pretty straightforward. I
don't the other is. strikes me
as. frankly. little murky.
because if you don't have a debt
exclusion vote. then does this
become a part of the general
fund expenditures that needs To
be budgeted?
Does the question make any
sense?
Michael McCall: I think it does.
a Select Board member. Whitney.
but I think that's what this
special exemption allows for you
for to happen that the taxpayers
are helping to pay the debt
service for the the Board of
Public Works project and I have
a note in here that says.
because water and sewer is not
under Proposition two and a
half. there isn't a traditional
debt exclusion vote. It's just
the Select Board makes the
decision.
William Whitney: But I thought
you said that it has only been
rarely invoked. and there's very
little experience with this.
Michael McCall: That's what town
counsel told me. correct.
Anne Brensley: Now. sorry. no. I
I've got it. I got the question.
And no. I did. and I understand
why. It's a little perplexing.
because the proposition two and
a half is specific to this very
situation. and yet we're trying
to almost not utilize it. if we
use tax dollars. my and where I
actually have my concern in what
you're bringing up. is the the
transparency of it all?
Carol Martin: Well. there will
be a long article number one.
but I think Michael has to go
back and research it. like he
said. because this is an
enterprise fund. and so they may
be different. We may not be able
to avail ourselves of the
traditional debt exclusion
process and processes if we were
to go this route. So I think we
have to have Michael get back to
us on this question. Tom. is
that sound about right? Michael
Michael McCall: Ken. the other
thing. I think. if we're going
to have a joint meeting on the
second perhaps I ask if Town
Counsel can be present to answer
some of these questions? Great
idea.
Carol Martin: All right. so
could we just. you know. I like
to keep things moving here.
Could we go back to the question
number one response? It seems
that they saw a couple head
shape that this. Were we
comfortable with leaving this
response. or do we want to go
back to the one. the original
one that was there. I think I
may have put in the packet the
last time. which was the Select
Board. Who makes the decision of
the Select Board. with input
from town manager. finance
director and town council. I saw
Doug shake his head. I thought.
yeah. that makes sense. We also
William Whitney: response. I
think that's a good response. I
don't know if you want to go on
to say. you know. should the
board decide to do this? This is
what you do. If the board should
decide not to do this. this
is. that's what you do. But
maybe that. maybe that's too
complicated to answer. Anne's
point about transparency. maybe
we just leave it use your
language. Carol.
Carol Martin: yeah. I would like
to get these done and out before
their next meeting. so that we
don't end up doing this on the
second So Tom. you didn't opine.
Are you comfortable with making
that change?
Tom Fay: One thought is to reach
out to the chair for public
works. Run this by him. get his
impressions and if he feels it's
unclear and needs further
information. and then you and
the Tom manager revise it and
then consider it finalized and
send it along.
Carol Martin: Okay. I am
comfortable with Michael. Are
you comfortable with making that
change? Just a much shorter.
simpler answer to number one.
Michael McCall: I'll have to
review the tape tomorrow. but
yes. we can. We can get the
exact language
Carol Martin: you're okay with
that. okay? And as anybody have
any other I mean. to Anne's
point. I do agree it is a little
skewed. but Michael was doing
them. so he gets to skew it
Michael McCall: originally
asked. I thought I was supposed
to give. I know. I know it's
your response. And the Board of
Public Works was giving their
own. So that's. that's how this
Carol Martin: Yeah. somewhere
along the line. my my note that
went with it didn't go with
them. so it's fine. All right.
Does anybody have any other
concerns with any of the other
responses to the other
questions. except for the
timeline answer. because that
one's perfect. Supposed to make
Tom laugh bill
William Whitney: at the top of
page three in the packet. the
question should affect the
property owners. Yeah. it's this
question of fairness. I think
there's another aspect of this
fairness question. which is.
let's say you have two houses
with identical assessed values.
One is occupied by a single
person or a couple. and the
other is occupied by a couple
with 14 ages. right? So
one assumes that the latter is
going to use more water than the
former. but to the extent that
the general fund or the taxes.
if you will. finance all or a
portion of the debt service. the
latter is getting a kind of a
subsidy at the expense of the
former. So I think there's a
little bit of an equity question
there.
Carol Martin: This one says this
really addresses the non profit.
those who are not would not get
captured in paying the cost if
we put it through the DEP. some
property owners the town. and
then our profits don't pay real
estate taxes. This really isn't
both the size the scope of the
house. This question was. how
are we going to capture that
every rate you every water user
contributes to the cost? So I
think this one. and if that I
didn't see anybody else have a
concern with this answer.
Unknown: I just wanted to
comment to Bill's question.
That's why I think. in the end.
went up with a hybrid payment
bill. and that's why the use
issue is use issue will be
addressed by the port of public
works well by the ultimate
decision. which will likely be
hybrid. and that the use of the
water will dictate your
quarterly bill To a certain
percentage. And your point. I
think. is. yeah. that's fine.
Tom. but should it be reflected
in the 100% and seeing the
question. but it's. I think it's
tough to do if you can do a
hybrid Well. the water rates are
William Whitney: a function of
the operating cost and the
capital cost. capital
expenditures and debt service.
If there's less debt service and
the then the rate is
lower. right? And so you're not
capturing the value if you're if
you're using more water than the
guy who is using less. and you
have the same assessed value.
Carol Martin: So with all due
respect. I think we're actually
talking more about what's our
opinion on hybrid all water
rates. all decked all debt. when
actually we're just supposed to
be focusing on responding to
these five questions. I. Would
think after we have the joint
meeting. even on the second. I
can schedule some time. maybe
Michael. we can squish into
that. you know. for us to
discuss what our thought is on
the proposal once we get that.
because we don't really know
what the proposal is yet. Does
that make sense? Yeah. Okay. So
anybody else feel that any of
the other questions need to be
adjusted? All right? So we'll
figure we'll adjust the first
one. and we'll get these out to
the Finance Committee and the
Board of Public Works. and then
that takes care of that. So one
of the next steps. which is the
next one. is. you know. when
will we have an opportunity to
discuss. you know. what we feel
as a board. and how we you know.
it's and I think we do need to
wait to get the proposal. So
hopefully on the second. we'll
be able to do that. once we've
had the proposal. we can have a
conversation after the joint
meeting. Does that work? Yeah.
okay. all right. and then that
brings us to the last part of
this. and it is the bill I'm
going to turn this over to you.
back to your possible third
party review. although I think
Michael has some information to
share that goes with this part
of the agenda. Yeah. oh.
Michael. did you want to speak
first?
Michael McCall: Not sure what I
have that you think I have.
Carol Martin: I think you have
the costs and the timelines and
the issues for engaging a third
party person.
Michael McCall: So I did you
third party review? Okay. now I
know where you were going. I did
take some time to try and call
some other firms that engage in
this type of work. And asked
some of them. would they be
interested in doing this type of
work? I also understand that Mr.
O'herley. he did talk about this
back in 2023 I went back and
watched portions of the Board of
Public Works meeting in the
FinCom meeting at that time. Mr.
Hurley. he had indicated when he
was in the private sector. just
like Select Board Member
Whitney. they did something
where they get a peer review.
And he thought it might cost 25
to $35.000 that's what Mr.
O'Herlihy. he said. Back in 2023
I did speak to a couple firms.
and some said they. you know.
they. they do peer reviews of
this nature some do strictly the
design work. I got some verbal
ranges between 25 and $50.000 to
do this type of work that it
could take anywhere from two to
four weeks to do it. And I did
get some essentially samples of
our cues from a couple towns
that I reached out to in the
event we were to move forward.
The The only thing I would
caution the board is right now.
because of what we had to do
last year to make sure we passed
the FY 26 budget. we everybody
took a slight reduction in their
expenses. and at the moment.
both the Select Board and town
manager expense accounts have
already incurred some
significant costs. We're paying
for certain engineering
appraisal for 14 West plain we
paid for the yonder pouches. So
it be something we'll have to
look at where we would find
funding if we want to do
something along that price
range.
Carol Martin: All right. Bill.
William Whitney: Just think it's
prudent for the board to have a
peer review for a proposed $38.6
million expenditure.
Carol Martin: Michael. did you
also want to talk about the
timeline?
Michael McCall: Well. we would
have to send something out. It
would take some time to send
that out. maybe a couple weeks
to solicit some input. And then.
once we picked a particular
firm. they've indicated it could
take anywhere from two to four
weeks to conduct the review. So
I suppose you're looking
anywhere from six to eight or so
weeks to get some feedback from
a firm.
Carol Martin: All right. open it
to the board. Tom. you look
ready? Yeah.
Unknown: One of my concerns was
the turnaround. which you've
just answered that question. So
I think that's a reasonable
turnaround. I think it's money
well spent. It is a huge
project. and traditionally. our
town does do a peer review on.
Significant projects. I think
it's consistent with town
policy. I would just ask if we
do decide to go to this route
that that your staff. Mr. Tom
manager. place it at the top of
the list so we can have the
final results. You know. ideally
by maybe mid December. which in
my view. would likely result in
this warrant article being still
on schedule. because I do think
it's very important that
residents have a chance to vote
on this in the spring
Doug Levine: bill. Have you
thought about the fact that the
peer review could come back and
say that this could be a higher
expense. and how we would handle
that result? Because I think
we're thinking that to make us
feel better. to make the voters
feel better. we're essentially
getting this second opinion.
like you would go to two doctors
and say. I am supporting what
was found originally. But what
if they come back and say. there
this actually should be at this
level? And I don't know. are we
then. in that case. rolling the
dice. whereas there's the idea.
we're kind of hoping they'll
come back and say this is
potentially the cost is
overblown. and it really should
be down here. We really have no
sense of what's going to come
back when we get this peer
review Correct. You just want
to. You just want the. the
validation. so to speak of a
second opinion.
William Whitney: You know. I I
don't know that it's reasonable
to expect somebody looking at
this for two to four weeks to
say. Oh. these numbers are way
off. or. Oh. these numbers are
too low. or these numbers are
perfect. You know. my concern.
as you know. is that we're
looking at a significant expense
to create a second source of
water and to fill a need of 15%
of the projected use of the Tom
water. So my interest would be.
my particular interest would be
to have them say. Yeah. this
seems like a reasonable
approach. Or there's. there's a
different way to attack this and
still meet your needs. So it's
more what's the what. rather
than how much does the what
cost. in my view. And
Anne Brensley: the only thing
that I'd say is. I think we.
from a liability standpoint.
absolutely should get a peer
review. And then also from
Michael. the scope of that peer
review. I would like to have it
include reviewing there
consistently is discussion about
how we have to keep the happy
hollow well going. and that
there's no alternative. And I
just haven't found support. full
support for that. And so I would
really like that peer review to
include that.
Carol Martin: Now. Michael. you
spoke to someone about that.
right?
Michael McCall: No. I I'm trying
to get a meeting with some
representatives of the
Massachusetts water resource
commission to to get that
information that Select Board
member bransley just indicated
Anne Brensley: I found. like.
just in my own research. you
know. an argument for a town to
say that it's just not
reasonable. and that's where at
least the cost starts to come
into play. And I just. I really
need it. People are saying it as
fact. and we don't have anything
that specifically states that is
back. And it could be that we
still decide. You know what. we
don't want to. we don't want to
fight it. and we're going to
keep. keep things the plan as
is. But I really want it
reviewed. because everybody
who's who's discussed it has
discussed it as fact. and I
don't believe that there's been
that it is fact. So that's all
I'd say about sorry.
Michael McCall: I've been told
we won't get something in
writing until we submit the
project. but we're being told
that this is what you need.
That's how it's been relayed to
me. So that's why I've written.
and I would like to hear that
firsthand. You know one thing I
do. you know. normally. when we
do peer reviews in town. and
somebody sending an application
to the town through one of our
boards. and we hire somebody to
do peer reviews. here. we're
doing a peer review of something
another. Con board has engaged
in. And sometimes. when you hire
folks. they you know they want
to try and get a result for you.
They try and be objective. but
sometimes they want to put their
own stamp on it. So you know.
they may find that what we're
doing is reasonably reasonable.
but to Select Board Member
Levine's point. they might say.
but we think you should do X. or
we recommend y. and. you know.
we run the risk of getting
something that opens up more
questions as well.
Tom Fay: So I either
Michael McCall: they're going to
say it's fine as is. it's too
big. It's too small. And it just
don't me personally. when you
ask me these. I don't know how
that affects what we doing when
we go into town meeting. this is
going to be something that's
going to need a two thirds vote.
So my endeavor to move forward.
I just hope it doesn't create
more confusion. and I hope it
settles the issue. For a lot
Tom Fay: of folks I am
Carol Martin: going to speak.
there was a chart that's So Ian.
what you're saying is. is that
you're thinking. if we don't get
proof. or it's confirmed that we
don't have to keep the help of
hollow. then you would. then we
would just go with a straight
MWRA correct.
Anne Brensley: It's just like.
you know. there's been a couple
people in town who've talked to
me about it. and they said I
really wasn't into it. but I
heard we have to do it
Carol Martin: right? So let's
say we don't. They come back and
say we don't have to maintain
the happy hollow. Are you saying
that? Then we would be in favor
of just with the MWRA 100%
Anne Brensley: it would just be
an influential factor in
discussing it. So there is a
chart back and forth on it to be
honest with you. Sorry.
Carol Martin: There is a chart
that was created by. I think.
abraham's group. That shows
because the cost of the water
that we would draw from MWRA is
more expensive than the water
that we draw from the wells. And
in particular. we do not pay for
it. We do not charge the talent
for any water that comes out of
the wells. We would have to pay
for every drop that we withdraw
from the MWRA. It shows that the
construction costs and the
initial costs are greater with
the dual source in the early
years. But then in the later
years. the MWRA would be as
expensive. not more expensive. I
think it's within the 10 year
mark is where they cross. We
probably should get that slide
for the board. So could we look
into.
Anne Brensley: I remember it. it
was. it was. it was very much
discussed. And it was a. was a
point well taken. You know.
again. we're heading into an
override. And it's also just
discussing. discussion with them
to know. I just want them to
know that it is or is not
possible. and if it's not. if it
is possible. okay. we still may.
may come out with the statement
outcome.
Unknown: All right. so
Carol Martin: I'm not sure
exactly where we're going to go
with this. What do we want to
do? Do we want to discuss this
again. next time? Or do we
Tom Fay: what do we want to do?
Doug Levine: Are we going to get
some more specifics first. and
then we should probably take a
vote. So let's put it on for
next
Unknown: time. Okay. where's my
trusty chat that chart? Carol. I
don't know where it is.
William Whitney: Okay. What
additional information are we
going to have between now and
the next second?
Doug Levine: Didn't we not have
what? What the actual cost of
this would be. the outlay?
Unknown: Do we have that number?
I thought my look into that 38
point 6 million. right? No. Of
this the peer review. Oh.
Michael McCall: well. I think
the only thing I can do is. do
our cues. point them to the
documents and ask them when they
submit their qualifications to
give me an estimate. you know.
And then we would have to
evaluate the qualifications and
then look at any price proposals
that they give us. But you
Doug Levine: also ask a few
fellow town managers or a list
serve that you're a part of of
what cost. if they had an idea
of what that cost would be for a
peer review.
Michael McCall: I did not know.
I'm
Doug Levine: saying is that? Is
that a possibility?
Michael McCall: I could. I
looked around and tried to find
somebody who had done a project
similar where they did a peer
review. And I found one town
that did a peer review on our
high school project. and that
was one of the communities that
I got a sample RFQ from. I could
go back and ask them what they
spent on it. But some of these
people haven't done it in recent
years. the ones that I got
there. if you. Years. five more
years old.
Unknown: I guess I would ask
too. There's always.
Michael McCall: I guess the
concern that you do a peer
review in the in the Board of
Public Works still wants to do
their dual source for their own
reasons. and I don't know where
that puts both boards. If your
peer review says we could do it
without the dual source. and the
Board of Public Works still
believes that the dual sources
is the right way to go. I don't
know what happens with that
result.
Carol Martin: That's a valid
point. because it's not our
project until they ask us to
support
Tom Fay: DEP. but in the end.
it's the residents that are
going to decide this question by
the Tom meeting Lisa. So more
information the better. right?
Carol Martin: All right. so
we'll get some more information.
and I will put that on the
agenda for September 2. because
I have put it on the list. So
there.
Tom Fay: why don't we move
Michael McCall: now back to I
can try the list serve. or. as
Select Board Member Levine had
indicated. I don't know if I can
help put together a scope of
work and an RFQ and get that
out. get some early indications
from people between now and the
second though.
Carol Martin: Thank you.
everyone. Sorry if I'm hopping
in I think I'm getting
Unknown: a drag or something.
because sometimes I miss then.
whatever.
Carol Martin: Okay. so if Mr.
Gould is available. we're all
set with this topic. right then
we'll move on. Thank you. Thank
you for your help with the
questions. by the way. Um. so if
Mr. Gould from CMG is available.
I see him there. I'd like to
recognize him. and we'll have
our discussion of 195 main
street. including. but not
limited to next steps to address
the site contamination. So if
you want to unmute and perhaps
put your camera on. we'll The
floor is yours. Could somebody
tell for the public who's
watching what page the we're in
the packet. it's around 130
Unknown: something. isn't it?
Hello. How are you?
Carol Martin: Hi. The floor is
going to be always we're just
pulling up
William Whitney: page 130 Thank
you. Page 130
Carol Martin: in the in the
packet. you'll have the four
documents that we are looking at
here. so the floor is yours.
sir.
Unknown: Okay. joining us.
Appreciate it. Okay. apologize
ben gould: for the spooky
lighting. I had to arrange this
as best I could. Are you able to
hear me? Okay.
Tom Fay: yes. Okay. good.
ben gould: All right. So since
the last time we have spoke with
the board. CMG had installed six
more monitoring wells at four of
them at 195 main. and two of
them on 207 main. although one
of them is right on the boundary
with 201
Tom Fay: main. So we have
ben gould: give me a little
scatter notes. I think we have
11 monitor wells at the moment
that are functioning. and we did
collect PFAS samples from all
the new wells and one of the
previous wells. just as a check
on see if anything changed. And
honestly. it's alarming that we
have as high levels as we do.
I'm aware that you have the
table of our groundwater quality
data
Tom Fay: for all of our
monitoring wells.
ben gould: The point to note. I
guess. is that new Well. MW 21
has 532. parts per trillion of
PFAS. six in it. so we are
something like 40 times above
the standard on that particular
well. that well is not
necessarily the most upgrading.
but it's probably the most
upgrading. one that's closest to
The Middle School. which sort of
reinforces the idea that perhaps
the middle school septic field
is. if not the source. then it's
a major contributor to the
source of this PFAS
contamination that we're looking
at. So the mapping. I believe
you've seen the mapping as well.
We had to enlist the services of
the town surveyor. so thank you
for allowing to do that. but
with his able assistance. we're
able to get much better readings
on the groundwater elevations.
which allows us to do the
groundwater flow mapping may not
be obvious from the figure.
Because there's a lot of contour
lines on it. but that's a very
shallow gradient. It's. in other
words. it's not steep at all.
If. if you put a marble on a
surface that steep. it wouldn't
move. So we don't have an awful
lot of gradient pushing it. But
what is there is pushing it in
the general direction of Dudley
pond. No surprise there. but we
do have confirmation on that. So
that's that's about all we've
learned in the past few months.
And it is a slow process. as we
talked before. It's an iterative
process. The next iteration. now
that we have this information.
will be to put additional
monitoring wells in. collect
groundwater samples from those
for PFAS analysis. and once
again. see what we see. I would
like to say we can do this in
one more iteration. but I'm
skeptical that we will. There's
only so many wells you can put
in a time. and I don't want to
waste the town's money putting
in a well that turns out to be
in a bad location. so I believe
it'll be two more iterations
before I can really get my head
wrapped around where the source
of this PFAS is coming from.
It's also possible. I you know.
we have to take in any
possibility at this point. It's
also possible that the source
is. in fact. not the middle
school. but it's in the general
direction. And we'd have to
continue going upgrade it. until
we can find something that is
the source. So that's that's
what the next steps will be. I
think that's about all I really
had prepared. So any questions?
Carol Martin: Thank you. So
let's start with Doug. please.
Oh. did you want to speak with
Michael. I'm sorry. Mike Doug.
can
Michael McCall: you hold on? I
did share with Mr. Gould. Mr.
Lowry. question about. you know.
reporting. and I was hoping Mr.
Gould could address a couple
things. We had some Mr. Gould.
before you're on. We had some
questions in public comment
period. I did share one of the
emails with you. Typically. my
office puts things up after we
have the consultant in. So now
that Mr. Gould has been here to
answer questions from the board.
I will ensure that the latest
test numbers in the maps get up
on the 195 website. Part of the
reason they didn't go out is
because I didn't want them out
until the board had a chance to
hear from Mr. Gould and ask
questions. But there was a
question raised by Mr. Lowry. I
don't know if he mentioned it
tonight. but he did earlier in
the day about should have this
been reported earlier to DEP Mr.
Gould and I corresponded back
and forth already. but I thought
you might want to explain a
little bit about the numbers and
what our obligations are and
what the timeline is. and what
we will ultimately have to do if
we locate the source of the
PFAS. I know that's a compound
question. but that all came in
this evening. Mr. Gould. okay. I
understood so. Mr. Lowery's
point. if I can just summarize
quickly. he was concerned that
perhaps the town had failed to
notify DEP about something they
should have notified DEP about.
which was the fact that the PFAS
results from the second round of
sampling we did was
substantially higher than it had
been in the past. So I'll
reiterate my response to you.
ben gould: DEP has certain rules
about what needs to be reported
in what time frame we are in a
zone two at 195 main street and
surrounding area for the happy
hollow well fields. That means
that DEP categorizes water as
RC. GW. one reportable
concentration. or the type of
groundwater that is used for
drinking purposes. So all of
that said. that means the number
we have to look at is 20
nanograms per liter. or parts
per trillion of the PFAS six the
sum of those six compounds. That
is what we looked at. And we did
notify the DEP on behalf of the
town. within the 120 days that
they allow for that sort of
notification. We didn't rush it.
We didn't drag our feet. We
notified them. I believe. on day
118 or 119 so that was the duly
the due notification that DEP
requires. based on what you
find. Now. since. since that
time. we did find higher levels
in the groundwater. However. the
groundwater category hasn't
changed. to my knowledge. and
this is backed up by information
I received from the Wayland
water department. I'm sorry. the
Wayland Board of Health. my
mistake that there are no
private drinking water supply
wells within 500 feet. That
would change the category a
little bit. but there are none.
again. to the best of my
knowledge. and because. Of that
finding a higher level doesn't
change the fact that we already
exceeded the threshold that
requires notification within 120
days. There's nothing in the DEP
regulations that says. tell them
if you find a much higher level.
unless there are certain
circumstances that trip in. I
could give some examples. but
I'll just summarize it by saying
195 main street doesn't fall
into any of those particular
categories that would require
additional notification to DEP
in such a circumstance. So if
that is sufficient answer. I'll
stop there. If it's not. tell me
and I'll go on.
Michael McCall: I think that's
good. What do you think?
Michael. no. I I just wanted the
board to hear and the public who
was viewing what. what was
related to me earlier today.
Unknown: Thank you very much.
Um. to go to the board members
now. So Ben.
Doug Levine: thank you. And I'm
just looking back at some of my
former notes when you were with
us earlier this year in the
spring and when you were with us
at the end of last year. Another
item that Michael was asking
about that I'm curious as well.
or is it completely unrelated?
Is it? Does it change the
overall timeline of our original
plan of cleaning the soils. or
should we look be bifurcating
this and looking at these as two
separate issues. the PFAS issue
and the soil cleanup issue.
ben gould: Okay. let me see if I
get past this. Well. you have a
problem with soil at the site.
You have a problem with
groundwater at the site. They
are interrelated. but not
necessarily dependent on each
other. So the groundwater passes
through the soil under the
ground. That means that any soil
in the ground has been affected
by whatever is in the
groundwater.
Tom Fay: That's a problem with
PFAS. in that
ben gould: if we go the route of
excavating out soil. that soil
will have PFAS in it. and
possibly to a level that might
even be cost prohibitive for
disposal. PFAS disposal is
difficult at best and quite
expensive. and the higher the
concentration in that soil. the
more they ask to dispose of it.
There's a few facilities that
will take it at almost any
level. but they're getting an
exorbitant amount of money for
that. and we don't want to go
there. So circling back the soil
issues that we're looking at.
there's some petroleum and soil.
as I've pointed out before. It's
a gasoline type problem that
will eventually go away on its
own. It does not seem to be the
kind of problem that would stop
any construction on the whatever
the town decides they want to do
with this property. It does mean
that you should be cautious
about vapor intrusion issues.
That's because of gasoline
vapors. the PFAS. even though
it's in groundwater. is not
particularly volatile. It it
doesn't pick up in the soil
vapor and migrate inside
buildings the way gasoline
vapors do. So to go back to what
we had discussed back in the
spring. there were three
scenarios for dealing with the
problems other than PFAS. And
I'm I'm holding fast to that.
that I do think that there are
three scenarios. And the third
scenario. of let's just address
this with some vapor mitigation.
is not only the most cost
effective. but it's the most
sensible way to look at this. If
we don't have to dig soil up.
let's not because it will be
very expensive to get rid of it.
Doug Levine: That is helpful.
The other question I had.
particularly toward the PFAS.
is. does there become a level
that is so high that it becomes
exceptionally difficult to
treat. Or if you you can treat
any amount of a lower level of
PFAS. You can treat a higher
level of PFAS for drinking water
purposes.
ben gould: Okay. for drinking
water purposes. the only
effective treatment currently is
to filter the PFAS out which
it's it's not particles in water
that you can take out. like. you
know. particles of silt and
water. It's not a. not a grit
filter. It has to be a specific
kind of filter that will absorb
the PFAS as it passes through.
There's two ways to do it.
activated carbon or charcoal.
same thing. or a ion resin.
which is more effective. cost
more upfront. in a long run.
depending on how much water
you're running through. it be
more cost effective. I have not
seen the design plans for what
the water department is
currently doing on the happy
hollow wealth fields. but I'm
fairly safe. Certain that
they're using an ion resin bed
to remove it. because. again.
with large volumes of water.
that's more cost effective with
small volumes of water. such as
a private drinking water supply.
well. for a single house. then
the carbon is probably more
effective up to a point. To
answer your question directly.
yes. it costs more to remove a
higher level simply because it
uses up the filter meter faster
with the charcoal or activated
carbon. You basically dispose of
it once it gets saturated with
the PFAS so that it starts to
break through. That's the
official term we use. And you
detect it beyond where the
filter is. then you need to
replace that filter carbon. And
the way we replace it is you
take it out and you give it to a
company that will then dispose
of it properly within a resin
bed. There are ways that you can
just recharge the resins so that
they can absorb it. but that
produces some extremely high
concentration PFAS of reverse
osmosis backwash. and that
becomes a hazardous waste that
needs to be disposed of as a
hazardous waste. I believe that
is probably what the water
department is doing now. And the
resin beds will last quite a
while. but they won't last
forever. and the higher the
concentration becomes. the
quicker that they will get used
up. I have sat in seminars
listening to people who market
this stuff. and they're not
scared of even 10.000 parts per
trillion in in a water supply.
I've I've seen some of the stuff
where they're actually dealing
with production waste water
that's even higher
concentrations than that. It
just requires more constant
backwashing of the resin beds
and then concentrating what's
left until you have a. you know.
a few barrels of very toxic
material that you then send to a
hazardous waste landfill for a
lot of money.
Unknown: Thanks. Ben. good care.
Okay. Bill. would you like to be
next Sure?
William Whitney: Two questions.
Ben. one is if. as we go forward
and do additional testing. and
you chase down to the best of
your ability the source. What
obligation does the town have to
address. uh. eliminating or
mitigating the contamination of
the source?
ben gould: Okay. you know.
forgive me for repeating myself.
but I'll tell you the same stuff
I did back in the spring. DEP.
DEP expects that anytime that
there's a release that gets a
tracking number such as this.
that the responsible party. or
potentially responsible party.
will then make every effort
reasonable to eliminate the
problem. Their goal is to
achieve background at all sites.
all sites with a tracking number
within the state. That's the
goal. The reality is that we can
certainly fix the soil
contamination problems. or at
least address them to the point
where they're not harming
anybody. and there's no
indication that they will harm
anybody. That's what DEP calls
no significant risk. and it
continues on of harm to human
health. public welfare. safety
or the environment. So we want
to get to that level of no
significant risk. If we do that.
whether that means bringing the
contamination to background or
not. that level of no
significant risk will allow you
to achieve a permanent solution.
That's the end point the DEP
wants you to be at. They would
like to get background. but
they're happy with the no
significant risk and a permanent
solution. So that's that's our
options on. on fixing the
problem at this level of PFAS
contamination. I honestly do not
foresee that we are going to be
able to get to a no significant
risk level. Forgive me for
saying it this way. as long as
the happy hollow well field is
there and inactive. I'm not
suggesting we close down the
happy hollow well field. I'm
just saying that the only way.
with this level of contamination
groundwater you're going to get
there is to wait for it to
dissipate. and at the level
we're looking at now. I predict
something on the order of
centuries before this dissipates
low enough to meet the current
DEP standard. And I think you're
well aware that EPA has has
issued a rule for drinking water
for a much lower PFAS standard.
DEP has stated publicly and
privately that they will adjust
the state standard to match or
possibly be even lower than the
EPA standard when EPA finally.
you know. drops the other shoe
and then starts enforcing it.
you. Um. the current
administration of the
government. of federal
government. has decided that the
PFAS issue is is not as urgent
as some have pushed in the past.
Therefore. they've suspended
enforcing that much lower
drinking water standard at the
moment. That doesn't mean it's
going away. They haven't changed
the standard. They just have
suspended enforcing it. So at
some point it's going to be even
more difficult to work with
this. So what we're looking at
best scenario is a temporary
solution where that's a it's
sort of a closure. but not a
complete closure. because you do
have to continue monitoring
until such time as you can
achieve a permit solution.
which. as I just said. is likely
to be in the range of centuries.
Now I can't predict what's going
to happen in 50 years. or even
tomorrow. probably. but I
predict that somebody is going
to be motivated enough to figure
out. what the heck can we do to
fix PFAS? Because there's going
to be a lot of money in it for
somebody to find a way to
actually fix this problem. There
is currently no real fix. You
can filter it out of the water.
You can remove the soil that has
contamination in it. I suppose
there are actually ways to treat
the soil to get it out. but
that's so expensive that no one
bothers. It's just disposing.
But as far as actually trying to
degrade the PFAS compound to
make it something less toxic.
Tom Fay: I don't see any
ben gould: treatment strategies
on the horizon that will work in
situ. that will work in the
groundwater. So I'm I'm sorry to
be the bearer of bad news again
and again on this one. but this
PFAS problem is not likely to go
away at all. and it's us getting
to a temporary solution will be
difficult. but that's where I'm
trying to steer us. At the
moment. with luck. we can get to
a temporary solution within five
years or so.
Tom Fay: Thank you. And
William Whitney: the second
question is. when do you
anticipate you'll be in a
position to sponsor another PIP
meeting?
Tom Fay: Okay. the way the PIP
is structured.
ben gould: we solicit public
comment whenever there is a
major milestone report going
into the state or when we're
about to change strategy or how
we want to address the problem.
Currently. the next milestone
report will be the phase two
comprehensive site assessment.
It technically due November 1 of
this year. I do not believe we
will have enough information to
meet the DEP requirements to
submit a phase two comprehensive
site assessment by November 1 of
this year. Therefore. I have
proposed to Mr. McCall and
anybody else who is in the loop
that we send in DEP a request
for a notice of delay. This is
something that they get
frequently. I've done lots and
lots of them. When you have a
difficult problem that you
haven't got your hands wrapped
around enough to get to the next
stage. you ask for more time to
do it. Initially. we'll ask for
one more year. That'll push it
to November 1 of 26 and
hopefully by then. we'll at
least know enough to know how
big the problem is. and we can
move forward with the phase two
comprehensive site assessment.
So that's really what I'm
looking at for the next PIP
meeting. However. I can also say
this. if there is sufficient
public interest and request.
then we can certainly do just a
status public meeting and
provide information on that. I
don't want to put a timeline on
that. I think you're all aware
currently experiencing a
personal catastrophe with my
wife being a hospital. and
honestly. I'm probably the only
person at CMG that is qualified
to give the presentation for
this particular site. We have
two other LSPs on staff. They
are definitely qualified by
training and expertise to do the
same thing. but they're not as
familiar with the site. and I'd
be reluctant to put them into
the learning curve that's
required to get to do a pip
meeting soon.
Unknown: So that all of that
said.
ben gould: I would say that it
makes sense to look to have
another PIP meeting. maybe at
the beginning of next year. just
as an informative meeting. and
then there'll be one a few
months after that. when we have
enough information to do a phase
two where we will put out a
draft phase two report. solicit
comment and hold a meeting to
discuss that.
Unknown: So Anne did.
Anne Brensley: That's a lot of
information. good and bad. I
mean. I think most people can
put it in context. even if you
don't have a a
Unknown: LSP background. So
ben gould: I try to say it in a
way that's understandable.
Anne Brensley: Yeah. So one of
the things that Ben brought up
that I think I'll just make sure
that I'm right about this Ben.
but I think could be a really
important point that maybe
wasn't verbally expressed. is if
you're having if the PFAS levels
are so high and really the most
cost effective option becomes
not digging into it. Then your
ability to do any type of
development or project where you
may have to go into the ground
to create a foundation becomes
incredibly difficult and may not
be something that we could even
require or allow.
ben gould: I would put it this
way. you would want to put a
foundation in area with the
least amount of PFAS. as long as
that's it works for the use of
the property. So at this point.
that means moving as far east as
you could.
Anne Brensley: would be okay. It
would be small. I think it's
just important from our from our
own assessment as a town. as to
future plans for this. that
capping would probably be the
cheapest for certain portions of
the land.
ben gould: right? And as as we
discussed before the the option
of doing just vapor mitigation
would also involve having an AOL
to prevent direct contact with
the metals problem. So that's.
that's a paper exercise. It
shouldn't affect anything about
construction.
Tom Fay: Thank you. Tom. first
of all. Mr. Gold. thank you for
hearing tonight. Appreciate your
time and appreciate your clear
answers and your good
communicator. My question is
this. based on your comments.
while it might be helpful the
town staff to inspect the middle
school septic system. it sounds
like it might be premature until
you do some more well work.
That's fair. right at this
ben gould: point. it appears to
be the most likely source. so
it's my prime suspect. if you
will. But we haven't proven
anything. and it will require
putting wells closer to the
septic field. probably in the
septic field itself. and then
some upgrading of it to show
that it diminishes past that.
Now. if we do that. and we find
out the highest levels we've
detected turn out to be in the
septic field or just downgrading
of it. and then as you go
further away. it drops off that
makes it not just the most
likely suspect. that makes it
the almost certain source. So
that's what we're looking for at
the moment. But again. it's
conjecture. I have the term DEP
uses a conceptual site model
where you form a hypothesis and
then you test it. So my
hypothesis is that it could be
the middle school septic system
where some past disposal of PFAS
unintentionally. absolutely. of
perhaps cleaning compounds for
the floors that's been brought
up as a possible source of it.
Possibly some other things I
know. food wrappers tend to have
a lot of PFAS in them as well.
So it's possible just from
dishwashing activities in the
cafeteria. So those are the
reasons. I suspect the middle
school septic system.
Unknown: You may have this
information already. and if you
think it's not helpful. please
let us know. But might be
helpful for Tom manager to reach
out to the Board of Health staff
and have them provide you with
information as to any
inspections that have been most
recently done that septic
system. Leave it up to you and
the time manager. Thank
Michael McCall: you. I've
already had the Board of Health
working with Mr. Gould as well
as. as you heard before the town
surveyor. so we've been trying
to utilize town staff to assist
where possible.
Tom Fay: Yes. and and the
ben gould: the Board of Health
has provided me with the plans
for the existing septic where it
is in their leech field. They
also said that that system was
installed long enough ago. They
don't really have the
engineering specs on it. and I
do not currently have any
inspections of the system. but
that would tell me very little.
I think those inspections are
designed to guarantee that the
septic system is capable of
receiving as much inflow as it
gets. So. They're not designed
to find out if there's PFAS in
it or not. CMG. on the other
hand. we know how to find out if
there's PFAS in the septic
system itself. and whether
there's any still in the septic
leaching field. So I certainly
welcome all the help from the
town that we can get. But in
this case. I believe we need to
be a little bit invasive on
Tom Fay: finding where it is.
Thank you.
Carol Martin: Thank you. Mr.
Gold. for coming. Everyone's had
their questions. right? We're
all set. Yep. Okay. great. Thank
you so much. I do echo. You
know. on behalf of the board.
how kind you were to come
tonight. I know you sent an
email. I think it was late last
week. I was meeting with
Michael. and you said. Oh. I
could come next week. And I we
jumped right on it. and we
appreciate you coming this
really important question and
information that we want. and we
appreciate the work you're doing
for us on our behalf. So thanks
for that. Thank you very much.
and look forward to better news
the next time maybe. Thank you.
All right. so that the next
agenda item was I did actually
happen to look at it. Can
somebody tell if we are live
stream? It says I've gotten a
text about an hour ago that said
we weren't.
Unknown: I just saw it that we
weren't the way cam was not
working.
Carol Martin: All right. okay.
next on our agenda. it's going
to be in the supplemental
packet. And I don't know what
page it's on. but there was a
memo from Michael that say
follow up is the proposal.
There's a from the fiscal 2027.
Budget Task Force recommending
our recommendation regarding
that financing of 60 River Road.
which we all know is the DEP W
building. as you know that that
committee that they've put
together. task force that
they've put together. I should
say. is trying to avoid an
operating override for FY 27 we
are it's it's getting harder and
harder to close the gap every
year. And this is one suggestion
that has come up. And so
Michael. I'm going to cede the
floor to you so that you can
speak to the memo in the
suggestion. and then we'll have
questions.
Michael McCall: Thank you. Madam
Chair. So as Madam Chair has
indicated. we have this working
group. There's some information
about it in the memo. We meeting
every other two weeks. roughly.
And Mr. Kevin. he had started
putting together a model. We're
putting in some of the worst
case scenarios. numbers for
state aid. and what we some of
the unknowns we won't get until
the beginning of the next
calendar year. including state
aid. our health care numbers.
and we're trying to refine those
numbers. Mr. Kevin E and the
school business manager been
working to tighten up payrolls.
We're going to have some
outstanding collective
bargaining issues for all of our
unions. so we're trying to
factor that all in. and trying
to look at areas that we could
cut or where we could find
savings in other strategies. And
so an idea came up within the
group about some of the levy
debt that we are carrying. which
could be characterized is
excluded debt. And this memo.
the first pass. was actually
created by one of the members.
Mr. Oh Hurley. He took a stab at
this draft. We. I should say. we
have some citizen members. We
have members of the school
administration. We have the
Chair of the Finance Committee.
Ms power. Spirlet is there. Mr.
Kevin is there. I'm there. The
Chair. Madam Chair. has been in
this working group. And so
Mister o'herley. he took a stab
at this memo. and then mister
Kevin and I put our touches on
it. and that's what you have
before you this evening. But the
gist of it is. and a lot of this
was related to me. that back in.
I believe. 2013 when they were
looking to finance the the new
DEP W facility. the the vote at
the Select Board did not pass.
You need a two thirds vote of
the board to put a debt
exclusion on the ballot. So Tom
meeting had to come back and
fund the finance financing of
this new. what we now know as
DEP W facility through the levy.
And so it is occupying
approximately $700.000 of levy
capacity year over year. and
will into the future. I think
we're roughly at the midpoint on
on servicing that debt. So I.
Even if we wanted to address it
for FY 27 we'll also have to
address it for the fiscal years
going beyond. because if we have
to come up with a number. if we
can avoid an operating override
this year. we're very confident
we're going to have to come back
for FY 28 and probably come with
a number that will address FY.
2829 and 30. and that levy debt
would be incorporated in that
amount. So the thought was. if
we were to convert this tom.
meeting has already approved the
funding if the board wanted to
have a special election. we
could ask the voters if they
want to reclassify this or re
characterize this as excluded
debt. That would do a couple
things. Would help us planning
for the outer years if we're
having a an operational
override. and it would also give
us some breathing room or
assurances if. while we're
trying to close this gap. which
is right now looking to be
between 750.000 and
approximately $1.5 million if
some of those numbers don't
break Our way and are worse than
we anticipated. We might have
some additional levy capacity
this this fiscal year. FY. 27 or
our plan. So the consensus from
the majority of the folks was
this is something we should look
into. Mr. Herlihy made a first
pass on the memo. Mr. Kevin and
I updated and put in additional
information. and we're bringing
it to you for your
consideration. I would also say
that I would also encourage the
board to get input from the
finance committee itself on
their thoughts on this. but it
if it is voted by the taxpayers
the day after the election.
there's no immediate impact on
the taxpayers. However. as with
unused levy capacity. depending
upon what our budget is next
year. how much we're looking to
spend. we may wind up utilizing
if we choose not to do this. and
we don't foresee that we can
close this gap later on. in
early October. late September.
we'll likely have to consider
doing an operational over So
this is one mechanism that may
allow us some breathing room. so
to speak. in the event the
numbers aren't there. and allow
us to go a little further into
the beginning of calendar year
FY 26 to see how those numbers
shake out on state aid and Our
health care costs. And that's.
that's pretty much where we are
right now in the planning
stages. And so this is one
thought that we would ask for
your consideration on this. All
right.
Unknown: so the board has
questions would like to start
and um.
Anne Brensley: I don't think I
fully understood um. the context
behind this when I read it. Um.
so let me come back to me.
because I want to absorb
everything that Michael just
said
Tom Fay: and reread it. Okay.
thank you. Bill
William Whitney: Michael.
constructively. are we swapping
a capital debt exclusion for an
operating override?
Michael McCall: I don't want to
say yes. I don't want to say no.
and I hate to sound like a
politician or a lawyer. there's
always that maybe. sorry. sorry.
yeah. I think if we don't
consider this. more than likely.
we'll have an operating
override. because we're going to
have to make a determination
this fall. because we Can't wait
till early January and see the
numbers. We will have to make a
best guess. and we're trying to
fine tune those. All this does
is. if we were to consider this
and the voters approve it. it
gives us one more tool in the
toolbox to avoid it. And I did
put a paragraph in there about
the town clerk. There are a lot
of municipal elections in
November every year. This is not
a state or federal election in
November. but a lot of cities
have their elections in
November. and the clerk said
they routinely get a lot of
citizens show up on the first
Tuesday of November. So it. Make
the most sense if we were going
to do it. and that's what the
timeline is there for your
consideration. But I think if
you want to interpret it that
way. that if we're trying to
avoid an override question in
the spring by asking people to
consider taking this out of the
operating budget and making
excluded debt. that fair
characterization.
William Whitney: So I know no
one on this board is a
politician. but rather
interested in government. But I
wonder. is it easier to get an
override. an operating override.
past where you can talk about
the consequence of not doing it
in terms of. you know.
diminution of services. layoffs
and so forth. versus basically
getting a debt exclusion for
debt that's already been issued.
Unknown: Yeah. Mr.
Michael McCall: Kevin. he would.
if he was here. would probably
tell you best practices for that
type of debt. for a large scale
public works project or other
type of construction project
that's only temporary. is
usually the type of debt you
would put in a debt exclusion
question that you would put to
the voters. and if approved.
then Tom meeting would fund. Tom
meeting did authorize the
borrowing. it's now. do we take
it out of the operating budget?
Now. strategically. if. if the
board considered this. we get an
answer one way or another. If
residents don't like that. you
can still come back and we could
ask for an override in the
spring. on the spring ballot.
It's just. as I said. a strategy
that this working group wanted
to consider in as a. you know.
kind of a last ditch effort to
avoid an override by continuing.
We're not going to stop trying
to find ways to close this gap.
but it's kind of a relief valve.
so to speak. if you had that
additional levy capacity. if
something were to go wrong.
Thank you.
Doug Levine: Michael. I had a
couple of quick questions for
you Sure.
Unknown: Sorry. I was
Carol Martin: muted. No problem.
Unknown: This idea. is it. I
Doug Levine: wouldn't say
commonplace. but has it been
used by a number of other
municipalities? And part two of
the question is. how is it
looked upon by ratings agencies.
if at all?
Michael McCall: So number two. I
don't know the answer to that.
and I did ask Town Council. they
said it would be possible to do
this. I don't know if anybody
else has tried it. I think
typically. most people would say
that this would go to be a debt
exclusion ballot question. and I
understand there. there may have
been reasons at the time why it
didn't go on the ballot and why
the board voted. I wasn't here.
Mr. O'herli. he did his best to
fill in that information on the
vote in the top half of the
memo. So I don't have an answer
for either one of your questions
right off the top my head. but I
can do some research.
Unknown: Okay. that'll be
helpful. Thank you. Tom just to
clarify. Mr. Town manager. you
saying that we the issue would
go before the voters prior to
the annual town election in the
spring or at that time we would
Michael McCall: the proposal
here would be for your
consideration to call a special
election on the first Tuesday in
November. when. typically. most
people in their minds feel
there's either a state or
federal election. This is an off
year. It's a municipal election
year. but still. a lot of people
feel that there's an election
day coming to do it. At that
time. the town clerk estimated
it would cost roughly $8.000 to
perform the special election
with one question on it. and
that would give you some indicia
of what to expect in the early
calendar year. if the state aid
numbers and health care numbers
change. if it didn't fail or we
didn't do it. we may still have
to ask for an override question
and the April ballot.
Unknown: okay? And. To so
Carol Martin: I had asked
Michael to put together this
memo to outline this. because it
is to Doug's point. something
that's not commonly done. and we
are being asked to consider
converting a levy debt to
exclude it like 13 years later.
So I think it would require some
some explaining for the concept
to be fully understood. And I
also asked Michael to to talk a
little bit about the strategy of
what we would do. what the Tom
would do. what the finance team
would do with that $700.000 that
would be part of the now unused
levy debt. Because I think we
really need to know what we're
asking the voters to do. And I
mean. as he's explained. we have
this gap. potential gap of 1.5
million. and if any of the
numbers don't come and the hope
is that some of the big numbers.
like the insurance and the state
aid bounce in our direction. but
if they don't bounce in our
direction. or. even worse.
bounce away from our direction.
this would provide this. this
gap. I mean. I think Bill raised
a good point. but you know.
there's. there's a number of
strategies that could be used
with these funds. They could
spend all of them. or they could
spend some and then hold some
out. you know. find news levy
capacity. you know. going into
the next year. which is always a
good. a good strategy as well.
And I also. so I think. I think
you did a really nice job. I
appreciate it. He. He did listen
to all my suggestions. Didn't
like them all. but he did listen
to them all. And I appreciate
it. because I think it's very
reads very clearly. I think you
have to read it a few couple
times. maybe. but I think it's
very clearly done. And I I think
that I thank you. Michael. very
nicely done. But
Michael McCall: I would
encourage you also to solicit
input from the finance
committee. because. let's say.
hypothetically. we did this. and
the voters allowed us to do
this. we still have to go
through the normal budget
process where we present it gets
vetted. The finance committee
would make its recommendations
relative to. you know. the
percentage. year over year
increase and how much levy we
have. And this working group is
still committed to trying
closing this gap. But again.
we're looking for some ways to
have a fallback plan in the
event everything doesn't break
our way.
Carol Martin: And if you just
for not full disclosure. but
maybe just entertainment. if you
will. In my first year on the
Finance Committee. we made a
recommendation to the board of
selectmen to fund the new DEP W
building with excluded debt. I
took that vote. I did vote it
with the finance committee to
support that at that time. but
the Select Board. as you know.
voted three two to not do that.
Unknown: Yes. Tom. Mr. Tom
manager. can you give us a sense
of what you're hearing from your
contacts. state in the state
house on the impact of federal
cuts on municipalities between
now and the spring. because I
think that's a factor here.
Michael McCall: I again wrote to
FEMA today to ask if there's any
update on on the snakebrook Dam.
that project is still on hold in
this large project review. and
I've been told. when I speak to
my peers and others. that money
that's coming down from the feds
is slowing down the Governor and
I may have circulated A an MMA
post to the board recently. had
asked to have emergency 9c
powers to make cuts to the
budget in the middle of the year
should certain funding sources
dry up. So there is some concern
at the state level that they
aren't going to get all the
monies that they anticipate from
the federal government. and I
would anticipate there would be
some level of trickle down to
the cities and towns. And I know
the MMA has already written. you
know. a position to the governor
with concerns about the
potential for these 9c emergency
cuts. So I think people are
mindful that there could be some
impact the cities and towns. but
so far. we haven't been tipped
off that we're going to get
anything less than was expected
by what the legislature had put
forward for. This current fiscal
year. but again. it's January.
when the governor usually
releases her preliminary numbers
for state aid and our cherry
sheets. And I think that's where
we might get the bad news. Thank
you.
Carol Martin: So one of the
things I'm going to put this on
the agenda for the next meeting.
obviously. But one of the one of
the parts of this proposal is
that we're being asked and not
only to consider this. but also
to consider holding a special
election on November 2. first.
Tuesday. whatever it is. And
that means that we will have to
if. if we were going to do it.
held the election November. we
would have to have this decision
by our September 15 meeting. I
mean. the the flip of the coin
is. is that we could also say
we're not going to hold the
election on November 1 six.
whatever it is. and maybe hold
it in December or whatever. But
the fact is that if we go
forward. we do need to make a
decision fairly quickly. So
first question I have is. what
other information do we need
beside. besides obviously
Tom Fay: getting input from.
Carol Martin: whom would you
like? What? What would you like
us to round up for this
discussion?
Unknown: I think we need to hear
from Finance Director. okay. are
we just kicking always trying to
do a band aid approach to a much
bigger problem. and isn't. is it
something that can be put off
till the spring with the
creative the creative idea. But.
you know. this concern that
we're going to be the same boat.
you know. come February and
March budget wise.
Carol Martin: yeah. I think
that's a good point Tom. I think
Michael. I think. said that is
that this is a suggestion. or a
suggested solution for FY 27 the
task so Michael hop in. because
I have not been to as many of
these meetings as obviously
Michael has been. But the
concern is. is that if there
were to be a debt exclusion or
there's a large project going
through in the spring. whether
it's debt exclusion or not.
which is the MWRA project.
right? So the thought was to not
have two big
Tom Fay: projects on
Carol Martin: that. plus an
operating override. So this is a
suggested solution. And then the
thought is. as Michael
mentioned. that probably we will
most likely be looking at an
operating override. FY. 28 and I
think that we probably. and
that's the one thing about this.
Is what I will say is
Unknown: that I can't.
Carol Martin: don't really want
to maybe have two upgrades on
this operating overrides in the
same year. or overrides in the
same year. But the fact is. I
think this one will require a
lot of explanation in order for
it to be. you know. fully
understood. because it is to
Doug's point. It's an unusual so
it's creative. There's no two
ways about it. but the end. but
it is a band aid. because it's
just so I think these are things
we have to model. So maybe we'll
have. maybe we have Brian come
in and speak with us. the
finance director. Does that seem
Michael McCall: okay? Michael.
yeah. we can ask him. I think
maybe a request of Chairman
Judas of the finance committee
to wait have his committee weigh
in. You know. one of the things
we've talked about is is. in
part. the strategy of trying to
hold off having an operating
overriding FY 27 so that we
could finish the collective
bargaining that's all going to
begin this fall. we would have
better numbers to try and plan
an override if we. if we decide
not to do this in a couple of
months. we don't think we can
close this gap. we're going to
have to come to the board and
ask for an override. and then
we're going to have to try and
determine the amount. whether
we're asking for one year or
multiple years. And develop.
typically. what you do is you
develop two different budgets.
and you have your ballot
question in the spring. and if
it passes. you present one in
town meeting. If it fails. you
present the other. And you know.
it's not that anybody's trying
to avoid doing all that work.
it's if we could get some
indication and some breathing
room. we might be able to get
through FY 27 finish all these
numbers with the collective
bargaining and other things. so
that we could have a better
presentation for those outer
years with more accurate and.
Numbers when we go and ask for
an override. which we think is
unavoidable for FY 28
Carol Martin: so I think before
we ask the Finance Committee to
come in. I personally would like
us to kind of narrow in. what
are we thinking? Are we looking
to do this levy conversion. on
this debt conversion. or are we
looking. you know. to. maybe. to
put Bill's point. just asked for
an override. Is it a one year?
Is it a three year? So before we
ask them to come in. it isn't
the policy that we have that we
always seek input from them when
we have an override. when we're
contemplating an override. so we
certainly would want to get
their input. But if then they
come in with charts and explain
it. this or that and the other.
And I think we probably rather
than just an off the cuff thing.
we think this is a great idea or
a bad idea. I think we really
need to wait till we figure out
what it is. We're asked.
Unknown: we're think.
contemplating. does anybody else
have any comments on this? All
right. thank you very much. I
think we are now moving on.
Choose. is it the town manager's
report? Is it? Sorry? I
Carol Martin: think we're in the
Tom leaders report. So back to
Michael.
Michael McCall: Thank you. Madam
Chair. I just want to remind
folks that I'm going to be
holding my town manager office
hours on August 25 at 530 things
have come up since the last
meeting. I want to make people
aware that tomorrow. the lobby.
the main lobby at the town hall.
is going to be closed for
renovation. For those of you
haven't been in the building.
one of the things that my staff
and I talked about early on was
updating the the entrance to the
town building and modernize it.
Mr. Fay and his staff are making
good on that. Right now there
are two large TV screens in
there. They're going to be
playing the directory on one
side. and events scrolling
through things such as the
newsletter. what the meetings
are for that evening. so that
it's much more welcoming lobby.
we're going to put the town seal
on the wall. It's getting
repainted. We're getting
assistance from the department
of corrections that they're
going to bring folks in to do
the painting for us. So we're
going to ask people to enter
from the back side of the
building tomorrow. where the COA
in the former COA entrance was.
or the middle of the building.
over near the again from the
backside. near where the
building department is. This
week. we met with the Collins
center from UMass. Boston. if
you may recall. I had worked
with Susan baton. She was
putting in a submission for a
grant to do an operational
review that was going to look at
combining certain services
between the town and the school.
and we did initial review with
the call and center. We're
hoping to get a final draft
after we give our feedback in a
couple of weeks. and it looks at
our human resources operation.
our it our payroll and our
facilities. So there's some good
information early on in so I'll
have that for the board soon. We
are also wrapping up our
facilities assessment. We had a
third party come in late last
fall and early this year do
assessments of each of our
facilities. We met with them.
and we're just putting the final
touches on that. We also had a
one of our. hopefully our last.
meeting with the equity
assessment folks for the 100
page data book. There's still a
couple outstanding issues. and
we're trying to get resolved.
but as soon as we get that.
we'll put that up with the other
33 page report that's already up
on the website. I also been we
met with our utility partners
recently ever source to talk
about storm response. as well as
other endeavors that they can
partner with in the Tom I've had
staff over in the last couple of
weeks to look at the building at
14 West plain street so that the
staff can give me feedback. So
that's something else we're
continuing to follow up on for
the board. And lastly. as of
Labor Day. that would be the
first week when we return back
to normal Town Hall hours. So
Friday the 29th will be the last
day that the town hall is closed
on Fridays. and that'll be the
last week that we have extended
hours on Tuesday. Wednesday and
Thursday. We will go back to our
regular schedule of eight to
four on Tuesday through Thursday
and Fridays. Eight to 1230 as of
Labor Day.
Unknown: Thank you very Thank
you very much. Does anyone have
any questions? Realize we will
move to consent. Can I have a
motion please
move the consent there for
August 18. Say that again.
please. I'll second
Doug Levine: Bill's motion.
Carol Martin: Okay. terrific. Is
there any Okay. so we'll just
vote. Go to the vote. Anne.
Unknown: yes. Tom. yes. Doug.
yes. Bill. yes.
Carol. yes. And then motion
passes. five. zero. Okay. let's
go on to the the minutes. All
right. so I think we have the
minutes of July 15 and July 29
do we
Tom Fay: want to have a motion
Doug Levine: that we approve the
July 15. 2025 Select Board
minutes as amended.
Unknown: Okay. and we have a
second second.
Carol Martin: Did we have the
dates correct that Tom you were
making a you looked perplexed.
No.
Unknown: I misheard. I think you
got it right.
Doug Levine: Did you want me to
do both in one motion. Carol.
Tom Fay: or one at a time?
Carol Martin: Well. we've done
one. so we'll stick with that.
All right. Anybody have any
edits or questions for the July
15 meeting?
Tom Fay: I think
Carol Martin: I'm sorry. So on
the first one. on a two. where
it says the town manager was
reviewing things. number one. it
says. uh. negotiating the
outstanding collective
bargaining McCall stated.
they've all been completed.
right? But I think with the
exception of the firefighters
union was part of that
discussion. And then the next
one. it says to finalize FY 25
budget. I think it's a 20. Was
the 26 because we're we've
already just okay.
Unknown: All right. Anybody else
have any
Carol Martin: comments? I just a
little bit concerned about those
Tom Fay: down here in number
five.
Carol Martin: review and amend
town policies. It says C Martin
noted that he expects policy
development. I think it
Unknown: might be a she. but
anyway. anyone have anything
else? Okay. all right. all those
in favor. Bill Yes. Anne. yes.
Tom. yes. Doug. yes.
Carol Martin: Carol. Yes. Motion
passes five zero minutes of July
29
Doug Levine: move approval of
the July 29 2025 Select Board.
minutes as amended.
Unknown: Second. please. second.
thank you. Anybody have any
edits
William Whitney: on a three.
there just a couple of typos on
G and H. where g and h are
listed twice.
Unknown: Okay. where are you g
and h? A 3g. and h
Doug Levine: Oh. I see. see how
William Whitney: it says.
Unknown: yeah. All right. just a
typo. All right. anything else.
Carol Martin: I thought I had
one. but I don't think so. All
right. any nobody else has
anything. Let's have a roll call
vote. Doug.
Unknown: yes. Tom. yes. Anne.
yes. Bill. yes. Carol.
Carol Martin: Yes. Motion passes
five zero. Correspondence. Does
anybody have any comments on
correspondence? Do
all right. did you want to speak
to the correspondence you
submitted to us? Are we all set
on that?
Doug Levine: People have
questions? I think we should be
good.
Carol Martin: Okay. that sounds
good. Let's move on. Oh. great.
Let's move to concerns and
reports. Who would like to
start?
Unknown: Dan. I didn't have any.
okay. thank you. Tom. two items.
There was an inquiry by one or
two residents regarding the
issue of our board not having
correspondence in our packet. My
memory that many years. several
years ago. the decision was made
not to include correspondence in
the packet. A few reasons.
Number one. sometimes
correspondence has
misinformation. and that
misinformation can be. To
snowball into other
misinformation before our board
gets a chance to correct the
misinformation. and that can
present problems. Number two.
some correspondence is simply
inappropriate to include in the
packet. Three. takes a lot of
staff time to organize it and
put it in the packet. And having
said all that. though. it's
always available for individuals
to come Tom building and review
it's not hidden so anyone can
can review it. The second item
have is just a rail trail
update. We working with the ECR.
To. hopefully this year. install
five signs along the rail trail
related to town's history.
focusing on the rail trail the
remaining signs west of route 27
these three or four of them or
so will be installed when the
construction occurs. completing
that rail trail section that
construction will likely occur
by the end of 2027 continue to
work with UCR and making
progress. It's slow. but we're
getting there. Thank you. Thank
you. Tom bill.
William Whitney: two things.
pardon me. the board has been
approached by the chair of the
design review board with respect
to updating those the design
review guidelines. And in
addition. there has been
discussion of appointment of an
advisory. ad hoc advisory group
on route 20 zoning. Just wanted
to report that the chair of the
planning board has graciously
consented to allow me to come
before that board on the 27th in
order to discuss those matters.
So just wanted to pass that
along. Secondly. I was contacted
by the chair of the
board of library trustees. with
respect to pardon me. a
proposal. quite an interesting
one at 21 Cochituate road to
convert that current office
building to a restaurant and
Bistro. They are seeking
relief from the board of
appeals. in part. from the on
site parking requirement. and I
gather that the proponent has
discussed this with the town
manager and with the Library
Board of Trustees. and he's
shaking his head. but in any
event. the library trustees are
hopeful that the parking area
adjacent to the library would
which is available for patrons
on the lower portion and the
upper portion for staff and
users of the rail trail. The in
a sense. held harmless from a
new retail use. where. as a
practical matter. the parking
demand it will create can't be
accommodated on site. So just
relate that concern.
Michael McCall: if I may. Madam
Chair. I have not spoken with
the proponent. I've heard
through staff that this was
coming. but the library has
reached out to me about it.
Unknown: Okay. Thank you. Thank
you. Doug. Don't do anything.
Carol Martin: Okay. thank you. I
have just a couple quick. you
know. general things. as soon as
I finally make sure. okay. so
I've already mentioned that we
are going to be back in the town
building. I don't know where. on
September 2. because think their
it. there's an IT issue in the
Select Board meeting room. maybe
it'll be resolved. We are going
to have that second joint
meeting on that night with the
Board of Public Works and the
Finance Committee. And there
were a number of items that we
tonight that we talked about
that will also be on that
agenda. So I do want to say that
on the 15th we are having the
forum. We're also having a
number of folks come in to speak
to us on that we've got all
these new projects that we're
adding in. And even though we
lots and lots of heavy
deadlines. even though we have
three meetings in September on
the second the 15th and the 29th
it may we may have to add in
another little one on a
Wednesday or Thursday or
whatever. so that we can get
some of these meet some of these
deadlines and get some of these
votes done. So just warning you
now not my it's not my number
one choice. but it's what I
think we may have to do. And
then I also want to announce
that tonight. you didn't notice
this. but tonight was the first.
First night. the first meeting
since I've been the chair. I did
not have at least one hearing.
I'm thrilled. however. it's
going to be a short lived glory.
And so with that. no. I'll take
a motion to adjourn at 940
Unknown: please. So moved
second. Thank you. And then
Bill.
William Whitney: knowing you'll
keep the streak going. I'm going
to vote yes
Unknown: and yes. Tom. yes. Tom.
yes.
Carol Martin: five. zero. Thank
you very much. everybody. Thank
you.
Unknown: Recording. stopped it.
MA.
Watch with transcript (33 meetings)
- September 8, 2026 - Select Board
- August 31, 2026 - Select Board
- August 13, 2026 - Select Board
- July 20, 2026 - Select Board
- July 7, 2026 - Select Board
- June 29, 2026 - Select Board
- June 15, 2026 - Select Board
- June 8, 2026 - Select Board
- June 1, 2026 - Select Board
- May 18, 2026 - Select Board
- April 27, 2026 - Select Board
- April 13, 2026 - Select Board
- March 30, 2026 - Select Board
- March 23, 2026 - Select Board
- March 16, 2026 - Select Board
- March 9, 2026 - Select Board
- March 2, 2026 - Select Board
- February 23, 2026 - Select Board
- February 13, 2026 - Select Board
- February 9, 2026 - Select Board
- February 2, 2026 - Select Board
- January 20, 2026 - Select Board
- January 14, 2026 - Select Board
- January 5, 2026 - Select Board
- December 19, 2025 - Select Board
- December 15, 2025 - Select Board
- December 1, 2025 - Select Board
- November 17, 2025 - Select Board
- November 3, 2025 - Select Board
- October 24, 2025 - Select Board
- October 20, 2025 - Select Board
- 6-Oct-25 - Select Board
- 09-29-25 - Select Board
Sudbury Wayland Sherman's Bridge Meeting
October 9, 2025 - Sudbury Wayland Sherman's Bridge Meeting
Watch with transcript (1 meetings)
Surface Water Quality Committee
Watch with transcript (10 meetings)
Trust Fund Commission
Watch with transcript (4 meetings)
Wastewater Management
September 14, 2026 - Wastewater Management57:27
July 27, 2026 - Wastewater Management41:21
June 8, 2026 - Wastewater Management45:01
May 11, 2026 - Wastewater Management01:05:00
April 13, 2026 - Wastewater Management01:47:01
March 9, 2026 - Wastewater Management46:03
February 9, 2026 - Wastewater Management37:18
December 15, 2025 - Wastewater Management01:09:13
January 12, 2026 - Wastewater Management31:35
November 17, 2025 - Wastewater Management01:14:08
8-Sep-25 - Wastewater Management45:40
Watch with transcript (11 meetings)
- September 14, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- July 27, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- June 8, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- May 11, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- April 13, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- March 9, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- February 9, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- December 15, 2025 - Wastewater Management
- January 12, 2026 - Wastewater Management
- November 17, 2025 - Wastewater Management
- 8-Sep-25 - Wastewater Management
Zoning Board of Appeals
September 17, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals08:01
September 8, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals59:32
July 14, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals51:56
June 9, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:52:41
April 14, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:41:48
March 10, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:36:39
February 10, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:55:07
January 26, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals02:56:52
January 13, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
December 9, 2025 - Zoning Board of Appeals02:01:16
November 18, 2025 - Zoning Board of Appeals
10-14-25 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:26:43
9-Sep-25 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:32:01
12-Aug-25 - Zoning Board of Appeals01:08:32
Watch with transcript (13 meetings)
- September 17, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- September 8, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- July 14, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- June 9, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- April 14, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- March 10, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- February 10, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- January 26, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- January 13, 2026 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- December 9, 2025 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- November 18, 2025 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- 9-Sep-25 - Zoning Board of Appeals
- 12-Aug-25 - Zoning Board of Appeals